The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering

1. Callister, W. D. Jr & Rethwisch, D. G. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction 8th edn (Wiley, 2007).

2. Langer, R. & Vacanti, J. P. Tissue engineering. Science 260, 920–926 (1993).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

3. Discher, D. E., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143 (2005). A seminal work reporting for the first time that mechanics alone affect the behaviour of cells.

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

4. Yanez, L. Z., Han, J., Behr, B. B., Pera, R. A. R. & Camarillo, D. B. Human oocyte developmental potential is predicted by mechanical properties within hours after fertilization. Nat. Commun. 7, 10809 (2016).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

5. Cross, S. E., Jin, Y. S., Rao, J. & Gimzewski, J. K. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 780–783 (2007).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

6. Baumgart, F. & Cordey, J. Stiffness — an unknown world of mechanical science? Injury 32, 14–23 (2001).

   Google Scholar 

7. Pang, Z., Deeth, H., Sopade, P., Sharma, R. & Bansal, N. Rheology, texture and microstructure of gelatin gels with and without milk proteins. Food Hydrocoll. 35, 484–493 (2014).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

8. Koga, Y., Koga, T., Kinekawa, Y. & Kitabatake, N. Properties of a thermostable emulsion prepared from process whey protein and olive oil; use as a cream-substitute and its practical application to panna-cotta. J. Cook. Sci. Jpn 34, 154–163 (2001).

   Google Scholar 

9. Williams, S. H., Wright, B. W., Truong, V., den, Daubert, C. R. & Vinyard, C. J. Mechanical properties of foods used in experimental studies of primate masticatory function. Am. J. Primatol. 67, 329–346 (2005).

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Perry, J. M. G., Bastian, M. L., St Clair, E. & Hartstone-Rose, A. Maximum ingested food size in captive anthropoids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 158, 92–104 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Davis, J. R. (ed.) Tensile Testing 2nd edn (ASM International, 2004).

12. Wong, B. L., Bae, W. C., Gratz, K. R. & Sah, R. L. Shear deformation kinematics during cartilage articulation: effect of lubrication, degeneration, and stress relaxation. Mol. Cell. Biomech. 5, 197–206 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

13. Pothan, L. A., Oommen, Z. & Thomas, S. Dynamic mechanical analysis of banana fiber reinforced polyester composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 63, 283–293 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

14. Meyers, M. A. & Chawla, K. K. Mechanical Behavior of Materials 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

15. Cross, R. Elastic and viscous properties of Silly Putty. Am. J. Phys. 80, 870–875 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

16. Omari, E. A., Varghese, T., Kliewer, M. A., Harter, J. & Hartenbach, E. M. Dynamic and quasi-static mechanical testing for characterization of the viscoelastic properties of human uterine tissue. J. Biomech. 48, 1730–1736 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Karunaratne, A., Li, S. & Bull, A. M. J. Nano-scale mechanisms explain the stiffening and strengthening of ligament tissue with increasing strain rate. Sci. Rep. 8, 3707 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

18. Wang, L. & Liu, X. Characterization of viscoelastic materials by quasi-static and dynamic indentation. Meas. Sci. Technol. 25, 064017 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

19. Schapery, R. A. Two simple approximate methods of Laplace transform inversion for viscoelastic stress analysis. Calif. Inst. Technol. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141114-114344034 (1961).

20. Schapery, R. A. Stress analysis of viscoelastic composite materials. J. Compos. Mater. 1, 228–267 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

21. Yofe, A. D. Physics at surfaces. Contemp. Phys. 29, 411–414 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Abazari, A. M., Safavi, S. M., Rezazadeh, G. & Villanueva, L. G. Modelling the size effects on the mechanical properties of micro/nano structures. Sensors 15, 28543–28562 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. McNamara, L. E. et al. The role of microtopography in cellular mechanotransduction. Biomaterials 33, 2835–2847 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

24. Peric, D. et al. On micro-to-macro transitions for multi-scale analysis of non-linear heterogeneous materials: unified variational basis and finite element implementation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 87, 149–170 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Geers, M. G. D., Kouznetsova, V. G. & Brekelmans, W. A. M. Multi-scale computational homogenization: trends and challenges. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234, 2175–2182 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Speirs, D. C. D., de Souza Neto, E. A. & Perić, D. An approach to the mechanical constitutive modelling of arterial tissue based on homogenization and optimization. J. Biomech. 41, 2673–2680 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

27. Hollister, S. J. & Lin, C. Y. Computational design of tissue engineering scaffolds. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 2991–2998 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

28. Kim, S. H., Turnbull, J. & Guimond, S. Extracellular matrix and cell signalling: the dynamic cooperation of integrin, proteoglycan and growth factor receptor. J. Endocrinol. 209, 139–151 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

29. Miller, C. J. & Davidson, L. A. The interplay between cell signalling and mechanics in developmental processes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 733–744 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

30. Alcaraz, J. et al. Laminin and biomimetic extracellular elasticity enhance functional differentiation in mammary epithelia. EMBO J. 27, 2829–2838 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

31. Keane, T. J., Horejs, C. M. & Stevens, M. M. Scarring vs. functional healing: matrix-based strategies to regulate tissue repair. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 129, 407–419 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

32. Sasaki, N. & Odajima, S. Stress–strain curve and Young’s modulus of a collagen molecule as determined by the X-ray diffraction technique. J. Biomech. 29, 655–658 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

33. Wenger, M. P. E., Bozec, L., Horton, M. A. & Mesquidaz, P. Mechanical properties of collagen fibrils. Biophys. J. 93, 1255–1263 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

34. Bornstein, P. & Sage, H. Structurally distinct collagen types. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 957–1003 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

35. Shoulders, M. D. & Raines, R. T. Collagen structure and stability. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 929–958 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

36. Zhang, W., Huang, Z. L., Liao, S. S. & Cui, F. Z. Nucleation sites of calcium phosphate crystals during collagen mineralization. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86, 1052–1054 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

