[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1952222.1952251acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Communicative criteria for usability evaluation: experiences from analysing an e-service

Published: 22 November 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Today we are primarily using computers for communication. We communicate via computers as professionals and at our spare time. One growing context of computer use is when we as citizens communicating with authorities. This paper suggests communication criteria for evaluation of public e- services. The suggested criteria are derived from a communication perspective and applied in a case study for evaluation of an e-service. Communication between authorities and citizens are often communication intensive and consequently conditions and consequences of communication should be evaluated. The aim of the suggested communication criteria is to be a complement to established traditional usability criteria.

References

[1]
Aitta M-R., Kaleva S., Kortelainen T., Heuristic evaluation applied to library web services, New Library World, Vol 109, Nr 1/2, pp 25--45 (2008)
[2]
Austin, J.L., How to do things with words, Oxford University press. (1962)
[3]
Burell, M., Personas -- a way to represent users with special needs in design of public e-services. Student thesis. Department of computer and Information Science, Linköping University. (2006)
[4]
Burmester, M., Machate J., Creative Design of Interactive Products and Use of Usability Guidelines - a Contradiction. In: Human-Computer Interaction: theory and practice (eds Julie A. Jacko, Constantine Stephanidis, Don Harris). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (2003)
[5]
Chevalier, A., Ivory, M.Y., Web site designs: Influences of designer's expertise and design constraints. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 1, p. 57--87. (2003)
[6]
Chisnell, D.E., Redish, J.C.G., Lee, A. "New heuristics for understanding older adults as web users", Technical Communication, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp 39--59. (2006)
[7]
Cronholm S. & Goldkuhl G. Actable Information Systems - Quality Ideals Put Into Practice. In proceedings of the Eleventh Conference On Information Systems (ISD 2002). Sep 12--14, Riga, Latvia. (2002)
[8]
Dietz J L G., DEMO: Towards a discipline of organisation engineering. In: European Journal of Operational Research (128:2) pp 351--363. (2001)
[9]
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., D and Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson Education Ltd, Harlow, (2004)
[10]
Gelderblom, J.H., Designing Technology for Young Children: Guidelines Grounded in a Literature Investigation on Child Development and Children's Technology, in School of Computing, (2008)
[11]
Goldkuhl, G., Pragmatic Qualities of Information Systems -- Actability Criteria for Design and Evaluation. In: the 11th International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations (ICISO), invited paper. Beijing, China (2009)
[12]
Goldkuhl, G., Lyytinen, K., A language action view of information systems. In: proceedings of the 3rd international conference on information systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 13--31. (1982)
[13]
Goldkuhl, G; Persson, A; (2006) Characteristics of Public E-services: Investigating the E-diamond Model Proceedings of the First International Pragmatic Web Conference, Stuttgart
[14]
Gould, J.D., Lewis, C., Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. In: Commun. ACM, 28, 3, p. 300--311. (1985)
[15]
Hassenzahl, M., User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In Proc. of the 20th international Conference of the Association Francophone D'interaction Homme-Machine. IHM '08, vol. 339. (2008) ACM, New York, NY, 11--15. (2008)
[16]
Habermas, J. The theory of communicative action. Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press. (1985)
[17]
Henderson, J., McGoldrick, E., McAdam, R., A critical review of e-service in Northern Ireland Electricity. In Managing Service Quality, Volume: 13 Issue: 6 Page: 463--470. MCB UP Ltd (2003)
[18]
Hirschheim, R., Smithson, S., A Critical Analysis of Information Systems Evaluation. In: IS Assessment: Issues and Changes (eds N Bjorn-Andersen & G B Davis), North-Holland, Amsterdam. (1988)
[19]
Häkkilä, J., Mäntyjärvi, J., Developing design guidelines for context-aware mobile applications. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Mobile technology, applications & systems. Bangkok, Thailand, ACM. (2006)
[20]
Kärkkäinen, L., Laarni J., Designing for small display screens. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human- computer interaction. Aarhus, Denmark, ACM, p. 227--230. (2002)
[21]
Law, E., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A., and Kort, J., Understanding, Scoping and Defining User experience: A Survey Approach. Proc. CHI'09, ACM SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (2009).
[22]
Mayhew, D.J. Principles and Guidelines in Software User Interface Design. Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey, (1992)
[23]
Muller, M.J., Matheson, L., Page, C., Gallup, R., Methods & Tools: participatory heuristic evaluation. In: Interactions, pp. 13--18. (1998)
[24]
Nielsen, J., Usability Engineering, Academic Press, Boston. (1993)
[25]
Nielsen, J., Heuristic Evaluation. In: Usability Inspection Methods (eds. Nielsen, J., Mack R. L.). John Wiley & Sons. New York. (1994)
[26]
Nielsen, J., Designing Web Usability. (1999)
[27]
Park, J., Kim, J., Effects of contextual navigation aids on browsing diverse Web systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. (2009)
[28]
Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A.M., & Goodstein L.P. Cognitive Systems Engineering, Wiley & Sons Inc. (1994)
[29]
Röstlinger, A., Cronholm, S. Design Criteria for Public e-Services. In: procedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). June 8--10, Verona, Italy. (2009)
[30]
Patton, M.Q., Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, second edition. Sage Publications. London. (1990)
[31]
Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, (2007)
[32]
Remenyi, D., Sherwood-Smith M., Maximise Information Systems Value by Continuous Participative Evaluation". In: Logistics Information Management. Vol 12, No 1/2, pp 14--31. (1999)
[33]
Santos J., E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions, Managin Service Quality, Vol 13, Issue 3 (2003)
[34]
Searle, J.R., Speech Acts -- an Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press. (1969)
[35]
Seddon, P., IT Evaluation Revisited: Plus !a Change, In: proceedings of Eight European Conference on Information Technology (ECITE). Oxford, United Kingdom. (2001)
[36]
Shneiderman, B., Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer- interaction. 3rd ed, Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, Mass. (1998)
[37]
Shneiderman, B., Designing Trust into Online Experiences, Communications of the ACM, Vol 43, Issue 12, pp 57--59 (2000)
[38]
Tao, Y.-H., Information system professionals' knowledge and application gaps toward Web design guidelines. In: Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3, pp. 956--968. (2008)
[39]
The Free Dictionary, http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/e-services (2009)
[40]
van Welie, M., Van Der Veer, G.C., Eliëns, A., Breaking down Usability. In: proceedings of Interact '99. Edinburgh, Scotland! 30th August - 3rd September. (1999)
[41]
Vredenburg, K., Mao J.Y., Smith P.W., Carey T., A survey of user-centered design practice. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves. Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA: ACM Press. (2002)
[42]
Walsham, G., Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations. Wiley & Sons. (1993)
[43]
Winograd, T., Flores, F., Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design Ablex, Norwood. (1986)
[44]
Yin, R.K., Case Study Research -- design and methods, third edition, Oxford University Press, London. (2003)
[45]
Ågerfalk, P. J., Information Systems Actability: Understanding Information Technology as a Tool for Business Action and Communication, PhD diss, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University. (2003)

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)eServices Classification, Trends, and Analysis: A Systematic Mapping StudyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2017.27662875(26104-26123)Online publication date: 2017

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
OZCHI '10: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction
November 2010
462 pages
ISBN:9781450305020
DOI:10.1145/1952222
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Queensland University of Technology
  • Adobe
  • Coopers and Lybrand Deloitte
  • CSIRO
  • Symplicit: Symplicit
  • Microsoft: Microsoft
  • Smart Services CRC: Smart Services CRC
  • NICTA: National Information and Communications Technology Australia
  • PTG Global: The Performance Technologies Group

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 November 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. design principles
  2. e-services
  3. guidelines
  4. usability criteria

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

OZCHI '10
Sponsor:
  • Symplicit
  • Microsoft
  • Smart Services CRC
  • NICTA
  • PTG Global

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 19 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)eServices Classification, Trends, and Analysis: A Systematic Mapping StudyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2017.27662875(26104-26123)Online publication date: 2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media