A Third Sector in the Third Millennium?

• Abzug, R. (1999). The nonprofit sector and the informal sector: A theoretical perspective. Voluntas, 10, 131–150.

  Google Scholar 

• Adams, C., and Perlmutter, F. (1991). Commercial venturing and the transformation of America's social welfare agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20(1), 25–38.

  Google Scholar 

• Alford, R. (1992). The political language of the nonprofit sector. In R. Merelman (ed.), Language: Symbolism and Politics: Essays in Honor of Murray Edelman, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, W., Frieden, B., and Murphy, M. (eds.) (1977). Managing Human Services, International City Managers Association, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Anheier, H., and Seibel, W. (eds.) (1990). The Nonprofit Sector: International and Comparative Perspectives, De Gruyter, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Austin, D. (1988). The Political Economy of Human Service Programs, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.

  Google Scholar 

• Benson, K. (1975). The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 229–249.

  Google Scholar 

• Bielefeld, W., and Galaskiewcz, J. (1998). Nonprofit Organizations in an Age of Uncertainty: A Study of Organizational Change, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, N.Y.

  Google Scholar 

• Billis, D. (1993). Sector blurring and nonprofit centres: The case of the UK. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22, 241–257.

  Google Scholar 

• Billis, D., and Glennerster, H. (1998). Human services and the voluntary sector:Atheory of comparative advantage. Journal of Social Policy, 27, 77–98.

  Google Scholar 

• Boje, D., Gephart, R., and Thatchenkery, T. (eds.) (1996). Postmodern Management and Organization Theory, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Boris, E., and Steurle, E. (eds.) (1998). Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict, Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Boulding, K. (1973). The Economy of Love and Fear, Wadsworth, Belmont, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Brody, E. (1996a). Agents without principals: The economic convergence of the nonprofit and for-profit organizational forms. New York Law School Law Review, 40, 457–536.

  Google Scholar 

• Brody, E. (1996b). Institutional dissonance in the nonprofit sector. Villanova Law Review, 41, 433–504.

  Google Scholar 

• Bruyn, S. (1977). The Social Economy, Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Clarke, C., and Estes, C. (1992). Sociological and economic theories of markets and nonprofits: Evidence from home health organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 945–969.

  Google Scholar 

• Claxton, G., Feder, J., Shactman, D., and Altman, S. (1997). Public policy issues in nonprofit conversions: An overview. Health Affairs, 16(2), 9–28.

  Google Scholar 

• DeGennaro, R. M. (1988). A study of youth services from a political economy perspective. Journal of Social Service Research, 11(4), 61–73.

  Google Scholar 

• Dickens, P. (1996). Human services as service industries. Service Industries Journal, 16(1), 82–91.

  Google Scholar 

• DiMaggio, P., and Anheier, H. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137–159.

  Google Scholar 

• Evers, A. (1991). Shifts in the welfare mix. Eurosocial, 57/58, 7–8.

  Google Scholar 

• Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. Voluntas, 6, 159–182.

  Google Scholar 

• Evers, A., and Svetlik, I. (eds.) (1993). Balancing Pluralism: NewWelfare Mixes in Care for the Elderly, Avebury, England.

• Feeney, S. (1997). Shifting the prism: Case explications of institutional analysis in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 489–508.

  Google Scholar 

• Ferris, J., and Graddy, E. (1989). Fading distinctions among the nonprofit, government, and for profit sectors. In V. Hodgkinson, R. Lyman, and Associates, (eds.), The Future of the Nonprofit Sector, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 123–139.

  Google Scholar 

• Ferris, J., and Graddy, E. (1996). Structural changes in the hospital industry and the nonprofit role in health care. In A. Merget, E. Weaver, and V. Hodgkinson (eds.), Nonprofit Organizations as Public Actors, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Ferris, J., and Graddy, E. (1999). The role of the nonprofit sector in a self-governing society: A view from the United States. Voluntas, 9, 137–154.

  Google Scholar 

• Geen, R., and Pollak, T. (1999). The changing role of the nonprofit sector in providing child welfare services in Maryland: The potential impact of managed care. In Crossing the Borders, Working Paper, Independent Sector, Spring Research Forum, Independent Sector, pp. 229–248.

• Gidron, B., Kramer, R. M., and Salamon, L. (1992). Government and the third sector in comparative perspective: Allies or adversaries? In B. Gidron, R. Kramer, and L. Salamon (eds.), Government and the Third Sector: Emerging Relationships in Welfare States, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 1–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Gilbert, N. (1995). Welfare Justice: Restoring Social Equity, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

  Google Scholar 

• Gray, B. (1997). Conversion of HMOs and hospitals: What's at stake? Health Affairs, 16(2), 29–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Grodzins, M. (1966). The American System: A New View of the United States, Rand McNally, Chicago.