37. Herchenhan, A. et al. Tenocyte contraction induces crimp formation in tendon-like tissue. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 11, 449–459 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

38. Hornsby, J. et al. Quantitative multiphoton microscopy of murine urinary bladder morphology during in situ uniaxial loading. Acta Biomater. 64, 59–66 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Wiesinger, H. P., Rieder, F., Kösters, A., Müller, E. & Seynnes, O. R. Are sport-specific profiles of tendon stiffness and cross-sectional area determined by structural or functional integrity? PLoS One 11, e0158441 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

40. Ma, Y., Feng, X., Rogers, J. A., Huang, Y. & Zhang, Y. Design and application of ‘J-shaped’ stress–strain behavior in stretchable electronics: a review. Lab. Chip 17, 1689–1704 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

41. Wagenseil, J. E. & Mecham, R. P. Elastin in large artery stiffness and hypertension. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 5, 264–273 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

42. Muiznieks, L. D., Weiss, A. S. & Keeley, F. W. Structural disorder and dynamics of elastin. Biochem. Cell Biol. 88, 239–250 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

43. Muiznieks, L. D. & Keeley, F. W. Molecular assembly and mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix: a fibrous protein perspective. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832, 866–875 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

44. Ryan, A. J. & O’Brien, F. J. Insoluble elastin reduces collagen scaffold stiffness, improves viscoelastic properties, and induces a contractile phenotype in smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 73, 296–307 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

45. Tsamis, A., Krawiec, J. T. & Vorp, D. A. Elastin and collagen fibre microstructure of the human aorta in ageing and disease: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20121004 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

46. Ahmadzadeh, H., Connizzo, B. K., Freedman, B. R., Soslowsky, L. J. & Shenoy, V. B. Determining the contribution of glycosaminoglycans to tendon mechanical properties with a modified shear-lag model. J. Biomech. 46, 2497–2503 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

47. Quinn, T. M., Dierickx, P. & Grodzinsky, A. J. Glycosaminoglycan network geometry may contribute to anisotropic hydraulic permeability in cartilage under compression. J. Biomech. 34, 1483–1490 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

48. Tavakoli Nia, H. et al. Aggrecan nanoscale solid–fluid interactions are a primary determinant of cartilage dynamic mechanical properties. ACS Nano 9, 2614–2625 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

49. Klotzsch, E. et al. Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18267–18272 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

50. Dray, N. et al. Cell–fibronectin interactions propel vertebrate trunk elongation via tissue mechanics. Curr. Biol. 23, 1335–1341 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

51. Gautieri, A., Uzel, S., Vesentini, S., Redaelli, A. & Buehler, M. J. Molecular and mesoscale mechanisms of osteogenesis imperfecta disease in collagen fibrils. Biophys. J. 97, 857–865 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

52. Mavilio, F. et al. Correction of junctional epidermolysis bullosa by transplantation of genetically modified epidermal stem cells. Nat. Med. 12, 1397–1402 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

53. Wagner, J. E. et al. Bone marrow transplantation for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 629–639 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

54. Germain, D. P. Clinical and genetic features of vascular Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 16, 391–397 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

55. De Paepe, A. & Malfait, F. The Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, a disorder with many faces. Clin. Genet. 82, 1–11 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

56. Von Erlach, T. C. et al. Cell-geometry-dependent changes in plasma membrane order direct stem cell signalling and fate. Nat. Mater. 17, 237–242 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

57. Kasza, K. E. et al. The cell as a material. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 101–107 (2007). This is the first article to consider cells as a material.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

58. Suresh, S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Mater. 55, 3989–4014 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

59. Fletcher, D. A. & Mullins, R. D. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463, 485–492 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

60. Kumar, S. et al. Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. Biophys. J. 90, 3762–3773 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

61. Salbreux, G., Charras, G. & Paluch, E. Actin cortex mechanics and cellular morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 536–545 (2012). This article offers an interesting perspective on cell cortex dynamics.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

62. Ingber, D. E. Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 97, 163–179 (2008). This article provides a complete overview of tensegrity in cell mechanics and its parallel with tensegrity architecture.

    Article  Google Scholar 

63. Ingber, D. E. From mechanobiology to developmentally inspired engineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170323 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

64. Mandriota, N. et al. Cellular nanoscale stiffness patterns governed by intracellular forces. Nat. Mater. 18, 1071–1077 (2019). The data in this article provide evidence of how much influence intracellular forces and states have on local cellular stiffness.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

65. Condeelis, J. Life at the leading edge: the formation of cell protrusions. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 9, 411–444 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

66. Charras, G. T., Yarrow, J. C., Horton, M. A., Mahadevan, L. & Mitchison, T. J. Non-equilibration of hydrostatic pressure in blebbing cells. Nature 435, 365–369 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

67. Prost, J., Jülicher, F. & Joanny, J. F. Active gel physics. Nat. Phys. 11, 111–117 (2015). An article providing a complete description of the physics of active gels.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

68. Guo, M. et al. Cell volume change through water efflux impacts cell stiffness and stem cell fate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E8618–E8627 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

69. Lekka, M. & Laidler, P. Applicability of AFM in cancer detection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 72–72 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

70. Gavara, N. & Chadwick, R. S. Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical atomic force microscope tips. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 733–736 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

71. Dimitriadis, E. K., Horkay, F., Maresca, J., Kachar, B. & Chadwick, R. S. Determination of elastic moduli of thin layers of soft material using the atomic force microscope. Biophys. J. 82, 2798–2810 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

72. Rianna, C. & Radmacher, M. Comparison of viscoelastic properties of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness substrates. Eur. Biophys. J. 46, 309–324 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

73. Kaushik, G., Fuhrmann, A., Cammarato, A. & Engler, A. J. In situ mechanical analysis of myofibrillar perturbation and aging on soft, bilayered Drosophila myocardium. Biophys. J. 101, 2629–2637 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

74. Tan, J. L. et al. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1484–1489 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

75. Tee, S. Y., Fu, J., Chen, C. S. & Janmey, P. A. Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. Biophys. J. 100, L25–L27 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

76. Gonzalez-Cruz, R. D., Fonseca, V. C. & Darling, E. M. Cellular mechanical properties reflect the differentiation potential of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1523–E1529 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

77. Yu, H. et al. Mechanical behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells during adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 393, 150–155 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

78. Norcross, S., Horsley, V., Mertz, A. F., Rosowski, K. A. & Dufresne, E. R. Edges of human embryonic stem cell colonies display distinct mechanical properties and differentiation potential. Sci. Rep. 5, 14218 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

79. Poh, Y.-C. et al. Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Mater. 9, 82–88 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

80. Das, R. K., Gocheva, V., Hammink, R., Zouani, O. F. & Rowan, A. E. Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment switch in soft responsive hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 15, 318–325 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

81. Leong, K. W., Yim, E. K. F., Kulangara, K., Darling, E. M. & Guilak, F. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31, 1299–1306 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

82. Conte, V. et al. Control of cell–cell forces and collective cell dynamics by the intercellular adhesome. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 409–420 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

83. Latorre, E. et al. Active superelasticity in three-dimensional epithelia of controlled shape. Nature 563, 203–208 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

84. Vincent, R. et al. Active tensile modulus of an epithelial monolayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 248103 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

85. Charras, G. & Yap, A. S. Tensile forces and mechanotransduction at cell–cell junctions. Curr. Biol. 28, R445–R457 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

86. Khalilgharibi, N. et al. Stress relaxation in epithelial monolayers is controlled by the actomyosin cortex. Nat. Phys. 15, 839–847 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

87. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, D., Guevorkian, K., Douezan, S. & Brochard-Wyart, F. Soft matter models of developing tissues and tumors. Science 338, 910–917 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

88. Serwane, F. et al. In vivo quantification of spatially varying mechanical properties in developing tissues. Nat. Methods 14, 181–186 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

89. Mongera, A. et al. A fluid-to-solid jamming transition underlies vertebrate body axis elongation. Nature 561, 401–405 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

90. Stooke-Vaughan, G. A. & Campàs, O. Physical control of tissue morphogenesis across scales. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 51, 111–119 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

91. Rho, J. Y., Ashman, R. B. & Turner, C. H. Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J. Biomech. 26, 111–119 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

92. McDonald, S. J. et al. Early fracture callus displays smooth muscle-like viscoelastic properties ex vivo: implications for fracture healing. J. Orthop. Res. 27, 1508–1513 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

93. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat. Mater. 15, 326–334 (2015). A seminal work on the effect of controlled 3D stress relaxation on the behaviour of stem cells.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

94. Chlasta, J. et al. Variations in basement membrane mechanics are linked to epithelial morphogenesis. Development 144, 4350–4362 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

95. Vuong-Brender, T. T. K., Suman, S. K. & Labouesse, M. The apical ECM preserves embryonic integrity and distributes mechanical stress during morphogenesis. Development 144, 4336–4349 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

96. Nerurkar, N. L., Lee, C. H., Mahadevan, L. & Tabin, C. J. Molecular control of macroscopic forces drives formation of the vertebrate hindgut. Nature 565, 480–484 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

97. Benech, J. C. et al. Diabetes increases stiffness of live cardiomyocytes measured by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 307, C910–C919 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

98. Somlyo, A. P. et al. Ultrastructure, function and composition of smooth muscle. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 11, 579–588 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

99. Darling, E. M., Topel, M., Zauscher, S., Vail, T. P. & Guilak, F. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J. Biomech. 41, 454–464 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

100. Li, X., Das, A. & Bi, D. Mechanical heterogeneity in tissues promotes rigidity and controls cellular invasion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 058101 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

101. Roduit, C. et al. Elastic membrane heterogeneity of living cells revealed by stiff nanoscale membrane domains. Biophys. J. 94, 1521–1532 (2008).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

102. Marturano, J. E. et al. Embryonically inspired scaffolds regulate tenogenically differentiating cells. J. Biomech. 49, 3281–3288 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

103. Sotres, J., Jankovskaja, S., Wannerberger, K. & Arnebrant, T. Ex-vivo force spectroscopy of intestinal mucosa reveals the mechanical properties of mucus blankets. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–14 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

104. Tyler, W. J. The mechanobiology of brain function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 867–878 (2012).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

105. McKee, C. T., Last, J. A., Russell, P. & Murphy, C. J. Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young’s modulus for soft biological tissues. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 17, 155–164 (2011).

     Article  Google Scholar 

106. Does, M. D. et al. Insights into reference point indentation involving human cortical bone: Sensitivity to tissue anisotropy and mechanical behavior. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 37, 174–185 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

107. Haase, K. & Pelling, A. Investigating cell mechanics with atomic force microscopy. J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20140970 (2015).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

108. Saxena, T., Gilbert, J., Stelzner, D. & Hasenwinkel, J. Mechanical characterization of the injured spinal cord after lateral spinal hemisection injury in the rat. J. Neurotrauma 29, 1747–1757 (2012).

     Article  Google Scholar 

109. Oakland, R. J., Hall, R. M., Wilcox, R. K. & Barton, D. C. The biomechanical response of spinal cord tissue to uniaxial loading. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H 220, 489–492 (2006).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

110. Pailler-Mattei, C., Bec, S. & Zahouani, H. In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests. Med. Eng. Phys. 30, 599–606 (2008).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

111. Pissarenko, A. et al. Tensile behavior and structural characterization of pig dermis. Acta Biomater. 86, 77–95 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

112. Iskratsch, T., Wolfenson, H. & Sheetz, M. P. Appreciating force and shape — the rise of mechanotransduction in cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 825–833 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

113. Guo, K. & Buehler, M. J. Nature’s way: hierarchical strength weakness. Matter 1, 302–303 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

114. Ramakrishna, S., Mayer, J., Wintermantel, E. & Leong, K. W. Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 1189–1224 (2001).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

115. Zhang, G. et al. Development of tendon structure and function: regulation of collagen fibrillogenesis. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 5, 5–21 (2005).

