[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Low Cost Satellite Data for Monthly Irrigation Performance Monitoring: Benchmarks from Nilo Coelho, Brazil

  • Published:
Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Abstract

Irrigation performance indicators can helpwater managers to understand how anirrigation scheme operates under actualcircumstances. The new contribution ofremote sensing data, is the opportunity tostudy the crop growing conditions at scalesranging from individual fields to schemelevel. Public domain internet satellitedata have been used to calculate actual andpotential crop evapotranspiration, soilmoisture and biomass growth on a monthlybasis in the Nilo Coelho irrigation scheme,Pernambuco (Brazil). Satellite interpretedraster maps were merged with vector maps ofthe irrigation water delivery system.Monthly values of a minimum list ofirrigation performance indicators for thevarious service units in the pressurizedNilo Coelho scheme were determined. NiloCoelho is a good performing scheme. Theperformance can be improved further if 25%irrigation water is saved from February toJuly. The benchmark figures from thismodern irrigation system are presented forcomparitive analysis with other systems.The acceptable ranges in space and timeare presented. On average, 65% of thelateral pumping units on a monthly basisfall within the acceptable limits ofirrigation performance. Low cost irrigationperformance data based on low resolutionsatellite images (US$ 1/ha) will help themanagement team to focus on specificpumping units, and discuss alternativeirrigation and farm management strategieswith the stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R.G., Pruitt, W.O., Businger, J.A., Fritschen, L.J., Jensen, M.E. and Quinn, F.H. 1996. Evapotranspiration and transpiration, Hydrology Handbook, 2nd edition, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice no. 28, New York, USA.

  • Asrar, G., Kanemu, E., Jackson, R.D. and Pinter, P.J. 1985. Estimation of total above-ground phytomass production using remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 17: 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., Menenti, M., Feddes, R.A. and Holtslag, A.A.M. 1998. A Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL), part 1: formulation. J. of Hydr. 212–213: 198–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. and Bos, M.G. 1999. Irrigation performance indicators based on remotely sensed data: a review of literature. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 13(4): 291–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., 2000. SEBAL-based sensible and latent heat fluxes in the irrigated Gediz Basin, Turkey. J. of Hydr. 229: 87–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M.G. and Nugteren, J. 1974. On irrigation efficiencies, ILRI Publication no. 19, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI), Wageningen, The Netherlands: 138 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M.G., Wolters, W., Drovandi, A. and Morabito, J.A. 1991. The Viejo Retamo secondary canal, performance evaluation case study: Mendoza, Argentina. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 5: 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M.G., Murray-Rust, D.H., Merrey, D.J., Johnson, H.G. and Snellen,W.B. 1994. Methodologies for assessing performance of irrigation and drainage management. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 5: 231–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos, M.G., 1997. Performance indicators for irrigation and drainage. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 11: 119–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, R.A.L., Soares, J.M., Cavalcanti, E.B. and Bos, M.G. 1998. Irrigation performance assessment for Nilo Coelho scheme in Northeastern Brazil, ICID Proc., 10th Afro-Asian Regional Conference, Bali, Indonesia, Volume II-A, A13.1–7: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, R.A.L., Souza, G.H.F., Dantas Neto, J. and Azevedo, C.A.V. 2000. Performance indicators for evaluation of irrigation districts, paper no. 002106, ASAE meeting presentation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, July 9–12, 2000: 9 pp.

  • Carslon, T.N. and Ripley, D.A. 1997. On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover and leaf area index. Rem. Sens. of Env. 62: 241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, A.H., Azvedo, P.V. de, Silva, B.B. da and Soares, J.M. 1999. Water consumption and crop coefficient of grape vine in the region of Petrolina, Pernambuco State, Brazil, Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agricola e Ambiental 3(3): 413–416 (in Portugese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, B.J. and DiGirolamo, 1998. A biophysical process-based estimate of global land surface evapotranspiration using satellite and ancillary data, 1. model description and comparison with observations. J. of Hydr. 205: 164–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro, G.C., 2000, Personal communication, Monitoring of water table fluctuations in sandy soil under irrigation, EMBRAPA, Petrolina, PE, Brasil

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, C.M. and Hamblin, J. 1976. The biological yields and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv. Agron. 28(1): 361–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt,W.O. 1977. Crop water requirements, Irrigation and Drainage Paper no. 24, FAO, Rome, Italy: 144 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos, J. and Kassam, A.H. 1979. Yield response to water, Irrigation and Drainage Paper no. 33, FAO, Rome, Italy: 193 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraiture, C. de and Garces-Restrepo, C. 1997. Assessing trends and changes in irrigation performance, the case of Samaca irrigation scheme, Colombia, paper presented at the International Workshop on Irrigation Performance related to RPIP, 3–7 November 1997, Mendoza, Argentina

  • Gallaghar, J.N. and Biscoe, P.V. 1978. Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. J. Agric. Sciences 91: 47–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieske, A., 1999. NPR software, personal communication, gieske@itc.nl, International Institute of Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P.G., 1976. The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, B273: 593–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.E., 1972. Programming irrigation for greater efficiency, in (ed.) D. Hillel, Optimizing the soil physical environment toward greater crop yields, Academic Press, New York, N.Y.: 133–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloezen, W.H., 1999. Measuring land and water productivity in a Mexican irrigation district. Int. J. of Water Resources Development 14(2): 231–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Malano, H.M and Hofwegen, P.J.M. van, 1999. Management of irrigation and drainage systems: a service approach, IHE Nomograph 3, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 149 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen, M.G. and Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. 2000. A new simple method to determine crop coefficients for water allocation planning from satellites; results from Kenya. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 14(3): 237–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden, D.J., 1997. Accounting for water use and productivity, SWIM paper 1, International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka: 16 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molden, D.J. and Sakthivadivel, R. 1999. Water accounting to assess use and productivity of water. Int. J. of Water Resources Development 15(1/2): 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, J.A., Bos, M.G., Vos, S. and Brouwer, R. 1998. The quality of service provided by the irrigation department to the users associations, Tunuyan System, Mendoza, Argentina. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 12: 49–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Poifo, E., 2000. Personal communication, EMBRAPA, Petrolina, PE, Brazil

  • Priestley, C.H.B. and Taylor, R.J. 1972. On the assessment of surface flux and evapotranspiration using large-scale parameters. Mon. Weather Rev. 100: 81–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar, A., Bastiaanssen, W.G.M., Dam, J.C. van and Boers, Th.M. 2000. Re-evaluating drainage design criteria for the Fourth Drainage Project, Pakistan, Part 1: Results of model calibration. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 14: 257–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, V. de Paulo Rodrigues, 2000. Estimation of irrigation needs in mango, Ph.D. thesis, Department of agro-meteorology, Campina Grande, PB, Brazil: 140 pp (in portugese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, R.W, Evett, S.R. and Howell, T.A. 2000. The Bowen-ratio energy balance method for estimating latent heat flux of irrigated alfalfa evaluated in a semi-arid, advective environment. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 103: 335–348

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bastiaanssen, W., Brito, R., Bos, M. et al. Low Cost Satellite Data for Monthly Irrigation Performance Monitoring: Benchmarks from Nilo Coelho, Brazil. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 15, 53–79 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017967021198

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017967021198

Navigation