Dual Computation of Projective Shape and Camera Positions from Multiple Images

• Carlsson, S. 1994. The double algebra: An effective tool for computing invariants in computer vision. Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, Springer, LNCS 825, pp. 145-164.

• Carlsson, S. 1995a. View variation and linear invariants in 2-D and 3-D. Tech. rep., Royal Institute of Technology, ISRN KTH/NA/ P-95/22-SE.

• Carlsson, S. 1995b. Duality of reconstruction and positioning from projective views. In IEEE Workshop on Representations of Visual Scenes, Cambridge, MA.

• Chen, H.H. and Huang, T.S. 1990. Matching 3-D line segments with applications to multiple-object motion estimation. T-PAMI 12, pp. 1002-1008.

  Google Scholar 

• Csurka, G. and Faugeras, O.D. 1994. Computing three-dimensional projective invariants from a pair of images using the Grassmann-Cayley algebra. Tech. report, INRIA-Sophia Antipolis.

• Demey, S., Ziserman, A., and Beardley, P. 1992. Affine and projective structure from motion. In Proc. BMVC-92.

• Faugeras, O.D. 1992. What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig? In Proc. 2nd ECCV, pp. 563- 578.

• Faugeras, O.D., Luong, Q.T., and Maybank, S.J. 1992. Camera selfcalibration: Theory and experiments. In Proc. 2ndECCV, pp. 321-334.

• Faugeras, O.D. and Mourrain, B. 1995. Algebraic and geometric properties of point correspondences between N images. In Proc 5th ICCV, pp. 951-956.

• Gros, P. 1994. How to use the cross ratio to compute invariants from two images. Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, Springer, LNCS 825, pp. 107-126.

• Hartley, R.I. 1994. Lines and Points in Three Views-An Integrated Approach IUWS.

• Hartley, R., Gupta, R., and Chang, T. 1992. Stereo from uncalibrated cameras. In Proc. CVPR, pp. 761-764.

• Heyden, A. 1995a. Reconstruction from image sequences by means of relative depths. In Proc 5th ICCV, pp. 1058-1063.

• Heyden, A. 1995b. Reconstruction from multiple images using kinetic depths. Tech. Report. Dep. of Mathematics, Lund University.

• Irani, M. and Anandan, P. 1996. Parallax geometry of pairs of points for 3D scence analysis. In Proc. 4th ECCV, vol. I, pp. 17- 30.

  Google Scholar 

• Koenderink, J.J. and van Doorn, A.J. 1991. Affine structure from motion, J. Optic. Soc. Am. A, 2:377-385.

  Google Scholar 

• Long Quan. 1994. Invariants of 6 points from 3 uncalibrated images. In Proc. 3rd ECCV, vol. 2, pp. 459-470.

  Google Scholar 

• Longuet-Higgins, H.C. and Prazdny, K. 1980. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. In Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B-208, pp. 385- 397.

• Luong, Q.-T. and Viéville, T. 1994. Canonic representations for the geometries of multiple projective views. In Proc. 3rd ECCV.

• Maybank, S.J. 1990. The projective geometry of ambiguous surfaces. In Proc. Royal Soc. A, vol. 322, pp. 1-47.

  Google Scholar 

• Mohr, R. 1992. Projective geometry and computer vision. Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision.

• Mohr, R., Quan, L., and Veillon, F. 1995. Relative 3-D reconstruction using multiple uncalibrated images international. Journal of Robotics Research, 6:619-632.

  Google Scholar 

• Rothwell, C.A., Forsyth, D.A., Zisserman, A.P., and Mundy, J.L. 1993. Extracting projective structure from single perspective views of 3-D point sets. In Proc. of 4th ICCV, pp. 573-582.

• Shashua, A. 1993. Projective depth: A geometric invariant for 3D reconstruction from two perspective/orthographic views and for visual recognition. In Proc 4th ICCV, pp. 583-590.

• Shashua, A. 1994. Trilinearity in visual recognition by alignment. In Proc. 3rd ECCV A, pp. 479-484.

• Shashua, A. 1995. Algebraic functions for recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(8):779- 789.

  Google Scholar 

• Shashua, A. and Werman, M. 1995. Trilinearity of three perspective views and its associated tensor. In Proc 5th ICCV, pp. 920-925.

• Shashua, A. and Avidan, S. 1996. The rank4 constraint in multiple view geometry. In Proc. 4th ECCV, pp. 196-206.

• Sparr, G. 1991. In Proc. 1st ESPRIT-DARPAWorkshop on Invariants in Computer Vision, Reykjavik.

• Sparr, G. 1992. Depth Computations from polyhedral images. Image and Vision Computing, 10(10):683-688.

  Google Scholar 

• Sparr, G. 1994. A common framework for kinetic depth, reconstruction and motion for deformable objects. In Proc.ECCVB, pp. 471- 482.

• Spetsakis, M.E. and Aloimonos, J.(Y.). 1990. Structure from motion using line correspondences. International Journal of Computer Vision, 4:171-183.

  Google Scholar 

• Tomasi, C. and Kanade, T. 1992. Shape and motion from image streams under orthography: Afactorization method. International Journal of Computer Vision, 9(2):137-154.

  Google Scholar 

• Triggs, B. 1995. Matching constraints and the joint image. In Proc 5th ICCV, pp. 338-343.

• Weinshall, D. 1993. Model-based invariants for 3D vision. International Journal of Computer Vision, 10(1):27-42.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinshall, D. and Tomasi, C. 1995. Linear and incremental acquisition of invariant shape models from image sequences. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(5):512-517.

  Google Scholar 

• Weinshall, D., Werman, M., and Shashua, A. 1995. Shape tensors for efficient and learnable indexing. In Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Representations of Visual Scenes, Cambridge, MA.

• Zisserman, A. 1994. A case against epipolar geometry. Applications of Invariance in Computer Vision, Springer, LNCS 825, pp. 69-88.

Download references