A Bayesian Diagnostic Algorithm for Student Modeling and its Evaluation

• Birnbaum, A.: 1968, Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's mental ability. In: F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick (eds.), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  Google Scholar 

• Bloom, B.: 1984, The 2 Sigma Problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 4–15.

  Google Scholar 

• Castillo, E., Gutiérrez, J. M. and Hadi, A.: 1997, Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models. New York: Springer Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Charniak, E.: 1991, Bayesian Networks Without Tears. AI Magazine 12(4), 50–63.

  Google Scholar 

• Collins, J. A., Greer, J. E. and Huang, S. H.: 1996, Adaptive assessment using granularity hierarchies and Bayesian nets. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1086. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference ITS'96, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 569–577.

  Google Scholar 

• Conati, C., Gertner, A., VanLehn, K. and Druzdzel, M.: 1997, On-line student modelling for coached problem solving using Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modelling UM'97, Vienna, New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 231–242.

  Google Scholar 

• Conati, C. and VanLehn, K.: 1996a, POLA: A student modeling framework for probabilistic on-line assessment of problem solving performance. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on User Modeling UM'96, User Modeling Inc., pp. 75–82.

• Flaugher, R.: 1990, Item pools. In H. Wainer (ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Hambleton, R. K.: 1989, Principles and selected applications of item response Theory. In: R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational Measurement. New York: MacMillan.

  Google Scholar 

• Jameson, A.: 1996, Numerical uncertainty management in user and student modeling: An overview of systems and issues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 5, 193–251.

  Google Scholar 

• Kingsbury, G. and Weiss, D. J.: 1983, A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and sequential mastery testing procedure. In: D. J. Weiss (ed.), New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Test Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing. New York: Academic Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, J. and Van Lehn, K.: 1995b, Student assessment using Bayesian nets. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 42, 575–591.

  Google Scholar 

• Mayo, M. and Mitrovic, A.: 2000, Using a probabilistic student model to control problem difficulty. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems ITS'2000, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 525–533.

  Google Scholar 

• Millán, E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L. and Suárez, E.: 2000, An adaptive Bayesian network for multilevel student modelling. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems ITS'2000, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 534–543.

  Google Scholar 

• Mislevy, R. and Gitomer, D. H.: 1996, The role of probability-based inference in an intelligent tutoring system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 5, 253–282.

  Google Scholar 

• Mitrovic, A.: 1998, Experiences in implementing constraint-based modeling in SQL-Tutor. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1452. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Proceedings of 4th International Conference ITS'98, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 414–423.

  Google Scholar 

• Mitrovic, A., Brent, M., Mayo. M.: 2002, Using evaluation to shape ITS design: Results and experiences with SQL-tutor. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, in this issue.

• Murray, W.: 1998, A practical approach to Bayesian student modelling. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1452. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Proceedings of 4th International Conference ITS'98, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 424–433.

  Google Scholar 

• Ohlsson, S.: 1994, Constraint-based student modelling. In: J. E. Greer and G. McCalla (eds.), Student Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction. Vol. 125, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 167–190.

  Google Scholar 

• Olea, J. and Ponsoda, V.: 1996, Tests adaptativos informatizados. In: J. Muñiz (ed.), Psicometría, Madrid: Universitas, pp. 731–783.

  Google Scholar 

• Pearl, J.: 1988, Probabilistic Reasoning in Expert Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

  Google Scholar 

• Reye, J.: 1996, A belief net backbone for student modeling. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1086. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference ITS'96, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 596–604.

  Google Scholar 

• Reye, J.: 1998, Two-phase updating of student models based on dynamic belief networks. In: B. P. Goettl, J.M. Half, C. L. Redfield and V. J. Shutte, (eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1452. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Proceedings of 4th International Conference ITS'98, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 6–15.

  Google Scholar 

• Ríos, A., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L. and Conejo, R.: 1999, Internet based evaluation system. In: Open Learning Environments: New Computational Technologies to Support Learning, Exploration and Collaboration. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Education AIED'99, Amsterdam: IOS Press, pp. 387–394.

  Google Scholar 

• Rudner, L.: 1998, An on-line, interactive, computer adaptive testing mini-tutorial. http://ericae.net/scripts/cat/catdemo.

• Shute, V. J.: 1995, Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present and future. In: D. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Scholastic Publications.

• Stern, M., Beck, J. and Woolf, B. P.: 1996, Adaptation of problem presentation and feedback in an intelligent mathematics tutor. In: C. Frasson, G. Gauthier and A. Lesgold (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 603–613.

  Google Scholar 

• Thissen, D. and Mislevy, R.: 1990, Testing algorithms. In: H. Wainer (ed.), Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 103–136.

  Google Scholar 

• Van der Linden, W. and Hambleton, R.: 1997, Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Lehn, K.: 1988, Student modelling. In: M. C. Polson and J. J. Richardson (eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 55–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Lehn, K.: 1996, Conceptual and meta learning during coached problem solving. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1086. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference ITS'96, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 29–47.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Lehn, K., Niu, Z., Siler, S. and Gertner, A. S.: 1998, Student modeling from conventional test data: A Bayesian approach without priors. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1452. Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Proceedings of 4th International Conference ITS'98, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 434–443.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Lehn, K., Ohlsson, S. and Nason, R.: 1995, Applications of Simulated Students: An Exploration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education 5(2), 135–175.

  Google Scholar 

• Wainer, H.: 1990, Computerized Adaptive Testing: a Primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  Google Scholar 

• Weiss, D. and Kingsbury, G.: 1984, Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems. Journal of Educational Measurement 12, 361–375.

  Google Scholar 

Download references