[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1557019.1557117acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quantification and semi-supervised classification methods for handling changes in class distribution

Published: 28 June 2009 Publication History

Abstract

In realistic settings the prevalence of a class may change after a classifier is induced and this will degrade the performance of the classifier. Further complicating this scenario is the fact that labeled data is often scarce and expensive. In this paper we address the problem where the class distribution changes and only unlabeled examples are available from the new distribution. We design and evaluate a number of methods for coping with this problem and compare the performance of these methods. Our quantification-based methods estimate the class distribution of the unlabeled data from the changed distribution and adjust the original classifier accordingly, while our semi-supervised methods build a new classifier using the examples from the new (unlabeled) distribution which are supplemented with predicted class values. We also introduce a hybrid method that utilizes both quantification and semi-supervised learning. All methods are evaluated using accuracy and F-measure on a set of benchmark data sets. Our results demonstrate that our methods yield substantial improvements in accuracy and F-measure.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (p897-weiss.jpg)
MP4 File (p897-weiss.mp4)

References

[1]
Alaiz-Rodriguez, R., Guerrero-Curieses, A. and Cid-Sueiro, J. Minimax Regret Classifier for Imprecise Class Distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8 (2007), 103--130.
[2]
Alaiz-Rodriguez, R. and Japkowicz, N. Assessing the Impact of Changing Environments on Classifier Performance. In the Proceedings of the 21st Canadian Conference in Artificial Intelligence (2008), 13--24.
[3]
Asuncion, A. and Newman, D. J. UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/ MLRepository.html (2007).
[4]
Chapelle, O., Scholkopf, B. and Zien, A. Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
[5]
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W. and Kegelmeyer, W. P. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16 (2002), 321--357.
[6]
Elkan, C. The foundations of cost-sensitive learning. In the Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2001), 973--978.
[7]
Forman, G. Quantifying counts and costs via classification. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, 17, 2 (2008), 164--206.
[8]
Forman, G. Counting Positives Accurately Despite Inaccurate Classification. In ECML (2005), 564--575.
[9]
Latinne, P., Saerens, M. and Decaestecker, C. Adjusting the Outputs of a Classifier to New a Priori Probabilities May Significantly Improve Classification Accuracy: Evidence from a multi-class problem in remote sensing. In the Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (2001), 298--305.
[10]
Provost, F. and Fawcett, T. Robust Classification for Imprecise Environments. Machine Learning, 42, 3 (2001), 203--231.
[11]
Provost, F., Fawcett, T. and Kohavi, R. The Case against Accuracy Estimation for Comparing Induction Algorithms. In the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (1998), 445--453.
[12]
Quinlan, R. J. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
[13]
Saerens, M., Latinne, P. and Decaestecker, C. Adjusting the outputs of a classifier to new a priori probabilities: A simple procedure. Neural Computing, 14 (2002), 14--21.
[14]
Tsymbal, A. The problem of concept drift: Definitions and related work. Computer Science Department, Trinity College Dublin, 2004.
[15]
Weiss, G. M. Mining with rarity: a unifying framework. SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 6, 1 (2004), 7--19.
[16]
Weiss, G. M. and Provost, F. Learning when training data are costly: The effect of class distribution on tree induction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 19 (2003), 315--354.
[17]
Witten, I. H. and Frank, E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd ed. Morgan Kaufmann, June 2005.
[18]
Yang, C. and Zhou, J. Non-stationary data sequence classification using online class priors estimation. Pattern Recognition, 41, 8 (2008), 2656--2664.
[19]
Zadrozny, B. and Elkan, C. Learning and making decisions when costs and probabilities are both unknown. In the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2001), 204--213.
[20]
Zhu, X. Semi-Supervised Learning Literature Survey. Computer Science Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)MC-SQ and MC-MQ: Ensembles for Multi-Class QuantificationIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.337201136:8(4007-4019)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2022)The Road AheadLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_7(121-123)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
  • (2022)The Quantification LandscapeLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_6(103-120)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Quantification and semi-supervised classification methods for handling changes in class distribution

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '09: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
    June 2009
    1426 pages
    ISBN:9781605584959
    DOI:10.1145/1557019
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 June 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. class distribution
    2. classification
    3. concept drift
    4. quantification
    5. semi-supervised learning

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    KDD09

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Upcoming Conference

    KDD '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)MC-SQ and MC-MQ: Ensembles for Multi-Class QuantificationIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2024.337201136:8(4007-4019)Online publication date: Aug-2024
    • (2022)The Road AheadLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_7(121-123)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
    • (2022)The Quantification LandscapeLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_6(103-120)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Advanced TopicsLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_5(87-101)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Methods for Learning to QuantifyLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_4(55-85)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Evaluation of Quantification AlgorithmsLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_3(33-54)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
    • (2022)Applications of QuantificationLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_2(19-31)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
    • (2022)The Case for QuantificationLearning to Quantify10.1007/978-3-031-20467-8_1(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2022
    • (2021)A bootstrapping approach to social media quantificationSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-021-00760-011:1Online publication date: 9-Aug-2021
    • (2020)Review of Concept Drift Detection Method for Industrial Process Modeling2020 39th Chinese Control Conference (CCC)10.23919/CCC50068.2020.9189106(5754-5759)Online publication date: Jul-2020
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media