The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence

• Allen,Barbara, O 'Loughlin,Paula, Jasperson,Amy,and Sullivan, John L.(1994).The media and the Gulf War:framing,priming,and the spiral of silence.Polity27: 255–284.

  Google Scholar 

• Alvarez, R.Michael,and Brehm,John (1995).American ambivalence toward abortion policy:a heteroskedastic probit method for assessing conflicting values.American Journal of Political Science39:1055–1082.

  Google Scholar 

• Alvarez, R.Michael,and Brehm,John (1997).Are Americans ambivalent about racial policies?American Journal of Political Science41:345–374.

  Google Scholar 

• Alvarez, R.Michael,and Brehm,John (1998).Speaking in two voices:American equivocation about the internal revenue service.American Journal of Political Science42: 418–452.

  Google Scholar 

• Alvarez,R.Michael,and Brehm,John (2000).Binding the frame:how important are frames for survey response?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Washington,DC,August 31–September 2.

• Arrow, Kenneth J.(1982).Risk perception in psychology and economics.Economic Inquiry20:1–9.

  Google Scholar 

• Ball-Rokeach,S.J., Power, Gerard J., Guthrie, K.Kendall,and Waring, H.Ross (1990). Value-framing abortion in the United States:an application of media system dependency theory.International Journal of Public Opinion Research2:249–273.

  Google Scholar 

• Bargh, John A., Bond,R., Lombardi,W.,and Tota,M.(1986).The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50:869–878.

  Google Scholar 

• Bargh, John A.,and Pietromonaco,Paula (1982).Automatic information processing and social perception:the influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43:438–449.

  Google Scholar 

• Bartels,Larry M.(1998).Democracy with attitudes.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Boston,MA,September 3–6.

• Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F.,and McPhee, William N.(1954).Voting:A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Berinsky, Adam J.,and Kinder, Donald R.(2000).Making sense of issues through frames:understanding the Kosova crisis.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Washington,DC,August 31–September 2.

• Bishop, George F., Oldendick, Robert W.,and Tuchfarber, Alfred J.(1982).Political.DRUCKMAN 250 information processing:question order and context effects.Political Behavior4: 177–200.

  Google Scholar 

• Bless,Herbert, Betsch,Tilmann,and Franzen,Axel (1998).Framing the framing effect:the impact of context cues on solutions to the “Asian disease ”problem.European Journal of Social Psychology28:287–291.

  Google Scholar 

• Boettcher,III, William A.(2000).Framing effects in the “real world ”:evaluating the political psychology adaptation of prospect theory.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Washington,DC,August 31–September 2.

• Bohm,Peter,and Lind,Hans (1992).A note on the robustness of a classical framing result.Journal of Economic Psychology13:355–361.

  Google Scholar 

• Brewer, Paul R.(2000).Passive receivers or motivated reasoners?:an experimental study of how citizens process value frames.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association,Chicago,IL,April 27–30.

• Brewer, Paul R.(2001).Value words and lizard brains:do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values?Political Psychology22:45–64.

  Google Scholar 

• Cappella, Joseph N.,and Jamieson, Kathleen Hall (1997).Spiral of Cynicism:The Press and the Public Good.New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chong,Dennis (1993).How people think,reason,and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science37:867–899.

  Google Scholar 

• Chong,Dennis (1996).Creating common frames of reference on political issues.In Diana C.Mutz, Paul M.Sniderman,and Richard A.Brody (eds.),Political Persuasion and Attitude Change,pp.195–224.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Chong,Dennis (2000).Rational Lives:Norms and Values in Politics and Society.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Cohen,Jacob,and Cohen,Patricia (1983).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Converse, Philip E.(1964).The nature of belief systems in mass publics.In David E. Apter (ed.),Ideology and Discontent,pp.206–261.New York: Free Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Converse, Philip E.(2000).Assessing the capacity of mass electorates.Annual Review of Political Science3:331–353.

  Google Scholar 

• Dahl, Robert A.(1971).Polyarchy:Participation and Opposition.New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Dawes, Robyn M.(1988).Rational Choice in an Uncertain World.San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

  Google Scholar 

• Druckman, James N.(2001a).On the limits of framing effects:who can frame?Journal of Politics63:1041–1066.

  Google Scholar 

• Druckman, James N.(2001b).Using credible advice to overcome framing effects. Journal of Law,Economics, & Organization17:62–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Druckman, James N.,and Lupia,Arthur (2000).Preference formation.Annual Review of Political Science3:1–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Edelman,Murray (1993).Contestable categories and public opinion.Political Communication10:231–242.

