[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Navigating Social and Institutional Barriers to Markets: How Social Entrepreneurs Identify and Evaluate Opportunities

  • Chapter
Social Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Entrepreneurship research can be broadly placed into three categories: that which examines the people (entrepreneurs); that which examines the process and that which examines the entrepreneurial or business opportunities. This chapter specifically looks at social entrepreneurial opportunities and the process of identifying and evaluating these types of opportunities. I address three important questions:

  • What makes social entrepreneurial opportunities different from other types of opportunities?

  • What makes social entrepreneurship special?

  • How do social entrepreneurs find social entrepreneurial opportunities?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 103.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 129.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. 1999. Are small firms important? Their role and impact. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. 1988. Innovation in small and large firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4): 678–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvord, S. H., Brown, D. L. and Letts, C. W. 2004. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation: An exploratory study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3): 260–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, J. S. 1956. Barriers to new competition. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, D. 2004. How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, L. A. and Siplon, P. D. 2004. Toward nonprofit organization reform in the voluntary spirit: Lessons from the internet. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(3): 435–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. R., Bigelow, L. S., Siedel, M. L. and Tsai, L. B. 1996. The fates of De Novo and De Alio producers in the American automobile industry, 1885–1981. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 117–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. 1982. The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. B. 1907. The Essentials of Economic Theory. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. 1998. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Paper. Centre for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, Durham. Available: http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case/doc-uments/dees_SE.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles (eds), Networks and organizations, structure, form and action: 25–56. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1999. The economic sociology of firms and entrepreneurs. In A. Portes (ed.), The Economic Sociology of Immigration: Essays in Networks, Ethnicity and Entrepreneurship: 128–65. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., Carroll, G. R., Dundon, E. A. and Torres, J. C. 1995. Organizational evolution in a multinational context: Entries of automobile manufacturers in Belgium, Britain, France, Germany and Italy. American Sociological Review, 60: 509–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. 1981. Barriers to entry and competitive strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 2: 395–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35(4): 519–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P. and Clay, K. 2000. The choice-within-constraints New Institutionalism and implications for Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 525–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P. and Simons, T. 2000. State formation, ideological competition, and the ecology of Israeli workers cooperatives, 1920–1992. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1): 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47: 313–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya, F. and Stahl, M. J. 1989. Barriers to entry and market entry decisions in consumer and industrial goods markets. Journal of Marketing, 53(2): 80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. 1997. Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S. and Simons, K. L. 2000. Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the US television receiver industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 997–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. and MacMillian, I. 2000. The entrepreneurial mindset. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. (2nd edn) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. 1994. The informal economy. In N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds) The handbook of economic sociology: 426–49. Princeton: Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A. 2004. An economic sociology of entry barriers: Social and institutional entry barriers to inner city markets. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Columbia University, Graduate School of Business — Management, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronstadt, R. 1988. The corridor principle. Journal of Business Venturing, 3: 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. 1980. Industrial market structure and economic performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, R. 1981. Economies of scale and barriers to entry. Journal of Political Economy, 89: 1228–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. P. 2001. A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the study of opportunity recognition and exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 10–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. L. 2002. The world of the social entrepreneur. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(4/5): 412–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, D. J., Singh, J. V. and Meinhard, A. 1990. Organizational form, population dynamics, and institutional change: The founding patterns of voluntary organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 151–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. 1994. The post-entry performance of new small firms in German manufacturing industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 52: 141–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods (3rd edn) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Jeffrey Robinson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating Social and Institutional Barriers to Markets: How Social Entrepreneurs Identify and Evaluate Opportunities. In: Mair, J., Robinson, J., Hockerts, K. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics