Abstract
Although the role of gut microbiota (GMB)-derived metabolites in mitochondrial and endolysosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) under metabolic syndrome remains unclear, deciphering these host–metabolite interactions represents a major public health challenge. Dysfunction of mitochondria and endolysosomal networks (ELNs) plays a crucial role in metabolic syndrome and can exacerbate AD progression, highlighting the need to study their reciprocal regulation for a better understanding of how AD is linked to metabolic syndrome. Concurrently, metabolic disorders are associated with alterations in the composition of the GMB. Recent evidence suggests that changes in the composition of the GMB and its metabolites may be involved in AD pathology. This review highlights the mechanisms of metabolic syndrome-mediated AD development, focusing on the interconnected roles of mitochondrial dysfunction, ELN abnormalities, and changes in the GMB and its metabolites. We also discuss the pathophysiological role of GMB-derived metabolites, including amino acids, fatty acids, other metabolites, and extracellular vesicles, in mediating their effects on mitochondrial and ELN dysfunction. Finally, this review proposes therapeutic strategies for AD by directly modulating mitochondrial and ELN functions through targeting GMB metabolites under metabolic syndrome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a leading cause of dementia worldwide, currently affects approximately 416 million individuals and poses a significant concern to global health care systems1. AD is primarily associated with a progressive decline in cognitive ability, accompanied by amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and tau tangles; these two pathologies are the hallmarks of its pathogenesis2. These features underlie neuronal damage and loss, indicating that these conditions are devastating. Although the etiology of AD is not fully understood, it is believed to be a multifactorial disease affected by genetic, environmental, and molecular factors2,3,4. Furthermore, increasing acknowledgment of the cellular disruptions in AD pathogenesis highlights the complexity of this condition, expanding beyond the traditional focus on Aβ plaques and tau tangles to encompass a wider range of pathological factors.
A broader understanding combined with epidemiological studies revealed that metabolic syndrome, a condition characterized by hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia, which increases the risk of diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity, leads to oxidative stress-mediated neuronal death and exacerbates the accumulation of Aβ and tau tangles5. Mitochondrial dysregulation induced by imbalanced mitochondrial biogenesis, fusion/fission, mitophagy, a specialized form of autophagy targeting mitochondria, and endolysosomal network (ELN) abnormalities are common pathophysiological mechanisms of AD and metabolic syndrome6,7,8,9. In particular, the functions of the mitochondria and the ELN are coordinated with each other in response to cellular metabolism and related signaling. In mitochondrial dysfunction, the cell inhibits nutrient-sensing AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) signaling, which reduces lysosomal activity, resulting in mitochondrial damage and dysfunction. Reciprocally, the cell responds to lysosomal deficiency by inhibiting the generation of new mitochondria, which appears to restrict lysosomal function. This condition also leads to mitochondrial impairment and lysosomal damage10. Although the precise molecular mechanisms involved require further investigation, these findings indicate that mitochondrial and ELN dysfunction are significant factors in the pathogenesis of AD associated with metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, because neurons have two morphologically distinct polarized compartments, the supply of energy by mitochondria and the transport and removal of vesicles/organelles by the ELN are critical for maintaining cell function. Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate the intricate connections between mitochondrial and ELN dysfunction and AD pathogenesis to develop disease treatment strategies.
Since dysregulation of the gut–brain axis (GBA) has been reported in AD, elucidating microbiota dysbiosis is important for understanding disease pathogenesis11,12. Gut dysbiosis is also observed in metabolic syndromes, suggesting that changes in the gut microbiota (GMB) and its metabolites may play a role in the development of metabolic syndrome-associated AD13. Transplantation of the fecal microbiota in patients with metabolic syndromes has emerged as a treatment strategy for AD that focuses primarily on modulating GMB12. Furthermore, the administration of gut-derived metabolites, such as butyrate, improves the brain’s energy metabolism and neurotransmitter synthesis by modulating oxidative stress and autophagy, a cellular process that removes dysfunctional components through lysosome-mediated degradation14. Although some metabolites enhance mitochondrial function and aid in the removal of harmful proteins14, others can increase oxidative stress and impede autophagy, exacerbating Aβ and tau pathologies15. Therefore, understanding the alterations and effects of the microbiota and its metabolites in metabolic syndrome is essential for elucidating AD regulatory mechanisms. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the interconnected roles of mitochondrial dysfunction, ELN abnormalities, and changes in GMB and its metabolites in the pathogenesis of AD associated with metabolic syndrome. By exploring the mechanisms through which GMB-derived metabolites influence these cellular processes, we hope to shed light on novel therapeutic targets and strategies for managing AD, especially in the context of metabolic syndrome. We first discussed the pathogenesis of AD associated with metabolic syndrome, focusing on mitochondrial and ELN dysfunction. Next, we explored alterations in the GMB composition and metabolites in metabolic diseases and their potential impact on AD development. Finally, we highlighted the therapeutic implications of targeting the GMB–metabolite–mitochondria–ELN axis in AD and propose future research directions to address current knowledge gaps.
Pathogenesis of AD associated with metabolic syndrome
Epidemiological research has shown that metabolic diseases such as DM and obesity increase the risk of developing AD5,16. Patients with type 2 diabetes have an additional 35% greater chance of developing AD if they have mutations that are strong genetic risk factors for AD5. A recent cross-sectional study suggested that the most prominent modifiable risk factor for AD is obesity16. These studies have led to further research on how metabolic disease significantly increases the risk of AD. The potential mechanisms underlying this connection in diabetes are hyperglycemia and advanced glycation end products (AGEs)-induced neuronal toxicity, oxidative stress, and insulin resistance in the brain17. Furthermore, dyslipidemia in obesity induces neuroinflammation compatible with AD, compromises the integrity of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and increases the deposition of Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles17. We demonstrated that elevated glucose reorganized lipid rafts and increased the BACE1-mediated production of Aβ in neuronal cells18. A high level of palmitic acid enhances Aβ production through GPR40-mediated signaling pathways in neuronal cells12. These findings highlight the intricate link between metabolic syndrome and the molecular pathogenesis of Aβ production, emphasizing the importance of maintaining metabolic homeostasis to prevent amyloidogenic pathways. In addition, recent evidence has suggested that GMB-derived metabolites are novel factors that strongly interact with neurons, affecting their function and behavior in metabolic diseases. Moreover, substantial evidence suggests that mitochondrial and ELN dysfunctions likely play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome-associated AD6,7,8,9. The following sections discuss the pathophysiological mechanisms of AD pathogenesis, focusing on mitochondrial dysfunction, ELN, and their crosstalk in the context of metabolic syndrome (Fig. 1).
Mitochondrial dysfunction
Numerous neural processes require significant energy expenditure, with mitochondria serving as the primary energy supplier by generating ATP through oxidative phosphorylation to maintain neuronal homeostasis and functionality. Mitochondria play a crucial role in the production of iron–sulfur centers and heme within neurons, which are integral for the synthesis of presynaptic transmitters in synapses19. Given this crucial role, disruptions in mitochondrial function are intricately linked to the mechanisms involved in neurodegenerative diseases, including AD. To date, numerous studies have demonstrated significant mitochondrial abnormalities in the brains of AD patients8. This is consistent with the finding that compromised energy metabolism consistently occurs before the clinical manifestation of AD. Consequently, mitochondrial dysfunction has been identified as an early and significant characteristic of AD, indicating its crucial involvement in its development. Since mitochondrial dysfunction is also responsible for the development of metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity20, elucidating the detailed mechanisms that link mitochondrial dysfunction to AD and metabolic disease is essential.
These mechanisms primarily involve the deterioration of mitochondrial structure and function, including mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics, mitophagy, interactions between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria, and the mitochondrial antioxidant system6,19. Genetic dysregulation of PPARGC1A, TFAM, and SIRT3 in mitochondrial biogenesis; DNM1L, FIS1, OPA1, and MFN2 in dynamics; PINK1 and PRKN in mitophagy; MCU, TGM2, and MICU1 in ER–mitochondrial contact; and SIRT1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 in the mitochondrial antioxidant system are strongly associated with the pathogenesis of diabetes6. Furthermore, obesity is characterized by impaired mitophagy due to PRKN and BNIP3 downregulation and excessive fission due to OPA1, MFN1, and 2 dysregulation21,22. These findings suggest that specific changes in mitochondrial regulators are important clues when considering the molecular mechanisms by which metabolic syndrome intensifies and exacerbates AD pathology. We previously demonstrated that metabolic syndrome-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction causes Aβ accumulation, neuronal dysfunction, and cognitive impairment. In fact, metabolic stress induces neuronal amyloidogenesis and cognitive impairment through the dysregulation of PINK1-mediated or NIX-mediated mitophagy14,23,24, Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission25, TGM2-dependent ER–mitochondria contacts and calcium overload26. These findings underscore the importance of metabolic syndrome-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction in AD development, suggesting that factors regulating mitochondrial biogenesis, mitophagy, dynamics, ER–mitochondrial contacts, and the mitochondrial antioxidant system are crucial in understanding the link between metabolic syndrome and AD.
Endolysosomal dysfunction
The ELN comprises intracellular membranous organelles that undergo dynamic interconversion. Organelles in the ELN include early endosomes, recycling endosomes, late endosomes, autophagosomes, and lysosomes. As neurons possess two different polarized regions and relatively long axons, the essential role of ELNs in facilitating the transportation and elimination of vesicles and organelles is crucial for the preservation of cell functionality. Therefore, ELN dysfunction can lead to a cascade of neurodegeneration due to the accumulation of toxic proteins and damaged organelles. Recent studies have conducted a comprehensive genetic analysis of 891 autophagic and endolysosomal genes in late-onset AD, highlighting that genetic variations in these pathways could contribute to the risk of developing AD9. Furthermore, the regulatory mechanisms of endosomal abnormalities and lysosomal impairment in the pathogenesis of AD are endolysosomal protein-mediated abnormal processing mediated by endolysosomal proteins of amyloid precursor protein (APP) and impaired degradation of Aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau27,28. Concurrently, since ELNs are essential for the regulation of metabolism through the classification and distribution of signaling receptors and membrane transporters of hormones or metabolites such as the insulin/glucagon receptor, glucose transporter 4, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor, and low-density lipoprotein receptor7, ELN dysfunction is considered an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases. In particular, the maintenance of proper endocytosis could mitigate pathophysiological changes in diabetic mice29,30.
Deficiency in retromer, a protein complex that plays a role in the retrograde transport of cargo from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network, or in the recycling cargo from endosomes back to the cell surface, exhibited abnormal glycemic control31. Disruption of lysosomal function and subsequent impairment of autophagic flux have been observed in both diabetes and obesity29,32. Therefore, ELN dysfunction is a potential pathophysiological hub between metabolic disease and AD. Our previous studies provide valuable information on ELN-associated mechanisms by which neuronal Aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau accumulate under high glucose conditions through the modulation of PICLAM-mediated APP endocytosis, VPS26a-mediated processing of APP and lysosomal hydrolases, TRIM-mediated lysophagy, and selective autophagy targeting lysosomes29,31,33. Although these studies collectively highlight the involvement of ELN dysfunction in AD pathogenesis, more research is needed to investigate other ELN regulators and their contributions to disease pathogenesis. This could help identify potential therapeutic targets for AD associated with metabolic syndrome.
Dysregulation of mitochondrial-ELN crosstalk
Mitochondrial dysfunction impacts components of the ELN, such as early (returning receptors on the cell surface) and late (directing cargo toward lysosomal degradation) endosomes34. A recent study demonstrated that endosome–mitochondria associations through phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–voltage-dependent anion channel 2 (VDAC2) interactions modulate endosomal maturation35. Early endosomes also regulate mitochondrial function through Rab5 GTPase and its adaptor protein-mediated mitophagy36. Although the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation and regulation of mitochondria-endosome contact sites are still largely unknown, the evidence suggests that physical contacts between the two organelles allow for the direct transfer of essential molecules, such as iron and cholesterol, and that mitochondrial impairment may disrupt the energy balance and cellular signaling pathways necessary for proper endosomal function37. Given the limited literature on the direct interactions between mitochondria and early/late endosomes, further research is essential to investigate the molecular pathways connecting mitochondrial dysfunction, endosomal abnormalities, and metabolic perturbations in the context of AD pathogenesis. Similar to mitochondria–endosome interactions, the contact between mitochondria and lysosomes is also regulated by Rab7 GTPase in a bidirectional manner, and this regulation occurs through the modulation of both mitochondrial and lysosomal dynamics, as well as the transfer of metabolites between these two organelles, and disruptions in these contact sites have been associated with AD38,39. Furthermore, it should also be noted that dysfunction of mitochondria and lysosomes may mutually intensify and exacerbate each other through metabolic stress-mediated signaling, contributing to the pathogenesis of AD10. Mitochondrial dysfunction induced by genetic mutations or Aβ and tau-mediated toxicity in AD pathogenesis associated with metabolic stress represses AMPK and transcription factor EB (TFEB), a master regulator of lysosomal genes, and triggers lysosomal hypoacidification, which induces the loss of lysosomal hydrolysis10. This mechanism may inhibit the degradation of damaged mitochondria by autophagy during mitochondrial dysfunction. Reciprocally, impaired lysosomal hydrolase is one of the many ways in which mitochondrial gene mutations are linked to ELN dysfunction. Therefore, ELN dysfunction can decrease mitophagy and increase the proportion of malfunctioning mitochondria. Furthermore, Aβ oligomers have been demonstrated to impede mitochondrial activation via mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)-dependent lysosomal amino acid sensing10. Taken together, the evidence suggests that in addition to individual mitochondrial and ELN dysfunctions, the crosstalk between mitochondria and ELN plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of AD associated with metabolic syndrome. Additionally, a deeper investigation into the regulatory mechanisms that govern mitochondria–ELN crosstalk could provide novel strategies for mitigating AD progression in patients with metabolic syndrome.
Microbial dysbiosis in metabolic diseases
Dysbiosis in the GMB is found in both metabolic disease and AD, and some of these changes are similar11,13, indicating that changes in the GMB in metabolic diseases may impact the development of AD. Therefore, identifying and regulating gut dysbiosis in metabolic diseases can help us understand disease pathogenesis. The typical GMB in humans consists primarily of Firmicutes, Proteus, Actinomycetes, Bacteroides, and Fusobacteria, which are crucial to metabolic health, and their dysbiosis is involved in the pathogenesis of diseases such as diabetes and obesity40. Dysbiosis of the GMB in both diseases is mainly caused by changes in the gut metabolome due to excessive metabolism of sugar, saturated fat, and protein and disruption of gut barrier integrity41,42. In diabetes, the GMB is associated with an increase in the abundance of bacteria with proinflammatory potential, such as Clostridium clostridioforme, Prevotella capricopri, and Bacteroides vulgatus; a decrease in the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila, which improves gut barrier function and regulates inflammation; and a loss of bacteria producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Changes in the composition of the GMB and its metabolites result in increased intestinal permeability, insulin resistance, systemic inflammation, dysregulation of glucose metabolism, and neuronal dysfunction41,43,44.
Obesity also causes changes in the GMB, especially an elevated ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes and a decrease in SCFA-producing bacteria, which is associated with a decreased conjugative capacity to transfer genetic material between bacteria and a decrease in superoxide reductase, leading to oxidative stress in the gut. The observed change in bacterial populations leads to better food energy utilization, which is associated with higher levels of adiposity and metabolic dysfunction45. Hansen et al. revealed that the GMB inhibits the expression of the long noncoding RNA Snhg9, resulting in increased lipid absorption and storage. Increased Snhg9 expression in mice resulted in decreased FA absorption, providing a defense against obesity generated by dietary factors and metabolic abnormalities46. Consequently, in metabolic diseases, dysbiosis in the GMB can affect gut function, systemic inflammation, and neurological function. Because GMB dysbiosis inherently induces changes in its metabolites, which may lead to the functional changes mentioned above, further exploration focusing on the function and regulatory mechanisms of metabolites is essential for expanding our knowledge of metabolic diseases and providing information for developing more effective AD treatment strategies.
Pathophysiological role of GMB-derived metabolites and extracellular vesicles in AD
Several studies have revealed that GMB dysbiosis in AD and metabolic diseases results in abnormal production of microbial metabolites that exacerbate disease progression12,42. Notably, elucidating the specific targets of GMB-derived metabolites and their mechanisms of action could provide crucial insights into potential therapeutic strategies for restoring the impaired function of intracellular organelles such as mitochondria and endolysosomes, which play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorder-associated AD. Recent studies have identified several key mitochondrial targets, such as adenine nucleotide translocator (ANT), voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC), mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), and mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes, which interact with Aβ and contribute to imbalances in mitochondrial dynamics, biogenesis, and mitophagy, as well as impairments in mitochondrial energy metabolism, membrane potential and Ca2+ homeostasis, advancing AD pathogenesis47,48,49,50,51,52. In addition to mitochondrial targets, endolysosomal dysfunction has been linked to the disruption of vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) activity, a decrease in neuronal FKBP4/FKBP52, and inhibition of IST1 (IST1 factor associated with ESCRT-III) expression, which mediates the proteopathy and impairs autophagosome–lysosome fusion53,54,55. By targeting these specific pathways and identifying potential GMB-derived metabolites, we may be able to develop novel interventions that effectively reduce the detrimental effects of metabolic dysfunction on the onset and progression of AD. Therefore, understanding the relationships between changes in metabolic disease-specific microbial metabolites and disease phenotypes is important for the development of drugs targeting GMB-derived metabolites. Metabolites that originate in the gut and hormones transported through the vagus nerve can influence the phenotypes of neurons and glia within the central nervous system and BBB. This influence can subsequently affect processes such as oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, amyloidosis, tauopathy, and the overall development of AD12. In the pathogenesis of obesity and T2DM, metabolites originating from the GMB can contribute to the onset of insulin resistance, potentially triggering an inflammatory response42.
GMB-derived metabolites transported into the bloodstream to the kidney can induce changes in mitochondrial function or interfere with mitophagy, which in turn promotes the progression of diabetic nephropathy56. Furthermore, GMB metabolites associated with metabolic diseases are pivotal in influencing GBA and the occurrence of psychiatric disorders40. As described above, mitochondrial dysfunction and ELN dysfunction are critical for the development of metabolic syndrome-associated AD, which may provide insight into the pathogenesis of AD induced by GMB metabolites. In the following section, we will categorize GMB-derived substances altered in metabolic diseases into amino acids, fatty acids, other metabolites, and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as these classifications can give us a subsequent hypothesis of how each metabolite regulates AD pathogenesis through specific signaling mechanisms associated with mitochondria and ELN function (Fig. 2). Consequently, we explored this issue by identifying metabolite-specific neuronal regulatory effects and mechanisms while simultaneously describing their therapeutic potential for AD. With an understanding of these connections, a more comprehensive approach to treating AD with targeted strategies can be developed.
Amino acid metabolites
Microbial communities produce several amino acid metabolites with unique significance to human health and pathology. In patients with diabetes and obesity, altered GMB-derived tryptophan metabolites are significantly correlated with disease progression40. Tryptophan, an essential amino acid, serves as a precursor for serotonin, melatonin, niacinamide, and vitamin B3, among other vital compounds, through the three distinct indole, serotonin, and kynurenine pathways. Research conducted in clinical settings revealed that obese and diabetic individuals exhibited significant decreases in indole metabolites such as indole-3-acid-acetic acid (IAA), indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), and indole-3-lactic acid (ILA), a phenomenon linked to gut dysbiosis with Bacteroides, Clostridium, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus40. In obese subjects, IAA, ILA, and IPA levels showed a negative relationship with serotonin and kynurenine/tryptophan levels, indicating a reduction in the microbial tryptophan metabolism pathways and an increase in the kynurenine and serotonin pathways40. Indole derivatives potentially interact with proteins involved in AD pathogenesis. After absorption from the intestines, IPA transits to the brain, where it neutralizes hydroxyl radicals, decreases DNA damage, alleviates neuroinflammation by inhibiting astrocytes and microglia and hinders the formation of Aβ fibrils57. Additionally, serotonin and melatonin, which are derived from tryptophan through the serotonergic pathway and are reduced in patients with AD, play a protective role in AD by increasing brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex and reducing intraneuronal Aβ accumulation and hippocampal apoptosis15. Serotonin is produced in the brain and the GMB, but it cannot cross the BBB. Therefore, the intermediate 5-hydroxytryptophan produced by GMB is important for the replenishment of serotonin in the brain. Furthermore, another aspect that is much discussed in connection with AD research relates to the kynurenine pathway, which produces both neuroprotective and neurotoxic metabolites. Kynurenic acid is an effective antagonist of the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDA), while 3-hydroxykynurenine and quinolinic acid induce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation15. Another kynurenine pathway-derived gut metabolite, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+), plays a crucial role in many biological processes, and NAD+ and its precursors, such as nicotinamide (NAM), mononucleotide (NMN), and nicotinamide riboside (NR), are being investigated for their potential protective effects against neurodegenerative disorders and metabolic diseases58. Feng Li et al. explored the relationship between NAD-modified metabolites and mitochondrial function, particularly in the context of AD. Their findings revealed that a specific GMB metabolite, nicotinamide N-oxide (NAMO), which is produced by bacteria such as Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus reuteri, prevents mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation59. NAMO promotes NAD+-dependent mitophagy, effectively regulating its activity levels, and halts the progression of AD. Previous investigations have indicated a strong association between NAD+ and GMB, with a focus on the essentiality of the microbiota in NR metabolism. Furthermore, NR supplementation has been shown to normalize disturbed GMB compositions60. However, studies investigating the effect of NAD+ on AD have failed to identify any specific gut bacteria involved in this process that directly regulates NAD+ metabolism. NAD+ plays a critical role in regulating mitochondrial function and lysosomal acidification, highlighting its importance in cellular metabolism and health61. These findings underscore the multifaceted roles played by tryptophan metabolites in AD62.
The importance of tyrosine derivatives in relation to metabolic diseases and neurological disorders cannot be understated. Our knowledge of the effects of tryptophan metabolites must be improved. Although the host does not synthesize p-cresol, L-tyrosine is converted to p-cresol by some bacterial species, including Fusobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridium difficile, and Coriobacteriaceae, while bacteria such as Escherichia coli and certain Clostridium species contribute to phenol production63. In the analysis of metabolome features, individuals with diabetes and obesity have a p-cresol enrichment pattern, which modifies mitochondrial oxidative metabolism and increases anion superoxide production64. Atypical social conduct triggered by p-cresol has been linked to a reduction in the functioning of central dopamine neurons, which play a role in the social reward pathway63. Another study showed that p-cresol altered the expression of NMDAR subunits within the nucleus accumbens and hippocampus in both healthy and epilepsy-prone rats. In addition, the activity of Rac1, a member of the Rho GTPase family that regulates neuronal structure, was abnormally increased by p-cresol, whereas CREB phosphorylation was defective in the hippocampus65. Therefore, it is likely that the increase in GMB-derived tyrosine metabolites in patients with diabetes and obesity contributes to neurological disorders through various mechanisms that need to be further investigated.
The natural polyamine spermidine can be acquired through oral intake from external dietary sources or through production by commensal GMB, including Bacteroides and Fusobacteria, and through cellular biosynthesis. Research has shown that increased dietary intake of spermidine is linked to neuroprotection and improved insulin resistance, which alleviates the progression of obesity, diabetes, and neurological disorders66. Although GMB-derived spermidine has not been reported to be involved in AD pathology, the therapeutic effects of spermidine are mainly related to maintaining mitochondrial function through the enhancement of mitophagy and mitochondrial respiration, anti-inflammatory effects, and the induction of autophagy associated with ELN function66. Consequently, these mechanisms are likely to be involved in reducing neuroinflammation and soluble Aβ levels in the AD mouse model induced by spermidine67.
Another amino acid metabolite, D-glutamate, can be produced by gut bacteria containing glutamate racemases, such as Corynebacterium glutamicum, Brevibacterium lactofermentum, and Brevibacterium avium. These bacteria are reduced in AD patients68. Because D-glutamate acts as an agonist of the NMDA receptor and its precursor glutamine regulates the function of ELN through TFEB regulation69, it has been the potential to improve cognition in AD68. Furthermore, since reduced fecal and plasma glutamate levels have been positively correlated with reduced glutamate-producing bacteria in obese patients70, obesity-reduced D-glutamate may contribute to AD development. Together, these GMB-derived amino acid metabolites play a distinctive role in AD progression in metabolic diseases. The pathophysiological mechanisms of amino acid metabolites remain unclear, but given that some metabolites act by modulating mitochondrial and ELN functions, it is likely that others also modulate these functions. Furthermore, further research to elucidate the detailed regulatory mechanisms of amino acid metabolites on mitochondria and ELN function could contribute to the development of specific therapeutic strategies for AD.
Fatty acid metabolites
SCFAs, such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate, are widely researched and prevalent metabolites produced by the GMB, including Bifidobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Lachnospiracea41,71. Once absorbed by colon cells, SCFAs can be used as an energy source in the colonic mucosa, can enter the bloodstream, or can pass through the BBB to affect brain function. They can attach to G protein-coupled receptors found in enteroendocrine L cells and trigger the release of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY), leading to increased energy expenditure, decreased food consumption, and improved regulation of glucose metabolism and insulin production41. Therefore, dysbiosis in bacteria and changes in SCFA concentration have been observed in patients with diabetes and obesity40. In fact, the presence of bacteria such as Eubacterium ventriosum and Roseburia intestinalis and an increase in acetate levels are linked to obesity, while bacteria such as Oscillospira spp., which produce butyrate, may be associated with being lean. In individuals with diabetes, there are reductions in the GMB responsible for the production of butyrate and butyrate plasma concentration41. Furthermore, the importance of SCFAs in AD has been highlighted by the observation of a reduced number of SCFA-producing bacteria in fecal samples from AD patients12.
SCFAs strongly inhibit histone deacetylases (HDACs), leading to epigenetic modifications in gene expression. This mechanism may attenuate the progression of AD by influencing oxidative stress, nutrient metabolism, and inflammatory processes. Previous research has indicated that propionate reduces damage to the mitochondrial structure, while butyrate enhances neuronal mitochondrial function by increasing OXPHOS metabolism and inhibiting oxidative stress through epigenetic regulation72,73. Moreover, butyrate administration through the inhibition of HDACs resulted in the restoration of memory function and the upregulation of genes associated with associative learning in the APP/PS1 mouse model of AD74. Given what we have previously reported and our previous research indicating that butyrate inhibits high cholesterol-induced neuronal amyloidogenesis72, reducing SCFAs in individuals with diabetes and obesity may offer a viable approach to boosting mitochondrial function, which may have therapeutic benefits for the treatment of AD. Furthermore, ELN may also be involved in SCFA-mediated disease-regulatory mechanisms, as we recently demonstrated that butyrate ameliorates diabetes-related cognitive impairment by improving Parkin-mediated mitophagy14. Finally, future studies investigating the effects and mechanisms of SCFAs on AD pathogenesis should be designed to distinguish between SCFAs because increased gut butyrate production is associated with improved insulin resistance while increased propionate production or absorption is associated with an increased likelihood of developing AD75.
Several studies have examined the distinctive functions of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) generated by gut bacteria. The first study indicated that the overproduction of certain FAs by gut bacteria, especially Fusimonas intestini, leads to intensified, exacerbated obesity. This is attributed to the generation of long-chain FAs such as elaidate, which impair intestinal epithelial integrity and promote metabolic endotoxemia76. In contrast, the second study highlighted the anti-inflammatory properties of a specific LCFA, 3-hydroxyoctadecaenoic acid, which is produced by Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 and Holdemanella biformis and is beneficial for reducing symptoms of colitis. FA functions by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) in epithelial cells and modulating inflammatory responses77. In summary, the contrasting yet significant roles of LCFAs, as exemplified by these studies, can have diverse effects ranging from anti-inflammatory effects to metabolic endotoxemia, highlighting the possible neuroprotective or neurotoxic effects of gut and brain signaling on the pathogenesis of AD.
Moreover, branched-chain fatty acids (BCFAs) have an impact on the pathogenesis of diabetes and obesity due to their effect on the gut environment as well as on general health; therefore, they should also be considered an important factor78,79. Metabolites formed by fermentation of chain amino acids can sometimes undergo branching by the addition of methyl groups and then elongation to reconstitute BCFAs by gut bacteria, including Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp.80. In obese mice, BCFAs, especially isobutyric acid and isovaleric acid, promote gluconeogenesis in hepatocytes and stimulate the mTORC1/S6K1 pathway79, which can inhibit autophagy and ELN function. Although there is no research on the effect of BCFAs on AD pathogenesis, these compounds may affect AD through the modulation of systemic inflammation, autophagy, and gut–brain signaling mechanisms. Overall, changes in GMB-derived fatty acid metabolites in metabolic diseases may affect the pathogenesis of AD. Although their effects and detailed molecular mechanisms need to be investigated further, their roles in mitochondrial and ELN dysfunction may be involved in the development of neurodegenerative diseases, including AD.
Other metabolites
Recent studies have shown that GMB-derived bile acids, which are secondary bile acids converted from primary bile acids, affect systemic health, including the immune system, and can play a role in metabolic disease41. Because secondary bile acids serve as important ligands for Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) and farnesoid X receptor, both of which play crucial roles in the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism through glucagon-like pathogenesis peptide-1 (GLP1) release, dysbiosis of bile acid-producing bacteria and subsequent changes in the concentrations of secondary bile acids are associated with diabetes and obesity40. The levels of secondary bile acids such as ursodeoxycholate (UDCA), chenodeoxycholate (CDCA), and lithocholate (LCA) were reduced in obese mice and were associated with a reduction in GMB, Clostridium sindens, and serum GLP1 concentrations81, while the level of deoxycholic acid (DCA) increased, accompanied by an increase in Lactococcus, Ruminococcus Coprococcus, and Blautia. Notably, in AD individuals, compared with older adults with normal cognitive function, there were notable reductions in the serum levels of cholic acid, a primary bile acid, and elevations in secondary bile acids such as DCA, along with its glycine and taurine conjugated forms82. Because numerous bile acids and their receptors have been detected in the brain, bile acid-mediated signaling may affect AD pathogenesis82. The interaction between DCA and nicastrin, a subunit of gamma-secretase, was found to be responsible for Aβ accumulation83. Additionally, another secondary bile acid, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), inhibits Aβ accumulation and neuronal cell death and improves mitochondrial function by improving Pink1-mediated mitophagy82.
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter, is predominantly synthesized and controlled by astrocytes and neurons. The tonic GABA current plays a crucial role in regulating various brain functions and cognitive processes, such as memory, learning, sensory perception, and circadian rhythms. Therefore, it is not surprising that not only are GABA levels reduced in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of AD patients, but there is also a significant reduction in GABA in the neuronal components of the brain84. Interestingly, GMBs such as Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus contribute to GABA production, as evidenced by studies showing that altered GMB can influence GABA levels85. Although direct studies focusing on the role of microbiota-derived GABA in AD are limited, existing research suggests its potential impact through the modulation of neuroinflammation and neural excitability. Furthermore, given that GABA administration improves insulin resistance in patients with high-fat-diet (HFD)-induced diabetes86, changes in GMB-derived GABA concentrations in metabolic diseases may affect AD pathogenesis.
Lactate is produced by certain species of gut microbiota, particularly those belonging to the Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium genera, alleviating diabetes symptoms through the fermentation of carbohydrates87,88. Notably, lactate can be further metabolized by other gut bacteria to produce SCFAs89,90. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that lactate could modulate intracellular Mg2+ dynamics, leading to increased mitochondrial Mg2+ uptake from the ER and subsequent alterations in mitochondrial function91. Moreover, changes in CSF Mg2+ concentrations have been reported to be associated with AD, suggesting a potential link between Mg2+ homeostasis and AD pathogenesis92. A recent study reported that lactate-mediated lactylation of PIK3C3/VPS34, a key component of the ELN, via the acetyltransferase KAT5/TIP6093 facilitates the endolysosomal degradation pathway by enhancing its lipid kinase activity. This finding suggested that lactate can directly regulate ELN function through posttranslational modifications, in addition to its effects on mitochondrial Mg2+ homeostasis. Given these findings, GMB-derived lactate could exert similar effects on mitochondrial and ELN function and potentially cross the intestinal barrier, enter the circulation, and influence metabolic alterations associated with changes in the gut microbiota composition. However, further research is needed to directly investigate the impact of gut microbiota-derived lactate on mitochondrial and ELN function in the context of metabolic disorders and AD pathogenesis.
The gut microbiota interacts with diet and may also have an impact on health outcomes, many of which involve metabolites produced by the microbiota from dietary components that can impact the host. Urolithin A (UA) is a member of the urolithin family and is produced in the colon through the GMB-mediated conversion of the natural polyphenols ellagitannins and ellagic acid found in various berry species. Notably, the specific bacteria responsible for producing UA in the human gut remain unidentified, and only approximately 40% of the population have the natural ability to efficiently convert dietary precursors into UA94. However, recent studies have identified the positive effects of the direct administration of UA on health, aging, and age-related conditions. In diabetic and obese mice, UA administration attenuated triglyceride accumulation in the liver, reduced plasma levels of low-density lipoproteins, and improved systemic insulin sensitivity94,95. A reduction in both Aβ plaques and phosphorylated tau levels and subsequent enhancement of cognitive functions were observed after UA treatment in the APP/PS1 mouse model of AD96. Research has consistently demonstrated that UA improves mitophagy and improves mitochondrial function while also reducing exaggerated inflammation94. Additionally, given that UA maintains mitochondrial calcium homeostasis by modulating abnormal ER–mitochondria contact in metabolic syndrome26 and significantly induces autophagic flux in hippocampal neurons97, further research may shed light on detailed disease regulatory mechanisms, including mitochondrial and ELN functions.
Trimethylamine (TMA) is synthesized by intestinal microbes such as Clostridia, Enterobacteriaceae, Klebsiella, and Citrobacter from dietary phosphatidylcholine, lecithin, and L-carnitine, enters the portal circulation, and is oxidized in the liver to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). Elevated TMAO concentrations and their effect on disease have mainly been investigated in metabolic syndrome-mediated atherosclerosis41, but a recent study suggested that elevated levels of plasma TMAO were correlated with a greater likelihood of developing newly diagnosed diabetes98, and an affirmative correlation was observed between elevated levels of circulating TMAO and obesity, as indicated by a greater body mass index99. A recent investigation detected TMAO in CSF, implying its penetration into the BBB and its potential relevance to neurological processes or conditions100. In particular, experimental findings in mice exposed to dietary TMAO revealed accelerated brain aging and cognitive decline100. Elevated levels of TMAO, which is linked to Aβ accumulation, tau aggregation, and synaptic damage through mitochondrial impairment and superoxide production within neurons and glia, have been observed in individuals with AD and aged mice101.
Extracellular vesicles
Recent findings have elucidated the translocation and existence of gut microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles (GMEVs) in addition to GMB-derived metabolites102. GMEVs exhibit various sizes, typically ranging from 20 to 400 nm, and are identifiable in various body fluids, including urine, serum, and CSF, as well as feces and intestinal aspirates. They can contain diverse bioactive compounds, such as proteins and nucleic acids, which can be transported over varying distances to regulate significant biological processes, thereby influencing the overall health of the host organism. In the development of diabetes and obesity, GMEVs can alter the permeability of the gut barrier and induce intestinal inflammation, increasing insulin resistance and triggering inflammation103. In fact, metagenomic analyses revealed the existence of EVs of the Proteobacteria phylum in the serum of individuals with diabetes, which inhibits insulin-induced activation of the insulin receptor substrate 1 in HFD-fed mice104. Furthermore, the outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) produced by the gram-negative bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis also decrease insulin-stimulated glycogen synthase kinase 3β signaling102. However, it is important to keep in mind that some bacterial EVs, such as OMVs derived from Akkermansia muciniphila, which reduce adipocyte size and increase fatty acid oxidation in obese mice102,104, have shown positive results in disease prevention. From this perspective, EVs derived from bacteria that have adverse effects on diabetes and obesity may also have negative effects on AD.
In the brain, EVs affect neurons and glia by delivering proteins, lipids, RNA, and DNA, and these vesicles may contain inflammatory mediators or signaling molecules that modulate AD pathogenesis105. However, there are some preliminary suggestions that certain substances in GMEVs might be involved in cognitive impairment and the pathogenesis of AD. It was previously observed that among young mice undergoing fecal transplantation, cognitive impairments were correlated with the presence of two bacteria, Paenalcaligenes hominis and Escherichia coli106. Interestingly, EVs from Paenalcaligenes hominis promoted cognitive dysfunction, whereas those from Escherichia coli did not. In addition, the gut–liver axis may play a role in neurological functional changes through microbiota-derived metabolites and EVs influencing liver function107. Furthermore, a recent study suggested that GMEVs not only serve as intercellular communicators but also inhibit Aβ peptide aggregation108. They can also regulate functions within the CNS through substances such as serotonin. Furthermore, they can be used as potential biomarkers due to their involvement in the modulation of diseases for the early detection of AD. Although direct research linking these GMEVs to AD has not yet been extensively conducted, the literature suggests a potential connection between metabolic disease-induced GMEVs and the pathogenesis of AD. Furthermore, considering that the inhibitory effect of Proteus mirabilis-derived OMVs on bone loss was established by mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis109, it is quite possible that GMEVs, which have not yet been fully characterized, affect the disease by modulating the function of mitochondria or ELNs in AD, and further studies are needed to understand the specific underlying mechanisms involved. This may open new avenues for therapeutic intervention and provide a deeper understanding of the pathogenesis of AD.
Therapeutic strategies targeting the GMB–metabolite–mitochondria–ELN axis in AD
Emerging evidence indicates an intricate interaction between GMB-derived metabolites, metabolic syndrome, and cellular dysregulation, such as mitochondrial and ELN dysfunction, in AD pathogenesis (Table 1). To further understand these associations, it is important to investigate the detailed mechanisms by which alterations in metabolic syndrome-specific bacterial species and their metabolites occur and how altered GMB-derived metabolites modulate mitochondrial or ELN functions and mitochondria-ELN crosstalk. Furthermore, by integrating multiomics data platforms, which encompass microbial, metabolomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic datasets, analyzing these relationships from a systems biology perspective will be instrumental in revealing their complex interplay. Recent progress, such as the application of UPLC–MS/MS and deep learning models to detect biomarkers of metabolic syndrome and AD, demonstrates the ability of metabolomics and metagenomics to provide valuable insights for preventive and therapeutic approaches110. Additionally, in vitro cell models and different in vivo animal models, including organoid–microbe coculture systems, conventional, germ-free, advanced genetic models, and gnotobiotic mice, are necessary to validate the direct links between microbial factors, subcellular defects, and AD progression111,112,113.
On the therapeutic front, targeting the metabolic syndrome-altered GMB–metabolite–mitochondria–ELN axis could be a promising strategy for intervening in AD. This approach underscores the need to develop integrated and personalized treatment modalities that go beyond traditional single-target therapies. Several strategies have been proposed to modulate the GMB, including the use of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics. Prebiotics are nondigestible food components that stimulate the growth and activity of advantageous gut bacteria, thus promoting a healthy gut microbiome. Probiotics involve the administration of beneficial bacteria to restore a healthy gut microbiome, which may involve reconstitution with a single bacterial treatment through nanoencapsulation techniques114,115,116. Synbiotics combine both probiotics and prebiotics to achieve a synergistic effect on the GMB. However, these approaches face challenges such as the survival and colonization of the introduced bacteria in the gut, which may limit their long-term efficacy. Given the anaerobic nature of many gut bacteria, postbiotics, bioactive compounds produced by microorganisms, may offer a promising alternative for modulating GMB-derived metabolites in the context of AD117. Postbiotics can be administered directly to exert beneficial effects without the need for live bacteria, thus overcoming potential challenges such as the survival and colonization of introduced bacteria in the gut. These postbiotic compounds include heat-killed fractions of probiotic bacteria and metabolites derived from GMB, such as lipoteichoic acid, butyrate, tryptophan metabolites, rhamnose-rich exopolysaccharides, and UDCA. These postbiotics may directly or indirectly regulate mitochondrial and endolysosomal functions through various mechanisms, including the modulation of autophagy, host metabolism, systemic immunity, and antioxidative effects, thereby potentially influencing the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome-associated AD118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125. However, further research is required to identify the specific compounds and their mechanisms of action, as well as to determine the optimal dosing and delivery methods for the clinical application of postbiotics.
In addition to these targeted interventions, nutritional strategies aimed at modulating the GMB and its metabolites may play a crucial role in the prevention and management of AD. Accumulating evidence suggests that diet can significantly influence the composition and function of the GMB, with implications for metabolic health and brain function. Investigating how diet affects GMB–mitochondria–ELN communication in the management of metabolic syndrome may lead to the development of nutritional strategies for both AD prevention and treatment. These strategies may include dietary interventions, such as increasing the consumption of fiber-rich foods and limiting the intake of processed and high-fat foods, as well as lifestyle modifications, such as regular exercise and stress reduction.
