[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2079296.2079313acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CIPT: using tuangou to reduce IP transit costs

Published: 06 December 2011 Publication History

Abstract

A majority of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) support connectivity to the entire Internet by transiting their traffic via other providers. Although the transit prices per Mbps decline steadily, the overall transit costs of these ISPs remain high or even increase, due to the traffic growth. The discontent of the ISPs with the high transit costs has yielded notable innovations such as peering, content distribution networks, multicast, and peer-to-peer localization. While the above solutions tackle the problem by reducing the transit traffic, this paper explores a novel approach that reduces the transit costs without altering the traffic. In the proposed CIPT (Cooperative IP Transit), multiple ISPs cooperate to jointly purchase IP (Internet Protocol) transit in bulk. The aggregate transit costs decrease due to the economies-of-scale effect of typical subadditive pricing as well as burstable billing: not all ISPs transit their peak traffic during the same period. To distribute the aggregate savings among the CIPT partners, we propose Shapley-value sharing of the CIPT transit costs. Using public data about IP traffic of 264 ISPs and transit prices, we quantitatively evaluate CIPT and show that significant savings can be achieved, both in relative and absolute terms. We also discuss the organizational embodiment, relationship with transit providers, traffic confidentiality, and other aspects of CIPT.

References

[1]
P. Antoniadis, S. Fdida, T. Friedman, V. Misra, "Federation of Virtualized Infrastructures: Sharing the Value of Diversity". Proc. of ACM CoNEXT 2010.
[2]
C. Amega-Selorm, et al., "Impact of IXPs - A Review of the Experiences of Ghana, Kenya and South Africa", Open Society Institute, 2009.
[3]
A. Archer et al., "Approximation and Collusion in Multicast Cost Sharing", Games and Economic Behavior, 47(1), 2004.
[4]
B. Augustin, B. Krishnamurthy, W. Willinger, "IXPs: Mapped?", Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM 2009.
[5]
G. Biczok, T. A. Trinh, "A User-Influenced Pricing Mechanism for Internet Access", In Proc. of ICQT 2009.
[6]
V. Bonneau, "Internet Traffic and Economics", DigiWorld Summit 2010.
[7]
The Multi Router Traffic Grapher. http://oss.oetiker.ch/mrtg/.
[8]
CESNET, Traffic Stats. http://www.ces.net/netreport/.
[9]
K. Cho, K. Fukuda, H. Esaki, A. Kato, "The Impact and Implications of the Growth in Residential User-to-User Traffic", Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM 2006.
[10]
D. R. Choffnes, F. E. Bustamante, "Taming the Torrent: A Practical Approach to Reducing Cross-ISP Traffic in Peer-to-peer Systems", Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM 2008.
[11]
Cisco Systems, "Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology", Cisco White Paper, 2008.
[12]
CIPT dataset: http://fourier.networks.imdea.org/people/~rade_stanojevic/CIPTdata/
[13]
S. Deering, "Multicast Routing in a Datagram Internetwork", Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 1991.
[14]
A. Dhamdhere, C. Dovrolis, "The Internet is Flat: Modeling the Transition from a Hierarchy to a Peering Mesh", Proc. of ACM CoNEXT 2010.
[15]
A. Dhamdhere, C. Dovrolis, P. Francois, "A Value-based Framework for Internet Peering Agreements", Proc. of ITC 2010.
[16]
X. Dimitropoulos, P. Hurley, A. Kind, M. Stoecklin, "On the 95-Percentile Billing Method", Proc. of PAM 2009.
[17]
M. Dischinger et al., "Glasnost: Enabling End Users to Detect Traffic Differentiation", Proc. of NSDI 2010.
[18]
European Internet Exchange Association, www.euro-ix.net.
[19]
J. Feigenbaum, C. Papadimitriou, S. Shenker, "Sharing the Cost of Multicast Transmissions", Computer and System Sciences: Special Issue on Internet Algorithms, 63 (1), 2001.
[20]
B. Fletcher, Renesys Official Blog, http://www.renesys.com/blog/2010/10/internet-transit-sales-2005-10.shtml, 2010.
[21]
Global Internet Geography, Telegeography Technical Report, http://www.telegeography.com/product-info/gig/download/telegeography-global-internet.pdf, 2010.
[22]
GRNET, Traffic Stats. http://mon.grnet.gr/rg/.
[23]
HEANET, Traffic Stats. http://www.hea.net/.
[24]
M. Hrybyk, "The Transit Exchange - A New Model for Open, Competitive Network Services", Proc. of PTC 2007.
[25]
P. Hui, R. Mortier, K. Xu, J. Crowcroft, V. O. K. Li, "Sharing Airtime with Shair Avoids Wasting Time and Money", Proc. of Hotmobile 2009.
[26]
E. Kreifeldt, IT Business Edge, http://www.itbusinessedge.com/cm/community/features/interviews/blog/ip-wholesale-volume-up-costs-down/?cs=44377&page=2, 2010.
[27]
C. Labovitz et al., "Internet Inter-domain Traffic", Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM 2010.
[28]
N. Laoutaris et al., "Delay Tolerant Bulk Data Transfers on the Internet", Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS 2009.
[29]
C. Li, K. Sycara, A. Scheller-Wolf, "Combinatorial Coalition Formation for Multi-item Group-buying with Heterogeneous Customers", Decision Support Systems, 49(1), 2010.
[30]
D. Liben-Nowell, A. Sharp, T. Wexler, K. Woods, "Computing Shapley Value in Cooperative Supermodular Games", Preprint, 2010.
[31]
R. T. B. Ma, D. M. Chiu, J. C. S. Lui, V. Misra, D. Rubenstein, "Internet Economics: The use of Shapley value for ISP settlement", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 18(3), 2010.
[32]
R. T. B. Ma, D. M. Chiu, J. C. S. Lui, V. Misra, D. Rubenstein, "On Cooperative Settlement Between Content, Transit and Eyeball Internet Service Providers", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 19(3), 2011.
[33]
R. Mahajan, D. Wetherall, T. Anderson, "Negotiation-Based Routing Between Neighboring ISPs", Proc. of NSDI 2005.
[34]
M. Marcon, M. Dischinger, K. P. Gummadi, A. Vahdat, "The Local and Global Effects of Traffic Shaping in the Internet", Proc. of COMSNETS 2011.
[35]
Minnesota Internet Traffic Studies (MINTS), http://www.dtc.umn.edu/mints, 2009.
[36]
V. Misra, S. Ioannidis, A. Chaintreau, L. Massoulie, "Incentivizing Peer-Assisted Services: A Fluid Shapley Value Approach", Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS 2010.
[37]
H. Moulin, S. Shenker, "Strategyproof Sharing of Submodular Costs: Budget Balance versus Efficiency", Economic Theory, 18 (3), 2001.
[38]
L. Qiu et al., "On the Placement of Web Server Replicas", Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2001.
[39]
SANET, Traffic Stats. http://samon.cvt.stuba.sk/.
[40]
L. S. Shapley, "A Value for n-Person Games", Annals of Mathematical Studies, 28, 1953.
[41]
G. Shrimali, A. Akella, A. Mutapcic, "Cooperative Interdomain Traffic Engineering Using Nash Bargaining and Decomposition", IEEE/ACM Trans. on Netw., 18(9), 2007.
[42]
R. Stanojevic, N. Laoutaris, P. Rodriguez, "On Economic Heavy Hitters: Shapley Value Analysis of the 95th-Percentile Pricing", Proc. of ACM IMC 2010.
[43]
R. Stanojevic, I. Castro, S. Gorinsky, "CIPT: Using Tuangou to Reduce IP Transit Costs", Technical Report TR-IMDEA Networks-2011-4, Institute IMDEA Networks, 2011.
[44]
V. Valancius, et al., "How Many Tiers? Pricing in the Internet Transit Market", Proc of ACM SIGCOMM, 2011
[45]
Voxel dot net, pricelist. https://www.voxel.net/ip-services
[46]
E. Winter, "The Shapley Value", The Handbook of Game Theory, North-Holland, 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Poster: Beyond Proximity: Exploring Remote Cloud PeeringProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference: Posters and Demos10.1145/3672202.3673715(7-9)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Money Adjustment Among ISPs Based on Cooperative Games for ICN Promotion2024 IEEE Cyber Science and Technology Congress (CyberSciTech)10.1109/CyberSciTech64112.2024.00043(222-229)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2024
  • (2018)Optimizing Internet Transit Routing for Content Delivery NetworksIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2017.276175226:1(76-89)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. CIPT: using tuangou to reduce IP transit costs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CoNEXT '11: Proceedings of the Seventh COnference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies
    December 2011
    364 pages
    ISBN:9781450310413
    DOI:10.1145/2079296
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 December 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Shapley value
    2. burstable billing
    3. cost sharing
    4. group buying
    5. network economics

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    Co-NEXT '11
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 198 of 789 submissions, 25%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Poster: Beyond Proximity: Exploring Remote Cloud PeeringProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference: Posters and Demos10.1145/3672202.3673715(7-9)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Money Adjustment Among ISPs Based on Cooperative Games for ICN Promotion2024 IEEE Cyber Science and Technology Congress (CyberSciTech)10.1109/CyberSciTech64112.2024.00043(222-229)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2024
    • (2018)Optimizing Internet Transit Routing for Content Delivery NetworksIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking10.1109/TNET.2017.276175226:1(76-89)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018
    • (2017)Redesigning CDN-Broker Interactions for Improved Content DeliveryProceedings of the 13th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies10.1145/3143361.3143366(68-80)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2017
    • (2017)CocoaACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems10.1145/30228762:2(1-31)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2017
    • (2016)Optimizing Internet transit routing for content delivery networks2016 IEEE 24th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)10.1109/ICNP.2016.7784432(1-10)Online publication date: Nov-2016
    • (2016)Reservation schemes for IaaS cloud broker: a time‐multiplexing way for different rental timeConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience10.1002/cpe.397229:16Online publication date: 10-Nov-2016
    • (2015)Analyzing Impact of Introducing CCN on Profit of ISPsIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2015.243201112:2(176-187)Online publication date: Jun-2015
    • (2014)Quid Pro QuoACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review10.1145/2695533.269555142:3(43-43)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2014
    • (2014)Pricing The Last MileProceedings of the 10th ACM International on Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies10.1145/2674005.2675008(295-306)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2014
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media