[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Nominalistic metalogic

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers a novel method for nominalizing metalogic without transcending first-order reasoning about physical tokens (inscriptions, etc.) of proofs. A kind of double-negation scheme is presented which helps construct, for any platonistic statement in metalogic, a nominalistic statement which has the same assertability condition as the former. For instance, to the platonistic statement “there is a (platonistic) proof of A in deductive system D” corresponds the nominalistic statement “there is no (metalogical) proof token in (possibly informal) set theory for the claim that there is no proof of A in D.” And it is argued that the nominalist can use all the platonistic results by transforming them into such nominalistic correlates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Chihara, C.: A Simple Type Theory Without Platonistic Domains, Journal of Philosophical Logic 13 (1984), 249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Detlefsen, M.: Hilbert's Program, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Field, H.: Science Without Numbers, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Field, H.: Is Mathematical Knowledge Just Logical Knowledge?, Philosophical Review 93 (1984), 509–552. Reprinted, with substantial changes, in Field, Realism, Mathematics and Modality, 79–124. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Field, H.: Metalogic and Modality, Philosophical Studies 62 (1991), 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Putnam, H.: The Thesis That Mathematics Is Logic, in R. Schoenman (ed.), Bertrand Russell: Philosopher of the Century, 273–303. Allen & Unwin, London, 1967a. Reprinted in Putnam, 1979, 12–42.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Putnam, H.: Mathematics Without Foundations, Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967b), 5–22. Reprinted in Putnam, 1979, 43–78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Putnam, H.: Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Resnik, M.: Review of Field, 1980, Noûs 17 (1983), 514-519.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shapiro, S.: Modality and Ontology, Mind 102 (1993), 455–481.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akiba, K. Nominalistic metalogic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 35–47 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004201013891

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004201013891

Navigation