More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

research-article

Metaphors in Voice User Interfaces: A Slippery Fish

Authors:

Michael TwidaleAuthors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Volume 30, Issue 6

Article No.: 89, Pages 1 - 37

https://doi.org/10.1145/3609326

Published: 25 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

We explore a range of different metaphors used for Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) by designers, end-users, manufacturers, and researchers using a novel framework derived from semi-structured interviews and a literature review. We focus less on the well-established idea of metaphors as a way for interface designers to help novice users learn how to interact with novel technology, and more on other ways metaphors can be used. We find that metaphors people use are contextually fluid, can change with the mode of conversation, and can reveal differences in how people perceive VUIs compared to other devices. Not all metaphors are helpful, and some may be offensive. Analyzing this broader class of metaphors can help understand, perhaps even predict problems. Metaphor analysis can be a low-cost tool to inspire design creativity and facilitate complex discussions about sociotechnical issues, enabling us to spot potential opportunities and problems in the situated use of technologies.

References

[1]

Ali Abdolrahmani, Ravi Kuber, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. “Siri Talks at You”: An empirical investigation of Voice-Activated Personal Assistant (VAPA) usage by individuals who are blind. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 249–258. DOI:

Digital Library

[2]

Douglas Adams. 1989. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Harmony Books.

[3]

Apple Computer, Inc. 1992. Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

[4]

Brooke Auxier. 2023. 5 things to know about Americans and their smart speakers. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 13, 2023 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/21/5-things-to-know-about-americans-and-their-smart-speakers/

[5]

Mirzel Avdic and Jo Vermeulen. 2021. Intelligibility issues faced by smart speaker enthusiasts in understanding what their devices do and why. In Proceedings of the 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 314–328. DOI:

Digital Library

[6]

Benett Axtell and Cosmin Munteanu. 2021. Tea, Earl Grey, Hot: Designing speech interactions from the imagined ideal of Star Trek. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–14. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from

Digital Library

[7]

Jack M. Barlow, James R. Kerlin, and Howard R. Pollio. 1971. Training Manual for Identifying Figurative Language. University of Tennessee, Dept. of Psychology, Knoxville.

[8]

Jack M. Barlow, Howard R. Pollio, and Harold J. Fine. 1977. Insight and figurative language in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 14, 3 (1977), 212–222. DOI:

[9]

Marcia J. Bates. 1979. Information search tactics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 30, 4 (1979), 205–214. DOI:

[10]

Eric P. S. Baumer, Bill Tomlinson, Lindsey E. Richland, and Janice Hansen. 2009. Fostering metaphorical creativity using computational metaphor identification. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 315–324. DOI:

Digital Library

[11]

Mohammed Slim Ben Mimoun, Ingrid Poncin, and Marion Garnier. 2012. Case study—Embodied virtual agents: An analysis on reasons for failure. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 19, 6 (2012), 605–612. DOI:

[12]

Erin Beneteau, Ashley Boone, Yuxing Wu, Julie A. Kientz, Jason Yip, and Alexis Hiniker. 2020. Parenting with Alexa: Exploring the introduction of smart speakers on family dynamics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. DOI:

Digital Library

[13]

Celeste Biever. 2014. More than 80 percent of Roomba owners name their Roomba. Slate Magazine. Retrieved July 6, 2021 from https://slate.com/technology/2014/03/roomba-vacuum-cleaners-have-names-irobot-ceo-on-peoples-ties-to-robots.html

[14]

Richard M. Billow. 1977. Metaphor: A review of the psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin 84, 1 (1977), 81–92. DOI:

[15]

Alan F. Blackwell. 2006. The reification of metaphor as a design tool. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 4 (2006), 490–530. DOI:

Digital Library

[16]

Sheryl Brahnam and Antonella De Angeli. 2008. Special issue on the abuse and misuse of social agents. Interacting with Computers 20, 3 (2008), 287–291. DOI:

Digital Library

[17]

Sheryl Brahnam, Marianthe Karanikas, and Margaret Weaver. 2011. (Un)dressing the interface: Exposing the foundational HCI metaphor “computer is woman.” Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 401–412. DOI:

Digital Library

[18]

Stacy M. Branham and Antony Rishin Mukkath Roy. 2019. Reading between the guidelines: How commercial voice assistant guidelines hinder accessibility for blind users. In Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 446–458. DOI:

Digital Library

[19]

Eric Bratten. 2023. As smart speakers evolve, so do consumers. Comscore, Inc. Retrieved February 13, 2023 from https://www.comscore.com/Insights/Blog/As-Smart-Speakers-Evolve-So-Do-Consumers

[20]

Michael Braun, Anja Mainz, Ronee Chadowitz, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2019. At your service: Designing voice assistant personalities to improve automotive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11. DOI:

Digital Library

[21]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. DOI:

[22]

Meredith Broussard. 2022. Agenda: Why the Scots are such a struggle for Alexa and Siri. HeraldScotland. Retrieved March 20, 2022 from https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/16219100.agenda-scots-struggle-alexa-siri/

[23]

Frederik Brudy, Christian Holz, Roman Rädle, Chi-Jui Wu, Steven Houben, Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2019. Cross-device taxonomy: Survey, opportunities and challenges of interactions spanning across multiple devices. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–28. DOI:

Digital Library

[24]

Julia Cambre and Chinmay Kulkarni. 2019. One voice fits all? Social implications and research challenges of designing voices for smart devices. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 223:1–223:19. DOI:

Digital Library

[25]

Lynne Cameron. 2008. Metaphor and talk. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. R. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 197–211. DOI:

[26]

Lynne Cameron and Robert Maslen. 2010. Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox, London. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from http://www.equinoxpub.com/books/showbook.asp?bkid=363&keyword=9781845534479

[27]

John M. Carroll and Caroline Carrithers. 1984. Training wheels in a user interface. Communications of the ACM 27, 8 (1984), 800–806. DOI:

Digital Library

[28]

John M. Carroll, Robert L. Mack, and Wendy A. Kellogg. 1988. Chapter 3 - interface metaphors and user interface design. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Martin Helander (Ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 67–85. DOI:

[29]

John M. Carroll and John C. Thomas. 1982. Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 12, 2 (1982), 107–116. DOI:

[30]

Jessie Chin and Smit Desai. 2021. Being a nice partner: The effects of age and interaction types on the perceived social abilities of conversational agents. In Technology, Mind, and Behavior.

[31]

Eugene Cho. 2019. Hey Google, Can I Ask You Something in Private? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 258:1–258:9. DOI:

Digital Library

[32]

Minji Cho, Sang-su Lee, and Kun-Pyo Lee. 2019. Once a kind friend is now a thing: Understanding how conversational agents at home are forgotten. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 1557–1569. DOI:

Digital Library

[33]

Dasom Choi, Daehyun Kwak, Minji Cho, and Sangsu Lee. 2020. “Nobody Speaks that Fast!” An empirical study of speech rate in conversational agents for people with vision impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. DOI:

Digital Library

[34]

Nazli Cila, Iskander Smit, Elisa Giaccardi, and Ben Kröse. 2017. Products as Agents: Metaphors for designing the products of the IoT Age. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 448–459. Retrieved August 6, 2021 from

Digital Library

[35]

Leigh Clark, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Emer Gilmartin, Stephan Schlögl, Jens Edlund, Matthew Aylett, João Cabral, Cosmin Munteanu, Justin Edwards, and Benjamin R. Cowan. 2019. The state of speech in HCI: Trends, themes and challenges. Interacting with Computers 31, 4 (2019), 349–371. DOI:

[36]

Leigh Clark, Nadia Pantidi, Orla Cooney, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Justin Edwards, Brendan Spillane, Emer Gilmartin, Christine Murad, Cosmin Munteanu, Vincent Wade, and Benjamin R. Cowan. 2019. What makes a good conversation?: Challenges in designing truly conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 475:1–475:12. DOI:

Digital Library

[37]

Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick. 1968. 2001; A Space Odyssey. New American Library, New York.

[38]

T. R. Colburn and G. M. Shute. 2008. Metaphor in computer science. Journal of Applied Logic 6, 4 (2008), 526–533. DOI:

[39]

Kate Conger. 2021. Racist computer engineering words: ‘Master,’ ‘Slave’ and the fight over offensive terms. The New York Times. Retrieved June 28, 2021 from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/13/technology/racist-computer-engineering-terms-ietf.html

[40]

Alan Cooper. 1995. About Face: The Essentials of User Interface Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Digital Library

[41]

Alan Cooper and Paul Saffo. 1999. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

[42]

Luc Côté and Jean Turgeon. 2005. Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Medical Teacher 27, 1 (2005), 71–75. DOI:

[43]

Benjamin R. Cowan, Nadia Pantidi, David Coyle, Kellie Morrissey, Peter Clarke, Sara Al-Shehri, David Earley, and Natasha Bandeira. 2017. “What Can I Help You with?”: Infrequent users’ experiences of intelligent personal assistants. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 43:1–43:12. DOI:

Digital Library

[44]

Kimberly E. Culley and Poornima Madhavan. 2013. A note of caution regarding anthropomorphism in HCI agents. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 3 (2013), 577–579. DOI:

Digital Library

[45]

Claudia Daudén Roquet and Corina Sas. 2021. Interoceptive interaction: An embodied metaphor inspired approach to designing for meditation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–17. Retrieved August 6, 2021 from

Digital Library

[46]

Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2007. Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human–robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362, 1480 (2007), 679–704. DOI:

[47]

Smit Desai and Jessie Chin. 2021. Hey Google, Can You Help Me Learn? In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. ACM, New York, NY, 1–4. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from

Digital Library

[48]

J. Dewey. 1929. The Quest for Certainty. Minton, Balch, Oxford, England.

[49]

Alan Dix, Tom Ormerod, Michael Twidale, Corina Sas, Paula Alexandra Silva, and Lorna McKnight. 2006. Why bad ideas are a good idea. In Proceedings of HCIEd.2006-1 Inventivity, Ballina/Killaloe. http://www.hcibook.com/alan/papers/HCIed2006-badideas/

[50]

Abbe Don, Susan Brennan, Brenda Laurel, and Ben Shneiderman. 1992. Anthropomorphism: From Eliza to Terminator 2. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 67–70. DOI:

Digital Library

[51]

Graham Dove and Anne-Laure Fayard. 2020. Monsters, metaphors, and machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–17. DOI:

Digital Library

[52]

Philip R. Doyle, Justin Edwards, Odile Dumbleton, Leigh Clark, and Benjamin R. Cowan. 2019. Mapping perceptions of humanness in intelligent personal assistant interaction. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1–12. DOI:

Digital Library

[53]

Stefania Druga, Randi Williams, Cynthia Breazeal, and Mitchel Resnick. 2017. “Hey Google is It OK if I Eat You?”: Initial explorations in child-agent interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 595–600. DOI:

Digital Library

[54]

Ron Eglash. 2007. Broken metaphor: The master-slave analogy in technical literature. Technology and Culture 48, 2 (2007), 360–369. DOI:

[55]

Stephen N. Elliott, Thomas R. Kratochwill, Joan Littlefield Cook, and John F. Travers. 2000. Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning. McGraw Hill, Boston.

[56]

Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114, 4 (2007), 864–886. DOI:

[57]

Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Martin Porcheron, and Rein Ove Sikveland. 2019. Progressivity for voice interface design. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. 1–8. DOI:

Digital Library

[58]

D. A. Frincke and Matt Bishop. 2004. Guarding the castle keep: Teaching with the fortress metaphor. Security & Privacy. 2, 3 (2004), 69–72. DOI:

Digital Library

[59]

Hannah Frith and Kate Gleeson. 2004. Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity 5, 1 (2004), 40–48. DOI:

[60]

Erik Frøkjær and Kasper Hornbæk. 2008. Metaphors of human thinking for usability inspection and design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 14, 4 (2008), 20:1–20:33. DOI:

Digital Library

[61]

Dedre Gentner and Christian Hoyos. 2017. Analogy and abstraction. Topics in Cognitive Science 9, 3 (2017), 672–693. DOI:

[62]

Katy Ilonka Gero and Lydia B. Chilton. 2019. Metaphoria: An algorithmic companion for metaphor creation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–12. Retrieved July 6, 2021 from

Digital Library

[63]

Karni Gilon, Joel Chan, Felicia Y. Ng, Hila Liifshitz-Assaf, Aniket Kittur, and Dafna Shahaf. 2018. Analogy mining for specific design needs. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–11. Retrieved August 6, 2021 from

Digital Library

[64]

Andrew Goatly. 2007. Washing the Brain: Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. DOI:

[65]

Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 22, 1 (2007), 1–39. DOI:

[66]

Jens Grubert, Matthias Kranz, and Aaron Quigley. 2016. Challenges in mobile multi-device ecosystems. mUX: The Journal of Mobile User Experience 5, 1 (2016), 5. DOI:

[67]

Frank Halasz and Thomas P. Moran. 1982. Analogy considered harmful. In Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 383–386. DOI:

Digital Library

[68]

Paul Heckel. 1984. The Elements of Friendly Software Design. Warner Books, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[69]

Helen Hester. 2017. Technology becomes her. New Vistas 3, 1 (2017), 46–50.

[70]

Douglas R. Hofstadter. 1995. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. Basic Books, New York, NY.

[71]

Xuedong Huang, James Baker, and Raj Reddy. 2014. A historical perspective of speech recognition. Communications of the ACM 57, 1 (2014), 94–103. DOI:

Digital Library

[72]

Edwin Hutchins. 1987. Metaphors for Interface Design. California Univ San Diego La Jolla Inst for Cognitive Science. Retrieved May 27, 2021 from https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA182248

[73]

Giulio Iacucci, Kari Kuutti, and Mervi Ranta. 2000. On the move with a magic thing: Role playing in concept design of mobile services and devices. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. 193–202. DOI:

Digital Library

[74]

B. Indurkhya. 2013. Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach. Springer Science & Business Media.

[75]

Jodi Aronson. 1995. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report 2, 1 (1995), 1--3.

[76]

J. Johnson, T. L. Roberts, W. Verplank, D. C. Smith, C. H. Irby, M. Beard, and K. Mackey. 1989. The Xerox Star: A retrospective. Computer 22, 9 (1989), 11–26. DOI:

Digital Library

[77]

Philip N. Johnson-Laird. 1983. Mental Models : Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved August 2, 2021 from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00702919

[78]

Hyunhoon Jung, Hee Jae Kim, Seongeun So, Jinjoong Kim, and Changhoon Oh. 2019. TurtleTalk: An educational programming game for children with voice user interface. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6. DOI:

Digital Library

[79]

Pranav Khadpe, Ranjay Krishna, Li Fei-Fei, Jeffrey Hancock, and Michael Bernstein. 2020. Conceptual metaphors impact perceptions of Human-AI collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1–26. DOI:

Digital Library

[80]

Eugene Eric Kim and Betty Alexandra Toole. 1999. Ada and the first computer. Scientific American 280, 5 (1999), 76–81.

[81]

Yelim Kim, Mohi Reza, Joanna McGrenere, and Dongwook Yoon. 2021. Designers characterize naturalness in voice user interfaces: Their goals, practices, and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. DOI:

Digital Library

[82]

Nigel King. 2004. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. In Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Catherine Cassell and Gillian Symon (Eds.). SAGE Publications Ltd., London, 256--270.

[83]

Mallory Knodel and Niels ten Oever. 2021. Terminology, Power, and Inclusive Language in Internet-Drafts and RFCs. Retrieved June 28, 2021 from https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-knodel-terminology-05

[84]

Zoltán Kövecses. 2002. Cognitive-linguistic comments on metaphor identification. Language and Literature 11, 1 (2002), 74–78. DOI:

[85]

Zoltán Kövecses. 2015. Metaphor and culture. In Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Zoltán Kövecses (Ed.), Oxford University Press. DOI:

[86]

Thomas S. Kuhn. 1993. Metaphor in science. In Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.), Andrew Ortony (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 533–542. DOI:

[87]

Anastasia Kuzminykh, Jenny Sun, Nivetha Govindaraju, Jeff Avery, and Edward Lank. 2020. Genie in the Bottle: Anthropomorphized perceptions of conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. DOI:

Digital Library

[88]

George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

[89]

Josephine Lau, Benjamin Zimmerman, and Florian Schaub. 2018. Alexa, Are You Listening?: Privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–31. DOI:

Digital Library

[90]

Brenda Laurel. 1997. Interface agents: metaphors with character. In Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology, Batya Friedman (Ed.). Center for the Study of Language and Information, 207--219.

[91]

Brenda Laurel and S. Joy Mountford. 1990. The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, MA.

Digital Library

[92]

David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation strategies for HCI toolkit research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–17. Retrieved March 4, 2022 from

Digital Library

[93]

Q. Vera Liao, Muhammed Mas-ud Hussain, Praveen Chandar, Matthew Davis, Yasaman Khazaeni, Marco Patricio Crasso, Dakuo Wang, Michael Muller, N. Sadat Shami, and Werner Geyer. 2018. All work and no play? In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–13. Retrieved August 6, 2021 from

Digital Library

[94]

Henry Lieberman and Ted Selker. 2003. Agents for the user interface. In Handbook of Agent Technology., Jeffrey Bradshaw (Ed.). MIT Press, 1--21.

[95]

Dan Lockton, Devika Singh, Saloni Sabnis, Michelle Chou, Sarah Foley, and Alejandro Pantoja. 2019. New metaphors: A workshop method for generating ideas and reframing problems in design and beyond. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition. 319–332. DOI:

Digital Library

[96]

Nick Logler, Daisy Yoo, and Batya Friedman. 2018. Metaphor cards: A how-to-guide for making and using a generative metaphorical design toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. DOI:

Digital Library

[97]

Irene Lopatovska, Elena Korshakova, Diedre Brown, Yiqiao Li, Jie Min, Amber Pasiak, and Kaige Zheng. 2021. User perceptions of an intelligent personal assistant's personality: The role of interaction context. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. 15–25. DOI:

Digital Library

[98]

Irene Lopatovska, Katrina Rink, Ian Knight, Kieran Raines, Kevin Cosenza, Harriet Williams, Perachya Sorsche, David Hirsch, Qi Li, and Adrianna Martinez. 2019. Talk to me: Exploring user interactions with the Amazon Alexa. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51, 4 (2019), 984–997. DOI:

[99]

Ewa Luger and Abigail Sellen. 2016. “Like Having a Really Bad PA”: The gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5286–5297. DOI:

Digital Library

[100]

Karl F. MacDorman. 2019. In the uncanny valley, transportation predicts narrative enjoyment more than empathy, but only for the tragic hero. Computers in Human Behavior 94 (2019), 140–153. DOI:

Digital Library

[101]

Karl F. MacDorman, Robert D. Green, Chin-Chang Ho, and Clinton T. Koch. 2009. Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 3 (2009), 695–710. DOI:

Digital Library

[102]

Jennifer (Jen) McGinn and Nalini Kotamraju. 2008. Data-driven persona development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1521–1524. DOI:

Digital Library

[103]

Donald McMillan and Razan Jaber. 2021. Leaving the butler behind: The future of role reproduction in CUI. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. 1–4. DOI:

Digital Library

[104]

Robinson Meyer. 2015. Even early focus groups hated Clippy. The Atlantic. Retrieved May 27, 2021 from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/06/clippy-the-microsoft-office-assistant-is-the-patriarchys-fault/396653/

[105]

Microsoft. 1995. Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design. Microsoft Press.

[106]

Arthur I. Miller. 1996. Metaphors in creative scientific thought. Creativity Research Journal 9, 2–3 (1996), 113–130. DOI:

[107]

Frank de Mink. 1995. Metaphors as keys to creative thinking. European Journal of High Ability 6, 2 (1995), 176–180. DOI:

[108]

Matti Minkkinen, Burkhard Auffermann, and Sirkka Heinonen. 2017. Framing the future of privacy: Citizens’ metaphors for privacy in the coming digital society. European Journal of Futures Research 5, 1 (2017), 1–13. DOI:

[109]

Aarthi Easwara Moorthy and Kim-Phuong L. Vu. 2015. Privacy concerns for use of voice activated personal assistant in the public space. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 31, 4 (2015), 307–335. DOI:

[110]

Masahiro Mori. 1970. The uncanny valley: The original essay by masahiro mori - IEEE spectrum. IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. Retrieved June 6, 2021 from https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/humanoids/the-uncanny-valley

[111]

Karin S. Moser. 2000. Metaphor analysis in psychology - method, theory, and fields of application. Forum: Qualitative Social Research (on-line journal) 1, 2 (2000). Retrieved July 31, 2023 from

[112]

Nasim Motalebi, Eugene Cho, S. Shyam Sundar, and Saeed Abdullah. 2019. Can Alexa be your therapist? How back-channeling transforms smart-speakers to be active listeners. In Proceedings of the Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 309–313. DOI:

Digital Library

[113]

Chelsea Myers, Anushay Furqan, Jessica Nebolsky, Karina Caro, and Jichen Zhu. 2018. Patterns for how users overcome obstacles in voice user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6:1–6:7. DOI:

Digital Library

[114]

Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 1 (2000), 81–103. DOI:

[115]

Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R. Tauber. 1994. Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 72–78. DOI:

Digital Library

[116]

Simone Natale. 2021. Deceitful Media: Artificial Intelligence and Social Life after the Turing Test. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, NY.

[117]

Dennis C. Neale and John M. Carroll. 1997. Chapter 20 - The role of metaphors in user interface design. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.). Marting G. Helander, Thomas K. Landauer and Prasad V. Prabhu (Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 441–462. DOI:

[118]

Jasmin Niess, Sarah Diefenbach, and Axel Platz. 2018. Moving beyond assistance: Psychological qualities of digital companions. In Proceedings of the 10th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 916–921. DOI:

Digital Library

[119]

Donald A. Norman. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York, NY.

[120]

Lorelli S. Nowell, Jill M. Norris, Deborah E. White, and Nancy J. Moules. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16, 1 (2017), 1609406917733847. DOI:

[121]

Daniel E. O'Leary. 2008. Gartner's hype cycle and information system research issues. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 9, 4 (2008), 240–252.

[122]

Kenneth Olmstead. 2017. Nearly half of Americans use digital voice assistants, mostly on their smartphones. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 13, 2023 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/12/nearly-half-of-americans-use-digital-voice-assistants-mostly-on-their-smartphones/

[123]

George Orwell. 1949. Nineteen Eighty-four. Harcourt, Brace and Company, New York.

[124]

Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W. Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, and David Moher. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews 10, 1 (2021), 89.

[125]

Gualtiero Piccinini. 2003. Turing's rules for the imitation game. In The Turing Test: The Elusive Standard of Artificial Intelligence. James H. Moor (Ed.), Springer, Dordrecht, 111–120. DOI:

[126]

Steven Pinker. 1994. The Language Instinct. William Morrow & Co, New York, NY.

[127]

Alexandra Plows. 2018. Messy Ethnographies in Action [Hardback]. Retrieved September 3, 2021 from https://vernonpress.com/book/385

[128]

Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice interfaces in everyday life. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 640:1–640:12. DOI:

Digital Library

[129]

Alisha Pradhan, Leah Findlater, and Amanda Lazar. 2019. “Phantom Friend” or “Just a Box with Information”: Personification and ontological categorization of smart speaker-based voice assistants by older adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019): 214:1–214:21. DOI:

Digital Library

[130]

Alisha Pradhan, Amanda Lazar, and Leah Findlater. 2020. Use of intelligent voice assistants by older adults with low technology use. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 4 (2020), 31:1–31:27. DOI:

Digital Library

[131]

Simon Priest and Michael A. Gass. 2006. The effectiveness of metaphoric facilitation styles in corporate adventure training (CAT) programs. Journal of Experiential Education 29, 1 (2006), 78–94. DOI:

[132]

John Pruitt and Tamara Adlin. 2005. The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.

Digital Library

[133]

Amanda Purington, Jessie G. Taft, Shruti Sannon, Natalya N. Bazarova, and Samuel Hardman Taylor. 2017. “Alexa is My New BFF”: Social roles, user satisfaction, and personification of the amazon echo. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2853–2859. DOI:

Digital Library

[134]

Aung Pyae and Paul Scifleet. 2018. Investigating differences between native english and non-native english speakers in interacting with a voice user interface: A case of google home. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. 548–553. DOI:

Digital Library

[135]

Lingyun Qiu and Izak Benbasat. 2009. Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25, 4 (2009), 145–182. DOI:

Digital Library

[136]

Fahimeh Raja, Kirstie Hawkey, Steven Hsu, Kai-Le Clement Wang, and Konstantin Beznosov. 2011. A brick wall, a locked door, and a bandit: A physical security metaphor for firewall warnings. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security. 1–20. DOI:

Digital Library

[137]

Sinduja Rangarajan. 2021. Hey Siri—why don't you understand more people who talk like me? Mother Jones. Retrieved June 6, 2021 from https://www.motherjones.com/media/2021/02/digital-assistants-accents-english-race-google-siri-alexa/

[138]

M. Reimer. 1996. The problem of dead metaphors. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 82, 1 (1996), 13–25.

[139]

Simon Robinson, Jennifer Pearson, Shashank Ahire, Rini Ahirwar, Bhakti Bhikne, Nimish Maravi, and Matt Jones. 2018. Revisiting “Hole in the Wall” computing: Private smart speakers and public slum settings. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11. DOI:

Digital Library

[140]

Samiha Samrose, Kavya Anbarasu, Ajjen Joshi, and Taniya Mishra. 2020. Mitigating boredom using an empathetic conversational agent. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 1–8. DOI:

Digital Library

[141]

Ana C. Sánchez Ramos, Virginia Contreras, Alejandra Santos, Cynthia Aguillon, Noemi Garcia, Jesus D. Rodriguez, Ivan Amaya Vazquez, and Megan K. Strait. 2018. A preliminary study of the effects of racialization and humanness on the verbal abuse of female-gendered robots. In Proceedings of the Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 227–228. DOI:

Digital Library

[142]

Alex Sciuto, Arnita Saini, Jodi Forlizzi, and Jason I. Hong. 2018. “Hey Alexa, What's Up?”: A mixed-methods studies of in-home conversational agent usage. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. 857–868. DOI:

Digital Library

[143]

J. Sculley. 1987. Odyssey: Pepsi to Apple, A Journey of Adventure, Ideas, and the Future. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.

Digital Library

[144]

Elena Semino and Gerard Steen. 2008. Metaphor in literature. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Jr. Raymond W. Gibbs (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 232--246.

[145]

Ruth C. Smith and Paaige K. Turner. 1995. A social constructionist reconfiguration of metaphor analysis: An application of “SCMA” to organizational socialization theorizing. Communication Monographs 62, 2 (1995), 152–181. DOI:

[146]

Jak Spencer, Juliette Poggi, and Rama Gheerawo. 2018. Designing out stereotypes in artificial intelligence: Involving users in the personality design of a digital assistant. In Proceedings of the 4th EAI International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good. 130–135. DOI:

Digital Library

[147]

Clara Strathmann, Jessica Szczuka, and Nicole Krämer. 2020. She talks to me as if she were alive: Assessing the social reactions and perceptions of children toward voice assistants and their appraisal of the appropriateness of these reactions. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 1–8. DOI:

Digital Library

[148]

Lucy A. Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.

Digital Library

[149]

Ja-Young Sung, Lan Guo, Rebecca E. Grinter, and Henrik I. Christensen. 2007. My Roomba Is Rambo: Intimate home appliances. In UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Springer, 145--162.

[150]

Selina Jeanne Sutton, Paul Foulkes, David Kirk, and Shaun Lawson. 2019. Voice as a design material: Sociophonetic inspired design strategies in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–14. Retrieved September 8, 2021 from

Digital Library

[151]

Milka Trajkova and Aqueasha Martin-Hammond. 2020. “Alexa is a Toy”: Exploring older adults’ reasons for using, limiting, and abandoning echo. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–13. Retrieved March 1, 2022 from

Digital Library

[152]

Anthony G. Tuckett. 2005. Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher's experience. Contemporary Nurse 19, 1–2 (2005), 75–87. DOI:

[153]

1Victoria Turk. 2016. Home invasion. New Scientist 232, 3104 (2016), 16–17. DOI:

[154]

Tony Veale, Ekaterina Shutova, and Beata Beigman Klebanov. 2016. Metaphor: A computational perspective. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies 9, 1 (2016), 1–160. DOI:

[155]

Alexandra Voit, Jasmin Niess, Caroline Eckerth, Maike Ernst, Henrike Weingärtner, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2020. ‘It's not a romantic relationship’: Stories of adoption and abandonment of smart speakers at home. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 71–82. DOI:

Digital Library

[156]

Jinping Wang, Hyun Yang, Ruosi Shao, Saeed Abdullah, and S. Shyam Sundar. 2020. Alexa as coach: Leveraging smart speakers to build social agents that reduce public speaking anxiety. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–13. Retrieved July 13, 2021 from

Digital Library

[157]

Qiaosi Wang, Koustuv Saha, Eric Gregori, David Joyner, and Ashok Goel. 2021. Towards mutual theory of mind in Human-AI Interaction: How language reflects what students perceive about a virtual teaching assistant. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1–14. Retrieved August 6, 2021 from

Digital Library

[158]

Joseph Weizenbaum. 1976. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. W. H. Freeman & Co.

Digital Library

[159]

Yorick Wilks (Ed.). 2010. Close Engagements with Artificial Companions. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdamn? and Philadelphia, PA.

[160]

Rainer Winkler, Matthias Söllner, Maya Lisa Neuweiler, Flavia Conti Rossini, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2019. Alexa, can you help us solve this problem? How conversations with smart personal assistant tutors increase task group outcomes. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6. DOI:

Digital Library

[161]

Heather Suzanne Woods. 2018. Asking more of Siri and Alexa: Feminine persona in service of surveillance capitalism. Critical Studies in Media Communication 35, 4 (2018), 334–349. DOI:

[162]

Xi Yang, Marco Aurisicchio, and Weston Baxter. 2019. Understanding affective experiences with conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 542:1–542:12. DOI:

Digital Library

[163]

J. Ylipulli, A. Luusua, and T. Ojala. 2017. On creative metaphors in technology design: Case “Magic.” In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 280–289. DOI:

Digital Library

[164]

Michelle X. Zhou, Gloria Mark, Jingyi Li, and Huahai Yang. 2019. Trusting virtual agents: The effect of personality. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 9, 2–3 (2019), 1–36. DOI:

Digital Library

[165]

Tamara Zubatiy, Kayci L. Vickers, Niharika Mathur, and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2021. Empowering dyads of older adults with mild cognitive impairment and their care partners using conversational agents. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15. DOI:

Digital Library

[166]

2022. Amazon Official Site: All-new Echo Dot (4th Gen) | Smart speaker with…. archive.ph. Retrieved February 13, 2023 from https://archive.ph/EmIAA

[167]

2021. Conversation Design | Google Developers. Retrieved June 6, 2021 from https://developers.google.com/assistant/conversation-design/create-a-persona

[168]

2021. Gartner Hype Cycle Research Methodology. Gartner. Retrieved July 3, 2021 from https://www.gartner.com/en/research/methodologies/gartner-hype-cycle

[169]

2021. Get Started with the Guide | Alexa Skills Kit. Amazon (Alexa). Retrieved September 9, 2021 from https://developer.amazon.com/en-US/docs/alexa/alexa-design/get-started.html

[170]

2023. Replika. replika.com. Retrieved February 13, 2023 from https://replika.com

Cited By

Inie NStray JDerczynski L(2025)Summon a demon and bind it: A grounded theory of LLM red teamingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.031465820:1(e0314658)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314658
Tófalvy T(2024)„Szia, Alexa!” A hangvezérlés mint új technológia kulturális megalkotása a platform-ökoszisztémábanIn Medias Res10.59851/imr.13.2.1213(182-197)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.13.2.12
Zargham NDubiel MDesai SMildner TBelz H(2024)Designing AI Personalities: Enhancing Human-Agent Interaction Through Thoughtful Persona DesignProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701608(490-494)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701571.3701608
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Metaphors in Voice User Interfaces: A Slippery Fish
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction devices
      1. Sound-based input / output
    2. Interaction paradigms
      1. Natural language interfaces

Recommendations

Examining Humanness as a Metaphor to Design Voice User Interfaces
CUI '24: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces

Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) increasingly leverage ‘humanness’ as a foundational design metaphor, adopting roles like ‘assistants,’ ‘teachers,’ and ‘secretaries’ to foster natural interactions. Yet, this approach can sometimes misalign user trust and ...
Design and Evaluation of Voice User Interfaces: What Should One Consider?
Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications
Abstract
Voice user interfaces (VUI) come in various forms of software or hardware, are controlled by voice, and can help the user in their daily life. Despite VUIs being readily available on smartphones, they have a low adoption rate. This can be ...
Using metaphors to create a natural user interface for microsoft surface
CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Creating a new model of human computer interaction is not straightforward. Only a handful of such models have been commercially successful. Those that have, such as the graphical user interface (GUI), can provide valuable lessons. When we were ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction Volume 30, Issue 6

December 2023

424 pages

ISSN:1073-0516

EISSN:1557-7325

DOI:10.1145/3623488

Editors:
Kristina Höök
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
,
Kasper Hornbæk
University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Issue’s Table of Contents

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 September 2023

Online AM: 15 July 2023

Accepted: 17 May 2023

Revised: 12 May 2023

Received: 07 April 2022

Published in TOCHI Volume 30, Issue 6

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

13
Total Citations
View Citations
1,321
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)722
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)59

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Inie NStray JDerczynski L(2025)Summon a demon and bind it: A grounded theory of LLM red teamingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.031465820:1(e0314658)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314658
Tófalvy T(2024)„Szia, Alexa!” A hangvezérlés mint új technológia kulturális megalkotása a platform-ökoszisztémábanIn Medias Res10.59851/imr.13.2.1213(182-197)Online publication date: 16-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.59851/imr.13.2.12
Zargham NDubiel MDesai SMildner TBelz H(2024)Designing AI Personalities: Enhancing Human-Agent Interaction Through Thoughtful Persona DesignProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701608(490-494)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3701571.3701608
Feldman P(2024)The Voice: Lessons on Trustworthy Conversational Agents from 'Dune'Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665890(1-5)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640794.3665890
Pias SHuang RWilliamson DKim MKapadia A(2024)The Impact of Perceived Tone, Age, and Gender on Voice Assistant Persuasiveness in the Context of Product RecommendationsProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665545(1-15)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640794.3665545
Desai SDubiel MLeiva L(2024)Examining Humanness as a Metaphor to Design Voice User InterfacesProceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces10.1145/3640794.3665535(1-15)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640794.3665535
Chin JDesai SLin SMejia S(2024)Like My Aunt Dorothy: Effects of Conversational Styles on Perceptions, Acceptance and Metaphorical Descriptions of Voice Assistants during Later AdulthoodProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373658:CSCW1(1-21)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637365
Tian MEschrich JSterman S(2024)Designing AI with Metaphors: Leveraging Ambiguity and Defamiliarization to Support Design CreativityProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3664250(537-541)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3635636.3664250
Inie NDruga SZukerman PBender E(2024)From "AI" to Probabilistic Automation: How Does Anthropomorphization of Technical Systems Descriptions Influence Trust?Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659040(2322-2347)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630106.3659040
Desai SWei CSin JDubiel MZargham NAhire SPorcheron MKuzminykh ALee MCandello HFischer JMunteanu CCowan B(2024)CUI@CHI 2024: Building Trust in CUIs—From Design to DeploymentExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636287(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3636287
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Figures

Tables

Media

View full text|Download PDF

View Issue’s Table of Contents