  Google Scholar 

• Gronbjerg, K. (1993). Understanding Nonprofit Funding: Managing Revenues in Social Service and Community Development Organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Hall, P. (1992). Inventing the Nonprofit Sector and Other Essays on Philanthropy, Voluntarism, and Nonprofit Organizations, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.

  Google Scholar 

• Hall, P. D. (1998). Review of R. Kuttner, 1997, Everything for sale, Arnova News, 26(3), 9.

  Google Scholar 

• Hammack, D., and Young, D. (eds.) (1993). Nonprofit Organizations in a Market Economy, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Hannan, M., and Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, pp. 27–42.

  Google Scholar 

• Hansmann, H. (1996). The Ownership of Enterprise, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Hasenfeld, Y (ed.) (1983). HumanService Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NewJersey.

  Google Scholar 

• Hasenfeld, Y. (ed.) (1992). Human Services as Complex Organizations, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Hatch, M. J. (1996). Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, Integrative in Post-Modern Perspectives, Oxford University Press, N.Y.

  Google Scholar 

• James, E. (ed.) (1989). The Nonprofit Sector in International Perspective: Studies in Comparative Culture and Policy, Oxford University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Kagan, S., and Newton, J. (1989). For-profit and nonprofit child care: Similarities and differences. Young Children, 45, 4–10.

  Google Scholar 

• Kamerman, S., and Kahn, A. (eds.) (1989). Privatization and the Welfare State, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

  Google Scholar 

• Kaufmann, F. X. (1991). The blurring of the distinction ‘state v. society’ in the welfare state. In F. X. Kaufmann (ed.), The Public Sector-Challenge for Coordination and Learning, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 152–164.

  Google Scholar 

• Knapp, M., Beecham, J., and Hallam, A. (1997). The mixed economy of psychiatric reprovision. In J. Leff (ed.), Care in the Community: Illusion or Reality? Wiley, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Knocke, D. (1990). Organizing for Collective Action: The Political Economies of Associations, Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, N.Y.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramer,M. (1981). Voluntary Agencies in theWelfare State, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramer, R. M. (1987). Voluntary agencies and the personal social services. In W. Powell (ed.), The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, pp. 240–257.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramer, R.M. (1994). Voluntary agencies and the contract culture: Dream or nightmare? Social Service Review, 68(1), 33–60.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramer, R. M. (1995). Is the sector concept obsolete? Inside ISTR, 3(1), Summer, 6–7.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramer, R. M. (1998). Nonprofit organizations in the 21st century: Will sector matter? The Aspen Institute, Washington, D.C.

  Google Scholar 

• Kramer, R., Lorentzen, H., Melief, W., and Pasquinelli, S. (1993). Privatization in Four European Countries in Four European Countries: Comparative Studies in Government-Third Sector Relationships, M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Krashinsky, M. (1998). Does auspice matter? The case of day care in Canada. In W. Powell and E. Clemens (eds.), Private Action and the Public Good, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, pp. 114–123.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuhnle, S., and Selle, P. (eds.) (1992). Government and Voluntary Organizations: A Relational Perspective, Avebury, England.

• Kuttner, R. (1997). Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets, Knopf, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Lifset, R. (1989). Cash cows or sacred cows: The politics of the commercialization movement. In V. Hodgkinson and R. Lyman (eds.), The Future of the Nonprofit Sector, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Locke, R. (1996). The Collapse of the American Managerial Mystique, Oxford University Press, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Lowndes, V. (1996). Varieties of new institutionalism: A critical appraisal. Public Administration, 74,Summer, 181–197.

  Google Scholar 

• Mauser, E. (1998). The importance of organizational form: Parent perception versus reality in the day care industry. In W. Powell and E. Clemens (eds.), Private Action and the Public Good, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, pp. 124–136.

  Google Scholar 

• McGovern, J. (1989). The use of for-profit subsidiary corporations by nonprofits. In V. Hodgkinson, R. Lyman, and Associates, The Future of the Nonprofit Sector, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 168–182.

  Google Scholar 

• Meyer, J., and Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 41–62.

  Google Scholar 

• Milofsky, C. (1996). Organizations as process. Paper presented at the 1996 Annual Conference of ARNOVA.

• Musolf, L., and Seidman, H. (1980). The blurred boundaries of public administration. Public Administration Review, March/April, 124–130.

• Ortmann, A. (1996). Modern economic theory and the study of nonprofit organizations: Why the twain shall meet. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 470–484.

  Google Scholar 

• Perry, J., and Rainey, H. (1988). The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 182–201.

  Google Scholar 

• Powell, W. (1990). Neither markets nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

  Google Scholar 

• Powell, W., and DiMaggio, P. (eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

  Google Scholar 

• Rein, M. (1989). The social structure of institutions: Neither public nor private. In S. Kamerman and A. Kahn (eds.), Privatization and the Welfare State, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp. 49–72.