  Google Scholar 

• Entman, Robert M.(1991).Framing U.S.coverage of international news:contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents.Journal of Communication41:6–27.

  Google Scholar 

• Entman, Robert M.(1993).Framing:toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43:51–58.

  Google Scholar 

• Fagley,N.S.,and Miller, Paul M.(1987).The effects of decision framing on choice of risky vs.certain options.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes39:264–277.

  Google Scholar 

• Fagley,N.S.,and Miller, Paul M.(1990).The effect of framing on choice:interactions with risk-taking propensity,cognitive style,and sex.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin16:496–510.

  Google Scholar 

• Fagley,N.S.,and Miller, Paul M.(1997).Framing effects and arenas of choice:your money or your life?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes71: 355–373.

  Google Scholar 

• Farr,James (1993).Framing democratic discussion.In George E.Marcus and Russell L.Hanson (eds.),Reconsidering the Democratic Public,pp.379–391.University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Fazio, Russell H.(1995).Attitudes as object-evaluation associations:determinants, consequences,and correlates of attitude accessibility.In Richard E.Petty and Jon A.Krosnick (eds.),Attitude Strength:Antecedents and Consequences,pp.247–282. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Federico, Christopher M.(2001).Predispositions,sophistication,and the framing of affirmative action.Unpublished paper,University of California,Los Angeles.

• Fillmore, Charles J.(1985).Frames and the semantics of understanding.Quaderni di Semantica6:222–254.

  Google Scholar 

• Freedman,Paul (2000).The political logic of framing.Unpublished paper,University of Virginia.

• Frisch,Deborah (1993).Reasons for framing effects.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes54:399–429.

  Google Scholar 

• Gamson, William A.(1992).Talking Politics.New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gamson, William A.,and Lasch, Katherine E.(1983).The political culture of social welfare policy.In Shimon E.Spiro and Ephraim Yuchtman-Yaar (eds.),Evaluating the Welfare State,pp.397–415.New York: Academic.

  Google Scholar 

• Gamson, William A.,and Modigliani,Andre (1987).The changing culture of affirmative action.In Richard D.Braungart (ed.),Research in Political Sociology,vol.3, pp.137–177.Greenwich,CT: JAI.

  Google Scholar 

• Gamson, William A.,and Modigliani,Andre (1989).Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power:a constructionist approach.American Journal of Sociology95: 1–37.

  Google Scholar 

• Gitlin,Todd (1980).The Whole World Is Watching:Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left.Berkeley: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Goffman,Erving (1974).Frame Analysis:An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Gross,Kimberly (2000).The limits of framing:how framing effects may be limited or enhanced by individual level predispositions.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association,Chicago,IL,April 27–30.

• Gross, Kimberly Ann,and D 'Ambrosio,Lisa (1999).Media framing,causal attribution and emotions:an experimental investigation of the framing of emotion response. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Atlanta,GA,September 2–5.

• Haider-Markel, Donald P.,and Joslyn, Mark R.(2001a).Gun policy,opinion,tragedy, and blame attribution:the conditional influence of issue frames.Journal of Politics63:520–543.

  Google Scholar 

• Haider-Markel, Donald P.,and Joslyn, Mark R.(2001b).Should we really “kill ”the messenger:issue frames and the limited role of messengers.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,San Francisco,CA, August 30–September 2.

• Herr, Paul M.(1986).Consequences of priming:judgment and behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51:1106–1115.

  Google Scholar 

• Higgins, E.Tory,and Rholes, William S.,and Jones, Carl R.(1977).Category accessibility and impression formation.Journal of Experimental Psychology13:141–154.

  Google Scholar 

• Hyman, Herbert H.,and Sheatsley, Paul B.(1950).The current status of American public opinion.In J.C.Payne (ed.),The Teaching of Contemporary Affairs,pp. 1134.New York: National Council of Social Studies.

  Google Scholar 

• Iyengar,Shanto (1990).The accessibility bias in politics:television news and public opinion.International Journal of Public Opinion Research2:1–15.

  Google Scholar 

• Iyengar,Shanto (1991).Is Anyone Responsible?:How Television Frames Political Issues.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Jackman,Simon,and Sniderman, Paul M.(1999).Institutional organization of choice spaces:a political conception of political psychology.Unpublished paper,Stanford University.

• Jacoby, William G.(2000).Issue framing and public opinion on government spending. American Journal of Political Science44:750–767.

  Google Scholar 

• Jones, Bryan D.(2001).Politics and the Architecture of Choice:Bounded Rationality and Governance.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Joslyn, Mark R.,and Haider-Markel, Donald P.(2001).The two faces of issue framing: examining framing effects on personal opinion and perception of public opinion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Las Vegas,NV,March.

• Kahneman,Daniel,and Tversky,Amos (1984).Choices,values,and frames.American Psychologist39:341–350.

  Google Scholar 

• Kellstedt, Paul M.(2000).Media framing and the dynamics of racial policy preferences.American Journal of Political Science44:239–255.

  Google Scholar 

• Kinder, Donald R.(1998).Communication and opinion.Annual Review of Political Science1:167–197.

  Google Scholar 

• Kinder, Donald R.,and Herzog,Don (1993).Democratic discussion.In George E. Marcus and Russell L.Hanson (eds.),Reconsidering the Democratic Public,pp. 347–377.University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kinder, Donald R.,and Sanders, Lynn M.(1990).Mimicking political debate with survey questions:the case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks.Social Cognition8:73–103.

  Google Scholar 

• Kinder, Donald R.,and Sanders, Lynn M.(1996).Divided By Color:Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kowert, Paul A.,and Hermann, Margaret G.(1997).Who takes risks?:daring and caution in foreign policy making.Journal of Conflict Resolution41:611–637.

  Google Scholar 

• Krosnick, Jon A.(1988).The role of attitude importance in social evaluation:a study of policy preferences,presidential candidate evaluations,and voting behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55:196–210.

  Google Scholar 

• Krosnick, Jon A.(1989).Attitude importance and attitude accessibility.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin55:297–308

  Google Scholar 

• Kühberger,Anton (1995).The framing of decisions:a new look at old problems.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes62:230–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Kühberger,Anton (1998).The influence of framing on risky decisions:a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes75:23–55.

  Google Scholar 

• Kühberger,Anton, Schulte-Mecklenbeck,Michael,and Perner,Josef (1999).The effects of framing,reflection,probability,and payoff on risk preference in choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes78:204–231

  Google Scholar 

• Kuklinski, James H.,and Hurley, Norman L.(1994).On hearing and interpreting political messages:a cautionary tale of citizen cue-taking.Journal of Politics56:729–751.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuklinski, James H.,and Hurley, Norman L.(1996).It 's a matter of interpretation.In Diana C.Mutz, Paul M.Sniderman,and Richard A.Brody (eds.),Political Persuasion and Attitude Change,pp.125–144.Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuklinski James H.,and Quirk, Paul J.(2000).Reconsidering the rational public:cognition,heuristics,and mass opinion.In Arthur Lupia, Mathew D.McCubbins,and Samuel L.Popkin (eds.),Elements of Reason:Cognition,Choice,and the Bounds of Rationality,pp.153–182.New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuklinski, James H., Quirk, Paul J., Jerit,Jennifer, Schwieder,David,and Rich, Robert F.(2000).Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship.Journal of Politics62:790–816.

  Google Scholar 

• Lacy,Dean (1997).A theory of nonseparable preferences in survey responses.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Political Methodology Society,Columbus, Ohio,July.

• Lau, Richard R., Smith, Richard A.,and Fiske, Susan T.(1991).Political beliefs,policy interpretations,and political persuasion.Journal of Politics53:644–675.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, Irwin P.,and Chapman, Daniel P.(1990).Risk taking,frame of reference,and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology26:421–434.

  Google Scholar 

• Levin, Irwin P., Schneider, Sandra L.,and Gaeth, Gary J.(1998).All frames are not created equal:a typology and critical analysis of framing effects.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes76:149–188.

  Google Scholar 

• Lupia,Arthur,and McCubbins, Mathew D.(1998).The Democratic Dilemma:Can Citizens Learn What They Need To Know?New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Manheim, Jarol B.(1991).All of the People All of the Time:Strategic Communication and American Politics.Armonk,NY: M.E.Sharpe,Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin,Leonard L.,and Achee,John W.(1992).Beyond accessibility:the role of processing objectives in judgment.In Leonard L.Martin and Abraham Tesser (eds.), The Construction of Social Judgments,pp.195–216.Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• McCaffery,Edward J., Kahneman,Daniel J.,and Spitzer,Matthew L.(1995).Framing the jury:cognitive perspectives on pain and suffering awards.Virginia Law Review81:1341–1420.

  Google Scholar 

• Mendelsohn,Matthew (1996).The media and interpersonal communication:the priming of issues,leaders,and party identification.Journal of Politics58:112–125.

  Google Scholar 

• Meyerowitz,Beth E.,and Chaiken,Shelly (1987).The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes,intentions,and behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52:500–510.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller,Joanne M.,and Krosnick,Jon A.(1996).News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations:a program of research on the priming hypothesis.In Diana C.Mutz, Paul M.Sniderman,and Richard A.Brody (eds.),Political Persuasion and Attitude Change,pp.79–99.Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller,Joanne M.,and Krosnick,Jon A.(2000).News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations:politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source.American Journal of Political Science44:295–309.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller, Paul M.,and Fagley,N.S.(1991).The effects of framing,problem variations, and providing rationale on choice.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin17: 517–522.

  Google Scholar 

• Mueller, John E.(1994).Policy and Opinion in the Gulf War.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, Thomas E.(2000.)Goals and values in the language of issue framing.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington,DC,August 31–September 2.

• Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A.,and Oxley, Zoe M.(1997a).Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance.American Political Science Review91:567–583.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, Thomas E.,and Kinder, Donald R.(1996).Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion.Journal of Politics58:1055–1078.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, Thomas E.,and Oxley, Zoe M.(1999).Issue framing effects and belief importance and opinion.Journal of Politics61:1040–1067.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, Thomas E., Oxley, Zoe M.,and Clawson, Rosalee A.(1997b).Toward a psychology of framing effects.Political Behavior19:221–246.

  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, Thomas E., Willey,Elaine,and Oxley, Zoe M.(1998).Belief content,importance,and accessibility in issue opinion.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association,Boston,MA,September 3–6.

• Page, Benjamin I.,and Shapiro, Robert Y.(1992).The Rational Public:Fifty Years of Trends in Americans 'Policy Preferences.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Pan,Zhongdang,and Kosicki, Gerald M.(1993).Framing analysis:an approach to news discourse.Political Communication10:55–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Parenti, Michael (1999).Methods of media manipulation.In Ray Eldon Hiebert (ed.), Impact of Mass Media:Current Issues.4th ed,pp.120–124.New York: Longman.

  Google Scholar 

• Patterson, Thomas E.(1993).Out of Order.New York: Alfred A.Knopf.

  Google Scholar 

• Payne, John W., Bettman, James R.,and Johnson, Eric J.(1993).The Adaptive Decision Maker.New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Petrocik,John R.(1996).Issue ownership in presidential elections,with a 1980 case study.American Journal of Political Science40:825–850.

  Google Scholar 

• Petty, Richard E.,and Wegener, Duane T.(1998).Attitude change:multiple roles for persuasion variables.In Daniel T. Gilbert,Susan T.Fiske,and Gardner Lindzey (eds.),Handbook of Social Psychology,4th ed.,vol.II,pp.323–390.New York: McGraw-Hill.

  Google Scholar 

• Popkin, Samuel L.(1994).The Reasoning Voter:Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns,2nd ed.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Price,Vincent,and Na,Eun-Kyung (2000).Citizen deliberation and resistance to framing effects.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research,Portland,Oregon,May.

• Price,Vincent,and Tewksbury,David (1997).News values and public opinion:a theoretical account of media priming and framing.In George A.Barnett and Franklin J. Boster (eds.),Progress in Communication Sciences:Advances in Persuasion,vol.13, pp.173–212.Greenwich,CT: Ablex.

  Google Scholar 

• Price,Vincent, Tewksbury,David,and Powers,Elizabeth (1997).Switching trains of thought:the impact of news frames on readers 'cognitive responses.Communication Research24:481–506.

  Google Scholar 

• Quattrone,George,and Tversky,Amos (1988).Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice.American Political Science Review82:719–736.

  Google Scholar 

• Rabin,Matthew (1998).Psychology and economics.Journal of Economic Literature36:11–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Rhee, June Woong (1997).Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: social cognitive account of framing effects.Journal of Communication47:26–48

  Google Scholar 

• Riker, William H.(1986).The Art of Political Manipulation.New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Riker, William H.(1995).The political psychology of rational choice theory.Political Psychology16:23–44.

  Google Scholar 

• Riker, William H.(1996).The Strategy of Rhetoric:Campaigning for the American Constitution.Randall L.Calvert, John Mueller,and Rick K.Wilson (eds.).New Haven: Yale University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Schattschneider,E.E.(1960).The Semisovereign People:A Realist 's View of Democracy in America.New York:Holt, Rinehart,and Winston.

• Scheufele, Dietram A.(1999).Framing as a theory of media effects.Journal of Communication49:103–122.

  Google Scholar 

• Scheufele, Dietram A.(2000).Agenda-setting,priming,and framing revisited:another look at cognitive effects of political communication.Mass Communication & Society3:297–316.

  Google Scholar 

• Schuman,Howard,and Ludwig,Jacob (1983).The norm of even-handedness in surveys as in life.American Sociological Review48:112–120.