     CAS  Google Scholar 

116. Agache, P. G., Monneur, C., Leveque, J. L. & De Rigal, J. Mechanical properties and Young’s modulus of human skin in vivo. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 269, 221–232 (1980).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

117. Menon, G. K. New insights into skin structure: scratching the surface. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54, S3–S17 (2002).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

118. Skulborstad, A. J., Swartz, S. M. & Goulbourne, N. C. Biaxial mechanical characterization of bat wing skin. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10, 36004 (2015).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

119. Hamasaki, T., Yamaguchi, T. & Iwamoto, M. Estimating the influence of age-related changes in skin stiffness on tactile perception for static stimulations. J. Biomech. Sci. Eng. 13, 17–00575 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

120. Cui, J., Lee, C. H., Delbos, A., McManus, J. J. & Crosby, A. J. Cavitation rheology of the eye lens. Soft Matter 7, 7827–7831 (2011).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

121. Krag, S. & Andreassen, T. T. Mechanical properties of the human posterior lens capsule. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 691 (2003).

     Article  Google Scholar 

122. Danielsen, C. C. Tensile mechanical and creep properties of Descemet’s membrane and lens capsule. Exp. Eye Res. 79, 343–350 (2004).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

123. Besner, S., Scarcelli, G., Pineda, R. & Yun, S. H. In vivo Brillouin analysis of the aging crystalline lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, 5093–5100 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

124. Tenorio, L. E. M., Devine, K. J., Lee, J., Kowalewski, T. M. & Barocas, V. H. Biomechanics of human parietal pleura in uniaxial extension. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 75, 330–335 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

125. Davis, N. F. et al. Urinary bladder vs gastrointestinal tissue: a comparative study of their biomechanical properties for urinary tract reconstruction. Urology 113, 235–240 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

126. Faingold, A. et al. The effect of hydration on mechanical anisotropy, topography and fibril organization of the osteonal lamellae. J. Biomech. 47, 367–372 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

127. Milovanovic, P. et al. Age-related deterioration in trabecular bone mechanical properties at material level: nanoindentation study of the femoral neck in women by using AFM. Exp. Gerontol. 47, 154–159 (2012).

     Article  Google Scholar 

128. Melo, E. et al. Effects of the decellularization method on the local stiffness of acellular lungs. Tissue Eng. Part C 20, 412–422 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

129. Peloso, A. et al. The human pancreas as a source of protolerogenic extracellular matrix scaffold for a new-generation bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Ann. Surg. 264, 169–179 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

130. Omidi, E. et al. Characterization and assessment of hyperelastic and elastic properties of decellularized human adipose tissues. J. Biomech. 47, 3657–3663 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

131. Ocal, S., Ozcan, U. M., Basdogan, I. & Basdogan, C. Effect of preservation period on the viscoelastic material properties of soft tissues with implications for liver transplantation. J. Biomech. Eng. 132, 101007 (2010).

     Article  Google Scholar 

132. Yamashita, J., Furman, B. R., Rawls, H. R., Wang, X. & Agrawal, C. M. The use of dynamic mechanical analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 58, 47–53 (2001).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

133. Buckwalter, J. A. & Mankin, H. J. Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. Instrum. Course Lect. 47, 487–504 (1998).

     CAS  Google Scholar 

134. Zhu, W., Mow, V. C., Koob, T. J. & Eyre, D. R. Viscoelastic shear properties of articular cartilage and the effects of glycosidase treatments. J. Orthop. Res. 11, 771–781 (1993).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

135. Nickien, M., Thambyah, A. & Broom, N. D. How a decreased fibrillar interconnectivity influences stiffness and swelling properties during early cartilage degeneration. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 75, 390–398 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

136. Brommer, H. et al. Functional consequences of cartilage degeneration in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint: quantitative assessment of cartilage stiffness. Equine Vet. J. 37, 462–467 (2005).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

137. Kamiya, A. & Togawa, T. Adaptive regulation of wall shear stress to flow change in the canine carotid artery. Am. J. Physiol. 239, H14–H21 (1980).

     CAS  Google Scholar 

138. Alkhouli, N. et al. The mechanical properties of human adipose tissues and their relationships to the structure and composition of the extracellular matrix. AJP Endocrinol. Metab. 305, E1427–E1435 (2013).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

139. Wood, L. K. & Brooks, S. V. Ten weeks of treadmill running decreases stiffness and increases collagen turnover in tendons of old mice. J. Orthop. Res. 34, 346–353 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

140. Peñuela, L. et al. Atomic force microscopy for biomechanical and structural analysis of human dermis: a complementary tool for medical diagnosis and therapy monitoring. Exp. Dermatol. 27, 150–155 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

141. Crichton, M. L. et al. The viscoelastic, hyperelastic and scale dependent behaviour of freshly excised individual skin layers. Biomaterials 32, 4670–4681 (2011).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

142. Lampi, M. C. & Reinhart-King, C. A. Targeting extracellular matrix stiffness to attenuate disease: from molecular mechanisms to clinical trials. Sci. Transl Med. 10, eaao0475 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

143. Stefanescu, H. et al. Spleen stiffness measurement using fibroscan for the noninvasive assessment of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 26, 164–170 (2011).