  Google Scholar 

• Reitan, T. (1998). Theories of interorganizational relations in the human services. Social Service Review, 72, 285–309.

  Google Scholar 

• Ryan, L. (1999). The new landscape for nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 77(1), 127–136.

  Google Scholar 

• Salamon, L. (1993). The marketization of welfare: Changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state. Social Service Review, 67(1), 16–39.

  Google Scholar 

• Salamon, L. (1998). The nonprofit sector at a crossroads: The case of America. Voluntas, 10, 5–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Salamon, L., and Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationality. Voluntas, 9, 213–248.

  Google Scholar 

• Schlesinger, M. (1998). Mismeasuring the consequences of ownership. In W. Powell and E. Clemens (eds.), Private Action and the Public Good, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, pp. 85–113.

  Google Scholar 

• Scott, W. (1995). Institutions and Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

  Google Scholar 

• Scotchmer, K., and Benschoten, E. (1999). Nonprofit pursuit of commercial ventures: Implications for nonprofit public purpose. In Independent Sector, Spring Research Forum, Crossing the Borders, Working Papers, pp. 397–418.

• Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, June, 270–278.

  Google Scholar 

• Sharkansky, I. (1979). Wither the State? Politics and Public Enterprise in Three Countries, Chatham House, New Jersey.

  Google Scholar 

• 6, P. (1994). Will anyone talk about the ‘third sector’ in 10 years’ time? In P. 6 and I. Vidal (eds.), Delivering Welfare, Centre d'Iniciatives de l'Economica Social, Barcelona, pp. 401–409.

  Google Scholar 

• Skloot, E. (1988). The Nonprofit Entrepreneur, The Foundation Center, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, B. L. R. (1975). The New Political Economy: The Public Use of the Private Sector, Wiley, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Stein, H. (ed.) (1986). Organizations and the Human Services: Cross-Disciplinary Reflections, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.

  Google Scholar 

• Steinberg, R. (1997). Overall evaluation of economic theories. Voluntas, 8, 179–204.

  Google Scholar 

• Svetlik, I. (1991). The future of welfare pluralism in the postcommunist countries. In A. Evers and I. Svetlik (eds.), New Welfare Mixes in Care for the Elderly, European Center for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Vienna, pp. 13–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, M. (1992). The changing role of the nonprofit sector in Britain: Moving toward the market. In B. Gidron, R. Kramer and L. Salamon (eds.), Government and the Third Sector: Emerging Relationships in Welfare States, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, pp. 147–175.

  Google Scholar 

• Taylor, M., and Lansley, J. (1992). Ideology and welfare in the UK: Implications for the voluntary sector. Voluntas, 3, 153–174.

  Google Scholar 

• Tucker, D. (1988). Ecological and institutional sources of change in organizational populations. In G. Carroll (ed.), Ecological Models of Organizations, Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 127–151.

  Google Scholar 

• Tuckman, H. (1998). Competition, commercialization and the evaluation of nonprofit structures. Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 165–174.

  Google Scholar 

• United Nations Social and Economic Council (1993). Statement of Guiding Principles, Commission for Social Development, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Til, J. (1988). Mapping the Third Sector: Voluntarism in a Changing Social Economy, The Foundation Center, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Til, J. (1994). Nonprofit organizations and social institutions. In Robert D. Herman Associates (eds.), The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, San Francisco, California, pp. 44–64.

• Young, D. (1999). Complementary, supplementary or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofit-government relations in the US. In E. Boris and C. Steuerle (eds.), Nonprofits and Government: Collaboration and Conflict, The Urban Institute Press, Washington D.C., pp. 31–67.

  Google Scholar 

• Voluntas, 8 (1997). Special Issue on Economic Theory, 93–204.

• Walmsley, G., and Zald, M. (1970). The Political Economy of Public Organizations, DC Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts.

  Google Scholar 

• Weisbrod, B. (ed.) (1998). To Profit or Not to Profit: The Commercial Transformation of the Nonprofit Sector, Cambridge University Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Wernet, S. (1994). A case study of adaptation in a nonprofit human service organization. Journal of Community Practice, 1(3).

• Wistow, G., Knapp, M., Hardy, B., Kendall, J., and Manning, R. (1996). Social Care Markets: Progress and Prospects, Open University Press, Buckingham.

  Google Scholar 

• Wolf, N., and Schlesinger, M. (1998). Access, hospital ownership, and competition between for profit and nonprofit institutions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 203–236.

  Google Scholar 

• Zald, M. (1970). Organizational Change: The Political Economy of the YMCA, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

  Google Scholar 

• Zucker, L. (1988). Combining institutional theory and population ecology: No legitimacy, no history. American Sociological Review, 54, 542–545.

  Google Scholar 

Download references