More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Engaging Women in Computer Science and Engineering: Promising Practices for Promoting Gender Equity in Undergraduate Research Experiences

Authors:

Kimberly O. Misa-EscalanteAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), Volume 11, Issue 2

Article No.: 8, Pages 1 - 19

https://doi.org/10.1145/1993069.1993072

Published: 01 July 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Building on research that identifies and addresses issues of women’s underrepresentation in computing, this article describes promising practices in undergraduate research experiences that promote women’s long-term interest in computer science and engineering. Specifically, this article explores whether and how REU programs include programmatic elements designed to promote gender equity and identifies specific mechanisms that are seen as effective in supporting women in REU programs and in encouraging them to persist in computer science and engineering fields. The findings are drawn from a comprehensive study that includes a national survey of REU programs, follow-up interviews with REU program directors from across the country, and an in-depth evaluation of one REU program over four years.

References

[1]

Babcock, L. and Laschever, S. 2003. Women Don’t Ask, Negotiation and the Gender Divide. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

[2]

Barker, L. 2009. Student and faculty perceptions of undergraduate research experiences in computing. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 9, 1.

Digital Library

[3]

Barres, B. A. 2006. Does gender matter? Nature 442, 13, 133--136.

[4]

Bonilla-Silva, E. 2006. Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States 2nd Ed. Rowman and Littlefield, New York.

[5]

Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac. 2006. The 2005-6 Almanac 52, 1, 20. http//chronical.com.

[6]

Cohoon, J. M. 2006. Just get over it or get on with it; Retaining women in undergraduate computing. In Women and Information Technology, Research on Underrepresentation, J. M. Cohoon and W. Aspray, Eds. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[7]

Cohoon, J. M. and Aspray, W. 2006. Women and Information Technology, Research on Underrepresentation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Digital Library

[8]

Collins, P. H. 2000. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics and Empowerment 2nd Ed. Rutledge, New York.

[9]

Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. The National Academies Press.

[10]

Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 2nd Ed. Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[11]

Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. P. 2006. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[12]

Creswell, J. W., Clark, V. L. P., Gutmann, M. L., and Hanson, W. E. 2003. Advanced mixed methods research design. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, A. Tashakkori, and C. Teddue, Eds. Sage Press, Thousand Oaks, CA. 209--240.

[13]

Cuny, J. and Aspray, W. 2000. Recruitment and retention of women graduate students in computer science and engineering. Tech rep., Computing Research Association, Washington, DC.

[14]

Etzkowitz, H., Kemelgor, C., and Uzzi, B. 2000. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. The University of Cambridge Press, UK.

[15]

Gibbons, M. T. 2006. The year in numbers. American Society for Engineering Education. www.asee.org/colleges.

[16]

Gladwell, M. 2005. Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. Little, Brown and Company, New York.

[17]

Greenwald, A. G. and Krieger, L. H. 2006. Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. Calif. Law Rev. 94 , 4, 945--968.

[18]

Gurin, P. 1985. Women’s gender consciousness. Public Opinion Quart. 49, 143.

[19]

Han, J. C., Sax, L. J., and Kim, K. A. 2007. Having the talk: Engaging engineering students in discussions on gender and equity. J. Women Minor. Sci. Engin. 13, 2, 145--163.

[20]

Harding, S. 1986. From the Women Question in Science to the Science Question in Feminism. Open University Press.

[21]

Hirshbein, L. D. 2006. Are women residency supervisors obligated to nurture? Med. Educ. 40, 1159--1161.

[22]

Jesse, J. K. 2006. The poverty of the pipeline metaphor: The AAAS/CPST study of nontraditional pathways into IT/CS education and the workforce. In Women and Information Technology, Research on Underreperesentation, J. M. Cohoon and W. Aspray, Eds. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[23]

Kang, J. 2005. Trojan horses of race. Harvard Law Rev. 118, 5, 1490--2005.

[24]

Kardash, C. M. 2000. Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty members. J. Educ. Psychol. 92, 1, 191--201.

[25]

Katz, S., Aronis, J., Wilson, C., Allbritton, D., and Soffa, M. L. 2006. Traversing the undergraduate curriculum in computer science: Where do students stumble? In Women and Information Technology, Research on Underreperesentation, J. M. Coohoon and W. Aspray, Eds. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[26]

Kundu, M. 2008. America needs more students entering science, mathematics fields. Arlington Times. http://www.pnwlocalnews.com/north_sound/arl/opinion/29642544.html.

[27]

Lapatto, D. 2003. The essential features of undergraduate research. Council Undergrad. Res. Quart.

[28]

Lapatto, D. 2004. Survey of undergraduate research experiences {SURE}: First Findings. Cell Biol. Educ. 3, 270, 277.

[29]

Level Playing Field Institute. 2005. Increasing the representation of women and people of color in science, technology, engineering and math {STEM}. Scan synopsis of approaches and opportunities. http://www.pathwaystocollege.net/pcnlibrary/ViewBiblio.aspx?aid=682.

[30]

Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. 2003. Unlocking the Clubhouse Women in Computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

[31]

National Academy of Engineering. 2008. The Offshoring of Engineering: Facts, Unknowns, and Potential Implications. National Academies, Washington, DC.

[32]

National Academies Press 2006. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. National Academies, Washington, DC.

[33]

National Governors Association 2007. Innovation America---Building a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Agenda. NGA Center for Best Practices. Washington, D.C.

[34]

National Science Foundation 2009. Statistics of women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in S&E. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.

