Articulating User Needs in Collaborative Design: Towards an Activity-Theoretical Approach

• Adler, P. and T.A. Winograd (1990): Usability. Turning Technologies into Tools. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Beyer, H. and K. Holzblatt (1998): Contextual Design. Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

  Google Scholar 

• Blume, S. (1992): Insight and Industry. On the Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Brun-Cotton, F. and P. Wall (1995): Using Video to Re-Present the User. Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 61–71.

  Google Scholar 

• Cole, M. and Y. Engeström (1993): A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition. In G. Salomon (ed.): Distributed Cognition. Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Constant, E.W. (1984): Communities and Hierarchies: Structure in the Practice of Science and Technology. In R. Laudan (ed.): The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 27–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Corbett, J., L. Rasmussen and F. Rauner (1991): Crossing the Border. The Social and Engineering Design of Integrated Manufacturing Systems. London: Springer Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Den Hertog. P., J.A. Stein, J. Schot and D. Gritzalis (1996): User Involvement in RTD: Concepts, Practices and Policy Lessons. TNO-Report STB/96/011. TNO Centre for Technology and Policy Studies.

• Engeström, Y. (1987): Learning by Expanding. An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.

  Google Scholar 

• Engeström, Y. and V. Escalante (1996): Mundane Tool or Object of Affection? The Rise and Fall of Postal Buddy. In B. Nardi (ed.): Activity theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 325–373.

  Google Scholar 

• Engeström, Y. and M. Cole (1997): Situated Cognition in the Search of Agenda. In D. Kirsher and J.A. Whitson (eds.): Situated Cognition. Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum, pp. 301–309.

  Google Scholar 

• Engeström, Y., R. Miettinen and R-L. Punamäki (eds.) (1999): Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Freeman, C. (1991): Networks of Innovators: A Synthesis of Research Issues. Research Policy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 499–514.

  Google Scholar 

• Green, K. (1992): Creating Demand for Biotechnology: Shaping Technologies and Markets. In R. Coombs, P. Saviotti and V. Walsh (eds.): Technological Change and Company Strategies. London: Academic Press, pp. 164–184.

  Google Scholar 

• Hari, R. and O.V. Lounasmaa (1989): Recording and Interpretation of Cerebral Magnetic Fields. Science, vol. 244, pp. 432–436.

  Google Scholar 

• Hasu, M. (2000): Blind Men and the Elephant: Implementation of a New Artifact as an Expansive Possibility. Outlines, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–41.

  Google Scholar 

• Hasu, M. and Y. Engeström (2000): Measurement in Action. An Activity-Theoretical Perspective on Producer-User Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 61–89.

  Google Scholar 

• Heiskanen, E. and M. Niva (1996): A Bird's-Eye View on Users and Usefulness. Take a Look at the Users. Seminar Papers September 3. Helsinki: Finnish National Consumer Research Centre, pp. 5–21.

  Google Scholar 

• Herstatt, C. and E. von Hippel (1992): From Experience: Developing New Product Concepts via Lead User Method: A Case from a “Low-Tech” Field. Journal of Production and Innovation Management, vol. 9, pp. 213–221.

  Google Scholar 

• Howell, J. (1997): Rethinking the Market-Technology Relationship for Innovation. Research Policy, vol. 25, pp. 1209–1219.

  Google Scholar 

• Hughes, T. (1987): The Evolving of Large Technological Systems. In W.E. Bijker, T. Hughes and T. Pinch (eds.): The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 51–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Hämäläinen, M., R. Hari, R. Ilmoniemi, J. Knuutila and O.V. Lounasmaa (1993): Magnetoencephalography – Theory, Instrumentation, and Applications to Noninvasive Studies of the Working Human Brain. Review of Modern Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 414–497.

  Google Scholar 

• Kotler, P. (1991): Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuutti, K. (1996): Activity Theory as Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research. In B. Nardi, (ed.): Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge.MA: The MIT Press, pp. 17–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Latour, B. (1987): Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Leont'ev, A.N. (1978): Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Lewine, J.D. and W.W. Orrison (1995): Spike and Slow Wave Localization by Magnetoencephalography. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 575–595.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindell, M. (1991): Developing New Products – an Action, Interaction and Contextual Approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management, vol. 3, pp. 173–189.

  Google Scholar 

• Lounasmaa, O.V., M. Hämäläinen, R. Hari and R. Salmelin (1996): Information Processing in the Human Brain: Magnetoencephalographic Approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 93, pp. 8809–8815.

  Google Scholar 

• Lundvall, B-Å. (1988): Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 349–370.

  Google Scholar 

• Miettinen, R. (1993): Methodological Issues of Studying Innovation-Related Networks. Group for Technology Studies. Working Papers no 4. Espoo: Technical Research Centre of Finland.

  Google Scholar 

• Miettinen, R. (1998): Object Formation and Networks in Research Work. The Case of Research on Cellulose Degrading Enzymes. Social Studies of Science, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 423–463.

  Google Scholar 

• Miettinen, R. (1999): Riddle of Things. Activity Theory and actor Network Theory as Approaches of Studying Innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, vol. 6, no 3, pp. 170–195.

  Google Scholar 

• Mowery, D. and N. Rosenberg (1979): The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies. Research Policy, vol. 8, pp. 102–153.

  Google Scholar 

• Nardi, B.A. (1996): Studying Context. A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition. In B.A. Nardi, (ed.): Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 69–102.

  Google Scholar 

• Normann, R. and R. Ramírez (1993): FromValue Chain to Value Constellation: Designing Interactive Strategy. Harvard Business Review (July–August), pp. 65–77.

• Normann, R. and R. Ramírez (1994): Designing Interactive Strategy. Chichester: John Viley & Sons.

  Google Scholar 

• Pinch, T.J. and W.E. Bijker (1987): The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. In W.E. Bijker, T. Hudges and T. Pinch (eds.): The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 17–50.

  Google Scholar 

• Powell, W.W. (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Networks Forms of Organization. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (eds.): Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12, pp. 295–336.

• Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput and K. Smith (1996): Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus on Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, pp. 116–145.

  Google Scholar 

• Rothwell, R. (1992): Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management, vol. 22, no 3, pp. 221–239.

  Google Scholar 

• Toikka, K. and R. Kuivanen (1993): Häiriöt kehitysmahdollisuutena. Tekniikan, organisaation ja työtavan kehitys joustavassa valmistusjärjestelmässä (In Finnish) (English title: Developmental Potential of Disturbances. The Development of Technology, Organization and Work in the Implementation of Flexible Manufacturing System). Helsinki: Metalliteollisuuden Keskusliitto.

  Google Scholar 

• Vicario, S. and G. Troilo (1998): Errors and Learning in Organizations. In von G. Krogh, J. Roos and D. Kleine (eds.): Knowing in Firms. London: SAGE, pp. 204–222.

  Google Scholar 

• von Hippel, E. (1976): The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process. Research Policy, vol. 5, pp. 212–239.

  Google Scholar 

• von Hippel, E. (1986): Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 791–805.

  Google Scholar 

• von Hippel, E. (1988): The Sources of Innovation. New York and Oxford: University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Vygotsky, L.S. (1979): Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Weingart, P. (1984): The structure of Technological Change: Reflections on a Sociological Analysis of Technology. In R. Laudan (ed.): The Nature of Technological Knowledge. Are Models of Scientific Change Relevant? Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 115–142.

  Google Scholar 

Download references