[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Drought self-propagation in drylands due to land–atmosphere feedbacks

Nature Geoscience volume 15, pages 262–268 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Reduced evaporation due to dry soils can affect the land surface energy balance, with implications for local and downwind precipitation. When evaporation is constrained by soil moisture, the atmospheric supply of water is depleted, and this deficit may propagate in time and space. This mechanism could theoretically result in the self-propagation of droughts, but the extent to which this process occurs is unknown. Here we isolate the influence of soil moisture drought on downwind precipitation using Lagrangian moisture tracking constrained by observations from the 40 largest recent droughts worldwide. We show that dryland droughts are particularly prone to self-propagating because evaporation tends to respond strongly to enhanced soil water stress. In drylands, precipitation can decline by more than 15% due to upwind drought during a single event and up to 30% during individual months. In light of projected widespread reductions in water availability, this feedback may further exacerbate future droughts.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Impact of upwind soil drought on downwind column water vapour.
Fig. 2: Upwind soil drought propagation to downwind precipitation deficits.
Fig. 3: Drought self-propagation in drylands.
Fig. 4: Upwind drought in drylands.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The FLEXPART model can be downloaded via https://www.flexpart.eu/. ERA-Interim data were obtained from http://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets. GLEAM data are available through https://www.gleam.eu/. MSWEP data are accessible through http://www.gloh2o.org/. The FLEXPART simulation employed here was performed by R. Nieto, A. Drumond and L. Gimeno and is not publicly accessible. Due to the large data volumes, post-processed FLEXPART data are available upon request from the corresponding author, and sample data are publicly accessible through Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5839819, together with the complete drought event data used for analysis and event-aggregated results. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code used for analysis is publicly available through Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5840791.

References

  1. Ligtvoet W. et al. The Geography of Future Water Challenges (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2018).

  2. Dai, A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 52–58 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ukkola, A. M., De Kauwe, M. G., Roderick, M. L., Abramowitz, G. & Pitman, A. J. Robust future changes in meteorological drought in CMIP6 projections despite uncertainty in precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, e2020GL087820 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, B., Jin, C. & Liu, J. Understanding future change of global monsoons projected by CMIP6 models. J. Clim. 33, 6471–6489 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, B. I., Mankin, J. S. & Anchukaitis, K. J. Climate change and drought: from past to future. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 4, 164–179 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, W., Ertsen, M. W., Svoboda, M. D. & Hafeez, M. Propagation of drought: from meteorological drought to agricultural and hydrological drought. Adv. Meteorol. 2016, 6547209 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilhite, D. A., Svoboda, M. D. & Hayes, M. J. Understanding the complex impacts of drought: a key to enhancing drought mitigation and preparedness. Water Resour. Manag. 21, 763–774 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrison, H. et al. Confronting the challenge of modeling cloud and precipitation microphysics. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 12, e2019MS001689 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schubert, S. D. et al. Global meteorological drought: a synthesis of current understanding with a focus on SST drivers of precipitation deficits. J. Clim. 29, 3989–4019 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoerling, M. & Kumar, A. The perfect ocean for drought. Science 299, 691–694 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koster, R. D., Guo, Z., Bonan, G., Chan, E. & Cox, P. Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science 1138, 10–13 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, Z. et al. GLACE: the global land–atmosphere coupling experiment. Part II: analysis. J. Hydrometeorol. 7, 611–625 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dirmeyer, P. A., Koster, R. D. & Guo, Z. Do global models properly represent the feedback between land and atmosphere? J. Hydrometeorol. 7, 1177–1198 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, C. M. et al. Frequency of Sahelian storm initiation enhanced over mesoscale soil-moisture patterns. Nat. Geosci. 4, 430–433 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, C. M., De Jeu, R. A. M., Guichard, F., Harris, P. P. & Dorigo, W. A. Afternoon rain more likely over drier soils. Nature 489, 423–426 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guillod, B. P., Orlowsky, B., Miralles, D. G., Teuling, A. J. & Seneviratne, S. I. Reconciling spatial and temporal soil moisture effects on afternoon rainfall. Nat. Commun. 6, 6443 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein, C. & Taylor, C. M. Dry soils can intensify mesoscale convective systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21132–21137 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dirmeyer, P. A., Schlosser, C. A. & Brubaker, K. L. Precipitation, recycling, and land memory: an integrated analysis. J. Hydrometeorol. 10, 278–288 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miralles, D. G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S. I. & Teuling, A. J. Land–atmospheric feedbacks during droughts and heatwaves: state of the science and current challenges. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1436, 19–35 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dirmeyer, P. A., Wei, J., Bosilovich, M. G. & Mocko, D. M. Comparing evaporative sources of terrestrial precipitation and their extremes in MERRA using relative entropy. J. Hydrometeorol. 15, 102–116 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ye, H. et al. Impact of increased water vapor on precipitation efficiency over northern Eurasia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2941–2947 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peters, O. & Neelin, J. D. Critical phenomena in atmospheric precipitation. Nat. Phys. 2, 393–396 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong, W. et al. Precipitable water and CAPE dependence of rainfall intensities in China. Clim. Dyn. 52, 3357–3368 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. DeAngelis, A. et al. Evidence of enhanced precipitation due to irrigation over the Great Plains of the United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115, D15115 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tuinenburg, O. A., Hutjes, R. W. A. & Kabat, P. The fate of evaporated water from the Ganges basin. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 117, D01107 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. De Vrese, P., Hagemann, S. & Claussen, M. Asian irrigation, African rain: remote impacts of irrigation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3737–3745 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Herrera-Estrada, J. E. et al. Reduced moisture transport linked to drought propagation across North America. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 5243–5253 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Holgate, C. M., Van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Evans, J. P. & Pitman, A. J. Local and remote drivers of Southeast Australian drought. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL090238 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koster, R. D., Chang, Y. & Schubert, S. D. A mechanism for land–atmosphere feedback involving planetary wave structures. J. Clim. 27, 9290–9301 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Seneviratne, S. et al. Impact of soil moisture-climate feedbacks on CMIP5 projections: first results from the GLACE-CMIP5 experiment. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 5212–5217 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Berg, A., Lintner, B. R., Findell, K. & Giannini, A. Uncertain soil moisture feedbacks in model projections of Sahel precipitation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 6124–6133 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Santanello, J. A. et al. Land-atmosphere interactions: the LoCo perspective. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 1253–1272 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 99, 125–161 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Miralles, D. G., Teuling, A. J., Van Heerwaarden, C. C. & De Arellano, J. V. G. Mega-heatwave temperatures due to combined soil desiccation and atmospheric heat accumulation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 345–349 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trenberth, K. E. Atmospheric moisture recycling: role of advection and local evaporation. J. Clim. 12, 1368–1381 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Berg, A. & McColl, K. A. No projected global drylands expansion under greenhouse warming. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 331–337 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Miralles, D. G. et al. Contribution of water-limited ecoregions to their own supply of rainfall. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 124007 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Houze, R. A. J., Rasmussen, K. L., Zuluaga, M. D. & Brodzik, S. R. The variable nature of convection in the tropics and subtropics: a legacy of 16 years of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission satellite. Rev. Geophys. 53, 994–1021 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Charney, J. G. & Eliassen, A. On the growth of the hurricane depression. J. Atmos. Sci. 21, 68–75 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, Y., Tan, Z. M. & Wu, Z. Noninstantaneous wave-CISK for the interaction between convective heating and low-level moisture convergence in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci. 76, 2083–2101 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Greve, P. et al. Global assessment of trends in wetting and drying over land. Nat. Geosci. 7, 716–721 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F. & Roderick, M. L. Little change in global drought over the past 60 years. Nature 491, 435–438 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Konapala, G., Mishra, A. K., Wada, Y. & Mann, M. E. Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3044 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Miralles, D. G. et al. El Niño–La Niña cycle and recent trends in continental evaporation. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 122–126 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Padrón, R. S. et al. Observed changes in dry-season water availability attributed to human-induced climate change. Nat. Geosci. 13, 477–481 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Laîné, A., Nakamura, H., Nishii, K. & Miyasaka, T. A diagnostic study of future evaporation changes projected in CMIP5 climate models. Clim. Dyn. 42, 2745–2761 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dirmeyer, P. A., Jin, Y., Singh, B. & Yan, X. Trends in land–atmosphere interactions from CMIP5 simulations. J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 829–849 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Findell, K. L. et al. Rising temperatures increase importance of oceanic evaporation as a source for continental precipitation. J. Clim. 32, 7713–7726 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou, S. et al. Soil moisture–atmosphere feedbacks mitigate declining water availability in drylands. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 38–44 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schlaepfer, D. R. et al. Climate change reduces extent of temperate drylands and intensifies drought in deep soils. Nat. Commun. 8, 14196 (2017).

