[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/158011.158240acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

An exploration of group member satisfaction

Published: 01 June 1993 Publication History

Abstract

This paper reports results from an empirical, field-based exploration of the components of group member satisfaction. Items included in the instrument were identified via literature review. Additionally, a group brainstorming session with supervisory and middle management level employees of a large high technology firm was used to supplement items identified from the literature. The resulting instrument, with a focus on both within-meeting as well as pre- and post-meeting aspects of group work, was administered to a convenience sample of 166 respondents from the high technology firm. Results of factor and reliability analyses are reported. This project is part of a program of research examining group member satisfaction from the psychological perspective of closure.

References

[1]
Anderson, A.B. (1975). Combined effects of interpersonal attraction and goal-path clarity on the cohesiveness of taskoriented groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 68-75.
[2]
Berscheid, E., Graziano, W., Monson, T., and Dermer, M. (1970). Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 978-989.
[3]
Campbell, D.T., and Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. P s~cholo;~ical Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
[4]
Comrey, A.L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York: Academic Press.
[5]
Collins, B.E., and Guetzkow, H. (1964). A social psychology of group processes for decision-making. New York: John Wiley.
[6]
Cummings, L.L., O'Connell, M.J., and Huber, G.P. (1976). Informational and structural determinants of decision-maker satisfaction. In Fiedler (Ed.), Managerial control and organizational democracy. Washington, D.C.' Halsted Press.
[7]
Doll, W.J., and Torkzadeh, G. (1988). The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Ouarterly, 12(2), 259-274.
[8]
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychologica! Review, 57, 271-282.
[9]
Fomell, C. (1983). Issues in the application of covariance structure analysis: A comment. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 443-448.
[10]
Gouran, D.S. (1973). Correlates of member satisfaction in group decision-making discussions. Central States Speech Journal, 24(2), 91-96.
[11]
Hackman, J.R. (1990). Work teams in organizations: An orienting framework. In Groups that work (and those that don't)- Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco' Jossey-Bass.
[12]
Hagen, B.J.H., and Burch, G. (1985). The relationship of group process and group task accomplishment to group member satisfaction. Small Group BehaYior, 16(2), 211- 233.
[13]
Hamblin, R.L. (1958). Leadership and crisis. Sociometry, 2, 322-335.
[14]
Hecht, M.L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 253-264.
[15]
Heslin, R., and Dunphy, D. (1964). Three dimensions of member satisfaction in small groups. Human Relations, 17, 99-112.
[16]
Hrycenko,I., and Minton, H.L. (1974). Internal-external control, power position, and satisfaction in task-oriented groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psvcholoey, 30, 871-878.
[17]
Kerlinger, F.N. (1978). Foundations of behavioral research (Third Edition). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[18]
Keyton, J. (1991). Evaluating individual group member satisfaction as a situational variable. Small Group Research, 22(2), 200-219.
[19]
Kriesberg, M. (1950). Executives evaluate administrative conferences. Advances in Management, 15, 15-18.
[20]
Kruglanski, A.W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
[21]
Kruglanski, A.W., and Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences' Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Exr~erimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
[22]
Kruglanski, A.W., Peri, N., and Zakai, D. (1991). Interactive effects of need for closure and initial confidence on social information seeking. Social Cognition, 9(2), 127- 148.
[23]
Kruglanski, A.W., and Webster, D.M. (1991). Group members' reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and of environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psvcholoe~, 61 (2), 212-225.
[24]
Larson, J.R., and Schaumann, L.J. (1992). Group goals, group coordination, and group member motivation. Human Performance, 6(I), 49-69.
[25]
Latham, G.P., and Locke, E.A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 212-247.
[26]
I_xmke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction, in M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Or~mnizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
[27]
Locke, E.A., and Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory ofgoalsetting and task performance. Englewood Clifl~q, NJ' Prentice-Hall.
[28]
Locke, E.A., Cartledge, N., and Knerr, C. (1970). Studies of the relationship between satisfaction, goal setting and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 135-158.
[29]
Losada, M., Sanchez, P., and Noble, E.E. (1990). Collaborative technology and group process feedback: Their impact on interactive sequences in meetings. CSCW 90 Proceedings, 53-64.
[30]
Marquis, D.G., Guetzkow, H., and Heyns, R.W. (1951). A social psychology of the decision-making conference. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
[31]
Maier, N.R.F. (1970). Problem-solving and creativity in individuals and groups. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[32]
Meier, R.L. (1962). A communication theory of urban growth. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[33]
Mulaik, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York' McGraw-Hill.
[34]
Nunamaker, J.F., Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S., Vogel, D.R., and George, J.F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 41-61.
[35]
Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric theory. (Second Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[36]
Parker, G.M. (1990). Team players and team work: The new competitive business startegy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[37]
Random House Dictionary of the English Laneuage (Second Edition). New York, NY' Random House, 1987.
[38]
Raven, B.H., and Rietsma, J. (1957). The effects of varied clarity of group goal and group path upon the individual and his relation to his group. Human Relations, 10, 29-45.
[39]
Rizzo, J.R., House, R.J., and Lirtzman, S.I. (1978). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Ouarter!y, 150-163.
[40]
Satzinger, J., and Olfman, L. (1992). A research program to assess user perceptions of group work support. In P. Bauersfield, J. Bennett and G. Lynch (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI '92 Conference, Monterey, California.
[41]
Smith, E.E. (1957). The effects of clear and unclear role expectations on group productivity and defensiveness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 213-217.
[42]
Van De Ven, A.H., and Delbecq, A.L. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, Delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17(4), 605-621.
[43]
Wagner, G.R., and Nagasundaram, M. (1988). Meeting process augmentation: The real substance of GDSS. In R.M. Lee, A.M. McCosh, and P. Migliarese (Eds.), Organizational decision support systems. Amsterdam: North Holland.
[44]
Wall, V.D., Galanes, G.G., and Love, S.B. (1987). Small task-oriented groups: Conflict, conflict management, satisfaction, and decision quality. Small Group Behavior, 18(1), 31-55.
[45]
Wilkinson, L. (1990). SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCPR '93: Proceedings of the 1993 conference on Computer personnel research
June 1993
496 pages
ISBN:0897915720
DOI:10.1145/158011
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 1993

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGCPR93
Sponsor:
SIGCPR93: SIGCPR '93 Conference
April 1 - 3, 1993
Missouri, St Louis, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 300 of 480 submissions, 63%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 425
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media