[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals

Abstract

During 2015–2016, record temperatures triggered a pan-tropical episode of coral bleaching, the third global-scale event since mass bleaching was first documented in the 1980s. Here we examine how and why the severity of recurrent major bleaching events has varied at multiple scales, using aerial and underwater surveys of Australian reefs combined with satellite-derived sea surface temperatures. The distinctive geographic footprints of recurrent bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef in 1998, 2002 and 2016 were determined by the spatial pattern of sea temperatures in each year. Water quality and fishing pressure had minimal effect on the unprecedented bleaching in 2016, suggesting that local protection of reefs affords little or no resistance to extreme heat. Similarly, past exposure to bleaching in 1998 and 2002 did not lessen the severity of bleaching in 2016. Consequently, immediate global action to curb future warming is essential to secure a future for coral reefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Geographic extent and severity of recurrent coral bleaching at a regional scale, Australia.
Figure 2: Recurrent severe coral bleaching.
Figure 3: The relationship between heat exposure (satellite-based DHWs in 2016) and the amount of bleaching measured underwater (per cent of corals bleached) in March/April.
Figure 4: Spectrum of bleaching responses by coral taxa on the Great Barrier Reef in 2016, with relative winners on the right, and losers on the left.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heron, S. F., Maynard, J. A., van Hooidonk, R. & Eakin, C. M. Warming trends and bleaching stress of the World’s coral reefs 1985–2012. Sci. Rep. 6, 38402 (2016)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spalding, M. D. & Brown, B. E. Warm-water coral reefs and climate change. Science 350, 769–771 (2015)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, A. C., Glynn, P. W. & Riegl, B. Climate change and coral reef bleaching: An ecological assessment of long-term impacts, recovery trends and future outlook. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 80, 435–471 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes, T. P. et al. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science 301, 929–933 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glynn, P. W. Widespread coral mortality and the 1982–83 El Nino Warming Events. Environ. Conserv. 11, 133–146 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oliver, J. K., Berkelmans, R. & Eakin, C. M. in Ecological Studies: Analysis and Synthesis (eds van Oppen, M. J. H. & Lough, J. M. ) 21–39 (2009)

  7. Eakin, C. M. et al. Global coral bleaching 2014–2017. Reef Currents 31, 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berkelmans, R., De’ath, G., Kininmonth, S. & Skirving, W. J. A comparison of the 1998 and 2002 coral bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef: spatial correlation, patterns, and predictions. Coral Reefs 23, 74–83 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrigan, A. D. & Puotinen, M. Tropical cyclone cooling combats region-wide coral bleaching. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1604–1613 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leahy, S. M., Kingsford, M. J. & Steinberg, C. R. Do clouds save the great barrier reef? Satellite imagery elucidates the cloud-SST relationship at the local scale. PLoS One 8, e70400 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM). Tropical Cyclone Stan Track. http://www.australiasevereweather.com/cyclones/2016/bom/tropical_cyclone_stan.png (2016)

  12. Feng, M., Meyeres, G., Pearce, A. & Wijffels, S. Annual and interannual variations of the Leeuwin Current at 32°S. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2156–2202 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wooldridge, S. A. et al. Excess seawater nutrients, enlarged algal symbiont densities and bleaching sensitive reef locations: 2. A regional-scale predictive model for the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 114, 343–354 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carilli, J., Donner, S. D. & Hartmann, A. C. Historical temperature variability affects coral response to heat stress. PLoS One 7, e34418 (2012)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guest, J. R. et al. Contrasting patterns of coral bleaching susceptibility in 2010 suggest an adaptive response to thermal stress. PLoS One 7, e33353 (2012)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pratchett, M. S., McCowan, D., Maynard, J. A. & Heron, S. F. Changes in bleaching susceptibility among corals subject to ocean warming and recurrent bleaching in Moorea, French Polynesia. PLoS One 8, e70443 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ainsworth, T. D. et al. Climate change disables coral bleaching protection on the Great Barrier Reef. Science 352, 338–342 (2016)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Loya, Y. et al. Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecol. Lett. 4, 122–131 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Swain, T. D. et al. Coral bleaching response index: a new tool to standardize and compare susceptibility to thermal bleaching. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2475–2488 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baird, A. H. & Marshall, P. A. Mortality, growth and reproduction in scleractinian corals following bleaching on the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 237, 133–141 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall, P. A. & Baird, A. H. Bleaching of corals on the Great Barrier Reef: differential susceptibilities among taxa. Coral Reefs 19, 155–163 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Connell, J. H., Hughes, T. P. & Wallace, C. C. A 30-year study of coral community dynamics: influence of disturbance and recruitment on abundance, at several scales in space and time. Ecol. Monogr. 67, 461–488 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kayanne, H., Harii, S., Ide, Y. & Akimoto, F. Recovery of coral populations after the 1998 bleaching on Shiraho Reef, in the southern Ryukyus, NW Pacific. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 239, 93–103 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilmour, J. P., Smith, L. D., Heyward, A. J., Baird, A. H. & Pratchett, M. S. Recovery of an isolated coral reef system following severe disturbance. Science 340, 69–71 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. van Hooidonk, R. et al. Local-scale projections of coral reef futures and implications of the Paris Agreement. Sci. Rep. 6, 39666 (2016)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheffer, M. et al. Climate and conservation. Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems. Science 347, 1317–1319 (2015)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. van de Leemput, I. A., Hughes, T. P., van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Multiple feedbacks and the prevalence of alternate stable states on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 35, 857–865 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hughes, T. P., Graham, N. A. J., Jackson, J. B. C., Mumby, P. J. & Steneck, R. S. Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 633–642 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Graham, N. A., Jennings, S., MacNeil, M. A., Mouillot, D. & Wilson, S. K. Predicting climate-driven regime shifts versus rebound potential in coral reefs. Nature 518, 94–97 (2015)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. West, J. M. & Salm, R. V. Resistance and resilience to coral bleaching: implications for coral reef conservation and management. Conserv. Biol. 17, 956–967 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Eakin, C. M. et al. Caribbean corals in crisis: record thermal stress, bleaching, and mortality in 2005. PLoS One 5, e13969 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reynolds, R. W. et al. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Clim. 20, 5473–5496 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Heron, S.F., et al. Climatology development for NOAA Coral Reef Watch’s 5-km product suite. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 145 (NOAA/NESDIS, 2015)

