[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While ecologists are well aware that spatial heterogeneity is scale-dependent, a general understanding of scaling relationships of spatial pattern is still lacking. One way to improve this understanding is to systematically examine how pattern indices change with scale in real landscapes of different kinds. This study, therefore, was designed to investigate how a suite of commonly used landscape metrics respond to changing grain size, extent, and the direction of analysis (or sampling) using several different landscapes in North America. Our results showed that the responses of the 19 landscape metrics fell into three general categories: Type I metrics showed predictable responses with changing scale, and their scaling relations could be represented by simple scaling equations (linear, power-law, or logarithmic functions); Type II metrics exhibited staircase-like responses that were less predictable; and Type III metrics behaved erratically in response to changing scale, suggesting no consistent scaling relations. In general, the effect of changing grain size was more predictable than that of changing extent. Type I metrics represent those landscape features that can be readily and accurately extrapolated or interpolated across spatial scales, whereas Type II and III metrics represent those that require more explicit consideration of idiosyncratic details for successful scaling. To adequately quantify spatial heterogeneity, the metric-scalograms (the response curves of metrics to changing scale), instead of single-scale measures, seem necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson P.M. 1993. The effect of spatial resolution on the experimental variogram of airborne MSS imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14: 1005–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson B.J. and Mackenzie M.D. 1995. Effects of sensor spatial resoltuion on landscape structure parameters. Landscape Ecology 10: 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian L. and Butler R. 1999. Comparing effects of aggregation methods on statistical and spatial properties of simulated spatial data. Photogrammatic Engineering & Remote Sensing 65: 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley R.C. 1985. Distinguishing the effects of area and habitat type on island plant species richness by separating floristic elements and substrate types. Journal of Biogeography 12: 527–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale M.R.T. 1983. Spatial Pattern Analysis in Plant Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohn R.C. 1998. Remote Sensing for Landscape Ecology: New Metric Indicators for Monitoring, Modeling, and Assessment of Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R.H. 1998. Pattern, process, and the analysis of spatial scales. In: Peterson D.L. and Parker V.T. (eds), Ecological Scale. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, New York, USA, pp. 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R.H., Milne B.T., Turner M.G. and O’Neill R.V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith P. 1983. Quantitative Plant Ecology. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • He F. and Legendre P. 1994. Diversity pattern and spatial scale: A study of a tropical rain forest of Malaysia. Environmental & Ecological Statistics 1: 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelinski D.E. and Wu J. 1996. The modifiable areal unit problem and implications for landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 11: 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenerette G.D. and Wu J. 2002. Analysis and simulation of land use change in the central Arizona-Phoenix region. Landscape Ecology 16: 611–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice C.O., Markham B.L., Townshend J.R.G. and Kennard R.L. 1989. Spatial degradation of satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 1539–1561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S., Gardner R.H. and O’Neill R.V. 1993. Analysis of pattern in hierarchically structured landscapes. Oikos 67: 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc A., Prairie Y.T. and Bergeron Y. 1994. Fractal dimension estimates of a fragmented landscape: Sources of variability. Landscape Ecology 9: 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H. and Reynolds J.F. 1993. A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 8: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H. and Reynolds J.F. 1994. A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75: 2446–2455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck M. and Wu J. 2002. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: A case study from the Phoenix Metropolitan region of USA. Landscape Ecology 17: 327–329, (accepted).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R.H. and Wilson E.O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau D.J., Howarth P.J. and Gratto D.J. 1994. Remote Sensing and the measurement of geographical entities in a forested environment. 1. The scale and spatial aggregation problem. Remote Sensing of Environment 49: 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marceau D.J. 1999. The scale issue in social and natural sciences. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-351. USDA-Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meentemeyer V. and Box E.O. 1987. Scale effects in landscape studies. In: Turner M.G. (ed.), Landscape Heterogeneity and Disturbance. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp. 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody A. and Woodcock C.E. 1995. The influence of scale and the spatial characteristics of landscapes on land-cover mapping using remote sensing. Landscape Ecology 10: 363–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., Gardner R.H., Milne B.T., Turner M.G. and Jackson B. 1991. Heterogeneity and Spatial Hierarchies. In: Kolasa J. and Pickett S.T.A. (eds), Ecological Heterogeneity. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA, pp. 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., Hunsaker C.T., Timmins S.P., Timmins B.L., Jackson K.B., Jones K.B. et al. 1996. Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale. Landscape Ecology 11: 169–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill R.V., Krummel J.R., Gardner R.H., Sugihara G., Jackson B., DeAngelis D.L. et al. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S. 1984. The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. Geo Books, Norwich, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi Y. and Wu J. 1996. Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology 11: 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters K.H., O’Neill R.V., Hunsaker C.T., Wickham J.D., Yankee D.H., Timmins K.B.J. et al. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters K.H., O’Neill R.V., Wickham J.D. and Jones K.B. 1996. A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis. Landscape Ecology 11: 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saura S. and Martinez-Millan J. 2001. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent. Photogrammatic Engineering & Remote Sensing 67: 1027–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: The Effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., Gardner R.H. and O’Neill R.V. 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M.G., O’Neill R.V., Gardner R.H. and Milne B.T. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 3: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham J.D. and Riitters K.H. 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 16: 3585–3595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M. 1988. Relationship of species number to area, distance and other variables. In: Myers A.A. and Giller P.S. (eds), Analytical Biogeography. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp. 91–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock C.E. and Strahler A.H. 1987. The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 21: 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. 1999. Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating information along a scaling ladder. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 25: 367–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J., Jelinski D.E., Luck M. and Tueller P.T. 2000. Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: Scale variance and pattern metrics. Geographical Information Systems 6: 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Levin S.A. 1994. A spatial patch dynamic modeling approach to pattern and process in an annual grassland. Ecological Monographs 64: 447–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Loucks O.L. 1995. From balance-of-nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 70: 439–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Vankat J.L. 1991. A System Dynamics model of island biogeography. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 53: 911–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J. and Vankat J.L. 1995. Island biogeography: Theory and applications. In: Nierenberg W.A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 371–379.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, J., Shen, W., Sun, W. et al. Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol 17, 761–782 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022995922992

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022995922992

Navigation