[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Combinatorial shell bounds for generalization ability

  • Mathematical Methods in Pattern Recognition
  • Published:
Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

We consider a problem of supervised statistical learning for a finite population and obtain PAC generalization bounds within the combinatorial PAC framework. Combinatorial counterparts of Langford shell bounds are obtained and are shown to be either the particular case of the Occam razor bound or a variant of Vapnik-Chervonenkis bound and similarly loose in both cases. The reasons for looseness of shell bounds are analyzed, the bounds are compared experimentally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. N. Vapnik and A. Y. Chervonenkis, “On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of E vents to Their Probabilities,” Theory Probab. Its Appl. 16, 264–280 (1971).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L. G. Valiant, “A Theory of the Learnable,” in Proc. 16th Ann. ACM Symp. On Theory of Computing—ACM (Boston, 1984), pp. 436–445.

  3. O. Bousquet, S. Boucheron, and G. Lugosi, “Introduction to Statistical Learning Theory,” in Advanced Lectures in Machine Learning (Springer, 2004), pp. 169–207.

  4. S. Boucheron, O. Bousquet, and G. Lugosi, “Theory of Classification: Some Recent Advances,” ESAIM Probab. Stat. 9, 323–375 (2005).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Haussler, N. Littlestone, and M. Warmuth, “Predicting (0, 1)-Functions on Randomly Drawn Points,” in Ann. IEEE Symp. On Foundations of Computer Science (White Plains, NY, 1988), pp. 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Valliant, A. H. Dorfman, and R. M. Royall, Finite Population Sampling and Inference: A Prediction Approach (Wiley, 2000).

  7. K. V. Vorontsov, “Combinatorial Probability and the Tightness of Generalization Bounds,” Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 18, No. 2, 243–259 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. A. Kochedykov, “Combinatorial Generalization Bounds Using the Splitting of Hypothesis Spaces” in Proc. Contemporary Problems of Fundamental and Applied Sciences (Moscow, 2008).

  9. K. V. Vorontsov, “Splitting and Similarity Phenomena in the Sets of Classifiers and Their Effect on the Probability of Overfitting,” Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 19, No. 3, 412–420 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. V. Vorontsov, “Tight Bounds for the Probability of Overfitting,” Dokl. Math. 80, No. 3, 793–796 (2009).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Kochedykov, “Connective Structures in Hypothesis Space and Generalization Bounds” in Proc. Conf. Mathematical Methods of Pattern Recognition (Suzdal, 2009) [in Russian].

  12. K. V. Vorontsov, “Exact Combinatorial Bounds on the Probability of Overfitting for Empirical Risk Minimization,” Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 20, No. 3, 269–285 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Langford and D. McAllester, “Computable Shell Decomposition Bounds,” J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 529–547 (2004).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Langford, “Quantitatively Tight Sample Complexity Bounds,” PhD. Thesis (Carnegie Mellon Univ., 2002).

  15. V. N. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory (Wiley, 1998).

  16. N. L. Johnson, S. Kotz, and A. W. Kemp, Univariate Discrete Distributions (Wiley Intersci., 1992).

  17. D. A. Kochedykov, “A Combinatorial Approach to Hypotheses Similarity in Generalization Bounds,” (2010)—submitted.

  18. D. Hush and C. Scovel, “Concentration of Hypergeometric Distribution,” Stat. Probab. Lett. 75, No. 2, 127–132 (2005).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Haussler, M. Kearns, H. S. Seung and N. Tishby, “Rigorous Learning Curve Bounds from Statistical Mechanics,” Mach. Learn., No. 25, 195–236 (1996).

  20. T. SHeffer and T. Joachims, “Expected Model Analisys for Model Selection,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Model Selection (1999).

  21. M. Anthony and P. Bartlett, Learning in Neural Networks: Theoretical Foundations (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999).

  22. C. B. Barber, D. Dobkin, and H. Huhdanpaa, “The Quickhull Algorithm for Convex Hulls,” ACM Trans. Math. Software 22, No. 4, 469–483 (1996).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. A. Kochedykov.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Denis A. Kochedykov. Graduated from Moscow State University, Computational Mathematics and Cybernatics Department (Master’s degree in Applied Mathematics) in 2005 and from Far Eastern State University (Specialist degree in Theoretical Physics) in 2001. At present, doctoral candidate at Dorodnicyn Computing Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences. Scientific interests: machine learning, statistics, statistical learning theory, and combinatorics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kochedykov, D.A. Combinatorial shell bounds for generalization ability. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 20, 459–473 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661810040061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661810040061

Keywords

Navigation