[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/2077489.2077531acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmedesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploiting reference section to classify paper's topics

Published: 21 November 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Classification is an important task in data mining. Classification is about organizing data into relevant nodes in taxonomy. In scientific domain, classification of documents to predefined category (ies) is an important research problem and supports number of tasks such as: information retrieval, finding experts, recommender systems etc. In Computer Science, the ACM categorization system is commonly used for organizing research papers in the topical hierarchy defined by the ACM. Accurately assigning a research paper to a predefined category (ACM topic) is a difficult task especially when the paper belongs to multiple topics. In the past, different approaches have been applied to find the actual topics of a paper such as content based analysis, metadata analysis, and semantic analysis etc. However, in this paper, we exploit the reference section of a research paper to discover topics of the paper. It is assumed that in most of the cases, papers belonging to the same or similar category are cited by an author. We have evaluated our technique for a dataset of Journal of Universal Computer Science (J.UCS). Our system collected 1460 documents from J. UCS along with their predefined topics assigned by authors and verified by journal's administration. The system used 1010 documents for training dataset. The system extracted references from training dataset and grouped them in a Topic Reference pair such as TR {Topic, Reference}. Subsequently, the system was tested on the remaining 450 documents. The references of the focused paper are parsed and compared in the pair TR {Topic, Reference}. The system collects corresponding list of topics matched with the references in the said pair. Subsequently multiple weights are assigned during the process of this matching. The system was able to predict the first node in the ACM topic (topic A to K) with 70% accuracy.

References

[1]
Sebastiani, F. 2002. Machine Learning in Automated Text Categorization, ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34, no. 1, 1--47, 2002.
[2]
Azeem, S, Asghar, S. 2009. Evaluation of Structured and Unstructured Document Classification Techniques, International Conference on Data Mining (DMIN'09), July 13--16, 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA 448--457.
[3]
Kok-Chin K., Choo-Yee T. 2006. A Bayesian Approach to Classify Conference Papers. MICAI 2006, 1027--1036.
[4]
Wang, Z, Zhang, Q, and Zhang, D. 2007. A pso-based web document classification algorithm. IEEE Eighth ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing. 30 July -- 1 August 2007. Qingdao, China, 659--664.
[5]
Wang, Z., G. 2003. Improving on latent semantic indexing for chemistry portal, The dissertation for the degree of Master of Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 2003.
[6]
Porter, M. F. 1997. An algorithm for suffix stripping, Readings in information retrieval Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, April 1997, 313--316.
[7]
Guerrero-Bote, V. P, Moya-Anegon, F, and Herrero-Solana, V. 2002. Document organization using Kohonen's algorithm, information processing and Management, Elsevier Science, New York, January 2002, 79--89.
[8]
Dumais, S. T. 1991. improving the retrieval of information from external sources, behavior research methods, instruments and computers, ingenta Connect publication, Cambridge, MA, February 1991, 229--236
[9]
Coulter, A. 1998. Computing Classification System 1998: Current Status and Future Maintenance. Report of the CCS Update Committee, Computing Reviews, Jan 1998, 1--5
[10]
Zhi-Hong D. 2002. A LinearText Classification Algorithm Based on Category Relevance Factors, digital libraries: people, knowledge, and technology, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2002, Volume 2555/2002, 88--98
[11]
De Falco, I, Della C. A., and Tarantino, E. 2006. Evaluation of particle swarm optimization effectiveness in Classification. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2006; 3849: 164--171.
[12]
Baoping Z. 2004. Combining structural and citation-based evidence for text classification. Thirteenth ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management (CIKM '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2004. 162--163.
[13]
Ziqiang, W. Xia S. 2009. Document Classification Algorithm Based on NPE and PSO, E-Business and Information System Security, 2009. EB ISS '09
[14]
Senthamarai, K. Ramaraj, N. 2008. Similarity based technique for Text Document Classification, International Journal of soft computing, 3 (1), 2008, 58--62
[15]
Dehzangi, O., Zolghadri, M. J., Taheri, S., Fakhrahmad, S. M. 2007. Efficient Fluzzy Rule Generation: A New Approach Using Data Mining Principles and Rule Weighting, Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2007) Vol 2, 2007. 134--139
[16]
Guerrero-Bote, V. P., Moya-Anegon, F., Herrero-Solana, V. 2002. Document organization using Kohonen's algorithm. Information Processing and Management, Elsevier Science, New York, January 2002, 79--89.
[17]
Levenshtein, I. V., Binary Codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybernetics and Control Theory, 10 (8), 1966, 707--710
[18]
Garfield, E. 1995. Citation Indexes for Science. Science, 122, 1995, 108--111.
[19]
Afzal, M. T., Maurer, H., Balke, W., Kulathuramaiyer, N. 2009. Improving Citation Mining, International Conference on Networked Digital Technologies (NDT 2009), Ostrava, Czech Republic, July 28--31, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Single vs. Multi-Label: The Issues, Challenges and Insights of Contemporary Classification SchemesApplied Sciences10.3390/app1311680413:11(6804)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Exploiting Label Dependencies for Multi-Label Document Classification Using TransformersProceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 202310.1145/3573128.3609356(1-4)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Optimizing Document Classification: Unleashing the Power of Genetic AlgorithmsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329224811(83136-83149)Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MEDES '11: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems
November 2011
316 pages
ISBN:9781450310475
DOI:10.1145/2077489
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 November 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ACM classification
  2. citations
  3. document classification
  4. multi-label classification
  5. scientific documents classification

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

MEDES'11

Acceptance Rates

MEDES '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 26 of 82 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 267 of 682 submissions, 39%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 10 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Single vs. Multi-Label: The Issues, Challenges and Insights of Contemporary Classification SchemesApplied Sciences10.3390/app1311680413:11(6804)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Exploiting Label Dependencies for Multi-Label Document Classification Using TransformersProceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering 202310.1145/3573128.3609356(1-4)Online publication date: 22-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Optimizing Document Classification: Unleashing the Power of Genetic AlgorithmsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329224811(83136-83149)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2022)Investigating Maps of Science Using Contextual Proximity of Citations Based on Deep Contextualized Word RepresentationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.315998010(31397-31419)Online publication date: 2022
  • (2021)Exploiting Papers’ Reference’s Section for Multi-Label Computer Science Research Papers’ ClassificationJournal of Information & Knowledge Management10.1142/S021964922150004020:01(2150004)Online publication date: 12-Mar-2021
  • (2021)A Comprehensive Evaluation of Metadata-Based Features to Classify Research Paper’s TopicsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.31151489(133500-133509)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Multi-label classification of research articles using Word2Vec and identification of similarity thresholdScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-021-01460-711:1Online publication date: 9-Nov-2021
  • (2019)Insights into relevant knowledge extraction techniques: a comprehensive reviewThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-019-03009-yOnline publication date: 3-Oct-2019
  • (2013)Exploiting Classical Bibliometrics of CSCW: Classification, Evaluation, Limitations, and the Odds of Semantic AnalyticsHuman Factors in Computing and Informatics10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_9(137-156)Online publication date: 2013

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media