[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1852786.1852790acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Replications types in experimental disciplines

Published: 16 September 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Experiment replication is a key component of the scientific paradigm. The purpose of replication is to verify previously observed findings. Although some Software Engineering (SE) experiments have been replicated, yet, there is still disagreement about how replications should be run in our field. With the aim of gaining a better understanding of how replications are carried out, this paper examines different replication types in other scientific disciplines. We believe that by analysing the replication types proposed in other disciplines it is possible to clarify some of the question marks still hanging over experimental SE replication.

References

[1]
J. P. F. Almqvist. Replication of controlled experiments in empirical software engineering - a survey. Master's thesis, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Lund University, Sweden, 2006.
[2]
H. M. Bahr, T. Caplow, and B. A. Chadwick. Middletown iii: Problems of replication, longitudinal measurement, and triangulation. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 9(1):243--264, Aug. 1983.
[3]
V. Basili, F. Shull, and F. Lanubile. Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(4):456--473, Jul/Aug 1999.
[4]
A. Brooks, J. Daly, J. Miller, M. Roper, and M. Wood. Replication of experimental results in software engineering. Technical Report ISERN-96-10, Univ. of Strathclyde, Scotland, 1996.
[5]
D. T. Campbell and J. C. Stanley. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1963.
[6]
T. Cook and D. Campbell. The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1976.
[7]
R. Easley, C. Madden, and M. Dunn. Conducting marketing science: The role of replication in the research process. Journal of Business Research, 48(1):83--92, April 2000.
[8]
H. Evanschitzky and J. S. Armstrong. Replications of forecasting research. International Journal of Forecasting, In Press, Corrected Proof, 2009.
[9]
B. Finifter. The generation of confidence: Evaluating research findings by random subsample replication. Sociological Methodology, 4:112--175, 1972.
[10]
J. Hannay, T. Dybå, E. Arisholm, and D. Sjøberg. The effectiveness of pair programming: A meta-analysis. Information and Software Technology, 51(7):1110--1122, July 2009.
[11]
W. Hayes. Research synthesis in software engineering: A case for meta-analysis. In Proc. of the 6th International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS '99), page 143, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
[12]
C. Hendrick. Replications, strict replications, and conceptual replications: Are they important? In J. W. Neuliep, editor, Handbook of Replication Studies in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 1990.
[13]
J. Hunter. The desperate need for replications. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1):149--158, 2001.
[14]
B. H. Kantowitz, H. L. Roediger III, and D. G. Elmes. Experimental Psychology. Wadsworth Publishing, second ed. edition, 1984.
[15]
C. Kelly, L. Chase, and R. Tucker. Replication in experimental communication research: an analysis. Human Communication Research, 5(4):338--342, 1979.
[16]
B. Kitchenham. The role of replications in empirical software engineering-a word of warning. Empirical Softw. Engg., 13(2):219--221, 2008.
[17]
M. A. La Sorte. Replication as a verification technique in survey research: A paradigm. The Sociological Quarterly, 13(2):218--227, 1972.
[18]
R. Leone and R. Schultz. A study of marketing generalizations. The Journal of Marketing, 44(1):10--18, 1980.
[19]
R. M. Lindsay and A. S. C. Ehrenberg. The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician, 47(3):217--228, 1993.
[20]
J. Lung, J. Aranda, S. Easterbrook, and G. Wilson. On the difficulty of replicating human subjects studies in software engineering. In Proc. of the 30th international conference on Software engineering (ICSE '08), pages 191--200, New York, NY, USA, 2008.
[21]
D. T. Lykken. Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychol Bull, 70(3):151--159, 1968.
[22]
M. Mendonça, J. Maldonado, M. de Oliveira, J. Carver, S. Fabbri, F. Shull, G. Travassos, E. Hőhn, and V. Basili. A framework for software engineering experimental replications. In Proc. of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS '08), pages 203--212, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
[23]
J. Miller. Can results from software engineering experiments be safely combined? In Proc. of the 6th International Symposium on Software Metrics (METRICS '99), page 152, Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
[24]
J. Miller. Applying meta-analytical procedures to software engineering experiments. J. Syst. Softw., 54(1):29--39, 2000.
[25]
J. Miller. Replicating software engineering experiments: a poisoned chalice or the holy grail. Information and Software Technology, 47(4):233--244, Mar. 2005.
[26]
J. Miller. Triangulation as a basis for knowledge discovery in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Engg., 13(2):223--228, 2008.
[27]
R. Mittelstaedt and T. Zorn. Econometric replication: Lessons from the experimental sciences. Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics, 23(1), 1984.
[28]
K. B. Monroe. Front matter. The Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1):i--iv, 1992.
[29]
H. Radder. Experimental reproducibility and the experimenters' regress. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1:63--73, 1992.
[30]
R. Rosenthal. Replication in behavioral research. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 4(4):1--30, 1990.
[31]
C. L. Sargent. The repeatability of significance and the significance of repeatability. European Journal of Parapsychology, 3:423--433, 1981.
[32]
S. Schmidt. Shall we really do it again? the powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13(2):90--100, 2009.
[33]
K. L. Shewmaker and C. W. Berenda. Science and the problem of psi. Philosophy of Science, 29(2):195--203, 1962.
[34]
F. Shull, J. Carver, S. Vegas, and N. Juristo. The role of replications in empirical software engineering. Empirical Softw. Engg., 13(2):211--218, 2008.
[35]
K. Singh, S. H. Ang, and S. M. Leong. Increasing replication for knowledge accumulation in strategy research. Journal of Management, 29(4):533--549, 2003.
[36]
E. Tsang and K.-M. Kwan. Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4):759--780, 1999.
[37]
M. H. Van IJzendoorn. A process model of replication studies: on the relation between different types of replication. Leiden University Library, 1994.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Survey of Researcher Perceptions of Replication in GeographyAnnals of the American Association of Geographers10.1080/24694452.2024.2415695(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Applying bayesian data analysis for causal inference about requirements quality: a controlled experimentEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10582-130:1Online publication date: 22-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Essential Areas in Empirical ResearchExperimentation in Software Engineering10.1007/978-3-662-69306-3_3(27-49)Online publication date: 8-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Replications types in experimental disciplines

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ESEM '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
    September 2010
    423 pages
    ISBN:9781450300391
    DOI:10.1145/1852786
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 September 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. classifications of replications
    2. experimental paradigm
    3. experimental replication
    4. software engineering
    5. types of replications

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ESEM '10
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ESEM '10 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 102 submissions, 29%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 130 of 594 submissions, 22%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)25
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)A Survey of Researcher Perceptions of Replication in GeographyAnnals of the American Association of Geographers10.1080/24694452.2024.2415695(1-21)Online publication date: 6-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Applying bayesian data analysis for causal inference about requirements quality: a controlled experimentEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10582-130:1Online publication date: 22-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Essential Areas in Empirical ResearchExperimentation in Software Engineering10.1007/978-3-662-69306-3_3(27-49)Online publication date: 8-May-2024
    • (2023)Open Science in Software Engineering: A Study on Deep Learning-Based Vulnerability DetectionIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2022.320714949:4(1983-2005)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2023
    • (2022)RepliGES and GEStory: Visual Tools for Systematizing and Consolidating Knowledge on User-Defined GesturesProceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces10.1145/3531073.3531112(1-9)Online publication date: 6-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Replication of design theories: Reflections on function, outcome, and impactInformation Systems Journal10.1111/isj.1238732:6(1158-1176)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2022
    • (2022)Replication of an Evaluation of Teacher Training in the Classification of Programming Exercises Using Bloom’s Taxonomy2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766707(1839-1848)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2022
    • (2022)Conceptual replications, research, and the “what works” agenda in educationEducational Research and Evaluation10.1080/13803611.2021.2022314(1-26)Online publication date: 31-Jan-2022
    • (2022)A model-based approach for specifying changes in replications of empirical studies in computer ScienceComputing10.1007/s00607-022-01133-x105:6(1189-1213)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2022
    • (2021)Toward replication study types for design science researchJournal of Information Technology10.1177/0268396221100642936:3(198-215)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media