[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1996461.1996498acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Formalizing model consistency based on the abstract syntax

Published: 13 June 2011 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we define a notion to describe consistency within and between models, which has been identified as important issue when using model-based tools. We introduce the abstract syntax of models as attributed typed graphs and define a formalism of consistency based on this formal description. The application of the formalism is illustrated by an example.

References

[1]
Favre, J. M., Towards a basic theory to model model driven engineering, in In Workshop on Software Model Engineering, WISME 2004, joint event with UML2004(2004.
[2]
Hermann, F., Ehrig, H. and Taentzer, G. A typed attributed graph grammar with inheritance for the abstract syntax of uml class and sequence diagrams, in Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 211 (Amsterdam, April 2008), Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., 261--269.
[3]
Limbourg, Q., Vanderdonckt, J, Transformational Development of User Interfaces with Graph Transformations, in CADUI (2005), Kluwer, 104--11.
[4]
Ehrig, H, Prange, U, Taentzer, G., Fundamental Theory for Typed Attributed Graph Transformation, in ICGT (Berlin, 2004), Springer berlin / Heidelberg, 161--17.
[5]
Ehrig, H., Ehrig, K., Habel, A., Pennemann, K., Theory of Constraints and Application Conditions: From Graphs to High-Level Structures, in Fundam. Inf. 74 (Amsterdam, 2006), IOS Press 135--16.
[6]
Schürr, A., Specification of Graph Translators with Triple Graph Grammars, in Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (London, 1995), Springer-Verlag, 151--16.
[7]
Brandt, C., Hermann, F., How Far Can Enterprise Modeling for Banking Be Supported by Graph Transformation?, in Graph Transformations (Berlin, 2010), Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 3--2.
[8]
Usman, M., Nadeem, A., Kim, T., Cho, E., A Survey of Consistency Checking Techniques for UML Models, in Advanced Software Engineering and Its Applications (Los Alamitos, 2008), IEEE Computer Society, 57--6.
[9]
Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M., A Framework for Multi-Valued Reasoning over Inconsistent Viewpoints, in In Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering (2001), IEEE Computer Society Press, 411--42.
[10]
Perrouin, G., Brottler, E., Baudry, B., Le Traon, Y., Composing Models for Detecting Inconsistencies: A Requirements Engineering Perspective, in Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ2009) (Amsterdam, 2009), Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS.
[11]
Sabetzadeh, M., Nejati, S., Liaskos, S., Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M., Consistency Checking of Conceptual Models via Model Merging, in 15th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2007) (2007), IEEE, 221--23.
[12]
Sabetzadeh, M., Nejati, S., Easterbrook, S., Chechik, M., Global Consistency Checking of Distributed Models with TReMer, in In 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'08) (2008.
[13]
Mao, X., Shan, L., Zhu, H., Wang, J., An adaptive casteship mechanism for developing multi-agent systems, in Int. J. Comput. Appl. Technol.(Geneva, 2008), Inderscience Publishers, 17--3.
[14]
Blanc, X., Mounier, I. Mougenot, A., Mens, T., Detecting model inconsistency through operation-based model construction, in Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering (Leipzig, 2008), ACM, 511--520.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Managing the Impact of UML Design Changes on Their Consistency and QualityArabian Journal for Science and Engineering10.1007/s13369-016-2040-741:8(2863-2881)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2016

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EICS '11: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems
June 2011
356 pages
ISBN:9781450306706
DOI:10.1145/1996461
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 June 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. abstract syntax
  2. consistency
  3. model driven engineering

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

EICS '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 73 of 299 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Managing the Impact of UML Design Changes on Their Consistency and QualityArabian Journal for Science and Engineering10.1007/s13369-016-2040-741:8(2863-2881)Online publication date: 4-Feb-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media