[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Ordinal On-Line Scheduling for Maximizing the Minimum Machine Completion Time

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

This paper considers the on-line problem of scheduling nonpreemptively n independent jobs on m > 1 identical and parallel machines with the objective to maximize the minimum machine completion time. It is assumed that the values of the processing times are unknown but the order of the jobs by their processing times is known in advance. We are asked to decide the assignment of all the jobs to some machines at time zero by utilizing only ordinal data rather than the actual magnitudes of jobs. Algorithms to slove the problem are called ordinal algorithms. In this paper, we give lower bounds and ordinal algorithms. We first propose an algorithm MIN which is at most \((\left\lceil {\sum {_{i = 1}^m {\text{ }}1/} i} \right\rceil + 1)\)-competitive for any m machine case, while the lower bound is ∑ mi=1 1/i. Both are on the order of Θ(ln m). Furthermore, for m = 3, we present an optimal algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A. Agnetis, “No-wait flow shop scheduling with large lot size,” Rap 16.89, Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Universita Degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Azar and L. Epstein, “On-line machine covering,” Algorithms-ESA'97, LNCS, vol. 1284, Springer Verlag, (1997), pp. 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Csirik, H. Kellerer, and G. Woeginger, “The exact LPT-bound for maximizing the minimum machine completion time,” Oper. Res. Letters, vol. 11, pp. 281–287, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Deuermeyer, D. Friesen, and M. Langston, “Scheduling to maximize the minimum processor finish time in a multiprocessor system,” SIAM J. Disc. Meth., vol. 3, pp. 190–196, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Friesen and B. Deuermeyer, “Analysis of greedy solutions for a replacement part sequencing problem,” Math. Oper. Res., vol. 6, pp. 74–87, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Graham, E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, and A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, “Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: A survey,” Annals of Oper. Res., vol. 5, pp. 287–326, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. He, “The optimal on-line parallel machine scheduling,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 39, pp. 117–121, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. He, “Semi on-line scheduling problem for maximizing the minimum machine completion time,” Acta Mathematica Applicatae Sinica, vol. 17, pp. 107–113, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. He and G. Zhang, “Semi online scheduling on two identical machines,” Computing, vol. 62, pp. 179–197, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Kellerer, V. Kotov, M. Speranza, and Z. Tuza, “Semi online algorithms for the partition problem,” Oper. Res. Letters, vol. 21, pp. 235–242, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.L. Lawler, Combinatorial Optimization: Networks and Matroids, Holt, Rinehart and Winston: Toronto, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.P. Liu and J.B. Sidney, “Ordinal algorithm for packing with target center of gravity,” Order, vol. 13, pp. 17–31, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.P. Liu and J.B. Sidney, “Bin packing using semi-ordinal data,” Oper. Res. Letters, vol. 19, pp. 101–104, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • W.P. Liu, J.B. Sidney, and A. van Vliet, “Ordinal algorithms for parallel machine scheduling,” Oper. Res. Letters, vol. 18, pp. 223–232, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • N.V.R. Mahadev, A. Pekec, and F.S. Roberts, “On the meaningfulness of optimal solutions to scheduling problems: Can an optimal solution be nonoptimal,” Oper. Res., vol. 46, pp. S120–S134, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Menipaz, Essentials of Production and Operations Management, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Seiden, J. Sgall, and G. Woeginger, “Semi-online scheduling with decreasing job sizes,” Oper. Res. Letters, vol. 27, pp. 215–221, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sleator and R.E. Tarjan, “Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 28, pp. 202–208, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Z.Y. Tan and Y. He, “Semi-on-line scheduling with ordinal data on two uniform machines,” Oper. Res. Letters, vol. 28, pp. 221–231, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Woeginger, “A polynomial time approximation scheme for maximizing the minimum machine completion time,” Oper. Res. Letters, vol. 20, pp. 149–154, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, Y., Tan, Z. Ordinal On-Line Scheduling for Maximizing the Minimum Machine Completion Time. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 6, 199–206 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013855712183

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013855712183

Navigation