[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ skip to main content
10.1145/1011870.1011896acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Technology trouble? talk to us: findings from an ethnographic field study

Published: 27 July 2004 Publication History

Abstract

The notion that the design of technology is only fully completed when in use [23] is shared by many who now investigate user participation in design and the domestication of new technologies. Taking this idea as our starting point, we developed a research to action project with a major Canadian hospital. Our goals were to address technology implementation issues that arose as most units in the hospital moved to a new building, in which most technology (ranging from wired beds to drug dispensing machines) was new. This paper reports our findings from this project. Emphasis is placed on how institutional arrangements influenced the range of socio-technical possibilities that could be pursued [7]. Work practice problems are discussed in relation to the meso or organizational contexts, including organizational, vendor and staff actor networks.

References

[1]
Balka, E. Sometimes Texts Speak Louder than Users: Locating Invisible Work Through Textual Analysis. In A.F. Grundy, D. Kohler, V. Oechtering and U. Petersen (Eds.). Women, Work and Computerization: Spinning a Web from Past to Future. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1997, 163--176.
[2]
Berg, M. Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 55 (1999), 87--101.
[3]
Berg, M. Working with protocols: A sociological view. The Netherlands Journal of Medicine, 49 (1996), 119--125.
[4]
Borel, J.M., and Rascati, K.L. Effect of an Automated Nursing Unit-Based Drug Dispensing Device on Medication Errors. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 52 (1995), 1875--1879.
[5]
Bowker, G., and Star, S.L. Sorting things out; Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999.
[6]
Gartner, J., and Wagner I. Mapping actors and agendas: Political frameworks of systems design and participation. Human-Computer Interaction, 11 (1996), 187--214.
[7]
Hanseth, O., Monteiro, E., and Hatling, M. Developing information infrastructure: The tension between standardization and flexibility. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21, 4(1996), 407--426.
[8]
Hanseth, O. Information technology as infrastructure. Gothenburg Studies in Informatics Report #10 (Doctoral Dissertation). Department of Informatics, Göteborg, Sweden, 1996.
[9]
Hart, E. and Bond, M. Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995.
[10]
Holter, I.M., and Schwartz-Barcott, D. Action research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 128, (1993), 298--304.
[11]
Karasti, H. Increasing sensitivity towards everyday work practice in system design (Academic Dissertation). Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, Finland, 2001.
[12]
Korpela, M., Mursu, A., Abimbola Soriyan, H., and Eerola, A. Information systems research and information systems practice in a network of activities. In Dittrich, Y., Floyd, C., and Klischewski, R. (Eds.) Social thinking -- software practice. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 2002, 287--308.
[13]
Law, J. Notes on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy and Heterogeneity. Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University, 1992.
[14]
Lee, L.W., et al. (1992). Use of an Automated Medication Storage and Distribution System. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 49, 851--55.
[15]
Monterio E., Hanseth O. Social Shaping of Information Infrastructure: On Being Specific about the Technology. In: Orlikowski W., Walsham W.J., Jones M.R., DeGross J.I., Eds. Information Technology and Changes in Organisational Work. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1995, 325--43.
[16]
Novek, J. IT, gender and professional practice: Or, why an automated drug distribution system was sent back to the manufacturer. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27, 3 (2002), 379--403.
[17]
Novek, J., Bettess, S., Burke, K. & Johnston, P. Nurses' perceptions of the reliability of an automated medication dispensing system. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 14, 2(2000), 1 -- 13.
[18]
Randall, D., Hughes, J., and Shapiro, D. Systems development -- The fourth dimension perspectives on the social organization of work. Paper presented at he SPRU CICT Conference, Sussex University, 1991.
[19]
Ray, M.D., Aldrich, L.T., and Lew, P.J. Experience with an Automated Point of Use Unit-Dose Drug Distribution System. Hospital Pharmacy, 30, 1(1995), pp. 18, 20--23, 27--30.
[20]
Robertson, T. Participatory design and participative practices in small companies. In Bloomberg, J., Kensing, F., and Dykstra-Erickson, E. (Eds.) PDC '96: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. Cambridge, Mass: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility, 1996, 35--43.
[21]
Schwarz, H.O., and Bradowy, B.A. Implementation and Evaluation of Automated Dispensing Systems. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 52, (1995), 823--828.
[22]
Star, S.L. & Strauss, A. Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, (1999), 9--30.
[23]
Suchman, L., and Jordan, B. Computerization and women's knowledge. In Women, work and computerization: IFIP conference proceedings, Amsterdam, 1988.
[24]
Suchman, L. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[25]
Taylor JR, Groleau C, Heaton L, Van Every E. The Computerization of Work: A Communcication Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage, 2001.
[26]
Tribble, D.A. How Automated Systems Can (and Do) Fail. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 53, (1996), 2622--2627. Vancouver Coastal Health Authority. Tower Move Project -- Project Charter, 2003.
[27]
Vancouver General Hospital chooses Omnicell for automated pharmacy dispensing http://www.omnicell.com/News/pf_release_display.asp?page=139 Accessed Feb. 12, 2004.
[28]
Westrup, C. On retrieving skilled practices: The contribution of ethnography to software development. In Dittrich, Y., Floyd, C., and Klischewski, R. (Eds.) Social thinking -- software practice. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press, 2002, 91--110.
[29]
Wise, L.C., et al. Cost Benefit Analysis of an Automated Medication System. Nursing Economics, 14, 4(1996), 224--23

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
PDC 04: Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Volume 1
July 2004
245 pages
ISBN:1581138512
DOI:10.1145/1011870
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 July 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 14 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Off-the-shelf digital tools as a resource to nurture the commonsProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 110.1145/3536169.3537787(133-146)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2022
  • (2013)A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in HealthcareComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-012-9168-022:4-6(609-665)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2013
  • (2011)Selecting users for participation in IT projectsInteracting with Computers10.1016/j.intcom.2011.02.00623:2(176-187)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011
  • (2008)Participative design and the challenges of large-scale systemsProceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 200810.5555/1795234.1795236(1-10)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008
  • (2007)Sorting Attachments: Usefulness of STS in Healthcare Practice and PolicyScience as Culture10.1080/0950543070156863616:3(237-251)Online publication date: Sep-2007
  • (2006)Making things workProceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work10.1145/1180875.1180912(229-238)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2006
  • (2006)Inside the belly of the beastProceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 110.1145/1147261.1147281(134-143)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006
  • (2006)Designing an immersive environment for public useProceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 110.1145/1147261.1147267(31-40)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006
  • (2005)Reconfiguring critical computing in an era of configurabilityProceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility10.1145/1094562.1094572(79-88)Online publication date: 20-Aug-2005

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media