[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Coverage of course topics in a student generated MCQ repository

Published: 06 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

A recent approach to engaging students in deep learning involves an online tool, PeerWise, through which students contribute multiple-choice questions to a shared question bank. Earlier work demonstrated a strong correlation between the use of PeerWise and student performance. In this study we investigate the quality of the MCQ repository created by students in an introductory programming course by analysing the range of topics on which students chose to write questions (i.e.~the repository coverage) without guidance from an instructor. We assess the repository coverage by comparing it with a common list of typical introductory programming topics, and by looking at its extent. We find that, despite having freedom to choose any topic, students created a repository that covered all the major topics in the curriculum.

References

[1]
M. Birenbaum and R. A. Feldman. Relationships between learning patterns and attitudes towards two assessment formats. Educational Research, 40(1):90--97, 1998.
[2]
P. Denny, J. Hamer, A. Luxton-Reilly, and H. Purchase. PeerWise: Students sharing their multiple choice questions. In ICER '08: Proceedings of the 2008 international workshop on Computing education research, pages 51--58, Sydney, Australia, 2008. ACM.
[3]
P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions. In Simon and M. Hamilton, editors, Tenth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2008), volume 78 of CRPIT, pages 69--74, Wollongong, NSW, Australia, 2008. ACS.
[4]
P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. Student use of the PeerWise system. In ITICSE '08: Proceedings of the 13th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, pages 73--77, Madrid, Spain, 2008. ACM.
[5]
P. Denny, A. Luxton-Reilly, and B. Simon. Quality of student contributed questions using PeerWise. In M. Hamilton and T. Clear, editors, Eleventh Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2009), volume 95 of CRPIT, Wellington, New Zealand, 2009. ACS.
[6]
J. Hamer, Q. Cutts, J. Jackova, A. Luxton-Reilly, R. McCartney, H. Purchase, C. Riedesel, M. Saeli, K. Sanders, and J. Sheard. Contributing student pedagogy. SIGCSE Bull., 40(4):194--212, 2008.
[7]
D. Nicol. E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1):53--64, 2007.
[8]
C. Schulte and J. Bennedsen. What do teachers teach in introductory programming? In ICER '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Computing education research, pages 17--28, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[9]
K. Scouller. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35:453--472, 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Lessons Learned From Four Computing Education Crowdsourcing SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325364211(22982-22992)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2021)Developing Miller’s Pyramid to Support Students’ Assessment LiteracyJournal of Veterinary Medical Education10.3138/jvme.2019-005848:2(158-162)Online publication date: Apr-2021
  • (2021)A proposal of recommendation function for element fill-in-Blank problems in java programming learning assistant systemInternational Journal of Web Information Systems10.1108/IJWIS-11-2020-007017:2(140-152)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Coverage of course topics in a student generated MCQ repository

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
    ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 41, Issue 3
    ITiCSE '09
    September 2009
    403 pages
    ISSN:0097-8418
    DOI:10.1145/1595496
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    • cover image ACM Conferences
      ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
      July 2009
      428 pages
      ISBN:9781605583815
      DOI:10.1145/1562877
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 July 2009
    Published in SIGCSE Volume 41, Issue 3

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. MCQ
    2. automated
    3. contributing student
    4. peer assessment
    5. peerwise
    6. question test bank
    7. topic coverage

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Lessons Learned From Four Computing Education Crowdsourcing SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325364211(22982-22992)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2021)Developing Miller’s Pyramid to Support Students’ Assessment LiteracyJournal of Veterinary Medical Education10.3138/jvme.2019-005848:2(158-162)Online publication date: Apr-2021
    • (2021)A proposal of recommendation function for element fill-in-Blank problems in java programming learning assistant systemInternational Journal of Web Information Systems10.1108/IJWIS-11-2020-007017:2(140-152)Online publication date: 5-Apr-2021
    • (2019)Student use of PeerWise: A multi‐institutional, multidisciplinary evaluationBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1275451:1(23-35)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2019
    • (2018)A discursive question: Supporting student‐authored multiple choice questions through peer‐learning software in non‐STEMM disciplinesBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1268650:4(1815-1830)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2018
    • (2010)Constructive evaluation: a pedagogy of student-contributed assessmentComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2010.48627520:2(145-167)Online publication date: Jun-2010
    • (2023)Experiences from Learnersourcing SQL Exercises: Do They Cover Course Topics and Do Students Use Them?Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Computing Education Conference10.1145/3576123.3576137(123-131)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2023
    • (2023)A Consolidated Catalogue of Question Types for Programming CoursesICT Education10.1007/978-3-031-48536-7_9(119-133)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
    • (2022)Can Students Review Their Peers?Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Vol. 110.1145/3502718.3524762(12-18)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2022
    • (2020)Estimating Knowledge Category Coverage by Courses Based on Centrality in TaxonomyIEICE Transactions on Information and Systems10.1587/transinf.2019DAP0002E103.D:5(928-938)Online publication date: 1-May-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media