Abstract
As they are maturing—i.e., as they are becoming validated, calibrated and refined—computational emulation models of organizations are evolving into: powerful new kinds of organizational design tools for predicting and mitigating organizational risks; and flexible new kinds of organizational theorem-provers for validating extant organization theory and developing new theory. Over the past 50 years, computational modeling and simulation have had enormous impacts on the rate of advancement of knowledge in fields like physics, chemistry and, more recently, biology; and their subsequent application has enabled whole new areas of engineering practice. In the same way, as our young discipline comes of age, computational organizational models are beginning to impact behavioral, organizational and economic science, and management consulting practice. This paper attempts to draw parallels between computational modeling in natural sciences and computational modeling of organizations as a contributor to both social science and management practice.
To illustrate the lifecycle of a computational organizational model that is now relatively mature, this paper traces the evolution of the Virtual Design Team (VDT) computational modeling and simulation research project at Stanford University from its origins in 1988 to the present. It lays out the steps in the process of validating VDT as a “computational emulation” model of organizations to the point that VDT began to influence management practice and, subsequently, to advance organizational science. We discuss alternate research trajectories that can be taken by computational and mathematical modelers who prefer the typical natural science validation trajectory—i.e., who attempt to impact organizational science first and, perhaps subsequently, to impact management practice.
The paper concludes with a discussion of the current state-of-the-art of computational modeling of organizations and some thoughts about where, and how rapidly, the field is headed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Axtel, R., R. Axelrod, J.M. Epstein, and M.D. Cohen (1996), “Aligning Simulation Models: A Case Study and Results,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1(2), 123–141.
Bonini, C.P. (1967), Simulation of Information and Decision Systems in the Firm (A Ford Foundation Prize Dissertation), Chicago, Markham Pub. Co.
Buettner, R.R. (1995), “Simulating the Impact of CKM on Project Performance,” in Proceedings of the CASOS 2002 Conference, CMU, Pittsburgh, PA.
Burton, R.M. and B. Obel (1995), “The Validity of Computational Models in Organization Science: From Model Realism to Purpose of the Model,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1, 57–71.
Burton, R.M. and B. Obel (1995, 1998, 2004). Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design, 3rd edition, Kluwer, New York.
Cheng, C.H.F. and R.E. Levitt (2001), “Contextually Changing Behavior in Medical Organizations,” in Proceedings of the 2001 Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association, Washington, DC.
Carley, K.M. and D.M. Svoboda (1996), “Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process,” Sociological Methods and Research, 25(1), 138–168.
Carroll, T. and R.M. Burton (2000), “Organizations and Complexity: Searching for the Edge of Chaos,” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 6(4), 319–337.
Christiansen, T.R. (1993), “Modeling Efficiency and Effectiveness of Coordination in Engineering Design Teams,” Doctoral Sissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
Cohen, G.P. (1992), “The Virtual Design Team: An Object-Oriented Model of Information Sharing in Project Teams,” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
Cohen, M.D., J.G. March and J.P. Olsen (1972), “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.
Cyert, R.M. and J.G. March (1963 and 1992), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd edition, Blackwell Business, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Fridsma, D.B. and J. Thomsen (1998), “Modeling Medical Protocols for Organizational Simulation: An Information-Processing Approach,” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 4(1), 71–95.
Jin, Y. and R.E. Levitt (1996), “The Virtual Design Team: A Computational Model of Project Organizations,” Journal of Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2(3), 171–195.
Kauffman, S. (1993), Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kish, J.S. (2001), “Modeling Concurrency Tradeoffs and their Effects on Project Duration and Rework,” Doctoral Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford University.
Kunz, J.C., R.E. Levitt and Y. Jin (1999), “TheVirtual Design Team:AComputational Simulation Model of Project Organizations,” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 41(11) (1998), pp. 84–92.
Lambert, M., J.C. Kunz and R.E. Levitt (2001), “Hierarchies and Transactive Memory Systems: Crafting a Model of Flexible Exception Handling,” in CASOS 2001 Conference, CMU, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 79–83.
Levitt, R.E., G.P. Cohen, J.C. Kunz, C.I. Nass, T. Christiansen and Y. Jin (1994), “The 'Virtual Design Team': Simulating How Organization Structure and Information Processing Tools Affect Team Performance,” in K.M. Carley and M.J. Prietula (Eds.), Computational Organization Theory, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ.
Levitt, R.E., M. Fyall, P. Bjornsson, W. Hewlett, III and T. Casebolt (2002), “When Information Flow in Project Organizations Becomes Turbulent: Toward an Organizational Reynolds Number,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Agent-Based-Modeling in the Social Sciences, UCLA Lake Arrowhead Conference Center, May 2002, p. 3.
Louie, M.A., K.M. Carley, L. Haghshenass, J.C. Kunz and R.E. Levitt (2003), “Model Comparisons: Docking ORGAHEAD and SimVision,” in NAACSOS Conference Proceedings, CMU, Pittsburgh, PA.
Miller, S.T. (2000), “The Effect of Communication Tools on Project Team Performance: A Simulation Study,” Engineer Degree Dissertation, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
Palazollo, E.T, A. Ghate, R. Dandi, A. Mahalingam, N. Contractor and R. Levitt (2002), “Modeling 21st Century Project Teams: Docking Workflow and Knowledge Network Computational Models,” in Proceedings of the CASOS 2002 Conference, CMU, Pittsburgh, PA.
Reminga, J., K. Carley and R. Murali (2004), “ORA: A Network Tool for Organization Risk Analysis,” SCS:ISRI Technical Report, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA.
Thomsen, J. (1998), “The Virtual Team Alliance (VTA): Modeling the Effects of Goal Incongruency in Semi-Routine, Fast-Paced Project Organizations,” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
Thomsen, J., R.E. Levitt, J.C. Kunz, C.I. Nass and D.B. Fridsma (1999), “ATrajectory forValidating Computational Emulation Models of Organizations,” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5(4), 385–401.
Wong, S.S. and R.M. Burton (2000), “Virtual Teams: What are their Characteristics, and Impact on Team Performance?” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 6(4), 339–360.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levitt, R.E. Computational Modeling of Organizations Comes of Age. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10, 127–145 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039166.53683.d0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000039166.53683.d0