[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1562877.1562933acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The academic enhancement program: encouraging students to learn about learning as part of their computing science courses

Published: 06 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

The Academic Enhancement Program (AEP) at Simon Fraser University has been created to support student learning by integrating activities that introduce students to basic learning theory and strategies into core first-year Computing Science (CS) courses. Program activities include two required workshops run specifically for the CS courses, tailored to course topics. The AEP also includes a third "Elective" component that encourages students to learn about a topic of their choice related to student success and wellness. Students receive course marks for these activities. In this paper we describe how we have developed the program over the past three years and present results about the perceived usefulness of these activities both from student survey responses and from interviews with academic advisors. We also discuss lessons learned. Our findings indicate that such practices are of general benefit to our student population and are promising to address students' academic challenges, possibly having a positive impact on retention.

References

[1]
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M.C., Eds. (2001). A taxonomy for learning and teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
[2]
Athanassiou, N., McNett, J. M.,&Harvey, C. (2003). Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom's taxonomy as a learning tool. Journal of Management Education, 27(5), 533--555.
[3]
Biggers, M., Brauer, A., Yilmaz, T. (2008). Student perceptions of computer science: a retention study comparing graduating seniors with CS leavers. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 402--406.
[4]
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. NY: D.McKayCo Inc.
[5]
Cairns, S. (2003). Facilitating adaptation to thinking expectations at the university level. Paper presented at the Canadian Association of College and University Student Services, Vancouver, June, 2003.
[6]
Commander, N. E.,&Smith, B.D. (1995). Developing adjunct reading and learning courses that work. Journal of Reading, 38(5), 352--360.
[7]
Cukierman, D.&McGee Thompson, D. (2008). The Academic Enhancement Program in Computing Science: Helping students succeed in post secondary studies; listening to students' voices as we expand. WCCCE 2008, May 2008.
[8]
Cukierman, D.&McGee Thompson, D. (2007). Learning Strategies Sessions within the classroom in CS. Poster presentation at ITICSE 2007, June 2007.
[9]
Durkin, K.,&Main, A. (2002). Discipline--based study skills support for first-year undergraduate students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 24--39.
[10]
Fuller U., Johnson C., Ahoniemi T., Cukierman D., Hernán-Losada I., Jackova J., Lahtinen E., Lewis T. L., McGee Thompson D., Riedesel C., Thompson E., (2007). Developing a Computer Science-specific Learning Taxonomy, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39(4), 152--170.
[11]
Gillis, M. K.,&Olson, M. W. (1989). Effects of teaching learning strategies with course contents. Paper ED 339 259.
[12]
Hadwin, A. F.,&Winne, P. H. (1996). Study skills have meager support:A review of recent research on study skills in higher education.Journal of Higher Education,67,692--715.
[13]
McCartney, R., Eckerdal, A., Mostrom, J. E., Sanders, K.,&Zander, C. (2007). Successful students' strategies for getting unstuck. In ITiCSE'07, Dundee, Scotland. June 2007.
[14]
McGrath Cohoon, J., Wu, Z.,&Luo L. (2008).Will they stay or will they go? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40(1), 397--401.
[15]
Norvig, P. (2001) Teach Yourself Programming in Ten Years, http://www.norvig.com/21-days.html
[16]
Simon Fraser University, Institutional Research and Planning (2008, July). Gatekeeper course analysis. Retrieved July 15, 2008, http://www.sfu.ca/irp/Students/gatekeeper/index.html
[17]
Widmar, G. E. (1994). Supplemental Instruction: From small beginnings to a national program. In D. C. Martin&Arendale, D. R. (Eds.), Supplemental Instruction: Increasing achievement and retention. Jossey-Bass, 3--10.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)The Academic Enhancement ProgramProceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3287324.3287422(686-692)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
  • (2015)Predicting Success in University First Year Computing Science CoursesProceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/2729094.2742623(248-253)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2015
  • (2011)The academic enhancement program in introductory CSProceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education10.1145/1999747.1999825(278-282)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2011

Index Terms

  1. The academic enhancement program: encouraging students to learn about learning as part of their computing science courses

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ITiCSE '09: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
    July 2009
    428 pages
    ISBN:9781605583815
    DOI:10.1145/1562877
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 July 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. experience report
    2. pedagogy
    3. retention

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ITiCSE '09
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ITiCSE '09 Paper Acceptance Rate 66 of 205 submissions, 32%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2019)The Academic Enhancement ProgramProceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3287324.3287422(686-692)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2019
    • (2015)Predicting Success in University First Year Computing Science CoursesProceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education10.1145/2729094.2742623(248-253)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2015
    • (2011)The academic enhancement program in introductory CSProceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education10.1145/1999747.1999825(278-282)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2011

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media