Cited By
View all- Ravali GManivannan M(2017)Haptic Feedback in Needle Insertion Modeling and SimulationIEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering10.1109/RBME.2017.270696610(63-77)Online publication date: 2017
Towards a psychophysical evaluation of a surgical simulator for bone-burring
Authors: 
Gavin Brelstaff, Marco Agus, Andrea Giachetti, 
Enrico Gobbetti, Gianluigi Zanetti, Antonio Zorcolo, Bruno Picasso, Stefano Sellari FranceschiniAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 139 - 143
Abstract
The CRS4 experimental bone-burr simulator implements visual and haptic effects through the incorporation of a physics-based contact model and patient-specific data. Psychophysical tests demonstrate that, despite its simplified model and its inherent technological constraints, the simulator can articulate material differences, and that its users can learn to associate virtual bone with real bone material. Tests addressed both surface probing and interior drilling task. We also explore a haptic contrast sensitivity function based on the model's two main parameters: an elastic constant and an erosion factor. Both parameters manifest power-law-like sensitivity with respective exponents of around two and three. Further tests may reveal how well simulator users perceive fine differences in bone material, like those encountered while drilling through real volume boundaries.
References
[1]
Agus, M., Giachetti, A., Gobbetti, E., Zanetti, G., John, N. W., and Stone, R. J. 2002. Mastoidectomy simulation with combined visual and haptic feedback. In Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2002, IOS Press, J. D. Westwood, H. M. Hoffmann, G. T. Mogel, and D. Stredney, Eds., 17--23.
[2]
Agus, M., Giachetti, A., Gobbetti, E., Zanetti, G., and Zorcolo, A. 2002. A multiprocessor decoupled system for the simulation of temporal bone surgery. Computing and Visualization in Science 5, 1.
[3]
Agus, M., Giachetti, A., Gobbetti, E., Zanetti, G., and Zorcolo, A. 2002. Real-time haptic and visual simulation of bone dissection. In IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, IEEE Computer Society Press, 209--216.
[4]
Bryan, J., Stredney, D., Wiet, G., and Sessanna, D. 2001. Virtual temporal bone dissection: A case study. In IEEE Visualization, 497--500.
[5]
Esen, H., Yano, K., and Buss, M. 2003. A control algorithm and preliminary user studies for a bone drilling medical training system. In RO-MAN Conference 2003.
[6]
Harada, T., Ishii, S., and Tayama, N. 1988. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the temporal bone from histological sections. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114, 1139--1142.
[7]
John, N. W., Thacker, N., Pokric, M., Jackson, A., Zanetti, G., Gobbetti, E., Giachetti, A., Stone, R. J., Campos, J., Emmen, A., Schwerdtner, A., Neri, E., Franceschini, S. S., and Rubio, F. 2001. An integrated simulator for surgery of the petrous bone. In Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2001, IOS Press, J. D. Westwood, Ed., 218--224.
[8]
Landau, L., and Lifshitz, E. 1986. Theory of elasticity. Pergamon Press.
[9]
Nelson, R. A. 1991. Temporal Bone Surgical Dissection Manual, second ed. House Ear Institute, Los Angeles.
[10]
Newell, F., Bulthoff, H., and Ernst, M. 2003. Cross-modal perception of actively explored objects. In Proc. EuroHaptics 2003, 291--299.
[11]
Nicholson, L., Adams, R., and Maher, C. 2000. Magnitude estimation of manually assessed elastic stiffness: Stability of the exponent. Perceptual and Motor Skills 91, 581--592.
[12]
Pettigrew, A. Pettigrew plastic temporal bones. http://www.temporal-bone.com/.
[13]
Pflesser, B., Petersik, A., Tiede, U., Hohne, K. H., and Leuwer, R. 2000. Volume based planning and rehearsal of surgical interventions. In Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, Proc. CARS 2000, Excerpta Medica International Congress, H. U. L. et al., Ed., 1214, 607--612.
[14]
Pflesser, B., Petersik, A., Tiede, U., Hohne, K. H., and Leuwer, R. 2002. Haptic volume interaction with anatomic models at sub-voxel resolution. In 10th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Proc. Haptics 2002, 66--72.
[15]
Russell M. Taylor, L., Hudson, T. C., Seeger, A., Weber, H., Juliano, J., and Helser, A. T. 2001. Vrpn: a device-independent, network-transparent vr peripheral system. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, ACM Press, 55--61.
[16]
Schutter, J. D. 1988. Improved force control laws for advanced tracking applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1497--1502.
[17]
Stredney, D., Wiet, G., Bryan, J., Sessanna, D., Murakami, J., Schamllbrock, O., Powell, K., and Welling, B. 2002. Temporal bone dissection simulation -- an update. In Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2002, IOS Press, J. D. Westwood, H. M. Hoffmann, G. T. Mogel, and D. Stredney, Eds., 507--513.
[18]
Volpe, R., and Khosla, P. 1993. Computational considerations in the implementation of force control strategies. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems: Theory and Applications. Special Issue on Computational Aspects of Robot Kinematics, Dynamics, and Control.
[19]
Wiet, G., Bryan, J., Sessanna, D., Streadney, D., Schmalbrock, P., and Welling, B. 2000. Virtual temporal bone dissection simulation. In Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2000, IDS Press, J. D. Westwood, Ed., 378--384.
Recommendations
Pedicle Screw Insertion Surgical Simulator
Digital Human Modeling. Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics, and Risk ManagementAbstractScoliosis is a sideway spinal deformity. If the curvature is measured to be more than 50, surgery is required to straighten the spine. Pedicle screw insertion is a procedure that requires the placement of screws from the pedicle into the ...
Towards Lean and Elegant Self-Motion Simulation in Virtual Reality
VR '05: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Conference 2005 on Virtual RealityDespite recent technological advances, convincing self-motion simulation in Virtual Reality (VR) is difficult to achieve, and users often suffer from motion sickness and/or disorientation in the simulated world. Instead of trying to simulate self-...
Beyond the visuals: tactile augmentation and sensory enhancement in an arthroscopy simulator
This paper considers tactile augmentation, the addition of a physical object within a virtual environment (VE) to provide haptic feedback. The resulting mixed reality environment is limited in terms of the ease with which changes can be made to the ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
August 2005
187 pages
Copyright © 2005 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 26 August 2005
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Article
Conference
APGV05
Sponsor:
APGV05: ACM Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization 2005
August 26 - 28, 2005
A Coroña, Spain
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 19 of 33 submissions, 58%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 266Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)1
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Ravali GManivannan M(2017)Haptic Feedback in Needle Insertion Modeling and SimulationIEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering10.1109/RBME.2017.270696610(63-77)Online publication date: 2017
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in