[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1811039.1811064acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incentivizing peer-assisted services: a fluid shapley value approach

Published: 14 June 2010 Publication History

Abstract

A new generation of content delivery networks for live streaming, video on demand, and software updates takes advantage of a peer-to-peer architecture to reduce their operating cost. In contrast with previous uncoordinated peer-to-peer schemes, users opt-in to dedicate part of the resources they own to help the content delivery, in exchange for receiving the same service at a reduced price. Such incentive mechanisms are appealing, as they simplify coordination and accounting. However, they also increase a user's expectation that she will receive a fair price for the resources she provides. Addressing this issue carefully is critical in ensuring that all interested parties--including the provider--are willing to participate in such a system, thereby guaranteeing its stability.
In this paper, we take a cooperative game theory approach to identify the ideal incentive structure that follows the axioms formulated by Lloyd Shapley. This ensures that each player, be it the provider or a peer, receives an amount proportional to its contribution and bargaining power when entering the game. In general, the drawback of this ideal incentive structure is its computational complexity. However, we prove that as the number of peers receiving the service becomes large, the Shapley value received by each player approaches a fluid limit. This limit follows a simple closed form expression and can be computed in several scenarios of interest: by applying our technique, we show that several peer-assisted services, deployed on both wired and wireless networks, can benefit from important cost and energy savings with a proper incentive structure that follows simple compensation rules.

References

[1]
M. S. Allen, B. Y. Zhao, and R.Wolski. Deploying video-on-demand services on cable networks. In Proc. of IEEE ICDCS, 2007.
[2]
R. Aumann and L. Shapley. Values of Non-Atomic Games. Princeton University Press, 1974.
[3]
L. J. Billera, D. C. Heath, and J. Raanan. Internal Telephone Billing Rates-A Novel Application of Non-Atomic Game Theory. Operations Research, 1978.
[4]
A. Chaintreau, J.-Y. L. Boudec, and N. Ristanovic. The age of gossip: Spatial mean-field regime. In Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS, 2009.
[5]
Y. F. Chen, Y. Huang, R. Jana, H. Jiang, M. Rabinovich, J. Rahe, B. Wei, and Z. Xiao. Towards capacity and profit optimization of video-on-demand services in a peer-assisted IPTV platform. Multimedia Systems, 15(1):19--32, 2009.
[6]
Y. T. Dov Samet and I. Zang. An Application of the Aumann-Shapley Prices for Cost Allocation in Transportation Problems. Mathematics of Operations Research, 9(1):25--42, February 1984.
[7]
L. Guo, S. Chen, Z. Xiao, E. Tan, X. Ding, and X. Zhang. Measurements, analysis, and modeling of bittorrent-like systems. In Proc. of ACM/USENIX IMC, 2005.
[8]
S. Hart. Values of Mixed Games. International Journal of Game Theory, 2:69--85, 1973.
[9]
C. Huang, J. Li, and K. W. Ross. Can internet video-on-demand be profitable? In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, 2007.
[10]
S. Ioannidis, A. Chaintreau, and L. Massoulie. Optimal and scalable distribution of content updates over a mobile social network. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, 2009.
[11]
M. Jamison and J. Hauge. Getting what you pay for: Analyzing the net neutrality debate. University of Florida, Department of Economics, PURC Working Paper, 2007. available at ssrn.com/abstract=1081690.
[12]
V. Janardhan and H. Schulzrinne. Peer assisted VoD for set-top box based IP network. In Proc. of ACM Workshop P2P--TV, 2007.
[13]
F. P. Kelly. The Clifford Paterson Lecture, 1995: Modelling Communication Networks, Present and Future. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 354(1707):437--463, March 1996.
[14]
R. T. Ma, D. Chiu, J. C. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein. On cooperative settlement between content, transit and eyeball internet service providers. In Proc. of ACM CoNEXT, 2008.
[15]
R. T. B. Ma, D. Chiu, J. C. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein. Interconnecting Eyeballs to Content: A Shapley Value Perspective on ISP Peering and Settlement. Proc. of ACM Workshop NetEcon.
[16]
R. T. B. Ma, D. Chiu, J. C. Lui, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein. Internet Economics: The use of Shapley value for ISP settlement. Proc. ACM CoNEXT, 2007.
[17]
A. Mas-Colell, M. D. Whinston, and J. R. Green. Microeconomic theory. Oxford University Press, 1995.
[18]
V. Misra, S. Ioannidis, A. Chaintreau, and L. Massoulie. Incentivizing Managed Peer to Peer Systems: A Fluid Shapley Value Approach. Technical report, Columbia University, 2009. Available at http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~misra/fluidshapley-tech.pdf.
[19]
J. Mundinger, R. Weber, and G. Weiss. Analysis of peer-to-peer file dissemination. SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev., 34(3):12--14, 2006.
[20]
J. Musacchio, G. Schwartz, and J. Walrand. Network neutrality and provider investment incentives. Proc. of Asilomar Conference, 2007.
[21]
R. Myerson. Graphs and cooperation in games. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2:225--229, 1977.
[22]
L. Shapley. A Value for n-Person Games. In H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, editors, Contributions to the Theory of Games II, volume 28 of Annals of Mathematics Studies, pages 307--317. Princeton University Press, 1953.
[23]
L. Shapley. Cores of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory, 1:11--26, 1971.
[24]
K. Suh, C. Diot, J. Kurose, L. Massoulie, C. Neumann, D. F. Towsley, and M. Varvello. Push-to-peer video-on-demand system: Design and evaluation. IEEE JSAC, 25(9):1706--1716, 2007.
[25]
V. Valancius, N. Laoutaris, L. Massoulie, C. Diot, and P. Rodriguez. Greening the Internet with nano Data Centers. In Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT, 2009.
[26]
C. Wu, B. Li, and S. Zhao. Multi-channel Live P2P Streaming: Refocusing on Servers. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, April 2008.
[27]
D. Wu, Y. Liu, and K. W. Ross. Queuing Network Models for Multi-Channel Live Streaming Systems. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, Rio de Jeneiro, April 2009.
[28]
X. Zhang, J. Liu, B. Li, and T. P. Yum. Coolstreaming/donet: A data-driven overlay network for peer-to-peer live media streaming. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Agent incentives of a proportional sharing mechanism in resource sharingJournal of Combinatorial Optimization10.1007/s10878-018-0315-537:2(639-667)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019
  • (2018)Incentivizing Hosts via Multilateral Cooperation in User-Provided NetworksProceedings of the Eighteenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing10.1145/3209582.3209597(141-150)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2018
  • (2018)A Game-theoretic Framework for Revenue Sharing in Edge-Cloud Computing System2018 IEEE 37th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)10.1109/PCCC.2018.8710866(1-8)Online publication date: Nov-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGMETRICS '10: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
June 2010
398 pages
ISBN:9781450300384
DOI:10.1145/1811039
  • cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
    ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 38, Issue 1
    Performance evaluation review
    June 2010
    382 pages
    ISSN:0163-5999
    DOI:10.1145/1811099
    Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 June 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. cooperative game theory
  2. incentive mechanisms

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGMETRICS '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 459 of 2,691 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 12 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Agent incentives of a proportional sharing mechanism in resource sharingJournal of Combinatorial Optimization10.1007/s10878-018-0315-537:2(639-667)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019
  • (2018)Incentivizing Hosts via Multilateral Cooperation in User-Provided NetworksProceedings of the Eighteenth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing10.1145/3209582.3209597(141-150)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2018
  • (2018)A Game-theoretic Framework for Revenue Sharing in Edge-Cloud Computing System2018 IEEE 37th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)10.1109/PCCC.2018.8710866(1-8)Online publication date: Nov-2018
  • (2018)iPand: Accurate Gesture Input with Ambient Acoustic Sensing on Hand2018 IEEE 37th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)10.1109/PCCC.2018.8710858(1-8)Online publication date: Nov-2018
  • (2018)Performance and Stability of Application Placement in Mobile Edge Computing System2018 IEEE 37th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC)10.1109/PCCC.2018.8710802(1-8)Online publication date: Nov-2018
  • (2018)Non-IT Energy Accounting in Virtualized Datacenter2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS)10.1109/ICDCS.2018.00038(300-310)Online publication date: Jul-2018
  • (2016)Crowd-Funding: A New Resource Cooperation Mode for Mobile Cloud ComputingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.016765711:12(e0167657)Online publication date: 28-Dec-2016
  • (2016)Fairness and Incentive Considerations in Energy Apportionment PoliciesACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems10.1145/29708162:1(1-29)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016
  • (2016)A Mechanism for Mobile Data Offloading to Wireless Mesh NetworksIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications10.1109/TWC.2016.257486215:9(5984-5997)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016
  • (2016)Incentivizing Selected Devices to Perform Cooperative Content Delivery: A Carrier Aggregation based ApproachIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications10.1109/TWC.2016.2551741(1-1)Online publication date: 2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media