From conception to performance: How undergraduate students conceptualise and construct essays

• Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R. and Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York: Basic Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Biggs, J.B. (1988). ‘Approaches to learning and essay writing’, in Schmeck, R.R. (ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Biggs, J.B. (1989). ‘Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching’, Higher Education Research and Development 8, 7–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. (1989). ‘Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings’, Higher Education 18, 529–549.

  Google Scholar 

• Boulton-Lewis, G. (1994). ‘Tertiary students' knowledge of their own learning and a SOLO Taxonomy’, Higher Education 28, 387–402.

  Google Scholar 

• Brooker, R. and Smith, D. (1996). ‘Assessing tertiary students in an education faculty: Rhetoric and reality’, Higher Education Research and Development 15(2), 163–175.

  Google Scholar 

• Burns, J., Clift, J. and Duncan, J. (1991). ‘Understanding of understanding: Implications for learning and teaching’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 61, 276–289.

  Google Scholar 

• Dart, B.C. and Clarke, J.A. (1991). ‘Helping students become better learners: A case study in teacher education’, Higher Education 22, 317–335.

  Google Scholar 

• Entwistle, A. and Entwistle, N. (1992). ‘Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations’, Learning and Instruction 2, 1–22.

  Google Scholar 

• Entwistle, N. (1995). ‘Frameworks for understanding as experienced in essay writing and in preparing for examinations’, Educational Psychologist 30(1), 47–54.

  Google Scholar 

• Entwistle, N., Entwistle, A. and Tait, H. (1991). ‘Academic understanding and contexts to enhance it: A perspective from research on student learning’, in Duffy, T.M., Lowych, J. and Jonassen, D.H. (eds.), Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Entwistle, N. and Marton, F. (1994). ‘Knowledge objects: Understandings constituted through intensive academic study’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 64, 161–178.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, J.R. (1997). ‘A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing’, in Levy, M. and Ransdell (eds.), The Science of Writing: theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, pp. 1–27.

  Google Scholar 

• Hayes, J.R., Flower, L.S., Schriver, K.S., Stratman, J. and Carey, L. (1987). ‘Cognitive processes in revision’, in Rosenberg, S. (ed.), Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics: Vol. 2, Reading, Writing and Language Processing. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 176–240.

  Google Scholar 

• Hounsell, D.J. (1984a). ‘Learning and essay writing’, in Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Hounsell, D. (1984b). ‘Essay planning and essay writing’, Higher Education Research and Development 3(1), 13–31.

  Google Scholar 

• Hounsell, D. (1987). ‘Essay writing and the quality of feedback’, in Richardson, J.T.E., Eysenck, M.W. and Piper, D.W. (eds.), Student Learning: Research in Education and Cognitive Psychology. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, pp. 109–119.

  Google Scholar 

• Mahalski, P.A. (1992). ‘Essay writing: do study manuals give relevant advice?’, Higher Education 24, 113–132.

  Google Scholar 

• Marton, F. (1975). ‘On non-verbatim training: Level of processing and level of outcome’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 16, 273–279.

  Google Scholar 

• Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. and Beaty, E. (1993). ‘Conceptions of Learning’, International Journal of Educational Research 46, 4–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Marton, F. and Saljo, R. (1976). ‘On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11.

  Google Scholar 

• Mowl, G. and Pain, R. (1995). ‘Using self and peer assessment to improve students' essay writing: A case study from geography’, Innovations in Education and Training International 32(4), 324–335.

  Google Scholar 

• Nightingale, P. (1988). ‘Understanding the processes and problems in student writing’, Studies in Higher Education 13(3), 263–283.

  Google Scholar 

• Norton, L.S. (1990). ‘Essay writing: What really counts?’, Higher Education 20, 411–442.

  Google Scholar 

• Norton, L.S. and Crowley, C.M. (1995). ‘Can students be helped to learn how to learn? an evaluation of an approaches to learning programme for first year degree students’, Higher Education 29, 307–328.

  Google Scholar 

• Perry, W.G.J. (1981). ‘Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning’, in Chickering, A.W. (ed.), The Modern American College. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.

  Google Scholar 

• Prosser, M. and Webb, C. (1994). ‘Relating the process of undergraduate writing to the finished product’, Studies in Higher Education 19(2), 125–138.

  Google Scholar 

• Stefani, L.A.J. (1994). ‘Peer, self and tutor assessment: Relative reliabilities’, Studies in Higher Education 19(1), 69–75.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, G. and Nightingale, P. (1990). ‘Not mechanics but meaning: Error in tertiary students’ writing’, Higher Education Research and Development 9(2), 161–175.

  Google Scholar 

• Torrance, M., Thomas, G.V. and Robinson, E.J. (1994). ‘The writing strategies of graduate research students in the social sciences’, Higher Education 27, 379–392.

  Google Scholar 

Download references