[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Under Inaccurate Data Conditions

  • Published:
Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Abstract

Reference evapotranspiration (ET0)estimates have been computed on a globalscale using a high-resolution monthlyclimate dataset. Penman-Monteith (PM) andHargreaves (HG) methods have been compared,showing very reasonable agreement betweenthe two methods. Fitting the two parametersof HG using the PM derived ET0 valuesdid not improve estimates by the HG methodsubstantially. Modifying the originalHargreaves method to a Modified-Hargreaves(MH) method by including a rainfall termimproved ET0 estimates significantlyfor arid regions. When a certain level ofinaccuracy in the meteorologicalobservations was assumed, calculatingET0 by PM and MH, given theseinaccuracy in observations, showed that MHperformed better than PM in reproducingoriginal calculations of ET0 ascalculated by PM assuming no data error. Itis concluded that the PM is a recommendedmethodology if accurate weather datacollection can be expected, but otherwiseMH should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R.G., Smith M., Perrier A. & Pereira L.S. 1994. An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bulletin 43(2): 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen R.G. 1993. Evaluation of a temperature difference method for computing grass reference evapotranspiration. Report submitted to the Water Resources Develop. and Man. Serv., Land and Water Develop. Div., FAO, Rome. 49 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D. & Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annandale J.G., Jovanovic N.Z., Benade N. & Allen R.G. 2001. User-friendly software for calculation and missing data error analysis of FAO-56 standardized Penman Monteith daily reference crop evaporation. (submitted to Irrigation Science.)

  • Camillo P.J. & Gurney R.J. 1984. A sensitivity analysis of a numerical model for estimating evapotranspiration. Water Res. Research 20(1): 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman G. & DeCoursey D.G. 1976. Sensitivity and model variance analysis applied to some evaporation and evapotranspiration models. Water Res. Research 12(5): 873–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J. & Pruitt W.O. 1977. Crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24, (rev.) FAO, Rome, Italy. l44 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Droogers P. 2000. Reference evapotranspiration comparison between FAO Climwat and IWMI Climate Atlas. International Water Management Institute, unpublished.

  • Droogers P. 2000. DSET, Data Scarce Evapotranspiration estimates. Software package. http://www.iwmi.org

  • Hargreaves G.H. 1994. Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE 120(6): 1132–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves G.L., Hargreaves G.H. & Riley J.P. 1985. Agricultural benefits for Senegal River basin. J. Irrig. and Drain. Engr., ASCE 111(2): 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWMI, International Water Management Institute 2000. World Water and Climate Atlas. http://www.iwmi.org

  • New M.G., Lister D., Hulme M. & Makin I. 2001. A high-resolution data set of surface climate for terrestrial areas. International Journal of Climatology (submitted).

  • Pereira L.S., Perrier A. & Allen R.G. 1999. Evapotranspiration: concepts and future trends. J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE 125(2): 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M. 1993. CLIMWAT for CROPWAT: A climatic database for irrigation planning and management. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 49. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temesgen B., Allen R.G. & Jensen D.T. 1999. Adjusting temperature parameters to reflect well-water conditions. J. Irrig. and Drain. Engrg., ASCE 125(1): 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter I.A., Allen R.G., Elliott R., Mecham B., Jensen M.E., Itenfisu D., Howell T.A., Snyder R., Brown P., Echings S., Spofford T., Hattendorf M., Cuenca R.H., Wright J.L. & Martin D. 2000. ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation, p. 209–215. In: Evans RG, Benham BL, Trooien TP (eds.) Proc. National Irrigation Symposium, ASAE, Nov. 14–16, 2000, Phoenix, AZ.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. International Water Management Institute, PO Box 2075, Colombo, Sri Lanka

    Peter Droogers

  2. Research and Extension Center, University of Idaho, 3793 N. 3600 E, Kimberley, ID, 83341, USA

    Richard G. Allen

Authors
  1. Peter Droogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard G. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Droogers, P., Allen, R.G. Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration Under Inaccurate Data Conditions. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 16, 33–45 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015508322413

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015508322413

Search

Navigation