[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
article

The perceptual evaluation of information systems using the construct of user satisfaction: case study of a large french group

Published: 28 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

This research work concerns the perceptual evaluation of the performance of information systems (IS) and more particularly, the construct of user satisfaction. Faced with the difficulty of obtaining objective measures for the success of IS, user satisfaction appeared as a substitutive measure of IS performance (DeLone & McLean, 1992). Some researchers have indeed shown that the evaluation of an IS could not happen without an analysis of the feelings and perceptions of individuals who make use of it. Consequently, the concept of satisfaction has been considered as a guarantee of the performance of an IS. Also it has become necessary to ponder the drivers of user satisfaction. The analysis of models and measurement tools for satisfaction as well as the adoption of a contingency perspective has allowed the description of principal dimensions that have a direct or less direct impact on user perceptions
The case study of a large French group, carried out through an interpretativist approach conducted by way of 41 semi-structured interviews, allowed the conceptualization of the problematique of perceptual evaluation of IS in a particular field study. This study led us to confirm the impact of certain factors (such as perceived usefulness, participation, the quality of relations with the IS Function and its resources and also the fit of IS with user needs). On the contrary, other dimensions regarded as fundamental do not receive any consideration or see their influence nuanced in the case studied (the properties of IS, the ease of use, the quality of information). Lastly, this study has allowed for the identification of the influence of certain contingency and contextual variables on user satisfaction and, above all, for the description of the importance of interactions between the IS Function and the users

References

[1]
Alpar, P., Kim, M. (1990). "Microeconomic Approaches to the Measurement of Information Technology Value," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.7, No.2, pp. 55--69.
[2]
Alter, S. (1999). "A General yet Useful Theory on Information Systems," Communication of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.1, No.13.
[3]
Avison, D.E. and Myers, M.D. (2002). "La Recherche Qualitative en Systèmes D¿information," Faire de la Recherche en Systèmes d'Information, Editions Vuibert, Fnege.
[4]
Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W. (1983). "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analysing Computer User Satisfaction", Management Science, Vol. 29, No.5.
[5]
Ballantine, J., Bonner, M., Levy, M., Martin, A., Munro, I., and Powell, P.L. (1998). "The 3-D Model of Information Systems Success: The search for the dependent Variable continues," Information Resources Management Journal, Vol.9, No.4, pp. 5--14.
[6]
Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1991). "User Participation and User Involvement in Information System Development," Proceedings of the 24th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, Vol.4, pp. 487--492.
[7]
Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1994). "Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude," MIS Quarterly, Vol.18, No.1, pp. 59--82.
[8]
Baroudi, J.J. and Orlikowski, W.J. (1988). "A Short-Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.4, No.4, pp. 44--59.
[9]
Baroudi, J.J. and Orlikowski, W.J. (1991). "Studying Information Technologies in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions," Information Systems Research, Vol.2, No.1, pp. 1--28.
[10]
Bharadwaj, A.S. (2000). "A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation," MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, pp. 169--196.
[11]
Bonner, M. (1995). "DeLone and McLean's Model for Judging Information Systems Success - A Retrospective Application in Manufacturing," Proceedings of the European Conference on IT Investment Evaluation, Henley Management College, UK, pp. 218--226.
[12]
Bostrom, R.P. and Heinen, J.S. (1977). "MIS Problems and Failures: A Socio-Technical Perspective. Part I : The Causes," MIS Quarterly, Vol.1, No.3, pp. 17--32.
[13]
Brown, R.M., Gatian, A.W., and Hicks, J.O. (1995). "Strategic Information Systems and Financial Performance," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.11, No.4, pp. 215--248.
[14]
Brynjolfsson, E. and Hitt, L.M. (1996). "Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence o the Returns to Information Systems Spending," Management Science, Vol.42, No.4, pp. 541--558.
[15]
Conrath, D.W., Mignen, O.P. (1990). "What Is Being Done to Measure User Satisfaction with EDP/MIS," Information and Management, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 7--19.
[16]
Cron, W., Sobol, M. (1983). "The Relationship between Computerization and Performance: A Strategy for Maximizing Economic Benefits of Computerization," Information & Management, Vol.6, pp. 171--181.
[17]
Crozier, M. and Friedberg, E. (1977). L'Acteur et le Système : Les Contraintes de l'Action Collective, Paris: Edition du Seuil.
[18]
Cyert, R. and March, H.J. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[19]
Davis, F.D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 319--340.
[20]
Delone, H.W. and McLean, R.E. (1992). "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, Vol.3, No.1, pp. 60--95.
[21]
Delone, H.W. and McLean, R.E. (2003). "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.19, No.4, pp. 9--30.
[22]
Devereux, G. (1980). De l'angoisse à la mèthode dans les Sciences du Comportement, Flammarion.
[23]
Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G. (1988). "The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction," MIS Quarterly, Vo.12, No.2, pp. 259--274.
[24]
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). "Building Theories from Case Study Research," Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.4, pp. 532--550.
[25]
Galletta, D. F. and Lederer, A. L. (1989). "Some Cautions on the Measurement of User Information Satisfaction," Decisions Science Journal, Vol. 20, No.3, pp. 419--439.
[26]
Galletta, D.F. and Heckman, R.L. (1990). "A Role Theory Perspective on End-User Development", Information Systems Research, Vol.1, No.2, pp. 168--187.
[27]
Gallagher, C.A. (1974). "Perceptions of the Value of Management Information Systems", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.17, No.1, pp. 46--55.
[28]
Galliers R., (1992) Information Systems Research: Issues, Methods and Practical Guidelines, Blackwell Scientific Editions.
[29]
Gelderman, M. (1998). "The Relation between User Satisfaction, Usage of information Systems and Performance," Information and Management, Vol.34, No.1, pp. 11--18.
[30]
Ginzberg, M.J. (1981). "Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process," MIS Quarterly, Vol.5, No.5, pp. 47--59.
[31]
Girin, J. (1981). "Quel Paradigme pour la Recherche en Gestion?", Economies et Sociètès, Vol.15, No.10-12, Sèrie Sciences de gestion, No. 2, pp. 1971--1889.
[32]
Girod-Seville, M. and Perret, V. (1999). "Fondements Epistèmologiques de la Recherche," dans THIETART R.A., Mèthodes de Recherche en Management, Dunod.
[33]
Goodhue, D.L. (1995). "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, Vol.41, No.12, pp. 1827--1844.
[34]
Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995). "Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance," MIS Quarterly, Vol.19, No.2, pp. 213--236.
[35]
Hamilton, S. and Chervany, N.L. (1981). "Evaluating Information System Effectiveness - Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches ; Part II: Comparing Evaluator Viewpoints," MIS Quarterly, Vol.5, No.4, pp. 79--86.
[36]
Ishman, M.D. (1996). "Measuring Information Success at the Individual Level in Cross-Cultural Environments," Information Resources Management Journal, Vol.9, No.4, pp. 60--78.
[37]
Ives, B., Olson, M.H., and Baroudi, J.J. (1983). "The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction," Communications of the ACM, Vol.26, No.10, pp. 785--793.
[38]
Ives, B. and Olson, M.H. (1992). "User Involvement and MIS Success," Management Science, Vol.30, No.5, pp. 586--603.
[39]
Kappelman, L. A. and McLean, E.R. (1992). "The Convergence of Organizational and End-User Computing," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.9, No.3, pp. 145--156.
[40]
Kappelman, L.A. and McLean, E.R. (1994). "User Engagement in the Development, Implementation, and Use of Information Technologies," Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, Maui, Hawaii, USA, pp. 512--521.
[41]
Kefi, H. (2002). "èvaluation des technologies et systèmes d' information : cas d'un entrepôt de donnèes implantè dans une institution financière", Thèse de Doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Direction Professeur Kalika, Universitè Paris IX Dauphine.
[42]
Khalifa, M. and Liu, V. (2003). "Determinants of Satisfaction at Different Adoption Stages of Internet-Based Services," Journal of The Association for Information Systems, Vol.4, No.5, pp. 206--232.
[43]
King, R.W. and Epstein, B.J. (1983). "Assessing Information Systems Value," Decision Sciences, Vol.14, No.1, pp. 34--45.
[44]
King, R.W. and Rodriguez, J.I. (1978). "Evaluating Management Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol.2, No.3, pp. 43--51.
