[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/180139.181167acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescoltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Exploiting random walks for learning

Published: 16 July 1994 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we consider an approach to passive learning. In contrast to the classical PAC model we do not assume that the examples are independently drawn according to an underlying distribution, but that they are generated by a time-driven process. We define deterministic and probabilistic learning models of this sort and investigate the relationships between them and with other models. The fact that successive examples are related can often be used to gain additional information similar to the information gained by membership queries. We show that this can be used to design on-line prediction algorithms. In particular, we present efficient algorithms for exactly identifying Boolean threshold functions, 2-term RSE, and 2-term-DNF, when the examples are generated by a random walk on {0,1}n.

References

[1]
D. Aldous and U. Vazirani. A Markovian extension of Valiant's learning model. In Proc. of the 31st Symposium on the Foundations of Cornp. Sci., pages 392-396. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1990.
[2]
P. L. Bartlett. Learning with a slowly changing distribution. In Proc. 5th Annu. Workshop on Cornput. Learning Theory, pages 243-252. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1992.
[3]
A. Blum. Separating PAC and mistake-bound learning models over the boolean domain. Proc. 31th Annu. IEEE Sympos. Found. Comput. Sci., 1990.
[4]
A. Blum and S. Rudich. Fast learning of k-term DNF formulas with queries. In Proc. ~~th Annu. ACM Sympos. Theory Comput., pages 382-389. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1992.
[5]
P. Diaconis, R. Graham, and J. Morrison. Asymptotic analysis of a random walk on a hypercube with many dimensions. Random Structures and Algorithms, 1:51-72, 1990.
[6]
P. Fischer and H. Simon. On learning ring-sum expansions. SIAM J. Comput., 21:181-192, 1992.
[7]
M. Flammini, A. Marchetti-Spaccamela, and L. K. Kucera. Learning DNF formulae under classes of probability distributions. In Proc. 5th Annu. Workshop on Comput. Learning Theory, pages 85-92. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1992.
[8]
Y. Freund, M. Kearns, D. Ron, R. Rubinfeld, R. Schapire, and L. Sellie. Efficient learning of typical finite automata from random walks. In Proc. 25ih Annu. ACM Sympos. Theory Comput., pages 315-324. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1993.
[9]
D. Haussler, M. Kearns, N. Littlestone, and M. Warmuth. Equivalence of models for polynomial learnability. Information and Computation, 95:129-161, 1991.
[10]
D. Haussler, N. Littlestone, and M. K. Warmuth. Predicting {0,1} functions on randomly drawn points. In Proceedings of the ~9th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 100-109. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1988.
[11]
M. Kearns, L. Pitt, and L. Valiant. Recent results on boolean concept learning. In Proc. Jth Workshop on Machine Learning, 1987.
[12]
N. Littlestone. Learning when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear-threshold algorithm. Machine Learning, 2:285-318, 1988.
[13]
L. Pitt and L. Valiant. Computational limitations on learning from examples. J. ACM, 35:965-984, 1988.
[14]
L. G. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Commun. ACM, 27(11):1134-1142, Nov. 1984.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Mixing Times and Structural Inference for Bernoulli Autoregressive ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2018.28295206:3(364-378)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • (2014)Learning graphical models from the Glauber dynamics2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)10.1109/ALLERTON.2014.7028584(1148-1155)Online publication date: Sep-2014
  • (2010)A Trade-Off between Sample Complexity and Computational Complexity in Learning Boolean Networks from Time-Series DataIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics10.1109/TCBB.2008.387:1(118-125)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
COLT '94: Proceedings of the seventh annual conference on Computational learning theory
July 1994
376 pages
ISBN:0897916557
DOI:10.1145/180139
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 July 1994

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

7COLT94
Sponsor:
7COLT94: 7th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory
July 12 - 15, 1994
New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 71 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Mixing Times and Structural Inference for Bernoulli Autoregressive ProcessesIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering10.1109/TNSE.2018.28295206:3(364-378)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
  • (2014)Learning graphical models from the Glauber dynamics2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)10.1109/ALLERTON.2014.7028584(1148-1155)Online publication date: Sep-2014
  • (2010)A Trade-Off between Sample Complexity and Computational Complexity in Learning Boolean Networks from Time-Series DataIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics10.1109/TCBB.2008.387:1(118-125)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010
  • (2005)Learning DNF from random walksJournal of Computer and System Sciences10.1016/j.jcss.2004.10.01071:3(250-265)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005
  • (2003)Extension of the PAC framework to finite and countable Markov chainsIEEE Transactions on Information Theory10.1109/TIT.2002.80613149:1(338-345)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2003
  • (2003)Learning DNF from random walks44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.10.1109/SFCS.2003.1238193(189-198)Online publication date: 2003
  • (2000)Neural ARX Models and PAC LearningAdvances in Artificial Intelligence10.1007/3-540-45486-1_25(305-315)Online publication date: 19-May-2000
  • (1999)Extension of the PAC framework to finite and countable Markov chainsProceedings of the twelfth annual conference on Computational learning theory10.1145/307400.307478(308-317)Online publication date: 6-Jul-1999
  • (1998)Learning dynamical systems in a stationary environmentSystems & Control Letters10.1016/S0167-6911(98)00005-X34:3(125-132)Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media