[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979407acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

CommentSpace: structured support for collaborative visual analysis

Published: 07 May 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Collaborative visual analysis tools can enhance sensemaking by facilitating social interpretation and parallelization of effort. These systems enable distributed exploration and evidence gathering, allowing many users to pool their effort as they discuss and analyze the data. We explore how adding lightweight tag and link structure to comments can aid this analysis process. We present CommentSpace, a collaborative system in which analysts comment on visualizations and websites and then use tags and links to organize findings and identify others'" contributions. In a pair of studies comparing CommentSpace to a system without support for tags and links, we find that a small, fixed vocabulary of tags (question, hypothesis, to-do) and links (evidence-for, evidence-against) helps analysts more consistently and accurately classify evidence and establish common ground. We also find that managing and incentivizing participation is important for analysts to progress from exploratory analysis to deeper analytical tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that tags and links can help teams complete evidence gathering and synthesis tasks and that organizing comments using tags and links improves analytic results.

Supplementary Material

MOV File (paper310.mov)

References

[1]
A. D. Balakrishnan, S. R. Fussell, and S. Kiesler. Do visualizations improve synchronous remote collaboration? In ACM CHI, pages 1227--"1236, 2008.
[2]
Y. Benkler. Coase's penguin, or, linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal, 112:369, 2002.
[3]
D. Billman, G. Convertino, J. Shrager, P. Pirolli, and J. Massar. Collaborative intelligence analysis with cache and its effects on information gathering and cognitive bias. In HCI Consortium Workshop, 2006.
[4]
M. Bloch, S. Carter, J. Corum, A. Cox, and M. Ericson. Jacksons billboard rankings over time (interactive graphic). New York Times interactive graphic, June 2009.
[5]
What's your college degree worth? Bloomberg Businessweek interactive table, June 2010.
[6]
J.Carroll, M.Rosson, G.Convertino, and C.Ganoe.Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interacting with Computers, 18(1):21--"46, 2006.
[7]
E. Chi and T. Mytkowicz. Understanding the efficiency of social tagging systems using information theory. In ACM Hypertext, pages 81--"88, 2008.
[8]
T. Chklovski, V. Ratnakar, and Y. Gil. User interfaces with semi-formal representations: a study of designing argumentation structures. In ACM IUI, pages 130--"136, 2005.
[9]
H. Clark and S. Brennan. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 13:127--"149, 1991.
[10]
Data360. http://data360.org.
[11]
N. Diakopoulos, S. Goldenberg, and I. Essa. Videolyzer: quality analysis of online informational video for bloggers and journalists. In ACM CHI, pages 799--"808, 2009.
[12]
P.DourishandV. Bellotti. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In ACM CSCW, page 114, 1992.
[13]
R.Eccles, T.Kapler, R.Harper, and W.Wright. Stories in GeoTime. Information Visualization, 7(1):3--"17, 2008.
[14]
D.Gergle, R.Kraut, and S.Fussell. Language efficiency and visual technology: Minimizing collaborative effort with visual information. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4):491, 2004.
[15]
S.Golder and B.Huberman. Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2):198, 2006.
[16]
Google Public Data Explorer.http://www.google.com/publicdata/.
[17]
T.Gordon and N.Karacapilidis. The Zeno argument at ion framework. In ACM ICIAL, pages 10--"18, 1997.
[18]
J.Heer and M.Agrawala. Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. Information Visualization, 7(1):49--"62, 2008.
[19]
J.Heer, F.Viegas, and M.Wattenberg. Voyagers and voyeurs: Supporting asynchronous collaborative visualization. Communications of the ACM, 52(1):87--"97, 2009.
[20]
N.Kong and M.Agrawala. Perceptual interpretation of ink annotations on line charts. In ACM UIST, pages 233--"236, 2009.
[21]
K.Luther, S.Counts, K.Stecher, A.Hoff, and P.Johns. Pathfinder:an online collaboration environment for citizen scientists. In ACM CHI, pages 239--"248, 2009.
[22]
M. McKeon. Harnessing the Web Information Ecosystem with Wiki-based Visualization Dashboards. IEEE TVCG, pages 1081--"1088, 2009.
[23]
I.Mistrik, B.P.Springer, S.J.B.Shum, S.J.B.Shum, A.M.Selvin, A. M. Selvin, M. Sierhuis, M. Sierhuis, J. Conklin, J. Conklin, C. B. Haley, C. B. Haley, B. Nuseibeh, and B. Nuseibeh. Hypermedia support for argumentation-based rationale. In 15 Years on from gIBIS and QOC. In: Rationale Management in Software Engineering (Eds, pages 111--"132. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2006.
[24]
K. Neuendorf. The content analysis guidebook. Sage Publications, Inc, 2002.
[25]
A. Perer and B. Shneiderman. Systematic yet flexible discovery: guiding domain experts through exploratory data analysis. In ACM IUI, pages 109--"118, 2008.
[26]
N. J. Pioch and J. O. Everett. Polestar: collaborative knowledge management and sensemaking tools for intelligence analysts. In ACM CIKM, pages 513--"521, 2006.
[27]
P. Pirolli. Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information. Oxford University Press, USA, 2007.
[28]
TIBCO Spotfire Decision Site. http://spotfire.tibco.com.
[29]
TableauServer.http://tableausoftware.com.
[30]
J. Thomas and K. Cook. Illuminating the path: The research and development agenda for visual analytics. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
[31]
F. Viégas, M. Wattenberg, M. McKeon, F. Van Ham, and J. Kriss. Harry potter and the meat-filled freezer: A case study of spontaneous usage of visualization tools. In Proc. HICSS, 2008.
[32]
F.Viégas, M.Wattenberg, F.VanHam, J.Kriss, and M.McKeon. Manyeyes: a site for visualization at internet scale. IEEE TVCG, 13(6):1121--"1128, 2007.
[33]
M. Wattenberg, F. Viégas, and K. Hollenbach. Visualizing activity on wikipedia with chromograms. Human-Computer Interaction--"INTERACT 2007, pages 272--"287, 2007.
[34]
W. Wright, D. Schroh, P. Proulx, A. Skaburskis, and B. Cort. The Sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods. In ACM CHI, page 810, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Discursive Patinas: Anchoring Discussions in Data VisualizationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345633431:1(1246-1256)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)VisStoryMaker: supporting non-expert analysts in visually exploring datasets and communicating insights with visual annotations and data storiesProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702113(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)DataDive: Supporting Readers' Contextualization of Statistical Statements with Data ExplorationProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645155(623-639)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
May 2011
3530 pages
ISBN:9781450302289
DOI:10.1145/1978942
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 May 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. asynchronous collaboration
  2. information visualization
  3. social data analysis
  4. tagging