[45]
Klein, H.Z. and Myers, M.D. (1999). "A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol.23, No.1, pp. 67--93.
[46]
Kwon, T.A. (1990). "A Diffusion of Innovation Approach to MIS Infusion : Conceptualization, Methodology and Management Strategy," Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Information Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp.139--146.
[47]
Larcker, D.F. and Lessig, V.P. (1980). "Perceived Usefulness of information: A psychometric examination," Decision Sciences, Vol.11, No.11, pp. 121--134.
[48]
Lawrence, P.R and Lorsch, J.W. (1973). Adapter les Structures, Editions d'Organisation.
[49]
Le Moigne, J.L. (1990). "Épistèmologies constructivistes et sciences de l'organisation," dans MARTINET, A.C., Épistèmologies et sciences de gestion, Paris, Économica.
[50]
Lucas, H.C. (1973). "A Descriptive Model of Information Systems in the Context of the Organization," Data Base, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 27--39.
[51]
Lucas, H.C. (1978). "Empirical Evidence for a Descriptive Model of Implementation," MIS Quarterly, Vol.2, No.2, pp. 27--42.
[52]
Mahmood, M.A., Burn J., Gemoets L; Jacquez C., (2000). "Variables Affecting Information Technology End-User Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.52, No.4, pp. 751--771.
[53]
Marciniak, R. (1996). "Management des Projets Informatiques: Complexitè et Gestion des conflits," Systèmes d'information et Management, Vol.1, No.1, pp. 27--50.
[54]
Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1984). "Rituals in Information System Design", MIS Quarterly, Vol.8, No.8, pp. 5--15.
[55]
Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. (1988). "Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research," Management Science, Vol.34, No.5, pp. 583--598.
[56]
McKeen, J.D., Guimares, T., and Wetherbe, J.C. (1994). "The Relationship between User Participation and User Satisfaction," MIS Quarterly, Vol.18, No.4, pp. 427--451.
[57]
McKeen, J.D. and Guimaraes, T. (1997). "Successful Strategies for User Participation in Systems Development," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.14, No.2, pp. 133--150.
[58]
Melone, N.P. (1990). "A Theoretical Assessment of the User Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research," Management Science, Vol.36, No.1, pp. 76--91.
[59]
Miles, A.M. and Huberman, B.M. (1991). Analyse des Donnèes Qualitatives, Recueil de Nouvelles Mèthodes, De Boeck Universitè, Bruxelles.
[60]
Myers, B.L., Kappelman, L.A., and Prybutok, V.R. (1998). "A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Contingency Theory of Information Systems Assessment," Information System Success Measurement, Idea Group Information Technology Management Series, pp. 94--121.
[61]
Neumann, S. and Segev, E. (1980). "Evaluate your Information System," Systems Management, Vol.31, No.3, pp. 34--41.
[62]
Powers, R. F. and Dickson, G.W. (1973). "MIS Project Management: Myths, Opinion and Reality", California Management Review, Vol.15, No. 3, pp. 147--156.
[63]
Orlikowski, W. (1992). "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, Vol.3, No.3, pp. 398--427.
[64]
Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., and Patnayakuni, N. (1997). "Technology Investment and Business Performance," Communications of the ACM, Vol.40, No.7, pp. 89--97.
[65]
Reix, R. (2002). Systèmes d'Information et Management des Organisations, Editions Vuibert Gestion, 4ème Edition.
[66]
Rowe, F. (2002). Faire de la Recherche en Systèmes d'Information, Vuibert, Fnege.
[67]
Sambamurthy, V. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). "Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies," MIS Quarterly, Vol.23, No.2, pp. 261--290.
[68]
Saunders, C.S. and Jones, J.W. (1992). "Measuring Performance of the Information Systems Function," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.8, No.4, pp. 63--82.
[69]
Seddon, P.B. (1997). "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success," Information Systems Research, Vol.8, No.3, pp. 240--253.
[70]
Straub, D., Limayem, M., and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). "Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing," Management Science, Vol.41, No.8, pp. 1328--1342.
[71]
Solow R.M., (1987), "We'd better watch out", New York Times, 12th July, Book Review, No.36.