Conclusions and prospects
In summary, elucidating the relationship between GMB metabolites and subcellular processes in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome-associated AD has the potential to provide novel perspectives for its treatment. Exploring the therapeutic strategies that directly influence the functions of mitochondria and endolysosomes within the broader scope of GMB and metabolite research represents a promising frontier in AD therapy. However, the current lack of research directly linking GMB-derived metabolites to mitochondrial and endolysosomal impairment in AD pathogenesis highlights the necessity for comprehensive investigations. Recent innovations in metabolomics and metagenomics, along with the utilization of various in vitro and in vivo models, can help validate the direct links between GMB, subcellular defects, and AD progression. Targeting the GMB–metabolite–mitochondria–endolysosome axis altered by metabolic syndrome could emerge as a promising approach for alleviating AD pathology, emphasizing the need for integrated and personalized therapeutic approaches. Translating the insights achieved from studying the GMB–metabolite–mitochondria–endolysosome axis into clinical practice will require meticulous consideration of various factors, including individual variations in GMB composition, the safety of GMB-targeted interventions, and the establishment of noninvasive biomarkers. Overcoming these concerns will be pivotal in bridging the gap between preclinical investigation and clinical application, enabling the development of effective and safe interventions directed at the GMB–metabolite–mitochondria–endolysosome axis in AD. Future research should concentrate on validating the direct associations between specific metabolites and cellular dysfunction, developing personalized therapeutic approaches, and addressing the hurdles linked to translating these findings into clinical practice.
References
Gustavsson, A. et al. Global estimates on the number of persons across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Alzheimers Dement 19, 658–670 (2023).
Bellenguez, C. et al. New insights into the genetic etiology of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Nat. Genet. 54, 412–436 (2022).
Scheltens, P. et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 397, 1577–1590 (2021).
van der Lee, S. J. et al. The effect of APOE and other common genetic variants on the onset of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia: a community-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 17, 434–444 (2018).
Santiago, J. A., Karthikeyan, M., Lackey, M., Villavicencio, D. & Potashkin, J. A. Diabetes: a tipping point in neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Mol. Med. 29, 1029–1044 (2023).
Lee, H. J., Chae, C. W. & Han, H. J. Enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in diabetes: amelioration of mitochondrial dysfunction-induced senescence. Biomed. Pharmacother. 168, 115759 (2023).
Gilleron, J. & Zeigerer, A. Endosomal trafficking in metabolic homeostasis and diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 19, 28–45 (2023).
Wilson, D. M. et al. Hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases. Cell 186, 693–714 (2023).
Gao, S., Casey, A. E., Sargeant, T. J. & Mäkinen, V. P. Genetic variation within endolysosomal system is associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 141, 2711–2720 (2018).
Deus, C. M., Yambire, K. F., Oliveira, P. J. & Raimundo, N. Mitochondria-lysosome crosstalk: from physiology to neurodegeneration. Trends Mol. Med. 26, 71–88 (2020).
Ferreiro, A. L. et al. Gut microbiome composition may be an indicator of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 15, eabo2984 (2023).
Chandra, S., Sisodia, S. S. & Vassar, R. J. The gut microbiome in Alzheimer’s disease: what we know and what remains to be explored. Mol. Neurodegener. 18, 1–21 (2023).
Yuan, X. et al. Functional and metabolic alterations of gut microbiota in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Nat. Commun. 13, 6356 (2022).
Cho, J. H. et al. Sodium butyrate ameliorates high glucose-suppressed neuronal mitophagy by restoring PRKN expression via inhibiting the RELA-HDAC8 complex. Autophagy 20, 1505–1522 (2024).
Aaldijk, E. & Vermeiren, Y. The role of serotonin within the microbiota-gut-brain axis in the development of Alzheimer’s disease: a narrative review. Ageing Res. Rev. 75, 101556 (2022).
Nianogo, R. A. et al. Risk factors associated with Alzheimer disease and related dementias by sex and race and ethnicity in the US. JAMA Neurol. 79, 584–591 (2022).
Ezkurdia, A., Ramírez, M. J. & Solas, M. Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: a focus on insulin resistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 4354 (2023).
Lee, H. J. et al. High glucose upregulates BACE1-mediated Aβ production through ROS-dependent HIF-1α and LXRα/ABCA1-regulated lipid raft reorganization in SK-N-MC cells. Sci. Rep. 6, 36746 (2016).
Wang, W., Zhao, F., Ma, X., Perry, G. & Zhu, X. Mitochondria dysfunction in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: recent advances. Mol. Neurodegener. 15, 30 (2020).
Al-Kuraishy, H. M., Jabir, M. S., Albuhadily, A. K., Al-Gareeb, A. I. & Rafeeq, M. F. The link between metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer disease: a mutual relationship and long rigorous investigation. Ageing Res. Rev. 91, 102084 (2023).
Huang, J.-r et al. Urolithin A ameliorates obesity-induced metabolic cardiomyopathy in mice via mitophagy activation. Acta Pharm. Sin. 44, 321–331 (2023).
de Mello, A. H., Costa, A. B., Engel, J. D. G. & Rezin, G. T. Mitochondrial dysfunction in obesity. Life Sci. 192, 26–32 (2018).
Onphachanh, X. et al. Enhancement of high glucose-induced PINK1 expression by melatonin stimulates neuronal cell survival: involvement of MT2 /Akt/NF-κB pathway. J. Pineal Res. 63, e12427 (2017).
Choi, G. E. & Han, H. J. Glucocorticoid impairs mitochondrial quality control in neurons. Neurobiol. Dis. 152, 105301 (2021).
Lim, J. R. et al. Ethanol-activated CaMKII signaling induces neuronal apoptosis through Drp1-mediated excessive mitochondrial fission and JNK1-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Cell Commun. Signal. 18, 123 (2020).
Lee, H. J. et al. Urolithin A suppresses high glucose-induced neuronal amyloidogenesis by modulating TGM2-dependent ER-mitochondria contacts and calcium homeostasis. Cell Death Differ. 28, 184–202 (2021).
Peric, A. & Annaert, W. Early etiology of Alzheimer’s disease: tipping the balance toward autophagy or endosomal dysfunction? Acta Neuropathol. 129, 363–381 (2015).
Nixon, R. A. Amyloid precursor protein and endosomal-lysosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: inseparable partners in a multifactorial disease. FASEB J. 31, 2729–2743 (2017).
Chae, C. W. et al. High glucose-mediated PICALM and mTORC1 modulate processing of amyloid precursor protein via endosomal abnormalities. Br. J. Pharm. 177, 3828–3847 (2020).
Tessneer, K. L., Jackson, R. M., Griesel, B. A. & Olson, A. L. Rab5 activity regulates GLUT4 sorting into insulin-responsive and non-insulin-responsive endosomal compartments: a potential mechanism for development of insulin resistance. Endocrinology 155, 3315–3328 (2014).
Chae, C. W. et al. High glucose-mediated VPS26a down-regulation dysregulates neuronal amyloid precursor protein processing and tau phosphorylation. Br. J. Pharm. 179, 3934–3950 (2022).
Luo, X. et al. Obesity induces preadipocyte CD36 expression promoting inflammation via the disruption of lysosomal calcium homeostasis and lysosome function. EBioMedicine 56, 102797 (2020).
Chae, C. W. et al. TRIM16-mediated lysophagy suppresses high-glucose-accumulated neuronal Aβ. Autophagy 19, 2752–2768 (2023).
Grant, B. D. & Donaldson, J. G. Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 597–608 (2009).
Satoh, A. O. et al. Interaction between PI3K and the VDAC2 channel tethers Ras-PI3K-positive endosomes to mitochondria and promotes endosome maturation. Cell Rep. 42, 112229 (2023).
Wu, K. K. L. & Cheng, K. K. Y. A new role of the early endosome in restricting NLRP3 inflammasome via mitophagy. Autophagy 18, 1475–1477 (2022).
Todkar, K., Chikhi, L. & Germain, M. Mitochondrial interaction with the endosomal compartment in endocytosis and mitochondrial transfer. Mitochondrion 49, 284–288 (2019).
Wong, Y. C., Ysselstein, D. & Krainc, D. Mitochondria-lysosome contacts regulate mitochondrial fission via RAB7 GTP hydrolysis. Nature 554, 382–386 (2018).
Cisneros, J., Belton, T. B., Shum, G. C., Molakal, C. G. & Wong, Y. C. Mitochondria-lysosome contact site dynamics and misregulation in neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosci. 45, 312–322 (2022).
Lin, K., Zhu, L. & Yang, L. Gut and obesity/metabolic disease: focus on microbiota metabolites. MedComm 3, e171 (2022).
Fan, Y. & Pedersen, O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 55–71 (2021).
Scheithauer, T. P. M. et al. Gut microbiota as a trigger for metabolic inflammation in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Front. Immunol. 11, 571731 (2020).
Hosomi, K. et al. Oral administration of Blautia wexlerae ameliorates obesity and type 2 diabetes via metabolic remodeling of the gut microbiota. Nat. Commun. 13, 4477 (2022).
Hossain, I. et al. Evaluating gut microbiota modification as a next-generation therapy for obesity and diabetes. Curr. Diabetes Rev. 20, e150523216913 (2023).
Suriano, F. et al. Fat and not sugar as the determining factor for gut microbiota changes, obesity, and related metabolic disorders in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 324, E85–e96 (2023).
Wang, Y. et al. The gut microbiota reprograms intestinal lipid metabolism through long noncoding RNA Snhg9. Science 381, 851–857 (2023).
Jha, S. K., Jha, N. K., Kumar, D., Ambasta, R. K. & Kumar, P. Linking mitochondrial dysfunction, metabolic syndrome and stress signaling in Neurodegeneration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1863, 1132–1146 (2017).
Atlante, A., Valenti, D., Latina, V. & Amadoro, G. Dysfunction of mitochondria in Alzheimer’s disease: ANT and VDAC interact with toxic proteins and aid to determine the fate of brain cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 7722 (2022).
Du, H. & Yan, S. S. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore in Alzheimer’s disease: cyclophilin D and amyloid beta. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1802, 198–204 (2010).
Bobba, A. et al. Mitochondrial respiratory chain Complexes I and IV are impaired by β-amyloid via direct interaction and through Complex I-dependent ROS production, respectively. Mitochondrion 13, 298–311 (2013).
Hansson Petersen, C. A. et al. The amyloid β-peptide is imported into mitochondria via the TOM import machinery and localized to mitochondrial cristae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 105, 13145–13150 (2008).
Arbel-Ornath, M. et al. Soluble oligomeric amyloid-β induces calcium dyshomeostasis that precedes synapse loss in the living mouse brain. Mol. Neurodegener. 12, 27 (2017).
Kim, S. H. et al. Endolysosomal impairment by binding of amyloid beta or MAPT/Tau to V-ATPase and rescue via the HYAL-CD44 axis in Alzheimer disease. Autophagy 19, 2318–2337 (2023).
Tong, B. C. et al. Lysosomal TPCN (two pore segment channel) inhibition ameliorates β-amyloid pathology and mitigates memory impairment in Alzheimer disease. Autophagy 18, 624–642 (2022).
Chambraud, B. et al. Decrease of neuronal FKBP4/FKBP52 modulates perinuclear lysosomal positioning and MAPT/Tau behavior during MAPT/Tau-induced proteotoxic stress. Autophagy 17, 3491–3510 (2021).
Ma, L. et al. The potential mechanism of gut microbiota-microbial metabolites-mitochondrial axis in progression of diabetic kidney disease. Mol. Med. 29, 148 (2023).
Pappolla, M. A. et al. Indoles as essential mediators in the gut-brain axis. Their role in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 156, 105403 (2021).
Alegre, G. F. S. & Pastore, G. M. NAD+ precursors nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) and nicotinamide riboside (NR): potential dietary contribution to health. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 12, 445–464 (2023).
Li, F. et al. The intestinal microbial metabolite nicotinamide n-oxide prevents herpes simplex encephalitis via activating mitophagy in microglia. Gut Microbes 14, 2096989 (2022).
Chu, X. et al. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide supplementation drives gut microbiota variation in Alzheimer’s mouse model. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14, 993615 (2022).
Yagi, M. et al. Mitochondrial translation deficiency impairs NAD+-mediated lysosomal acidification. EMBO J. 40, e105268 (2021).
Wang, Z., Zou, Z. & Li, Q. Nicotinic acid supplementation contributes to the amelioration of Alzheimer’s disease in mouse models. Ann. Transl. Med. 10, 1049 (2022).
Bermudez-Martin, P. et al. The microbial metabolite p-Cresol induces autistic-like behaviors in mice by remodeling the gut microbiota. Microbiome 9, 157 (2021).
Fromentin, S. et al. Microbiome and metabolome features of the cardiometabolic disease spectrum. Nat. Med. 28, 303–314 (2022).
Tevzadze, G. et al. Gut neurotoxin p-cresol induces differential expression of GLUN2B and GLUN2A subunits of the NMDA receptor in the hippocampus and nucleus accumbens in healthy and audiogenic seizure-prone rats. AIMS Neurosci. 7, 30–42 (2020).
Madeo, F., Eisenberg, T., Pietrocola, F. & Kroemer, G. Spermidine in health and disease. Science 359, eaan2788 (2018).
Freitag, K. et al. Spermidine reduces neuroinflammation and soluble amyloid β in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. J. Neuroinflammation 19, 172 (2022).
Chang, C. H., Lin, C. H. & Lane, H. Y. D-glutamate and gut microbiota in Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2676 (2020).
Wilden, A. R., Molina, J. A., Feuerborn, M., Boyle, D. & Lee, S. Y. Glutamine-dependent lysosome homeostatic changes induced by starvation and lysosome inhibition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1865, 1356–1367 (2018).
Palomo-Buitrago, M. E. et al. Glutamate interactions with obesity, insulin resistance, cognition and gut microbiota composition. Acta Diabetol. 56, 569–579 (2019).
Fusco, W. et al. Short-chain fatty-acid-producing bacteria: Key components of the human gut microbiota. Nutrients 15, 2211 (2023).
Kim, S. Y. et al. Sodium butyrate inhibits high cholesterol-induced neuronal amyloidogenesis by modulating NRF2 stabilization-mediated ROS levels: involvement of NOX2 and SOD1. Cell Death Dis. 11, 469 (2020).
Cheng, Y. et al. Propionate relieves pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures, consequent mitochondrial disruption, neuron necrosis and neurological deficits in mice. Biochem. Pharm. 169, 113607 (2019).
Silva, Y. P., Bernardi, A. & Frozza, R. L. The role of short-chain fatty acids from gut microbiota in gut-brain communication. Front. Endocrinol. 11, 25 (2020).
Sanna, S. et al. Causal relationships among the gut microbiome, short-chain fatty acids and metabolic diseases. Nat. Genet. 51, 600–605 (2019).
Takeuchi, T. et al. Fatty acid overproduction by gut commensal microbiota exacerbates obesity. Cell Metab. 35, 361–375.e369 (2023).
Pujo, J. et al. Bacteria-derived long chain fatty acid exhibits anti-inflammatory properties in colitis. Gut 70, 1088–1097 (2021).
Ran-Ressler, R. R., Glahn, R. P., Bae, S. & Brenna, J. T. Branched-chain fatty acids in the neonatal gut and estimated dietary intake in infancy and adulthood. Nestle Nutr. Inst. Workshop Ser. 77, 133–143 (2013).
Choi, B. S. Y. et al. Feeding diversified protein sources exacerbates hepatic insulin resistance via increased gut microbial branched-chain fatty acids and mTORC1 signaling in obese mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 3377 (2021).
Hemalatha, R. et al. Effect of probiotic supplementation on total lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and short chain fatty acids in 2-5-year-old children. Micro. Ecol. Health Dis. 28, 1298340 (2017).
Wei, M. et al. A dysregulated bile acid-gut microbiota axis contributes to obesity susceptibility. EBioMedicine 55, 102766 (2020).
MahmoudianDehkordi, S. et al. Altered bile acid profile associates with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease-An emerging role for gut microbiome. Alzheimers Dement. 15, 76–92 (2019).
Luan, H., Li, X., Zhang, W. & Luan, T. Thermal proteome profiling unveils protein targets of deoxycholic acid in living neuronal cells. Adv. Biotechnol. 1, 7 (2023).
Carello-Collar, G. et al. The GABAergic system in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 12, 5025–5036 (2023).
Loh, J. S. et al. Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases. Signal. Transduct. Target Ther. 9, 37 (2024).
Rezazadeh, H., Sharifi, M. R., Sharifi, M. & Soltani, N. Ɣ-aminobutyric acid attenuates insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients and reduces the risk of insulin resistance in their offspring. Biomed. Pharmacother. 138, 111440 (2021).
Pessione, E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2, 86 (2012).
Wang, G. et al. Lactic acid bacteria reduce diabetes symptoms in mice by alleviating gut microbiota dysbiosis and inflammation in different manners. Food Funct. 11, 5898–5914 (2020).
Wang, S. P. et al. Pivotal roles for pH, lactate, and lactate-utilizing bacteria in the stability of a human colonic microbial ecosystem. mSystems 5, e00645–00620 (2020).