  51. Miralles, D. G., De Jeu, R. A. M., Gash, J. H., Holmes, T. R. H. & Dolman, A. J. Magnitude and variability of land evaporation and its components at the global scale. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 967–981 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Martens, B. et al. GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 1903–1925 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Andreadis, K. M., Clark, E. A., Wood, A. W., Hamlet, A. F. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Twentieth-century drought in the conterminous United States. J. Hydrometeorol. 6, 985–1001 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vernieuwe, H., De Baets, B. & Verhoest, N. E. C. A mathematical morphology approach for a qualitative exploration of drought events in space and time. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 530–543 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sodemann, H., Schwierz, C. & Wernli, H. Interannual variability of Greenland winter precipitation sources: Lagrangian moisture diagnostic and North Atlantic Oscillation influence. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D03107 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Keune, J. & Miralles, D. G. A precipitation recycling network to assess freshwater vulnerability: challenging the watershed convention. Water Resour. Res. 55, 9947–9961 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schumacher, D. L. et al. Amplification of mega-heatwaves through heat torrents fuelled by upwind drought. Nat. Geosci. 12, 712–717 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ek, M. & Mahrt, L. Daytime evolution of relative humidity at the boundary layer top. Mon. Weather Rev. 122, 2709–2721 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Munley, W. G. & Hipps, L. E. Estimation of regional evaporation for a tallgrass prairie from measurements of properties of the atmospheric boundary layer. Water Resour. Res. 27, 225–230 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. van Heerwaarden, C., Vila-Guerau de Arellano, J., Moene, A. & Holtslag, A. Interactions between dry-air entrainment, surface evaporation and convective boundary-layer development. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 1277–1291 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mahrt, L. Boundary‐layer moisture regimes. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 117, 151–176 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yu, H., Liu, S. C. & Dickinson, R. E. Radiative effects of aerosols on the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 107, AAC 3-1–AAC 3-14 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wood, R. & Bretherton, C. S. Boundary layer depth, entrainment, and decoupling in the cloud-capped subtropical and tropical marine boundary layer. J. Clim. 17, 3576–3588 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Stohl, A., Hittenberger, M. & Wotawa, G. Validation of the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART against large-scale tracer experiment data. Atmos. Environ. 32, 4245–4264 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P. & Wotawa, G. Technical note: the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 2461–2474 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Dominguez, F., Kumar, P., Liang, X. Z. & Ting, M. Impact of atmospheric moisture storage on precipitation recycling. J. Clim. 19, 1513–1530 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. van der Ent, R. J., Tuinenburg, O. A., Knoche, H. R., Kunstmann, H. & Savenije, H. H. G. Should we use a simple or complex model for moisture recycling and atmospheric moisture tracking? Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 4869–4884 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Alejandro Martinez, J. & Dominguez, F. Sources of atmospheric moisture for the La Plata River basin. J. Clim. 27, 6737–6753 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Emanuel, K. A. A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 2313–2335 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Trigo, R. M. et al. The record winter drought of 2011–12 in the Iberian Peninsula. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94, S41–S45 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Drumond, A., Stojanovic, M., Nieto, R., Vicente-Serrano, S. M. & Gimeno, L. Linking anomalous moisture transport and drought episodes in the IPCC reference regions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 1481–1498 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Thorncroft, C. D., Hoskins, B. J. & McIntyre, M. E. Two paradigms of baroclinic‐wave life‐cycle behaviour. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 119, 17–55 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Appenzeller, C., Davies, H. C. & Norton, W. A. Fragmentation of stratospheric intrusions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 101, 1435–1456 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wernli, H. & Sprenger, M. Identification and ERA-15 climatology of potential vorticity streamers and cutoffs near the extratropical tropopause. J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 1569–1586 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Seibert, P. Convergence and accuracy of numerical methods for trajectory calculations. J. Appl. Meteorol. 32, 558–566 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Stohl, A. & Seibert, P. Accuracy of trajectories as determined from the conservation of meteorological tracers. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 124, 1465–1484 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Schumacher, D. L., Keune, J. & Miralles, D. G. Atmospheric heat and moisture transport to energy- and water-limited ecosystems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1472, 123–138 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Sodemann, H. Beyond turnover time: constraining the lifetime distribution of water vapor from simple and complex approaches. J. Atmos. Sci. 77, 413–433 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Yu, L. & Weller, R. A. Objectively analyzed air–sea heat fluxes for the global ice-free oceans (1981–2005). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 527–539 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Stevens, B. et al. Structure and dynamical influence of water vapor in the lower tropical troposphere. Surv. Geophys. 38, 1371–1397 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Atlas, R., Wolfson, N. & Terry, J. The effect of SST and soil moisture anomalies on GLA model simulations of the 1988 US summer drought. J. Clim. 6, 2034–2048 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Sud, Y. C., Mocko, D. M., Lau, K. M. & Atlas, R. Simulating the midwestern US drought of 1988 with a GCM. J. Clim. 16, 3946–3965 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Koster, R. D. et al. GLACE: the Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: overview. J. Hydrometeorol. 7, 590–610 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Zaitchik, B. F., Santanello, J. A., Kumar, S. V. & Peters-Lidard, C. D. Representation of soil moisture feedbacks during drought in NASA unified WRF (NU-WRF). J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 360–367 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Froidevaux, P., Schlemmer, L., Schmidli, J., Langhans, W. & Schar̈, C. Influence of the background wind on the local soil moisture–precipitation feedback. J. Atmos. Sci. 71, 782–799 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Yang, L., Sun, G., Zhi, L. & Zhao, J. Negative soil moisture–precipitation feedback in dry and wet regions. Sci. Rep. 8, 4026 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Drumond, A., Gimeno, L., Nieto, R., Trigo, R. M. & Vicente-Serrano, S. M. Drought episodes in the climatological sinks of the Mediterranean moisture source: the role of moisture transport. Glob. Planet. Change 151, 4–14 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Salah, Z., Nieto, R., Drumond, A., Gimeno, L. & Vicente-Serrano, S. M. A Lagrangian analysis of the moisture budget over the Fertile Crescent during two intense drought episodes. J. Hydrol. 560, 382–395 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Shah, D. & Mishra, V. Drought onset and termination in India. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 125, e2020JD032871 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Tuller, S. E. Seasonal and annual precipitation efficiency in Canada. Atmosphere 11, 52–66 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Beck, H. E. et al. MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 589–615 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Beck, H. E. et al. Daily evaluation of 26 precipitation datasets using Stage-IV gauge-radar data for the CONUS. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 23, 207–224 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Holloway, C. E. & Neelin, J. D. Temporal relations of column water vapor and tropical precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci. 67, 1091–1105 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Pfahl, S. & Sprenger, M. On the relationship between extratropical cyclone precipitation and intensity. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 1752–1758 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the European Research Council (ERC) under grant agreement no. 715254 (DRY–2–DRY). We also thank R. Nieto, L. Gimeno and A. Drumond for providing FLEXPART simulations and related support. The computational resources and services used for this study were provided by the VSC (Flemish Supercomputer Center), funded by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO) and the Flemish Government, Department of Economy, Science and Innovation (EWI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hydro-Climate Extremes Lab, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Dominik L. Schumacher, Jessica Keune & Diego G. Miralles

