[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Mammograms Using Surrounding Region Dependence Method and Artificial Neural Network

  • Published:
Journal of VLSI signal processing systems for signal, image and video technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clustered microcalcifications on X-ray mammograms are an important sign in the detection of breast cancer. A statistical texture analysis method, called the surrounding region dependence method (SRDM), is proposed for the detection of clustered microcalcifications on digitized mammograms. The SRDM is based on the second-order histogram in two surrounding regions. This method defines four textural features to classify region of interests (ROIs) into positive ROIs containing clustered microcalcifications and negative ROIs of normal tissues. The database is composed of 64 positive and 76 negative ROI images, which are selected from digitized mammograms with a pixel size of 100 × 100 μm2 and 12 bits per pixel. An ROI is selected as an area of 128 × 128 pixels on the digitized mammograms. In order to classify ROIs into the two types, a three-layer backpropagation neural network is employed as a classifier. A segmentation of individual microcalcifications is also proposed to show their morphologies. The classification performance of the proposed method is evaluated by using the round-robin method and a free-response receiver operating-characteristics (FROC) analysis. A receiver operating-characteristics (ROC) analysis is employed to present the results of the round-robin testing for the case of several hidden neurons. The area under the ROC curve, A z, is 0.997, which is achieved in the case of 4 hidden neurons. The FROC analysis is performed on 20 cropped images. A cropped image is selected as an area of 512 × 512 pixels on the digitized mammograms. In terms of the FROC, a sensitivity of more than 90% is obtained with a low false-positive (FP) detection rate of 0.67 per cropped image.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.G. Bird, R.G. Wallace, and B.C. Yankaskas, “Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography”, Radiology, Vol. 184, pp. 613–617, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P.C. Johns and M.J. Yaffe, “X-ray characterization of normal and neoplastic breast tissues”, Phys. in Med. and Biol., Vol. 32, No.6, pp. 675–695, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D.B. Kopans, Breast Imaging, J.B. Lippincoff Company, Philadelphia, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Lanyi, Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Breast Calcifications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Dengler, S. Behrens, and J.F. Desaga, “Segmentation of microcalcifications in mammograms”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 12, No.4, pp. 634–642, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R.N. Strickland and H.I. Hahn, “Wavelet transform for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms”, IEEE Trans. Imag., Vol. 15, No.2, pp. 218–229, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Shen, R.M. Rangayyan, and J.E.L. Desautels, “Application of shape analysis to mammographic calcifications”, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 263–274, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H.P. Chan, K. Doi, C.J. Vyborny, R.A. Schmidt, C.E. Metz et al., “Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis”, Invest. Radiol., Vol. 25, No.10, pp. 1102–1110, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. H.P. Chan, K. Doi, S. Galhotra, C.J. Vyborny, H. MacMahon, and P.M. Jokich, “Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 1. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography”, Med. Phys., Vol. 14, No.4, pp. 538–548, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H.P. Chan, K. Doi, C. Vyborny, K.L. Lam, and R.A. Schmidt, “Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms: Methodology and preliminary clinical study”, Invest. Radiol., Vol. 23, pp. 664–671, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Wu, K. Doi, M.L. Giger, and R.M. Nishikawa, “Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: Application of artificial neural networks”, Med. Phys., Vol. 19, No.3, pp. 555–560, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Zhang, K. Doi, M.L. Giger, Y. Wu, R.M. Nishikawa, and R.A. Schmidt, “Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network”, Med. Phys., Vol. 21, No.4, pp. 517–524, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. B.W. Fam, S.L. Olson, P.F. Winter, and F.J. Scholz, “Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms”, Radiology, Vol. 169, pp. 333–337, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D.H. Davies and D.R. Dance, “Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms”, Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 35, No.8, pp. 1111–1118, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Fausett, Fundamentals of Neural Networks, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. K.R. Castleman, Digital Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Nadler and E.P. Smith, Pattern Recognition Engineering, Wiley, New York, NY, 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. C.E. Metz, “ROC methodology in radiologic imaging”, Investigative Radiology, Vol. 21, No.9, pp. 720–733, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C.E. Metz, “Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies”, Investigative Radiology, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 234–245, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. C.E. Metz, J.H. Shen, and B.A. Herman, “New methods for estimating a binormalROCcurve from continuously-distributed test results”, Presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Anaheim, CA, Aug. 7, 1990.

  21. P.C. Bunch, J.F. Hamilton, G.K. Sanderson, and A.H. Simmons, “A free response approach to measurement and characterization of radiographic observer performance”, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 127, pp. 124–135, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.K., Park, J.M., Song, K.S. et al. Detection of Clustered Microcalcifications on Mammograms Using Surrounding Region Dependence Method and Artificial Neural Network. The Journal of VLSI Signal Processing-Systems for Signal, Image, and Video Technology 18, 251–262 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007989231205

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007989231205

Keywords

Navigation