[72]
Swanson, E.B. (1974). "Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement," Management Science, Vol.21, No.2, pp. 178--188.
[73]
Thietart, R.A. (1999). Mèthodes de Recherche en Management, Dunod.
[74]
Treacy, M.E. (1985). "An Empirical Examination of a Causal Model of User Information Satisfaction," Center of Information Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, Massachussets Institute of Technology.
[75]
Turner, J. (1982). "Firm Size, Performance and Computer Use," Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 109--120.
[76]
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, Vol.46, No.2, pp. 186--204.
[77]
Wacheux, F. (1996). Mèthodes Qualitatives et Recherches en Gestion, Editions Economica.
[78]
Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
[79]
Walsham, G. (1995). "Interpretative Case Study in IS Research: Nature and Method," European Journal of Information System, Vol.4, pp. 74--81.
[80]
Weick, K.E. (1990). "Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in new technologies" in Goodman P.S. et al. (Eds)," Technology and Organizations.
[81]
Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[82]
Yin, R.K. (1994). "Case Study Research: Design and Methods," Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol.5, No.2, pp. 181--191.
[83]
Zmud, R.W. and Apple, L.E. (1992). "Measuring Technology Incorporation/Infusion," Journal of Productivity Innovation Management, Vol.9, pp. 148--155.
[84]
Zviran, M. and Erlich, Z. (2003). "Measuring IS User Satisfaction: Review and Implications," Communications of the AIS, Vol.12, No.5, pp. 81--104.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluation of Success and Failure Factors for Maternal and Child Health in Integrated Healthcare Center Information Systems (IHCIS) Using the HOT-Fit MethodJournal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence10.20473/jisebi.10.1.152-16610:1(152-166)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Evaluation of User Satisfaction Towards WfMS Implementation in Indonesian Food Company Using Structural Equation ModelingProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.076234(885-893)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Computerized accounting information systems: An application of task technology fit model for microfinanceInternational Journal of Information Management Data Insights10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.1002244:1(100224)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 38, Issue 2
May 2007
88 pages
ISSN:0095-0033
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/1240616
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 May 2007
Published in SIGMIS Volume 38, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. case study
  2. contextual perspective
  3. evaluation of the performance of information systems
  4. individual perceptions
  5. qualitative interpretativist methodology
  6. user satisfaction

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluation of Success and Failure Factors for Maternal and Child Health in Integrated Healthcare Center Information Systems (IHCIS) Using the HOT-Fit MethodJournal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence10.20473/jisebi.10.1.152-16610:1(152-166)Online publication date: 28-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Evaluation of User Satisfaction Towards WfMS Implementation in Indonesian Food Company Using Structural Equation ModelingProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.076234(885-893)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Computerized accounting information systems: An application of task technology fit model for microfinanceInternational Journal of Information Management Data Insights10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.1002244:1(100224)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2023)Beyond design and delivery: developing a model to measure end-user satisfaction (delight) in projectsBuilt Environment Project and Asset Management10.1108/BEPAM-07-2022-010613:4(509-534)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2023
  • (2023)Revisiting the E-Learning Systems Success Model in the Post-COVID-19 Age: The Role of Monitoring QualityInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.223127840:18(5087-5102)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Using a Hybrid Machine Learning and SEM Approach to Measure the Success of e-Government: A Case Study of the Kingdom of Bahrain2022 IEEE International Conference on Computing (ICOCO)10.1109/ICOCO56118.2022.10031894(324-329)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Developing and validating a business simulation systems success model in the context of management educationThe International Journal of Management Education10.1016/j.ijme.2022.10063420:2(100634)Online publication date: Jul-2022
  • (2022)The influence of user involvement in information system adoption: an extension of TAMCognition, Technology and Work10.1007/s10111-021-00685-w24:2(215-231)Online publication date: 1-May-2022
  • (2021)Evaluating user satisfaction with the e-payment gateway system in TanzaniaSA Journal of Information Management10.4102/sajim.v23i1.143023:1Online publication date: 13-Dec-2021
  • (2021)The Influence of Situational Involvement on Employees’ Intrinsic Involvement During IS DevelopmentBusiness & Information Systems Engineering10.1007/s12599-021-00719-764:3(317-334)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media