  2. Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

    Paul Dirmeyer

Authors
  1. Dominik L. Schumacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Keune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul Dirmeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Diego G. Miralles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.G.M. conceived the study. D.L.S. and J.K. designed the experiments. D.L.S. conducted the analysis. D.L.S., D.G.M., J.K. and P.D. wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the results and the editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik L. Schumacher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Geoscience thanks Niko Wanders, Jeffrey Basara and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Tom Richardson, in collaboration with the Nature Geoscience team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 All drought events used for analysis.

Analogous to Fig. 1a, yet using colors for all 40 events; for aesthetic reasons, a shows the 20 largest droughts, gauged by both their spatial extent and duration. b visualizes the remaining events, ranked 21–40.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Main climatological source regions of water vapor for the six highlighted droughts.

Source regions of tropospheric water vapor (light blue) over the respective drought areas (pink contours), covering 70% of the total water vapor; for the period 1980–2016. The extent of the respective main source region can be compared across events to gauge the dependence on proximate or more remote evaporation.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Soil stress S during the six highlighted droughts.

S, given by the ratio of E over Ep, is expressed as anomalies with respect to the climatological mean. This is calculated per pixel and using only months for which drought conditions were present according to the morphed droughts — in other words, the climatology is obtained analogously to the drought values, for the same months (or seasons), but based on 1980–2016. Brighter colors imply more soil stress (lower S) and thus more severely water-limited evaporation.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Peak drought self-propagation as a function of the climatological precipitation recycling ratio.

Similar to Fig. 3, but displaying the peak self-propagation on the y-axis, while the fraction of the respective drought pixels being classified as dryland (P/Ep < 0.65) is visualized by the color of each marker.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table 1 and Figs. 1–3.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Water-vapour data for each highlighted event.

Source Data Fig. 2

Precipitation data for each highlighted event.

Source Data Fig. 3

Drought self-propagation estimates for all events.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schumacher, D.L., Keune, J., Dirmeyer, P. et al. Drought self-propagation in drylands due to land–atmosphere feedbacks. Nat. Geosci. 15, 262–268 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00912-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00912-7

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene