[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1026533.1026555acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Cooperative writing: achieving coordination together and apart

Published: 10 October 2004 Publication History

Abstract

Cooperative writing requires a coordinated, engineered process. Groups must achieve coordination at three levels: a shared contextual motivation that translates into group actions, which operationalize as drafting activities. The arrangement of material resources in face-to-face settings supports those communication events. When efforts at coordination are moved online, however, the material and temporal means of support change. Coordination efforts become distributed over time and media, affecting the quality of coordination achieved.
This paper explores the ways that a group of writers built coordination through while drafting a survey research instrument. Based on this case study, I recommend ways to consider technology purchases to support cooperation.

References

[1]
Couture, B., and Rymer, J. Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing. In M.M. Lay and W.M. Karis (eds.) Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigations in Theory and Practice. Baywood Press, Amityville, NY, 1991, 87--108.
[2]
Ede, L., and Lunsford, A. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1990.
[3]
Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
[4]
Kim, H., and Eklundh, K.S. Reviewing practices in collaborative writing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10 (2001), 247--259.
[5]
Kuutti, K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi (ed.) Context and Consciousness. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996, 17--44.
[6]
Middleton, D. Talking work: Argument, common knowledge, and improvisation in teamwork. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds.) Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge UP, New York, 1998, 233--256.
[7]
Noël, S., and Robert, J. Empirical study on collaborative writing: What do co-authors do, use, and like? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13 (2004), 63--89.
[8]
Plowman, L. Tracing the Evolution of a Co-authored Text. CSRP 367. University of Sussex, Brighton, 1995.
[9]
Sellen, A.J., and Harper, R.H.R. The Myth of the Paperless Office. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
[10]
Winsor, D.A. Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 1 (2001), 5--28.
[11]
Wood, C.C. A Cultural-cognitive Approach to Collaborative Writing. CSRP 242. University of Sussex, Brighton, 1992.
[12]
Yates, J. Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. The Johns Hopkins UP, Baltimore, 1993.

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Making the Pitch: Examining Dialogue and Revisions in Entrepreneurs' Pitch DecksIEEE Transactions on Professional Communication10.1109/TPC.2014.234235457:3(158-181)Online publication date: Sep-2014
  • (2008)Advances in understanding knowledge workProceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/1456536.1456585(243-248)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2008
  • (2007)CAWSCHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/1240866.1241040(2555-2560)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2007
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGDOC '04: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international conference on Design of communication: The engineering of quality documentation
October 2004
160 pages
ISBN:1581138091
DOI:10.1145/1026533
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 October 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. collaboration
  2. coordination
  3. mediation
  4. tools

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGDOC04
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 355 of 582 submissions, 61%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2014)Making the Pitch: Examining Dialogue and Revisions in Entrepreneurs' Pitch DecksIEEE Transactions on Professional Communication10.1109/TPC.2014.234235457:3(158-181)Online publication date: Sep-2014
  • (2008)Advances in understanding knowledge workProceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication10.1145/1456536.1456585(243-248)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2008
  • (2007)CAWSCHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/1240866.1241040(2555-2560)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2007
  • (2007)The Link between Agent Coordination and CooperationIntelligent Information Processing III10.1007/978-0-387-44641-7_2(11-19)Online publication date: 2007

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media