Abstract
In recent years, a great deal of attention has been devoted to logics of common-sense reasoning. Among the candidates proposed, circumscription has been perceived as an elegant mathematical technique for modeling nonmonotonic reasoning, but difficult to apply in practice. The major reason for this is the second-order nature of circumscription axioms and the difficulty in finding proper substitutions of predicate expressions for predicate variables. One solution to this problem is to compile, where possible, second-order formulas into equivalent first-order formulas. Although some progress has been made using this approach, the results are not as strong as one might desire and they are isolated in nature. In this article, we provide a general method that can be used in an algorithmic manner to reduce certain circumscription axioms to first-order formulas. The algorithm takes as input an arbitrary second-order formula and either returns as output an equivalent first-order formula, or terminates with failure. The class of second-order formulas, and analogously the class of circumscriptive theories that can be reduced, provably subsumes those covered by existing results. We demonstrate the generality of the algorithm using circumscriptive theories with mixed quantifiers (some involving Skolemization), variable constants, nonseparated formulas, and formulas with n-ary predicate variables. In addition, we analyze the strength of the algorithm, compare it with existing approaches, and provide formal subsumption results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Ackermann, W.: Untersuchungen über das Eliminationsproblem der mathematischen logik, Mathematische Annalen 110(1935), 390–413.
Ackermann, W.: Solvable Cases of the Decision Problem, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1954.
Van Benthe, J.: Modal Logic and Classical Logic, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1983.
Van Benthe, J.: Correspondence theory, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 2, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 167–247.
Van Benthem, J.: Semantic parallels in natural language and computation, in H.-D. Ebbinghaus et al. (eds), Logic Colloquium, Granada 1987, 1989, pp. 331–375.
Doherty, P., Łukaszewicz, W. and Szałas, A.: A Characterization Result for Circumscribed Normal Logic Programs, Technical Report LITH-IDA-95-20, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1995. Also to appear in Fundamenta Informaticae, 1996.
Doherty, P., Łukaszewicz, W. and Szałas, A.: General Domain Circumscription and Its First-Order Reduction, Technical Report LITH-IDA-95, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1995. See also: Proceedings of FAPR’96(D. Gabbay, H. J. Ohlbach, eds.), LNAI 1085, Springer-Verlag, 1996, 93–109.
Gabbay, D. and Ohlbach, H. J.: Quantifier Elimination in Second-Order Predicate Logic, Technical Report MPI-I-92-231, Max-Planck Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany, 1992.
Gelfond, M. and Lifschitz, V.: Compiling circumscriptive theories into logic programs, in: Proc. 2nd Int. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 346, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989, pp. 74–99.
Ginsberg, M. L.: A circumscriptive theorem prover, Artificial Intelligence 39(1989), 209–230.
Kartha, G. N. and Lifschitz, V.: A simple formalization of actions using circumscription, in Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
Kolaitis, P. and Papadimitriou, C.: Some computational aspects of circumscription, in AAAI-88: Proc. 7th Nat. Conf. Artificial Intelligence, 1988, pp. 465–469.
Lifschitz, V.: Computing circumscription, in Proc. 9th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, 1985, pp. 121–127.
Lifschitz, V.: Pointwise circumscription, in M. Ginsberg (ed.), Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988, pp. 179–193.
Lifschitz, V.: Circumscription, in D. M. Gabbay, C. J. Hogger and J. A. Robinson (eds), Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, Handbook of Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Vol.3, Oxford University Press, 1994.
Lifschitz, V.: Nested abnormality theories, Artificial Intelligence 74(2) (1995), 351–365.
Löwenheim, L.: Über Möglichkeiten im Relativekalkül, Mathematische Annalen(1915), 137–148.
McCarthy, J.: Circumscription, a form of nonmonotonic reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13(1–2) (1980), 27–39.
Przymusinski, T.: An algorithm to compute circumscription, Artificial Intelligence 38(1991), 49–73.
Rabinov, A.: A generalization of collapsible cases of circumscription (research note), Artificial Intelligence 38(1989), 111–117.
Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13(1980), 81–132.
Szałas, A.: On the correspondence between modal and classical logic: An automated approach, J. Logic and Computation 3(1993), 605–620.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doherty, P., Łukaszewicz, W. & SzaŁas, A. Computing Circumscription Revisited: A Reduction Algorithm. Journal of Automated Reasoning 18, 297–336 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005722130532
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005722130532