  Google Scholar 

• Schuman,Howard,and Presser,Stanley (1981).Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys:Experiments in Question Form,Wording,and Context.New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Schumpeter, Joseph Alois (1942).Capitalism,Socialism,and Democracy.New York: Harper.

• Schwarz,Norbert (1996).Cognition and Communication:Judgmental Biases,Research Methods,and the Logic of Conversation.Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Sears, David O.,and Lau,Richard R.(1983).Inducing apparently self-interested political preferences.American Journal of Political Science27:223–52.

  Google Scholar 

• Shah, Dhavan V., Domke,David,and Wackman, Daniel B.(1996).“To thine own self be true ”:values,framing,and voter decision-making strategies.Communication Research23:509–560.

  Google Scholar 

• Sieck,Winston,and Yates, J.Frank (1997).Exposition effects on decision making: choice and confidence in choice.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes70:207–219.

  Google Scholar 

• Silverstein,Gordon (2000).How law kills politics.Unpublished paper,University of Minnesota.

• Simon, Adam F.(2001).A unified method for analyzing media framing.In Roderick P.Hart and Daron R.Shaw (eds.),Communication in U.S.Elections:New Agendas, pp.75–89.Lanham,MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Sniderman, Paul M.(2000).Taking sides:a fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In Arthur Lupia, Mathew D.McCubbins,and Samuel L.Popkin (eds.),Elements of Reason:Cognition,Choice,and the Bounds of Rationality,pp.67–84.New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sniderman, Paul M.,Brody, Richard A.,and Tetlock, Philip E.(1991).Reasoning and Choice:Explorations in Political Psychology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sniderman, Paul M.,and Theriault, Sean M.(1999).The dynamics of political argument and the logic of issue framing.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association,Chicago,IL,April 15–17.

• Somin,Ilya (1998).Voter ignorance and the democratic ideal.Critical Review12: 413–458.

  Google Scholar 

• Stanovich,Keith E.,and West,Richard F.(1998).Individual differences in framing and conjunction effects.Thinking and Reasoning4:289–317.

  Google Scholar 

• Stapel,Diederik, Koomen,Willem,and Zeelenberg,Marcel (1998).The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation,comparison,and correction processes:accuracy ?knowledge accessibility effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74:878–893.

  Google Scholar 

• Sweetser,Eve and Fauconnier,Gilles (1996).Cognitive links and domains:basic aspects of mental space theory.In Gilles Fauconnier and Eve Sweetser(eds.),Spaces, Worlds,and Grammar,pp.1–28.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Takemura,Kazuhisa (1994).Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision.The Journal of Psychology128:33–39.

  Google Scholar 

• Tetlock, Philip E.(1986).A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50:819–827.

  Google Scholar 

• The American Heritage Dictionary,Second college edition (1983).Houghton Mifflin Company.

• The Random House Dictionary of the English Language,Second edition (1987).Edited by Stuart Berg Flexner,Random House Inc.

• Tourangeau,Roger, Rasinski, Kenneth A., Bradburn,Norman,and D 'Andrade,Roy (1989).Belief accessibility and context effects in attitude measurement.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology25:401–421.

  Google Scholar 

• Tversky,Amos,and Kahneman,Daniel (1981).The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science211:453–458.

  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Tversky,Amos,and Kahneman,Daniel (1987).Rational choice and the framing of decisions.In Robin M.Hogarth and Melvin W.Reder (eds.),Rational Choice:The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology,pp.67–94.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Tversky,Amos,and Thaler, Richard H.(1990).Preference reversals.Journal of Economic Perspectives4:201–211.

  Google Scholar 

• Tykocinski,Orit, Higgins, E.Tory,and Chaiken,Shelly (1994).Message framing,selfdiscrepancies,and yielding to persuasive messages:the motivational significance of psychological situations.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin20:107–115.

  Google Scholar 

• van der Pligt, Joop,and Eiser, J. Richard (1984).Dimensional salience,judgment,and attitudes.In J. Richard Eiser (ed.),Attitudinal Judgment,pp.161–177.New York: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Wang,X.T.(1996).Framing effects:dynamics and task domains.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes68:145–157.

  Google Scholar 

• Wittman,Donald (1995).The Myth of Democratic Failure:Why Political Institutions Are Efficient.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Wyer Jr., Robert S.,and Srull, Thomas K.(1989).Memory and Cognition in its Social Context.Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar 

• Zald,Mayer N.(1996).Culture,ideology,and strategic framing.In Doug McAdam, John D.McCarthy,and Mayer N.Zald (eds.),Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Zaller,John (1992).The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion,pp.261–274.New York: Cambridge University Press.

  Google Scholar 

Download references