     Article  Google Scholar 

144. Hu, X. et al. Indirect prediction of liver fibrosis by quantitative measurement of spleen stiffness using the fibroscan system. J. Ultrasound Med. 33, 73–81 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

145. Veiga, Z. S. T. et al. Transient elastography evaluation of hepatic and spleen stiffness in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 29, 730–735 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

146. Pawluś, A. et al. Shear wave elastography of the spleen: evaluation of spleen stiffness in healthy volunteers. Abdom. Radiol. 41, 2169–2174 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

147. Chien, C. H. et al. Transient elastography for spleen stiffness measurement in patients with cirrhosis role in degree of thrombocytopenia. J. Ultrasound Med. 35, 1849–1857 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

148. Kalli, M. & Stylianopoulos, T. Defining the role of solid stress and matrix stiffness in cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Front. Oncol. 8, 55 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

149. Mancini, M. L. & Sonis, S. T. Mechanisms of cellular fibrosis associated with cancer regimen-related toxicities. Front. Pharmacol. 5, 51 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

150. Coelho, N. M. & McCulloch, C. A. Contribution of collagen adhesion receptors to tissue fibrosis. Cell Tissue Res. 365, 521–538 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

151. Martinez, F. J. et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis review. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 3, 17074 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

152. Meng, X. M., Nikolic-Paterson, D. J. & Lan, H. Y. Inflammatory processes in renal fibrosis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 10, 493–503 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

153. Tsochatzis, E. A., Bosch, J. & Burroughs, A. K. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet 383, 1749–1761 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

154. Li, Q., Chen, L. & Zhou, Y. Diagnostic accuracy of liver stiffness measurement in chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels. Sci. Rep. 8, 5224 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

155. Ogawa, S. et al. Relationship between liver tissue stiffness and histopathological findings analyzed by shear wave elastography and compression testing in rats with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Med. Ultrason. 43, 355–360 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

156. Pang, J. X. Q. et al. Liver stiffness by transient elastography predicts liver-related complications and mortality in patients with chronic liver disease. PLoS One 9, e95776 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

157. Desai, S. S. et al. Physiological ranges of matrix rigidity modulate primary mouse hepatocyte function in part through hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha. Hepatology 64, 261–275 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

158. Li, Q. S., Lee, G. Y. H., Ong, C. N. & Lim, C. T. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 374, 609–613 (2008).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

159. Gaikwad, R. M., Woodworth, C. D., Sokolov, I., Subba-Rao, V. & Iyer, S. Atomic force microscopy detects differences in the surface brush of normal and cancerous cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 389–393 (2009).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

160. Wong, R. et al. AFM-based analysis of human metastatic cancer cells. Nanotechnology 19, 384003 (2008).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

161. Lekka, M. Discrimination between normal and cancerous cells using AFM. Bionanoscience 6, 65–80 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

162. Maciaszek, J. L. & Lykotrafitis, G. Sickle cell trait human erythrocytes are significantly stiffer than normal. J. Biomech. 44, 657–661 (2011).

     Article  Google Scholar 

163. Lin, H.-H. et al. Mechanical phenotype of cancer cells: cell softening and loss of stiffness sensing. Oncotarget 6, 20946–20958 (2015).

     Google Scholar 

164. Gilkes, D. M. et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors mediate coordinated RhoA-ROCK1 expression and signaling in breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E384–E393 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

165. Dvorak, H. F. Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 1650–1659 (1986).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

166. Dias Carvalho, P. et al. KRAS oncogenic signaling extends beyond cancer cells to orchestrate the microenvironment. Cancer Res. 78, 7–14 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

167. Huang, S. & Ingber, D. E. Cell tension, matrix mechanics, and cancer development. Cancer Cell 8, 175–176 (2005).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

168. Lyshchik, A. et al. Elastic moduli of thyroid tissues under compression. Ultrason. Imaging 110, 101–110 (2005).

     Article  Google Scholar 

169. Murphy, M. C. et al. Regional brain stiffness changes across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum. Neuroimage Clin. 10, 283–290 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

170. Chaturvedi, R. R. et al. Passive stiffness of myocardium from congenital heart disease and implications for diastole. Circulation 121, 979–988 (2010).

     Article  Google Scholar 

171. Vardakastani, V. et al. Increased intra-cortical porosity reduces bone stiffness and strength in pediatric patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Bone 69, 61–67 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

172. Ye, K. et al. Matrix stiffness and nanoscale spatial organization of cell-adhesive ligands direct stem cell fate. Nano Lett. 15, 4720–4729 (2015).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

173. Zhou, Q. et al. Development of a novel orthogonal double gradient for high-throughput screening of mesenchymal stem cells–materials interaction. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 5, 4–11 (2018).

     Google Scholar 

174. Garreta, E. et al. Fine tuning the extracellular environment accelerates the derivation of kidney organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Mater. 18, 397–405 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

175. Uynuk-Ool, T. et al. The geometrical shape of mesenchymal stromal cells measured by quantitative shape descriptors is determined by the stiffness of the biomaterial and by cyclic tensile forces. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 11, 3508–3522 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

176. Branco da Cunha, C. et al. Influence of the stiffness of three-dimensional alginate/collagen-I interpenetrating networks on fibroblast biology. Biomaterials 35, 8927–8936 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

177. Xie, J. et al. Substrate elasticity regulates adipose-derived stromal cell differentiation towards osteogenesis and adipogenesis through β-catenin transduction. Acta Biomater. 79, 83–95 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

178. Lv, H. et al. Biomaterial stiffness determines stem cell fate. Life Sci. 178, 42–48 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

179. Sun, A. X. et al. Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in 3-dimensional, photocrosslinked hydrogel constructs: Effect of cell seeding density and material stiffness. Acta Biomater. 58, 302–311 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

180. Hadden, W. J. et al. Stem cell migration and mechanotransduction on linear stiffness gradient hydrogels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5647–5652 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

181. Xi, W., Saw, T. B., Delacour, D., Lim, C. T. & Ladoux, B. Material approaches to active tissue mechanics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 23–44 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

182. Chaudhuri, O. et al. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading. Nat. Commun. 19, 6364 (2015).

     Google Scholar 

183. Guvendiren, M. & Burdick, J. A. Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics. Nat. Commun. 3, 792 (2012).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

184. Storm, C., Pastore, J. J., MacKintosh, F. C., Lubensky, T. C. & Janmey, P. A. Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 435, 191–194 (2005).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

185. Kouwer, P. H. J. et al. Responsive biomimetic networks from polyisocyanopeptide hydrogels. Nature 493, 651–655 (2013).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

186. de Almeida, P. et al. Cytoskeletal stiffening in synthetic hydrogels. Nat. Commun. 10, 609 (2019). A seminal work showing that hydrogels with cytoskeletal-like stress stiffening can be obtained.

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

187. Dhume, R. Y. & Barocas, V. H. Emergent structure-dependent relaxation spectra in viscoelastic fiber networks in extension. Acta Biomater. 87, 245–255 (2019).

     Article  Google Scholar 

188. Lee, H. P., Gu, L., Mooney, D. J., Levenston, M. E. & Chaudhuri, O. Mechanical confinement regulates cartilage matrix formation by chondrocytes. Nat. Mater. 16, 1243–1251 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

189. Kim, B. S., Nikolovski, J., Bonadio, J. & Mooney, D. J. Cyclic mechanical strain regulates the development of engineered smooth muscle tissue. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 979–983 (1999).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

190. Cochis, A. et al. Bioreactor mechanically guided 3D mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis using a biocompatible novel thermo-reversible methylcellulose-based hydrogel. Sci. Rep. 7, 45018 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

191. Chu, S.-Y. et al. Mechanical stretch induces hair regeneration through the alternative activation of macrophages. Nat. Commun. 10, 1524 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

192. Lee, J. K. et al. Tension stimulation drives tissue formation in scaffold-free systems. Nat. Mater. 16, 864–873 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

193. Tsimbouri, P. M. et al. Stimulation of 3D osteogenesis by mesenchymal stem cells using a nanovibrational bioreactor. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 758–770 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

194. Wisdom, K. M. et al. Matrix mechanical plasticity regulates cancer cell migration through confining microenvironments. Nat. Commun. 9, 4144 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

195. Miotto, M. et al. 4D corneal tissue engineering: achieving time-dependent tissue self-curvature through localized control of cell actuators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1807334 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

196. Loebel, C., Mauck, R. L. & Burdick, J. A. Local nascent protein deposition and remodelling guide mesenchymal stromal cell mechanosensing and fate in three-dimensional hydrogels. Nat. Mater. 18, 883–891 (2019). This article together with references 194 and 195 are important studies that serve as the foundation for our definition of biolabile environments and show the importance of allowing cells to ‘master their own fate’.

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

197. Qiao, E. L., Kumar, S. & Schaffer, D. V. Mastering their own fates through the matrix. Nat. Mater. 18, 779–780 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

198. Vert, M., Li, S. M., Spenlehauer, G. & Guerin, P. Bioresorbability and biocompatibility of aliphatic polyesters. J. Mater. Sci. 3, 432–446 (1992).

     CAS  Google Scholar 

199. Hutmacher, D. W. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21, 2529–2543 (2000).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

200. Deringer, V. L., Caro, M. A. & Csányi, G. Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

201. Ansari, S., Khorshidi, S. & Karkhaneh, A. Engineering of gradient osteochondral tissue: from nature to lab. Acta Biomater. 87, 41–54 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

202. Silva, E. D. et al. Multifunctional magnetic-responsive hydrogels to engineer tendon-to-bone interface. Nanomedicine 14, 2375–2385 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

203. Calejo, I., Costa‐Almeida, R., Reis, R. L. & Gomes, M. E. A textile platform using continuous aligned and textured composite microfibers to engineer tendon‐to‐bone interface gradient scaffolds. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1900200 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

204. Ribeiro, V. P. et al. Enzymatically cross-linked silk fibroin-based hierarchical scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 3781–3799 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

205. Canadas, R. F. et al. Biochemical gradients to generate 3D heterotypic-like tissues with isotropic and anisotropic architectures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1804148 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

206. Calejo, I., Costa-Almeida, R., Reis, R. L. & Gomes, M. E. A physiology-inspired multifactorial toolbox in soft-to-hard musculoskeletal interface tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 38, 83–98 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

207. Grigoryan, B. et al. Multivascular networks and functional intravascular topologies within biocompatible hydrogels. Science 364, 458–464 (2019).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

208. Chimene, D., Lennox, K. K., Kaunas, R. R. & Gaharwar, A. K. Advanced bioinks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44, 2090–2102 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

209. Bertoldi, K., Vitelli, V., Christensen, J. & Van Hecke, M. Flexible mechanical metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17066 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

210. Frenzel, T., Kadic, M. & Wegener, M. Three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials with a twist. Science 358, 1027–1032 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

211. Zhao, Z., Fang, R., Rong, Q. & Liu, M. Bioinspired nanocomposite hydrogels with highly ordered structures. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703045 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

212. Chen, T., Bakhshi, H., Liu, L., Ji, J. & Agarwal, S. Combining 3D printing with electrospinning for rapid response and enhanced designability of hydrogel actuators. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1800514 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

213. Ingber, D. E. Cellular tensegrity: defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. 104, 613–627 (1993).

     Google Scholar 

214. Fabry, B. et al. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 148102 (2001).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

215. Stamenović, D. et al. Rheological behavior of living cells is timescale-dependent. Biophys. J. 93, 39–41 (2007).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

216. Ingber, D. E., Wang, N. & Stamenović, D. Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 046603 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

217. Yip, A. K. et al. Anisotropic traction stresses and focal adhesion polarization mediates topography-induced cell elongation. Biomaterials 181, 103–112 (2018).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

218. Saruwatari, L. et al. Osteoblasts generate harder, stiffer, and more delamination-resistant mineralized tissue on titanium than on polystyrene, associated with distinct tissue micro- and ultrastructure. J. Bone Miner. Res. 20, 2002–2016 (2005).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