Bourriaud, C. et al. Lactate is mainly fermented to butyrate by human intestinal microfloras but inter-individual variation is evident. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 201–212 (2005).
Daw, C. C. et al. Lactate elicits ER-Mitochondrial Mg2+ dynamics to integrate cellular metabolism. Cell 183, 474–489 (2020).
Veronese, N. et al. Magnesium status in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 31, 208–213 (2016).
Sun, W., Jia, M., Feng, Y. & Cheng, X. Lactate is a bridge linking glycolysis and autophagy through lactylation. Autophagy 19, 3240–3241 (2023).
D’Amico, D. et al. Impact of the natural compound urolithin A on health, disease, and aging. Trends Mol. Med. 27, 687–699 (2021).
Toney, A. M. et al. Urolithin A, a gut metabolite, improves insulin sensitivity through augmentation of mitochondrial function and biogenesis. Obesity 27, 612–620 (2019).
Fang, E. F. et al. Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-β and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 401–412 (2019).
Ballesteros-Álvarez, J., Nguyen, W., Sivapatham, R., Rane, A. & Andersen, J. K. Urolithin A reduces amyloid-β load and improves cognitive deficits uncorrelated with plaque burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Geroscience 45, 1095–1113 (2023).
Shan, Z. et al. Association between microbiota-dependent metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide and type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 106, 888–894 (2017).
Dehghan, P., Farhangi, M. A., Nikniaz, L., Nikniaz, Z. & Asghari‐Jafarabadi, M. Gut microbiota‐derived metabolite trimethylamine N‐oxide (TMAO) potentially increases the risk of obesity in adults: an exploratory systematic review and dose‐response meta‐analysis. Obes. Rev. 21, e12993 (2020).
Vogt, N. M. et al. The gut microbiota-derived metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide is elevated in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 10, 124 (2018).
Buawangpong, N., Pinyopornpanish, K., Siri-Angkul, N., Chattipakorn, N. & Chattipakorn, S. C. The role of trimethylamine-N-Oxide in the development of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cell Physiol. 237, 1661–1685 (2022).
Villard, A., Boursier, J. & Andriantsitohaina, R. Microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles and metabolic syndrome. Acta Physiol. 231, e13600 (2021).
Díez-Sainz, E., Milagro, F. I., Riezu-Boj, J. I. & Lorente-Cebrián, S. Effects of gut microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles on obesity and diabetes and their potential modulation through diet. J. Physiol. Biochem. 78, 485–499 (2022).
Choi, Y. et al. Gut microbe-derived extracellular vesicles induce insulin resistance, thereby impairing glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle. Sci. Rep. 5, 15878 (2015).
Gomes, P. et al. Extracellular vesicles and Alzheimer’s disease in the novel era of precision medicine: implications for disease progression, diagnosis and treatment. Exp. Neurol. 358, 114183 (2022).
Lee, K. E. et al. The extracellular vesicle of gut microbial Paenalcaligenes hominis is a risk factor for vagus nerve-mediated cognitive impairment. Microbiome 8, 107 (2020).
Kang, S. G. et al. Effect of gut microbiome-derived metabolites and extracellular vesicles on hepatocyte functions in a gut-liver axis chip. Nano Converg. 10, 5 (2023).
Kim, N. Y. et al. Effect of gut microbiota-derived metabolites and extracellular vesicles on neurodegenerative disease in a gut-brain axis chip. Nano Converg. 11, 7 (2024).
Avila-Calderón, E. D. et al. Outer membrane vesicles of gram-negative bacteria: an outlook on biogenesis. Front. Microbiol. 12, 557902 (2021).
Dekkers, K. F. et al. An online atlas of human plasma metabolite signatures of gut microbiome composition. Nat. Commun. 13, 5370 (2022).
Martín, R., Bermúdez-Humarán, L. G. & Langella, P. Gnotobiotic rodents: an in vivo model for the study of microbe-microbe interactions. Front. Microbiol. 7, 409 (2016).
Kennedy, E. A., King, K. Y. & Baldridge, M. T. Mouse microbiota models: comparing germ-free mice and antibiotics treatment as tools for modifying gut bacteria. Front. Physiol. 9, 1534 (2018).
Puschhof, J. et al. Intestinal organoid cocultures with microbes. Nat. Protoc. 16, 4633–4649 (2021).
Ueda, A. et al. Identification of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains for gut microbiome-based intervention in Alzheimer’s-type dementia. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100398 (2021).
Centurion, F. et al. Nanoencapsulation for probiotic delivery. ACS Nano 15, 18653–18660 (2021).
Liu, N. et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle-encapsulated Bifidobacterium attenuates brain Aβ burden and improves olfactory dysfunction of APP/PS1 mice by nasal delivery. J. Nanobiotechnol. 20, 439 (2022).
Liang, B. & Xing, D. The current and future perspectives of postbiotics. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 15, 1626–1643 (2023).
Fiedorowicz, M. et al. Tryptophan and kynurenine pathway metabolites in animal models of retinal and optic nerve damage: different dynamics of changes. Front. Physiol. 10, 1254 (2019).
Fu, J. et al. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid protects retinal and visual function in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Pharmaceutics 13, 1154 (2021).
Ghoneim, M. A. M., Hassan, A. I., Mahmoud, M. G. & Asker, M. S. Effect of polysaccharide from Bacillus subtilis sp. on cardiovascular diseases and atherogenic indices in diabetic rats. BMC Complement Alter. Med. 16, 112 (2016).
Balaguer, F. et al. Lipoteichoic acid from Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BPL1: a novel postbiotic that reduces fat deposition via IGF-1 pathway. Micro. Biotechnol. 15, 805–816 (2022).
Balzaretti, S. et al. A novel rhamnose-rich hetero-exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus paracasei DG activates THP-1 human monocytic cells. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 83, e02702–e02716 (2017).
Huang, Y. et al. Sodium butyrate ameliorates diabetic retinopathy in mice via the regulation of gut microbiota and related short-chain fatty acids. J. Transl. Med. 21, 451 (2023).
Magryś, A. & Pawlik, M. Postbiotic fractions of probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum 299v and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG show immune-modulating effects. Cells 12, 2538 (2023).
Piqué, N., Berlanga, M. & Miñana-Galbis, D. Health benefits of heat-killed (tyndallized) probiotics: an overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2534 (2019).
Kircher, B. et al. Predicting butyrate- and propionate-forming bacteria of gut microbiota from sequencing data. Gut Microbes 14, 2149019 (2022).
Erny, D. et al. Microbiota-derived acetate enables the metabolic fitness of the brain innate immune system during health and disease. Cell Metab. 33, 2260–2276.e2267 (2021).
Fock, E. & Parnova, R. Mechanisms of blood-brain barrier protection by microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids. Cells 12, 657 (2023).
Hoyles, L. et al. Metabolic retroconversion of trimethylamine N-oxide and the gut microbiota. Microbiome 6, 73 (2018).
Vizioli, C. et al. Administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis strain BB-12® in healthy children: characterization, functional composition, and metabolism of the gut microbiome. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1165771 (2023).
Strandwitz, P. et al. GABA-modulating bacteria of the human gut microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 396–403 (2019).
Banerjee, S. et al. Transcriptomics reveal different metabolic strategies for acid resistance and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production in select Levilactobacillus brevis strains. Micro. Cell Fact. 20, 173 (2021).
Lyu, C. et al. Exploring the contributions of two glutamate decarboxylase isozymes in Lactobacillus brevis to acid resistance and γ-aminobutyric acid production. Micro. Cell Fact. 17, 180 (2018).
Mulak, A. Bile acids as key modulators of the brain-gut-microbiota axis in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 84, 461–477 (2021).
Saksena, S. et al. Upregulation of P-glycoprotein by probiotics in intestinal epithelial cells and in the dextran sulfate sodium model of colitis in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 300, G1115–G1123 (2011).
Foley, S. E. et al. Gut microbiota regulation of P-glycoprotein in the intestinal epithelium in maintenance of homeostasis. Microbiome 9, 183 (2021).
Chiu, C. et al. P-glycoprotein expression and amyloid accumulation in human aging and Alzheimer’s disease: preliminary observations. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 2475–2482 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2023-00208475) and BK21 FOUR Future Veterinary Medicine Leading Education and Research Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jung, Y.H., Chae, C.W. & Han, H.J. The potential role of gut microbiota-derived metabolites as regulators of metabolic syndrome-associated mitochondrial and endolysosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Mol Med 56, 1691–1702 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01282-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-024-01282-3