Abstract
This study presents two experiments that examine howindividuals learn relative directions betweenlandmarks in a desktop virtual environment. Subjectswere presented snapshot images of different virtualenvironments containing distinguishing landmarks anda road network. Following the presentation of eachvirtual environment, subjects were given a relativedirection test. The relative direction test involvedindicating the direction of hidden landmarks fromdifferent vantage points in the environment. Half ofthese vantage points were presented during thelearning phase, while the other half were novel.Results showed that subjects learned relativedirections between landmarks equally well when sceneswere presented in either a sequential or random order.Furthermore, viewing a configuration of landmarks ina desktop virtual environment from multipleperspectives produced a viewpoint dependentrepresentation in memory. Subjects had significantlygreater response times for new viewing perspectives,as compared to previously viewed scenes. Thisviewpoint dependent representation of the environmentpersisted despite learning under conditions ofspatio-temporal discontinuity and changes to anenvironmental frame of reference.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albert, W.S., Reinitz, M.T., Beusmans, J.B. and Gopal, S. (1999). The Role of Attention in Spatial Learning During Simulated Navigation, Environment and Planning A 31: 1459–1472.
Allen, G.L. (1988). The Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge under Conditions of Temporospatial Discontinuity, Psychological Research 50: 183–190.
Allen, G.L., Siegel, A.W. and Rosinski, R.R. (1978). The Role of Perceptual Context in Structuring Spatial Knowledge, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Learning, and Memory 4: 617–630.
Couclelis, H., Golledge, R.G., Gale, N. and Tobler, W. (1987). Exploring the Anchor-Point Theory of Spatial Cognition, Journal of Environmental Psychology 7: 99–122.
Darken, R.P., Allard, T. and Achille, L.B. (1998). Spatial Orientation andWayfinding in Large-Scale Virtual Spaces: An Introduction, Presence 7: 101–107.
Diwadkar, V.A. and McNamara, T.P. (1997). Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition, Psychological Science 8: 302–307.
Gärling, T. and Golledge, R.G. (eds.) (1993). Behavior and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McNamara, T.P. and Diwadkar, V.A. (1996). Viewpoint Dependence in Human Spatial Memory, Cognitive and Computational Models of Spatial Representation: Papers from the 1996 AAAI Spring Symposium. AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA.
Montello, D.R. (1992). Scale and Multiple Psychologies of Space. In A.U. Frank, I. Campari and U. Formentini (eds.), International Conference: GIS – From Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning. Pisa, Italy.
Richardson, A.R., Montello, D.R. and Hegarty, M. (1999). Spatial Knowledge Acquisition from Maps, and from Navigation in Real and Virtual Environments, Memory and Cognition 27: 741–750.
Shelton, A.L. and McNamara, T.P. (1997). Multiple Views of Spatial Memory, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4: 102–106.
Subbiah, I., Veltri, L., Liu, A. and Pentland, A. (1996). Paths, Landmarks, and Edges as Reference Frames in Mental Maps of Simulated Environments. Cambridge Basic Research Technical Report, 96–11, Cambridge, MA.
Tlauka, M. and Wilson, P.N. (1996). Orientation-Free Representations from Navigation Through a Computer-Simulated Environment. Environment and Behavior 28: 647–664.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albert, W.S., Rensink, R.A. & Beusmans, J.M. Learning relative directions between landmarks in a desktop virtual environment. Spatial Cognition and Computation 1, 131–144 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010096408311
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010096408311