219. Kalyan Phani, M., Kumar, A., Arnold, W. & Samwer, K. Elastic stiffness and damping measurements in titanium alloys using atomic force acoustic microscopy. J. Alloys Compd. 676, 397–406 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

220. Brown, A. L. et al. 22 week assessment of bladder acellular matrix as a bladder augmentation material in a porcine model. Biomaterials 23, 2179–2190 (2002).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

221. Barak, M. M. & Black, M. A. A novel use of 3D printing model demonstrates the effects of deteriorated trabecular bone structure on bone stiffness and strength. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 78, 455–464 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

222. Ramadan, S., Paul, N. & Naguib, H. E. Standardized static and dynamic evaluation of myocardial tissue properties. Biomed. Mater. 12, 025013 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

223. Yoo, L., Gupta, V., Lee, C., Kavehpore, P. & Demer, J. L. Viscoelastic properties of bovine orbital connective tissue and fat: constitutive models. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 10, 901–914 (2012).

     Article  Google Scholar 

224. Schachar, R. A., Chan, R. W. & Fu, M. Viscoelastic properties of fresh human lenses under 40 years of age: implications for the aetiology of presbyopia. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 95, 1010–1013 (2011).

     Article  Google Scholar 

225. Ozawa, H., Matsumoto, T., Ohashi, T., Sato, M. & Kokubun, S. Comparison of spinal cord gray matter and white matter softness: measurement by pipette aspiration method. J. Neurosurg. Spine 95, 221–224 (2001).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

226. Lee, L. M. & Liu, A. P. The application of micropipette aspiration in molecular mechanics of single cells. J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med. 5, 040902 (2014).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

227. Moshtagh, P. R., Pouran, B., Korthagen, N. M., Zadpoor, A. A. & Weinans, H. Guidelines for an optimized indentation protocol for measurement of cartilage stiffness: the effects of spatial variation and indentation parameters. J. Biomech. 49, 3602–3607 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

228. Uriarte, J. J. et al. Early impairment of lung mechanics in a murine model of Marfan syndrome. PLoS One 11, e0152124 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

229. Shi, Y., Glaser, K. J., Venkatesh, S. K., Ben-Abraham, E. I. & Ehman, R. L. Feasibility of using 3D MR elastography to determine pancreatic stiffness in healthy volunteers. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 41, 369–375 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

230. Murphy, M. C. et al. Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography. PLoS One 8, e81668 (2013).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

231. Anvari, A., Dhyani, M., Stephen, A. E. & Samir, A. E. Reliability of shear-wave elastography estimates of the Young modulus of tissue in follicular thyroid neoplasms. Am. J. Roentgenol. 206, 609–616 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

232. Dutov, P., Antipova, O., Varma, S., Orgel, J. P. R. O. & Schieber, J. D. Measurement of elastic modulus of collagen type I single fiber. PLoS One 11, e0145711 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

233. Li, W. et al. Fibrin fiber stiffness is strongly affected by fiber diameter, but not by fibrinogen glycation. Biophys. J. 110, 1400–1410 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

234. Collet, J.-P., Shuman, H., Ledger, R. E., Lee, S. & Weisel, J. W. The elasticity of an individual fibrin fiber in a clot. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9133–9137 (2005).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

235. Aaron, B. B. & Gosline, J. M. Elastin as a random‐network elastomer: a mechanical and optical analysis of single elastin fibers. Biopolymers 20, 1247–1260 (1981).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

236. Gosline, J. et al. Elastic proteins: biological roles and mechanical properties. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 357, 121–132 (2002).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

237. Zahn, J. T. et al. Age-dependent changes in microscale stiffness and mechanoresponses of cells. Small 7, 1480–1487 (2011).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

238. Alcaraz, J. et al. Microrheology of human lung epithelial cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 84, 2071–2079 (2003).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

239. Nakamura, K. et al. Altered nano/micro-order elasticity of pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells of patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Int. J. Cardiol. 140, 102–107 (2010).

     Article  Google Scholar 

240. Lulevich, V., Yang, H. Y., Isseroff, R. R. & Liu, G. Y. Single cell mechanics of keratinocyte cells. Ultramicroscopy 110, 1435–1442 (2010).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

241. Siamantouras, E., Hills, C. E., Squires, P. E. & Liu, K. K. Quantifying cellular mechanics and adhesion in renal tubular injury using single cell force spectroscopy. Nanomedicine 12, 1013–1021 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

242. Sun, S., Song, Z., Cotler, S. J. & Cho, M. Biomechanics and functionality of hepatocytes in liver cirrhosis. J. Biomech. 47, 2205–2210 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

243. Hozic, A., Rico, F., Colom, A., Buzhynskyy, N. & Scheuring, S. Nanomechanical characterization of the stiffness of eye lens cells: a pilot study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 53, 2151–2156 (2012).

     Article  Google Scholar 

244. Kolipaka, A. et al. Magnetic resonance elastography to estimate brain stiffness: measurement reproducibility and its estimate in pseudotumor cerebri patients. Clin. Imaging 51, 114–122 (2018).

     Article  Google Scholar 

245. Arani, A. et al. Measuring the effects of aging and sex on regional brain stiffness with MR elastography in healthy older adults. Neuroimage 111, 59–64 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

246. Ma, Z. et al. In vitro and in vivo mechanical properties of human ulnar and median nerves. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 101, 2718–2725 (2013).

     Article  Google Scholar 

247. Robinson, D. L. et al. Mechanical properties of normal and osteoarthritic human articular cartilage. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 61, 96–109 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

248. Comley, K. & Fleck, N. A. A micromechanical model for the Young’s modulus of adipose tissue. Int. J. Solids Struct. 47, 2982–2990 (2010).

