[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1693042.1693120acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Public sector IT governance: from frameworks to action

Published: 10 November 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The use of information technology (IT) in government represents a significant investment of public resources. Designing a decision-making framework for enterprise IT governance can enable public sector organizations to make more consistent and transparent decisions about technology strategies and investments. By clearly articulating how decisions are made, governments can also demonstrate greater accountability for their use of public resources in IT implementation. This poster draws upon a project conducted by the Center for Technology in Government (CTG) to develop a prototype model of enterprise IT governance for a U.S. state government. Based on data from stakeholders within this state development process and interviews with IT executives from 10 additional U.S. state governments, we offer observations about how public sector entities design, implement, and redesign their IT governance frameworks.

References

[1]
Weill, P. & Ross, J. W. IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
[2]
Sambamurthy, V. & Zmud, R. W. Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quarterly 23, 1999, 261--290

Recommendations

Reviews

Barrett Hazeltine

This is a poster that offers observations about how government entities manage their information technology (IT) governance frameworks. One set of observations deals with IT governance. Authority patterns in government are centralized, decentralized, or fragmented. IT governance must be aligned with government authority patterns; a centralized governance pattern will be difficult to implement if the authority pattern is federated. A major theme in IT governance is assigning design decisions to the proper government level. In state governments, the authority for IT decisions tends to be federated, distributed between a central IT organization and agencies. The central organization focuses on providing services, and on policy and strategy. Four coordination mechanisms are observed: external committees, communities of users, enterprise-oriented offices, and agency liaisons. Raup-Kounovsky et al. interviewed representatives from IT offices in 11 states. These interviews indicate the importance of having clear value propositions, which can inform annual plans and assist in assessing success. The interviews also emphasized the importance of central IT organizations gaining buy-in from stakeholders, building trust by offering training, demonstrating proof of concept, and soliciting feedback. Redesign should not be looked at as failure. The flexibility to respond to changes is important. The observations seem sound and helpful and would benefit the reader interested in setting up or managing IT organizations for state governments. The observations are not developed in detail, but one would not expect them to be in a poster. Online Computing Reviews Service

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICEGOV '09: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance
November 2009
431 pages
ISBN:9781605586632
DOI:10.1145/1693042
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 November 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. governance
  2. information technology
  3. management

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICEGOV '09

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 955
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media