[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1807342.1807392acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mix and match

Published: 07 June 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Consider a matching problem on a graph where disjoint sets of vertices are privately owned by self-interested agents. An edge between a pair of vertices indicates compatibility and allows the vertices to match. We seek a mechanism to maximize the number of matches despite self-interest, with agents that each want to maximize the number of their own vertices that match. Each agent can choose to hide some of its vertices, and then privately match the hidden vertices with any of its own vertices that go unmatched by the mechanism. A prominent application of this model is to kidney exchange, where agents correspond to hospitals and vertices to donor-patient pairs. Here hospitals may game an exchange by holding back pairs and harm social welfare.
In this paper we seek to design mechanisms that are strategyproof, in the sense that agents cannot benefit from hiding vertices, and approximately maximize efficiency, i.e., produce a matching that is close in cardinality to the maximum cardinality matching. Our main result is the design and analysis of the eponymous Mix-and-Match mechanism; we show that this randomized mechanism is strategyproof and provides a 2-approximation. Lower bounds establish that the mechanism is near optimal.

References

[1]
D. Abraham, A. Blum, and T. Sandholm. Clearing algorithms for barter exchange markets: Enabling nationwide kidney exchanges. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), pages 295--304, 2007.
[2]
N. Alon, M. Feldman, A. D. Procaccia, and M. Tennenholtz. Strategyproof approximation mechanisms for location on networks. Manuscript, 2010.
[3]
N. Alon, F. Fischer, A. D. Procaccia, and M. Tennenholtz. Sum of us: Strategyproof selection from the selectors. Manuscript, 2010.
[4]
I. Ashlagi and A.E. Roth. Large scale multi-hospital kidney exchange. Manuscript, 2010.
[5]
P. Biró, D. F. Manlove, and R. Rizzi. Maximum weight cycle packing in directed graphs, with application to kidney exchange programs. Discrete Mathematics, Algorithms and Applications, 1(4):499--517, 2009.
[6]
G. Christodoulou, E. Koutsoupias, and A. Vidali. A lower bound for scheduling mechanisms. Algorithmica, 55(4):729--740, 2009.
[7]
O. Dekel, F. Fischer, and A. D. Procaccia. Incentive compatible regression learning. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2010. To Appear.
[8]
P. Dhangwatnotai, S. Dobzinski, S. Dughmi, and T. Roughgarden. Truthful approximation schemes for single-parameter agents. In Proceedings of the 49th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 15--24, 2008.
[9]
S. Dughmi and A. Ghosh. Truthful assignment without money. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), 2010.
[10]
H. N. Gabow. Data structures for weighted matching and nearest common ancestors with linking. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 434--443, 1990.
[11]
M. Guo and V. Conitzer. Strategy-proof allocation of multiple items without payments or priors. In Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), 2010.
[12]
R. Lavi and C. Swami. Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming. In Proceedings of the 46th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 595--604, 2005.
[13]
D. Lehmann, L. I. O'Callaghan, and Y. Shoham. Truth revelation in rapid, approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. Journal of the ACM, 49(5):577--602, 2002.
[14]
P. Lu, Y. Wang, and Y. Zhou. Tighter bounds for facility games. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Internet and Network Economics (WINE), pages 137--148, 2009.
[15]
R. Meir, A. D. Procaccia, and J. S. Rosenschein. Strategyproof classification under constant hypotheses: A tale of two functions. In Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 126--131, 2008.
[16]
R. Meir, A. D. Procaccia, and J. S. Rosenschein. Strategyproof classification with shared inputs. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 220--225, 2009.
[17]
N. Nisan and A. Ronen. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior, 35(1-2):166--196, 2001.
[18]
A. D. Procaccia and M. Tennenholtz. Approximate mechanism design without money. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), pages 177--186, 2009.
[19]
A. E. Roth, T. Sönmez, and M. U. Ünver. Kidney exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119:457--488, 2004.
[20]
A. E. Roth, T. Sönmez, and M. U. Ünver. A kidney exchange clearinghouse in New England. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 95(2):376--380, 2005.
[21]
A. E. Roth, T. Sönmez, and M. U. Ünver. Pairwise kidney exchange. Journal of Economic Theory, 125:151--188, 2005.
[22]
A. E. Roth, T. Sönmez, and M. U. Ünver. Efficient kidney exchange: Coincidence of wants in markets with compatibility-based preferences. American Economic Review, 97:828--851, 2007.
[23]
T. Sönmez and M. U. Ünver. Market Design for Kidney Exchange. In Z. Neeman, M. Niederle, and N. Vulkan, editors, Oxford Handbook of Market Design. Oxford University Press, 2010. To Appear.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Efficient Allocation of Free StuffProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3306127.3331785(918-925)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
  • (2018)Non-Payment Incentive Mechanism Design for Resource Allocation in a Private Cloud SystemIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2018.28615616(44147-44160)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2018)Approximate efficiency and strategy-proofness for moneyless mechanisms on single-dipped policy domainJournal of Global Optimization10.1007/s10898-017-0586-x70:4(859-873)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EC '10: Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
June 2010
400 pages
ISBN:9781605588223
DOI:10.1145/1807342
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 June 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. approximate mechanism design without money
  2. kidney exchange

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

EC '10
Sponsor:
EC '10: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
June 7 - 11, 2010
Massachusetts, Cambridge, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

Upcoming Conference

EC '25
The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
July 7 - 11, 2025
Stanford , CA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 30 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Efficient Allocation of Free StuffProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3306127.3331785(918-925)Online publication date: 8-May-2019
  • (2018)Non-Payment Incentive Mechanism Design for Resource Allocation in a Private Cloud SystemIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2018.28615616(44147-44160)Online publication date: 2018
  • (2018)Approximate efficiency and strategy-proofness for moneyless mechanisms on single-dipped policy domainJournal of Global Optimization10.1007/s10898-017-0586-x70:4(859-873)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2018
  • (2017)Facility location with double-peaked preferencesAutonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/s10458-017-9361-031:6(1209-1235)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
  • (2017)Strategyproof Mechanisms for Competitive Influence in NetworksAlgorithmica10.1007/s00453-016-0169-078:2(425-452)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2017
  • (2015)Efficient and Accurate Spherical Kernel Integrals Using Isotropic DecompositionACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/279713634:5(1-14)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2015
  • (2015)Approximate Translational Building Blocks for Image Decomposition and SynthesisACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/275728734:5(1-16)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2015
  • (2015)Sketching FoldsACM Transactions on Graphics10.1145/274945834:5(1-12)Online publication date: 3-Nov-2015
  • (2015)User-Constrained Multimodal Route PlanningACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics10.1145/269988619(1-19)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2015
  • (2015)Candidate Sets for Alternative Routes in Road NetworksACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics10.1145/267439519(1-28)Online publication date: 7-Jan-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media