[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1473018.1473035acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social inclusion and creative expressions using non-digital artefacts: a case study on pinholes

Published: 16 January 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Motivation -- The research aims to identify and analyse the relationships between social inclusion, sense of community and spaces through creative activities, exploiting the potential of low tech and "transparent" tools and their impact on the acquisition of social competencies, as well as on creative expression skills. In a long-term perspective, the study aims at exploring uses of ICT in art-based inclusion practices.
Research approach -- An explorative case study approach is used to investigate the potential of non-digital artefacts in supporting creative workshops involving migrants, local citizens, children, adults and elderly people.
Findings/Design -- The study provides evidence that social inclusion is related to the involvement of mixed groups of people in the community space. It highlights the role of non-digital artefact on the acquisition of social and creative competences: In the observed creative workshops, people learned about their local community; felt legitimized to express their views about it and to engage in its development. Participants learned about themselves and gained confidence, reinforcing their inclusion in the community. Both migrants and local people, youngsters and elders, overcame prejudices related to lack of understanding and gained empathy for other people's aspirations, contributions, and human potential.
Research limitations/Implications -- The presented results are based on a study that focused on non-digital artefact: pinhole camera, as a support for creative activity fostering social inclusion. Their implications for designing technology-enhanced environments will be investigated based on the results obtained.
Originality/Value -- The research makes a contribution to the need to design simple and federating tools in order to foster creative, joyful and mindful interactions between mixed groups of users.
Take away message -- Technological artefacts to be used in creative activities fostering social inclusion should allow mindful interactions and appreciation of community places and spaces.

References

[1]
Ackermann, E., Chabert-Ramon, A., Decortis, F., Magli, R., Napoletano, L., & Owen, M. (2006). La piazza. Convivial spaces for intergenerational learning: what places for the digital age? Current developments in computer-assisted education, 3, pp. 1359--1363.
[2]
Auburn, T., & Barnes, R. (2006). Producing place: A neo-Schutzian perspective on the "psychology of place". Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 38--50.
[3]
Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[4]
Csikszntmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow. The classic work on how to achieve happiness. Auckland: Rider.
[5]
Hernandez, B., Hidalgo, M., Salazar-Laplce, M., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 310--319.
[6]
Hutchins, E. (1990). The technology of team navigation. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut and C. Edigo, Intellectual Teamwork. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[7]
Kiss, A. (1992). L'empathie et la rencontre interculturelle. Paris: L'Harmattan.
[8]
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews, an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[9]
Mannarini, T., Tartaglia, S., Fedi, A., & Greganti, K. (2006). Image of neighborhood, self-image and sense of community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 202--214.
[10]
Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 67--86.
[11]
Morgan, D. L., Krueger, R. A., & King, J. A. (1998). The focus group kit, Vols. 1--6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[12]
Norman (1991). The invisible computer. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[13]
Twigger-Ross, C., & Uzzell, D. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 205--220.
[14]
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Social inclusion and creative expressions using non-digital artefacts: a case study on pinholes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ECCE '08: Proceedings of the 15th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: the ergonomics of cool interaction
      January 2008
      205 pages
      ISBN:9781605583990
      DOI:10.1145/1473018
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 January 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. community space
      2. creative expression
      3. non-digital and digital artefact
      4. pinhole
      5. semiotic artefact
      6. social inclusion

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      ECCE08
      Sponsor:
      ECCE08: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics
      September 16 - 19, 2008
      Funchal, Portugal

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 91 submissions, 62%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media