  34. Rayner, N. et al. Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4407 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Globcolour. Remotely-sensed chlorophyll concentration (mg/m3) and Secchi Disk depth (m) based on Sea-Viewing Wide Field of View Sensor (SeaWIFS) imagery. http://hermes.acri.fr/ (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the 21 institutions that supported this research, in Australia, the UK, and the USA. Twenty-six of the authors are supported by funding from the Australian Research Council’s Centre of Excellence Program. Other funding support includes the Australian Commonwealth Government, the European Union, the USA National Oceanographic & Atmospheric Administration, and USA National Science Foundation. GlobColour data (http://globcolour.info) used in this study has been developed, validated, and distributed by ACRI-ST, France. The contents in this manuscript are solely the opinions of the authors and do not constitute a statement of policy, decision or position on behalf of NOAA or the US Government. We thank the many student volunteers who participated in field studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study was conceptualized by T.P.H. who wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors contributed to writing subsequent drafts. J.T.K. coordinated data compilation, analysis and graphics. Aerial bleaching surveys in 2016 of the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait were executed by J.T.K., T.P.H. and T.S., and in 1998 and 2002 by R.B. and D.R.W. Underwater bleaching censuses in 2016 were undertaken on the Great Barrier Reef by M.A.-N., A.H.B., D.R.B., M.B., N.E.C., C.Y.K., G.D.-P., A.S.H., M.O.H., E.V.K., M.J.M., R.J.P., M.S.P., G.T. and B.L.W., in the Coral Sea by T.C.B. and H.B.H., in subtropical Queensland and New South Wales by M.B., I.R.B., R.C.B., S.J.D., W.F.F., H.A.M., J.M.P. and B.S., off western Australia by R.C.B., S.C., J.P.G., J.-P.A.H., M.T.M., V.S. and S.K.W. J.G.A.-R., S.R.C., C.M.E., S.F.H., G.L., J.M.L. and W.J.S. undertook the analysis matching satellite data to the bleaching footprints on the Great Barrier Reef.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry P. Hughes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 A generalized linear model to explain the severity of coral bleaching.

Curves show the estimated relationships between probability of severe bleaching (>30%) on individual reefs of the Great Barrier Reef in 2016 and three explanatory variables (DHWs, chlorophyll a, and reef zoning, see Extended Data Table 1). The DHW-only model is shown in black. For the DHW plus chlorophyll a model, the blue threshold shows the estimated relationship between probability of severe bleaching and DHW for the 25th percentile of chlorophyll a, and the brown threshold shows the same for the 75th percentile of chlorophyll a. For the DHW plus reef zoning model, the red threshold shows the relationship for fished reefs, and the green for unfished reefs. Water-quality metrics and level of reef protection make little, if any, difference.

Extended Data Figure 2 Difference in daily sea surface temperatures between the northern and southern Great Barrier Reef, before and after ex-tropical cyclone Winston.

The disparity between Lizard Island (14.67° S) and Heron Island (23.44° S) increased from 1 °C in late February to 4 °C in early March 2016.

Extended Data Figure 3 A test for the effect of past bleaching experience on the severity of bleaching in 2016.

The relationship between previous bleaching scores (in 1998 or 2002, whichever was higher) and the residuals from the DHW generalized linear model (Extended Data Table 1). Each data point represents an individual reef that was scored repeatedly. There is no negative relationship to support acclimation or adaptation.

Extended Data Figure 4 Flight tracks of aerial surveys of coral bleaching, conducted along and across the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait in March and April 2016.

Blue colour represents land, white colour represents open water.

Extended Data Figure 5 Ground-truthing comparisons of aerial and underwater bleaching scores.

Aerial scores are: 0 (<1% of colonies bleached), 1 (1–10%), 2 (10–30%), 3 (30–60%) and 4 (60–100%) on the Great Barrier Reef in 2016 (Fig. 1a). Continuous (0–100%) underwater scores are based on in situ observations from 259 sites (104 reefs). Error bars indicate two standard errors both above and below the median underwater score, separately for each aerial category.

Extended Data Table 1 A test for the causes of coral bleaching
Extended Data Table 2 Winners and losers

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hughes, T., Kerry, J., Álvarez-Noriega, M. et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543, 373–377 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21707

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21707

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing