[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
research-article

Quantifying the Effect of Social Presence on Online Social Conformity

Published: 29 May 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Social conformity occurs when individuals in group settings change their personal opinion to be in agreement with the majority's position. While recent literature frequently reports on conformity in online group settings, the causes for online conformity are yet to be fully understood. This study aims to understand how social presencei.e., the sense of being connected to others via mediated communication, influences conformity among individuals placed in online groups while answering subjective and objective questions. Acknowledging its multifaceted nature, we investigate three aspects of online social presence: user representation (generic vs.user-specific avatars), interactivity (discussion vs.no discussion ), and response visibility (public vs.private ). Our results show an overall conformity rate of 30% and main effects from task objectivity, group size difference between the majority and the minority, and self-confidence on personal answer. Furthermore, we observe an interaction effect between interactivity and response visibility, such that conformity is highest in the presence of peer discussion and public responses, and lowest when these two elements are absent. We conclude with a discussion on the implications of our findings in designing online group settings, accounting for the effects of social presence on conformity.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (v4cscw055aux.zip)
Read Me 1. The attached file includes the 18 multiple choice quiz questions used for this research study. 2. Each multiple choice question has 4 answer options. 3. The questions are organised into two subsections (as per the requirement of the study): objective and subjective questions. 4. Each objective question has one correct answer (in bold). 5. The document is in pdf format and can be opened in a web browser or any other conventional pdf reader.

References

[1]
John G Adair. 1972. Demand characteristics or conformity?: Suspiciousness of deception and experimenter bias in conformity research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, Vol. 4, 3 (1972), 238.
[2]
Solomon E Asch. 1951. Groups, leadership and men .Carnegie Press, Oxford, England, Chapter: Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements, 177--190.
[3]
Solomon E Asch. 1955. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, Vol. 193, 5 (1955), 31--35.
[4]
Louise Barkhuus and Juliana Tashiro. 2010. Student Socialization in the Age of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 133--142. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753347
[5]
Douglas Bates, Martin M"achler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 67, 1 (2015), 1--48.
[6]
Tanya Beran, Michelle Drefs, Alyshah Kaba, Noof Al Baz, and Nouf Al Harbi. 2015. Conformity of responses among graduate students in an online environment. The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 25 (2015), 63--69.
[7]
Robert R Blake, Harry Helson, and Jane Srygley Mouton. 1957. The Generality of Conformity Behavior as a Function of Factual Anchorage. Difficulty of Task, and Amount of Social Pressure. Journal of Personality, Vol. 25, 3 (1957), 294--305.
[8]
Benjamin M. Bolker, Mollie E. Brooks, Connie J. Clark, Shane W. Geange, John R. Poulsen, M. Henry H. Stevens, and Jada-Simone S. White. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 24, 3 (2009), 127--135.
[9]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[10]
Michael J. Brzozowski, Phil Adams, and Ed H. Chi. 2015. Google
[11]
Communities As Plazas and Topic Boards. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3779--3788. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702600
[12]
Jennifer D Campbell, Abraham Tesser, and Patricia J Fairey. 1986. Conformity and attention to the stimulus: Some temporal and contextual dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 2 (1986), 315--324.
[13]
Emily Christofides, Towhidul Islam, and Serge Desmarais. 2009. Gender stereotyping over instant messenger: The effects of gender and context. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25, 4 (2009), 897--901.
[14]
Robert B Cialdini. 2001. Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, 9 (2001), 72--81.
[15]
Robert B Cialdini and Noah J Goldstein. 2004. Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol., Vol. 55 (2004), 591--621.
[16]
Joanie B Connell, Gerald A Mendelsohn, Richard W Robins, John Canny, and John Canny. 2001. Effects of communication medium on interpersonal perceptions. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, 117--124.
[17]
Morton Deutsch and Harold B Gerard. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 3 (1955), 629--636.
[18]
Leonard W Ferguson. 1944. An analysis of the generality of suggestibility to group opinion. Journal of Personality, Vol. 12, 3 (1944), 237--243.
[19]
David R Fortin and Ruby Roy Dholakia. 2005. Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of business research, Vol. 58, 3 (2005), 387--396.
[20]
D Randy Garrison, Terry Anderson, and Walter Archer. 2001. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, Vol. 15, 1 (2001), 7--23.
[21]
Solomon C Goldberg. 1954. Three situational determinants of conformity to social norms. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, 3 (1954), 325--329.
[22]
Jorge Goncalves, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jayant Venkatanathan. 2013. Narrowcasting in Social Media: Effects and Perceptions. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 502--509.
[23]
Li Gong. 2008. How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, 4 (2008), 1494--1509.
[24]
Charlotte N Gunawardena. 1995. Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International journal of educational telecommunications, Vol. 1, 2 (1995), 147--166.
[25]
Charlotte N Gunawardena and Frank J Zittle. 1997. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American journal of distance education, Vol. 11, 3 (1997), 8--26.
[26]
Joseph F Hair, William C Black, Barry J Babin, Rolph E Anderson, and RL Tatham. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson, New Jersey, NJ, USA.
[27]
Khaled Hassanein and Milena Head. 2007. Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 65, 8 (2007), 689--708.
[28]
Khaled S Hassanein and M Head. 2004. Building online trust through socially rich web interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd annual conference on privacy, security and trust, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. 15--22.
[29]
Traci J Hess, Mark Fuller, and Damon E Campbell. 2009. Designing interfaces with social presence: Using vividness and extraversion to create social recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 10, 12 (2009), 1.
[30]
Jessica Hullman, Eytan Adar, and Priti Shah. 2011. The Impact of Social Information on Visual Judgments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1461--1470. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979157
[31]
Chester A. Insko, Richard H. Smith, Mark D. Alicke, Joel Wade, and Sylvester Taylor. 1985. Conformity and Group Size: The Concern with Being Right and the Concern with Being Liked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 11, 1 (1985), 41--50.
[32]
Adam N. Joinson. 2008. Looking at, Looking Up or Keeping Up with People?: Motives and Use of Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1027--1036. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357213
[33]
Jitendra Kumar. 1983. Conformity behavior as a function of confederates' age and size of the confederate group. Personality Study & Group Behaviour, Vol. 3 (1983), 69--73.
[34]
Lieve Laporte, Christof van Nimwegen, and Alex J. Uyttendaele. 2010. Do People Say What They Think: Social Conformity Behavior in Varying Degrees of Online Social Presence. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305--314.
[35]
Bibb Latané. 1981. The psychology of social impact. American psychologist, Vol. 36, 4 (1981), 343.
[36]
Eun-Ju Lee. 2004. Effects of gendered character representation on person perception and informational social influence in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 20, 6 (2004), 779--799.
[37]
Eun-Ju Lee. 2007. Wired for gender: Experientiality and gender-stereotyping in computer-mediated communication. Media Psychology, Vol. 10, 2 (2007), 182--210.
[38]
Eun-Ju Lee and Clifford Nass. 2002. Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communication: When interacting via computers differs from interacting with computers. Human Communication Research, Vol. 28, 3 (2002), 349--381.
[39]
John M Levine. 1999. Solomon Asch's legacy for group research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 3, 4 (1999), 358--364.
[40]
Wendy Liu and Derek Ruths. 2013. What's in a name? Using first names as features for gender inference in twitter, In 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium Series. AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report, Vol. SS-13-01, 10--16.
[41]
Yong Liu, Jayant Venkatanathan, Jorge Goncalves, Evangelos Karapanos, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2014. Modeling What Friendship Patterns on Facebook Reveal About Personality and Social Capital. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., Vol. 21, 3, Article Article 17 (June 2014), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2617572
[42]
Patrick R Lowenthal and Chareen Snelson. 2017. In search of a better understanding of social presence: an investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, Vol. 38, 2 (2017), 141--159.
[43]
Paul Benjamin Lowry, Tom L Roberts, Nicholas C Romano Jr, Paul D Cheney, and Ross T Hightower. 2006. The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference? Small Group Research, Vol. 37, 6 (2006), 631--661.
[44]
Misa Maruyama, Scott P. Robertson, Sara Douglas, Roxanne Raine, and Bryan Semaan. 2017. Social Watching a Civic Broadcast: Understanding the Effects of Positive Feedback and Other Users' Opinions. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 794--807.
[45]
Misa T. Maruyama, Scott P. Robertson, Sara K. Douglas, Bryan C. Semaan, and Heather A. Faucett. 2014. Hybrid Media Consumption: How Tweeting During a Televised Political Debate Influences the Vote Decision. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1422--1432.
[46]
Katelyn YA McKenna and Amie S Green. 2002. Virtual group dynamics. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol. 6, 1 (2002), 116--127.
[47]
Brian Mullen. 1983. Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, 4 (1983), 295--322.
[48]
Kristine L Nowak and Frank Biocca. 2003. The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, Vol. 12, 5 (2003), 481--494.
[49]
Julie Prescott, Terry Hanley, and Katalin Ujhelyi Gomez. 2019. Why do young people use online forums for mental health and emotional support? Benefits and challenges. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling (2019), 1--11.
[50]
Vincent Price, Lilach Nir, and Joseph N Cappella. 2006. Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory, Vol. 16, 1 (2006), 47--74.
[51]
Rabindra Ratan, David Beyea, Benjamin J Li, and Luis Graciano. 2019. Avatar characteristics induce users' behavioral conformity with small-to-medium effect sizes: a meta-analysis of the proteus effect. Media Psychology (2019), 1--25.
[52]
Bernardo Reynolds, Jayant Venkatanathan, Jorge Goncc alves, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2011. Sharing Ephemeral Information in Online Social Networks: Privacy Perceptions and Behaviours. In Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2011, Pedro Campos, Nicholas Graham, Joaquim Jorge, Nuno Nunes, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 204--215.
[53]
Jennifer Richardson and Karen Swan. 2003. Examing social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, Vol. 7, 1 (2003), 68--88.
[54]
Michael Rosander and Oskar Eriksson. 2012. Conformity on the Internet--The role of task difficulty and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 28, 5 (2012), 1587--1595.
[55]
Leon Rosenberg. 1961. Group size, prior experience, and conformity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 63, 2 (1961), 436--437.
[56]
Victor Savicki, Merle Kelley, and E Oesterreich. 1999. Judgments of gender in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 15, 2 (1999), 185--194.
[57]
Eva Sharma and Munmun De Choudhury. 2018a. Mental Health Support and Its Relationship to Linguistic Accommodation in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 641, 13 pages.
[58]
Eva Sharma and Munmun De Choudhury. 2018b. Mental Health Support and Its Relationship to Linguistic Accommodation in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 641, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174215
[59]
John Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
[60]
David J Stang. 1976. Ineffective deception in conformity research: Some causes and consequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 6, 3 (1976), 353--367.
[61]
Abhay Sukumaran, Stephanie Vezich, Melanie McHugh, and Clifford Nass. 2011. Normative Influences on Thoughtful Online Participation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3401--3410.
[62]
Abraham Tesser, Jennifer Campbell, and Susan Mickler. 1983. The role of social pressure, attention to the stimulus, and self-doubt in conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 13, 3 (1983), 217--233.
[63]
Chih-Hsiung Tu and Marina McIsaac. 2002. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. The American journal of distance education, Vol. 16, 3 (2002), 131--150.
[64]
Jayant Venkatanathan, Evangelos Karapanos, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Gonccalves. 2012. Network, Personality and Social Capital. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 326--329. https://doi.org/10.1145/2380718.2380760
[65]
Jayant Venkatanathan, Vassilis Kostakos, Evangelos Karapanos, and Jorge Gonçalves. 2013. Online Disclosure of Personally Identifiable Information with Strangers: Effects of Public and Private Sharing. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 26, 6 (11 2013), 614--626. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwt058 https://doi.org/10.1145/3359247
[66]
Senuri Wijenayake, Niels van Berkel, Vassilis Kostakos, and Jorge Goncalves. 2020 b. Impact of contextual and personal determinants on online social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior (2020), 106302.
[67]
Haiyi Zhu, Bernardo Huberman, and Yarun Luon. 2012. To Switch or Not to Switch: Understanding Social Influence in Online Choices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2257--2266. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208383

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing Cognitive and Social Awareness among Group Members in AI-assisted CollaborationProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701582(338-350)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Effect of Explanation Conceptualisations on Trust in AI-assisted Credibility AssessmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869228:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Collaborating with Bots and Automation on OpenStreetMapACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/366532631:3(1-30)Online publication date: 17-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 4, Issue CSCW1
CSCW
May 2020
1285 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3403424
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 29 May 2020
Published in PACMHCI Volume 4, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. interactivity
  2. majority size
  3. online social conformity
  4. online social presence
  5. response visibility
  6. self-confidence
  7. task objectivity
  8. user representation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)192
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28
Reflects downloads up to 13 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing Cognitive and Social Awareness among Group Members in AI-assisted CollaborationProceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3701571.3701582(338-350)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Effect of Explanation Conceptualisations on Trust in AI-assisted Credibility AssessmentProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869228:CSCW2(1-31)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Collaborating with Bots and Automation on OpenStreetMapACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/366532631:3(1-30)Online publication date: 17-May-2024
  • (2024)AI-Driven Mediation Strategies for Audience Depolarisation in Online DebatesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642322(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)A Review of Online Social Conformity: Outcomes and DeterminantsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2424385(1-30)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Mapping in harmony: Co-designing user interfaces for conflict management on OSMInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103316190(103316)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Peer-supplied credibility labels as an online misinformation interventionInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103276188:COnline publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Managing Social Presence in Collaborative Learning with Agent FacilitationSustainability10.3390/su1507618515:7(6185)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Effects of External Factors on User Behaviour towards Influencer Generated Online MisinformationProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638399(86-98)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Upvotes? Downvotes? No Votes? Understanding the relationship between reaction mechanisms and political discourse on RedditProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580644(1-28)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media