SNP and haplotype mapping for genetic analysis in the rat

1. Jacob, H.J. & Kwitek, A.E. Rat genetics: attaching physiology and pharmacology to the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 33–42 (2002).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

2. Bihoreau, M.T. et al. A linkage map of the rat genome derived from three F2 crosses. Genome Res. 7, 434–440 (1997).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

3. Guryev, V., Berezikov, E., Malik, R., Plasterk, R.H. & Cuppen, E. Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with rat expressed sequences. Genome Res. 14, 1438–1443 (2004).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

4. Zimdahl, H. et al. A SNP map of the rat genome generated from cDNA sequences. Science 303, 807 (2004).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

5. Thomas, M.A., Chen, C.F., Jensen-Seaman, M.I., Tonellato, P.J. & Twigger, S.N. Phylogenetics of rat inbred strains. Mamm. Genome 14, 61–64 (2003).

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Kurtz, T.W. & Morris, R.C. Jr. Biological variability in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Implications for research with the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension 10, 127–131 (1987).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

7. Kurtz, T.W., Montano, M., Chan, L. & Kabra, P. Molecular evidence of genetic heterogeneity in Wistar-Kyoto rats: implications for research with the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension 13, 188–192 (1989).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

8. Gauguier, D. The rat as a model physiological system. In Encyclopedia of Genetics vol. 3 (eds. Jorde, L.B., Little, P., Dunn, M. & Subramaniam, S.) 1154–1171 (Wiley, London, 2006).

   Google Scholar 

9. Arbiza, L. et al. Selective pressures at a codon-level predict deleterious mutations in human disease genes. J. Mol. Biol. 358, 1390–1404 (2006).

   Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

10. Goñi, J.R., de la Cruz, X. & Orozco, M. Triplex-forming oligonucleotide target sequences in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 354–360 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Hedrich, H.J. (ed.) Genetic Monitoring of Inbred Strains of Rat (Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

12. Huson, D.H. & Bryant, D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 254–267 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

13. Mashimo, T. et al. A set of highly informative rat simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) markers and genetically defined rat strains. BMC Genet. 7, 19 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Smits, B.M. et al. Efficient single nucleotide polymorphism discovery in laboratory rat strains using wild rat-derived SNP candidates. BMC Genomics 6, 170 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Gabriel, S.B. et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296, 2225–2229 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

16. Barrett, J.C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M.J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

17. Wade, C.M. et al. The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genome. Nature 420, 574–578 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

18. Frazer, K.A. et al. A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains. Nature 448, 1050–1053 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

19. Yang, H., Bell, T.A., Churchill, G.A. & Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F. On the subspecific origin of the laboratory mouse. Nat. Genet. 39, 1100–1107 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

20. Lindblad-Toh, K. et al. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438, 803–819 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

21. Guryev, V. et al. Haplotype block structure is conserved across mammals. PLoS Genet. 2, e121 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Jensen-Seaman, M.I. et al. Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes. Genome Res. 14, 528–538 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

23. Grupe, A. et al. In silico mapping of complex disease-related traits in mice. Science 292, 1915–1918 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

24. Payseur, B.A. & Place, M. Prospects for association mapping in classical inbred mouse strains. Genetics 175, 1999–2008 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

25. Gauguier, D. et al. Chromosomal mapping of genetic loci associated with non-insulin dependent diabetes in the GK rat. Nat. Genet. 12, 38–43 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

26. Hubner, N. et al. Integrated transcriptional profiling and linkage analysis for identification of genes underlying disease. Nat. Genet. 37, 243–253 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

27. Dumas, M.E. et al. Direct quantitative trait locus mapping of mammalian metabolic phenotypes in diabetic and normoglycemic rat models. Nat. Genet. 39, 666–672 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

28. Mashimo, T., Voigt, B., Kuramoto, T. & Serikawa, T. Rat Phenome Project: the untapped potential of existing rat strains. J. Appl. Physiol. 98, 371–379 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Ihaka, R. & Gentleman, R.R. A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 5, 299–314 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

30. Broman, K.W. The genomes of recombinant inbred lines. Genetics 169, 1133–1146 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

31. Shisa, H. et al. The LEXF: a new set of rat recombinant inbred strains between LE/Stm and F344. Mamm. Genome 8, 324–327 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

32. Fujiyama, A. et al. Construction and analysis of a human-chimpanzee comparative clone map. Science 295, 131–134 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

33. Ning, Z., Cox, A.J. & Mullikin, J.C. SSAHA: a fast search method for large DNA databases. Genome Res. 11, 1725–1729 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

34. Oliphant, A., Barker, D.L., Stuelpnagel, J.R. & Chee, M.S. BeadArray technology: enabling an accurate, cost-effective approach to high-throughput genotyping. Biotechniques 32 (suppl.), 56–58, 60–61 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

35. Hardenbol, P. et al. Multiplexed genotyping with sequence-tagged molecular inversion probes. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 673–678 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

36. Hardenbol, P. et al. Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay. Genome Res. 15, 269–275 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

37. Vlieghe, D. et al. A new generation of JASPAR, the open-access repository for transcription factor binding site profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D95–D97 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

38. Blanco, E., Messeguer, X., Smith, T.F. & Guigo, R. Transcription factor map alignment of promoter regions. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2, e49 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

39. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1596–1599 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

40. Reimand, J., Kull, M., Peterson, H., Hansen, J. & Vilo, J. g:Profiler–a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W193–W200 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references