[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1593105.1593236acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-seConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The relationship between the features of sparse matrix and the matrix solving status

Published: 28 March 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Solving very large sparse linear systems are often encountered in many scientific and engineering applications. Generally there are two classes of methods available to solve the sparse linear systems. The first class is the direct solution methods, represented by the Gauss elimination method. The second class is the iterative solution methods, of which the preconditioned Krylov subspace methods are considered to be the most effective ones currently available in this field. The sparsity structure and the numerical value distribution which are considered as features of the sparse matrices may have important effect on the iterative solution of linear systems. We first extract the matrix features, and then preconditioned iterative methods are used to the linear system. Our experiments show that a few features that may affect, positively or negatively, the solving status of a sparse matrix with the level-based preconditioners.

References

[1]
G. H. Golub, H. A. van der Vorst. Closer to the solution: iterative linear solvers. In I. S. Duff and G. A. Watson, editors, The State of the Art in Numerical Analysis, pp. 63--92, Oxford, 1997.
[2]
A. Greenbaum. Iterative Methods for Solving Linear Systems. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1997.
[3]
N. Kang, J. Zhang, and E. S. Carlson. Parallel simulation of anisotropic diffusion with human brain DT-MRI data. Computers and Structures, Vol. 82, pp. 2389--2399 (2004)
[4]
G. Karypis, V. Kumar. Parallel threshold-based ILU factorization. Supercomputing, ACM/IEEE 1997 Conference, (CDROM). pp. 1--24 (1997)
[5]
J. Lee, J. Zhang, and C.-C. Lu. Performance of preconditioned Krylov iterative methods for solving hybrid integral equations in electromagnetics. J. of Applied Comput. Electromagnetics Society, Vol. 18, pp. 54--61 (2003)
[6]
http://math.nist.gov/MatrixMarket/
[7]
Y. Saad. Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, PWS, New York, 1996.
[8]
http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/saad/software/SPARSKIT/sparskit.html
[9]
S. Xu, J. Zhang. A new data mining approach to predicting matrix condition numbers. Communications in Information and Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 325--340 (2004).
[10]
S. Xu, J. Zhang. A data mining approach to matrix preconditioning problem. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Mining Scientific and Engineering Datasets (MSD'05), pp. 49--57 (2005)
[11]
Y. Wang, J. Lee, and J. Zhang. A short survey on preconditioning techniques for large scale dense complex linear systems in electromagnetics. International Journal of Computer Mathematics, Vol. 84, pp. 1211--1223 (2007)

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ACMSE '08: Proceedings of the 46th annual ACM Southeast Conference
March 2008
548 pages
ISBN:9781605581057
DOI:10.1145/1593105
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 March 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. ACM proceedings
  2. features of matrices
  3. iterative methods
  4. preconditioner

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ACM SE08
ACM SE08: ACM Southeast Regional Conference
March 28 - 29, 2008
Alabama, Auburn

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 502 of 1,023 submissions, 49%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 90
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media