     Article  Google Scholar 

249. Savelberg, H. H. C. M., Kooloos, J. G. M., Huiskes, R. & Kauer, J. M. G. Stiffness of the ligaments of the human wrist joint. J. Biomech. 25, 369–376 (1992).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

250. Przybylski, G. J., Carlin, G. J., Patel, P. R. & Woo, S. L. Y. Human anterior and posterior cervical longitudinal ligaments possess similar tensile properties. J. Orthop. Res. 14, 1005–1008 (1996).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

251. Pintar, F. A. Geometric and mechanical properties of human cervical spine ligaments. J. Biomed. Eng. 122, 623–629 (2000).

     Google Scholar 

252. Arani, A. et al. Cardiac MR elastography for quantitative assessment of elevated myocardial stiffness in cardiac amyloidosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 46, 1361–1367 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

253. Domian, I. J., Yu, H. & Mittal, N. On materials for cardiac tissue engineering. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6, 1600768 (2017).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

254. Eby, S. F. et al. Shear wave elastography of passive skeletal muscle stiffness: influences of sex and age throughout adulthood. Clin. Biomech. 30, 22–27 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

255. Leong, H. T., Hug, F. & Fu, S. N. Increased upper trapezius muscle stiffness in overhead athletes with rotator cuff tendinopathy. PLoS One 11, e0155187 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

256. Brandenburg, J. E. et al. Feasibility and reliability of quantifying passive muscle stiffness in young children by using shear wave ultrasound elastography. J. Ultrasound Med. 34, 663–670 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

257. Souron, R. et al. Sex differences in active tibialis anterior stiffness evaluated using supersonic shear imaging. J. Biomech. 49, 3534–3537 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

258. Wang, L., Yan, F., Yang, Y., Xiang, X. & Qiu, L. Quantitative assessment of skin stiffness in localized scleroderma using ultrasound shear-wave elastography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 43, 1339–1347 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

259. Marinelli, J. P. et al. Quantitative assessment of lung stiffness in patients with interstitial lung disease using MR elastography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 46, 365–374 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

260. Mariappan, Y. K. et al. Estimation of the absolute shear stiffness of human lung parenchyma using 1 h spin echo, echo planar MR elastography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 40, 1230–1237 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

261. Booth, A. J. et al. Acellular normal and fibrotic human lung matrices as a culture system for in vitro investigation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 186, 866–876 (2012).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

262. Bensamoun, S. F., Robert, L., Leclerc, G. E., Debernard, L. & Charleux, F. Stiffness imaging of the kidney and adjacent abdominal tissues measured simultaneously using magnetic resonance elastography. Clin. Imaging 35, 284–287 (2011).

     Article  Google Scholar 

263. Samir, A. E. et al. Shear wave elastography in chronic kidney disease: a pilot experience in native kidneys. BMC Nephrol. 16, 119 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

264. Ling, W. et al. Effects of vascularity and differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma on tumor and liver stiffness: in vivo and in vitro studies. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 40, 739–746 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

265. Cha, S. W. et al. Nondiseased liver stiffness measured by shearwave elastography: a pilot study. J. Ultrasound Med. 33, 53–60 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

266. Leal-Egaña, A. et al. Tuning liver stiffness against tumours: an in vitro study using entrapped cells in tumour-like microcapsules. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 9, 113–121 (2012).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

267. Lee, D. H., Lee, J. M., Han, J. K. & Choi, B. I. MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 38, 1215–1223 (2013).

     Article  Google Scholar 

268. Venkatesh, S. K., Wang, G., Teo, L. L. S. & Ang, B. W. L. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver in healthy Asians: normal liver stiffness quantification and reproducibility assessment. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 39, 1–8 (2014).

     Article  Google Scholar 

269. Gangadhar, K., Hippe, D. S., Thiel, J. & Dighe, M. Impact of image orientation on measurements of thyroid nodule stiffness using shear wave elastography. J. Ultrasound Med. 35, 1661–1667 (2016).

     Article  Google Scholar 

270. Brezak, R., Hippe, D., Thiel, J. & Dighe, M. K. Variability in stiffness assessment in a thyroid nodule using shear wave imaging. Ultrasound Q. 31, 243–249 (2015).

     Article  Google Scholar 

271. Lam, A. C. L., Pang, S. W. A., Ahuja, A. T. & Bhatia, K. S. S. The influence of precompression on elasticity of thyroid nodules estimated by ultrasound shear wave elastography. Eur. Radiol. 26, 2845–2852 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

272. Bahn, M. M. et al. Development and application of magnetic resonance elastography of the normal and pathological thyroid gland in vivo. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30, 1151–1154 (2009).

     Article  Google Scholar 

273. Pozzi, R. et al. Point shear-wave elastography in chronic pancreatitis: a promising tool for staging disease severity. Pancreatology 17, 905–910 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

274. An, H., Shi, Y., Guo, Q. & Liu, Y. Test–retest reliability of 3D EPI MR elastography of the pancreas. Clin. Radiol. 71, 1068.e7–1068.e12 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

275. Kolipaka, A. et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of the pancreas: measurement reproducibility and relationship with age. Magn. Reson. Imaging 42, 1–7 (2017).

     Article  Google Scholar 

276. Nenadic, I. et al. Noninvasive evaluation of bladder wall mechanical properties as a function of filling volume: potential application in bladder compliance assessment. PLoS One 11, e0157818 (2016).

     Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

277. Matalia, J. et al. Correlation of corneal biomechanical stiffness with refractive error and ocular biometry in a pediatric population. Cornea 36, 1221–1226 (2017).

     Google Scholar 

278. Last, J. A., Thomasy, S. M., Croasdale, C. R., Russell, P. & Murphy, C. J. Compliance profile of the human cornea as measured by atomic force microscopy. Micron 43, 1293–1298 (2012).

     Article  Google Scholar 

279. Jardeleza, M. S. R., Daly, M. K., Kaufman, J. D., Klapperich, C. & Legutko, P. A. Effect of trypan blue staining on the elastic modulus of anterior lens capsules of diabetic and nondiabetic patients. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 35, 318–323 (2009).

     Article  Google Scholar 

Download references