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '11
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 410 of 1,532 submissions, 27%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025
ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 26 - May 1, 2025
Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Discursive Patinas: Anchoring Discussions in Data VisualizationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.345633431:1(1246-1256)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)VisStoryMaker: supporting non-expert analysts in visually exploring datasets and communicating insights with visual annotations and data storiesProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702113(1-15)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)DataDive: Supporting Readers' Contextualization of Statistical Statements with Data ExplorationProceedings of the 29th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3640543.3645155(623-639)Online publication date: 18-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Bringing Data into the Conversation: Adapting Content from Business Intelligence Dashboards for Threaded Collaboration Platforms2024 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS)10.1109/VIS55277.2024.00024(81-85)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Enthusiastic and Grounded, Avoidant and Cautious: Understanding Public Receptivity to Data and VisualizationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332691730:1(1435-1445)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)What Do We Mean When We Say “Insight”? A Formal Synthesis of Existing TheoryIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332669830:9(6075-6088)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • (2023)SlideSpecs: Automatic and Interactive Presentation Feedback CollationProceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3581641.3584035(695-709)Online publication date: 27-Mar-2023
  • (2023)DataPilot: Utilizing Quality and Usage Information for Subset Selection during Visual Data PreparationProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581509(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)CrowdIDEA: Blending Crowd Intelligence and Data Analytics to Empower Causal ReasoningProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581021(1-17)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)What Exactly is an Insight? A Literature Review2023 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS)10.1109/VIS54172.2023.00027(91-95)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media