[35]

Neal, A. N., Smith, T., and McCormick, J. 2008. Beyond Sputnik: U.S. Science Policy in the Twenty-First Century. University of Michigan.

[36]

Nelson, D. 2005. A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties and research universities. Association for Diversity in Science. http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity&percnt;20Report&percnt;20Final.pdf.

[37]

Roberts, E. S., Kassianidou, M., and Irani, L. 2002. Encouraging women in computer Science. SIGCE Bull. 24, 2, 84--88.

Digital Library

[38]

Sanders, J. 2005. Gender and Technology in Education: A Research Review. Sage, London.

[39]

Sax, L. J. 1998. Graduate Education in Science, Math, and Engineering: Gender Differences in Enrollment, Persistence, and Satisfaction. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, New York.

[40]

Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. M. 1997. Thinking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

[41]

Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, A. L., and Deantoni, T. 2003. Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Ethnography and Evaluation Research, Center to Advance Research and Teaching in the Social Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder.

[42]

Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., and Ambady, N. 1999. Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychol. Sci. 10, 80--83.

[43]

Steele, C. M. and Aronson, J. 1995. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J. Person. Social Psych. 69, 5, 797.

[44]

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., and Aronson, J. 2002. Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Adv. Exper. Psychol. 34, 379--440.

[45]

Valian, V. 1999. Why so Slow? The Advancement of Women. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

[46]

Zweben, S. 2009. 2007-2008 taulbee survey. Comput. Res. News 21, 3. http://archive.cra.org/statistics/survey/0708.pdf.

Cited By

Bustamante-Mora ADiéguez-Rebolledo MHormazábal YValdés YVidal E(2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125038
Zavaleta Bernuy ASibia NChen PXu JTran EYe RPammer-Schindler VPetersen AWilliams JLiut M(2024)Does the Medium Matter? An Exploration of Voice-Interaction for Self-ExplanationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661596(86-101)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661596
García-Holgado AVázquez-Ingelmo AJosé García-Peñalvo F(2024)Gender Mainstreaming and Diversity in Higher Education: An Experience in Software Engineering EducationIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2024.341140967:5(712-723)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TE.2024.3411409
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Engaging Women in Computer Science and Engineering: Promising Practices for Promoting Gender Equity in Undergraduate Research Experiences
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        Information science education

Recommendations

Student and Faculty Perceptions of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Computing

Undergraduate research experiences are promoted and funded for their potential in increasing students’ likelihood of pursuing graduate degrees, increasing their confidence, and expanding their awareness of their discipline and career opportunities. ...
Understanding the Exodus of Undergraduate Women from Computer Science Majors: A Two-Factor Model of Self-Esteem
TechMindSociety '18: Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and Society

Retaining women in computer science is key to maintaining diversity in the field and in subfields such as HCI. There is considerable evidence that women leave STEM majors more frequently than men, leaving behind low numbers of female graduates in ...
Research and teaching strategies integration at post-secondary programs
WCCCE '11: Proceedings of the 16th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education

In this paper, we describe the integration of research and teaching strategies into computer science and engineering departments at universities and colleges. A significant amount of current software engineering research is conducted within the context ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education

ACM Transactions on Computing Education Volume 11, Issue 2

July 2011

111 pages

EISSN:1946-6226

DOI:10.1145/1993069

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2011 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2011

Accepted: 01 November 2010

Revised: 01 October 2010

Received: 01 February 2010

Published in TOCE Volume 11, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed

Funding Sources

Division of Human Resource Development

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

33
Total Citations
View Citations
2,206
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)74
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

Reflects downloads up to 20 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bustamante-Mora ADiéguez-Rebolledo MHormazábal YValdés YVidal E(2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125038
Zavaleta Bernuy ASibia NChen PXu JTran EYe RPammer-Schindler VPetersen AWilliams JLiut M(2024)Does the Medium Matter? An Exploration of Voice-Interaction for Self-ExplanationsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661596(86-101)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661596
García-Holgado AVázquez-Ingelmo AJosé García-Peñalvo F(2024)Gender Mainstreaming and Diversity in Higher Education: An Experience in Software Engineering EducationIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2024.341140967:5(712-723)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TE.2024.3411409
Alsalim LAlghamdi MAlmazroa HAlsudais TAlghamdi A(2024)Undergraduate research symposium: Vital component in undergraduates' research journeyThe Journal of Academic Librarianship10.1016/j.acalib.2024.10296950:6(102969)Online publication date: Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102969
Read DWerse NHowell L(2023)Why Women Go ElsewhereHandbook of Research on Exploring Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Through an Intersectional Lens10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch015(311-329)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8412-8.ch015
Belland BKim CZhang ALee E(2023)A Generalized Estimating Equations Approach to Investigate Predictors of Teacher Candidates’ Views of CodingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/358716323:2(1-23)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3587163
Mithun SLuo XLaakso MMonga MSimon Sheard J(2023)Improving Perceptions of Underrepresented Students towards Computing Majors through MentoringProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3587102.3588817(26-32)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3587102.3588817
Lunn SMarques Samary MPeterfreund ADoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)Research Experiences for Graduate Students (REGS)Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569858(701-707)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569858
Boerkoel JErgezer MDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)An Undergraduate Consortium for Addressing the Leaky Pipeline to Computing ResearchProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569841(687-693)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569841
Davis SRorrer AGrainger CHejazi Moghadam SDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)Equitable Student Persistence in Computing Research Through Distributed Career MentorshipProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569789(94-100)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569789
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents