[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-14T04:58:25.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Big data: a new perspective on cities

from Part III - Big data over social networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2015

Riccardo Gallotti
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA, France
Thomas Louail
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA, France
Rémi Louf
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA, France
Marc Barthelemy
Affiliation:
Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA, France
Shuguang Cui
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Alfred O. Hero, III
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Zhi-Quan Luo
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
José M. F. Moura
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

The recent availability of large amounts of data for urban systems opens the exciting possibility of a new science of cities. These datasets can roughly be divided into three large categories according to their time scale. We will illustrate each category by an example on a particular aspect of cities. At small time scales (of order a day or less), mobility data provided by cell phones and GPS reveal urban mobility patterns but also provide information about the spatial organization of urban systems. At very large scales, the digitalization of historical maps allows us to study the evolution of infrastructure such as road networks, and permits us to distinguish on a quantitative basis self-organized growth from top-down central planning. Finally at intermediate time scales, we will show how socio-economical series provide a nice test for modeling and identifying fundamental mechanisms governing the structure and evolution of urban systems. All these examples illustrate, at various degrees, how the empirical analysis of data can help in constructing a theoretically solid approach to urban systems, and to understand the elementary mechanisms that govern urbanization leaving out specific historical, geographical, social, or cultural factors. At this period of human history that experiences rapid urban expansion, such a scientific approach appears more important than ever in order to understand the impact of current urban planning decisions on the future evolution of cities.

Big data and urban systems

A common trait shared by all complex systems – including cities – is the existence of a large variety of processes occurring over awide range of time and spatial scales.The main obstacle to the understanding of these systems therefore resides at least in uncovering the hierarchy of processes and in singling out the few that govern their dynamics. Albeit difficult, the hierarchization of processes is of prime importance. A failure to do so leads either to modelswhich are too complex to give any real insight into the phenomenon or to be validated, or too simple to provide a satisfactory framework which can be built upon. As a matter of fact, despite numerous attempts [1–6], a theoretical understanding of many observed empirical regularities in cities is still missing. This situation is, however, changing with the recent availability of an unprecedented amount of data about cities and their inhabitants.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] M., Fujita, P. R., Krugman, and A. J., Venables, The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, MIT Press, 2001.Google Scholar
[2] H. A., Makse, S., Havlin, and H. E., Stanley, “Modelling urban growth patterns,” Nature, vol. 377, no. 6550, pp. 608–612, 1995.Google Scholar
[3] M., Batty, “The size, scale, and shape of cities,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5864, pp. 769–771, 2008.Google Scholar
[4] G. F., Frasco, J., Sun, H. D., Rozenfeld, and D., Ben-Avraham, “Spatially distributed social complex networks,” Physical Review X, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 011008, 2014.Google Scholar
[5] L., Bettencourt and G., West, “A unified theory of urban living,” Nature, vol. 467, no. 7318, pp. 912–913, 2010.Google Scholar
[6] L. M., Bettencourt, “The origins of scaling in cities,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6139, pp. 1438– 1441, 2013.Google Scholar
[7] M., Batty, The New Science of Cities, MIT Press, 2013.Google Scholar
[8] M., Barthelemy, “Spatial networks,” Physics Reports, vol. 499, no. 1, pp. 1–101, 2011.Google Scholar
[9] B., Hillier, A., Leaman, P., Stansall, and M., Bedford, “Space syntax,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 147–185, 1976.Google Scholar
[10] B., Jiang and C., Claramunt, “Topological analysis of urban street networks,” Environment and Planning B, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 151–162, 2004.Google Scholar
[11] M., Rosvall, A., Trusina, P., Minnhagen, and K., Sneppen, “Networks and cities: an information perspective,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 2, p. 028701, 2005.Google Scholar
[12] S., Porta, P., Crucitti, and V., Latora, “The network analysis of urban streets: a primal approach,” arXiv preprint physics/0506009, 2005.
[13] S., Porta, P., Crucitti, and V., Latora, “The network analysis of urban streets: a dual approach,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 369, no. 2, pp. 853–866, 2006.Google Scholar
[14] A., Cardillo, S., Scellato, V., Latora, and S., Porta, “Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns,” Physical Review E, vol. 73, no. 6, p. 066107, 2006.Google Scholar
[15] S., Lämmer, B., Gehlsen, and D., Helbing, “Scaling laws in the spatial structure of urban road networks,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 363, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2006.Google Scholar
[16] M., Barthelemy and A., Flammini, “Modeling urban street patterns,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 13, p. 138702, 2008.Google Scholar
[17] M., Barthélemy and A., Flammini, “Co-evolution of density and topology in a simple model of city formation,” Networks and Spatial Economics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 401–425, 2009.Google Scholar
[18] M., Fialkowski and A., Bitner, “Universal rules for fragmentation of land by humans,” Landscape Ecology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1013–1022, 2008.Google Scholar
[19] E., Strano, V., Nicosia, V., Latora, S., Porta, and M., Barthélemy, “Elementary processes governing the evolution of road networks,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, 2012.Google Scholar
[20] M., Barthelemy, P., Bordin, H., Berestycki, and M., Gribaudi, “Self-organization versus topdown planning in the evolution of a city,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, 2013.Google Scholar
[21] A. P., Masucci, K., Stanilov, and M., Batty, “Limited urban growth: London's street network dynamics since the 18th century,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 8, p. e69469, 2013.Google Scholar
[22] T., Courtat, C., Gloaguen, and S., Douady, “Mathematics and morphogenesis of cities: A geometrical approach,” Physical Review E, vol. 83, no. 3, p. 036106, 2011.Google Scholar
[23] “OpenStreetMap (OSM) is a collaborative project to create a free editable map of the world,” http://www.openstreetmap.org.
[24] C., Roth, S. M., Kang, M., Batty, and M., Barthelemy, “A long-time limit for world subway networks,” Journal of The Royal Society Interface, vol. 9, pp. 2540–2550, 2012.Google Scholar
[25] L., Benguigui, “The fractal dimension of some railway networks,” Journal de Physique I, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 385–388, 1992.Google Scholar
[26] K. S., Kim, L., Benguigui, and M., Marinov, “The fractal structure of Seoul's public transportation system,” Cities, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2003.Google Scholar
[27] D., Levinson, “Density and dispersion: the co-development of land use and rail in london,” Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 55–77, 2008.Google Scholar
[28] D., Levinson, “Network structure and city size,” PloS one, vol. 7, no. 1, p. e29721, 2012.Google Scholar
[29] S., Derrible and C., Kennedy, “Network analysis of world subway systems using updated graph theory,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 2112, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2009.Google Scholar
[30] W. R., Black, “An iterative model for generating transportation networks,” Geographical Analysis, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 283–288, 1971.Google Scholar
[31] R., Louf, P., Jensen, and M., Barthelemy, “Emergence of hierarchy in cost-driven growth of spatial networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 22, pp. 8824–8829, 2013.Google Scholar
[32] F., Xie and D., Levinson, “Topological evolution of surface transportation networks,” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 211–223, 2009.Google Scholar
[33] R., Louf, C., Roth, and M., Barthelemy, “Scaling in transportation networks,” PloS one, vol. 9, no. 7, p. e102007, 2014.Google Scholar
[34] I., Rhee, M., Shin, S., Hong, et al., “On the levy-walk nature of human mobility,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 630–643, 2011.Google Scholar
[35] A., Noulas, S., Scellato, R., Lambiotte, M., Pontil, and C., Mascolo, “A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility,” PLos One, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e37027, 2012.Google Scholar
[36] R., Gallotti, A., Bazzani, and S., Rambaldi, “Toward a statistical physics of human mobility,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, vol. 23, no. 9, 2012.Google Scholar
[37] C., Coffey, A., Pozdnoukhov, and F., Calabrese, “Time of arrival predictability horizons for public bus routes,” in Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science, ACM, 2011, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
[38] X., Liang, X., Zheng, W., Lv, T., Zhu, and K., Xu, “The scaling of human mobility by taxis is exponential,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 391, no. 5, pp. 2135–2144, 2012.Google Scholar
[39] C., Song, Z., Qu, N., Blumm, and A.-L., Barabási, “Limits of predictability in human mobility,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5968, pp. 1018–1021, 2010.Google Scholar
[40] R., Gallotti, A., Bazzani, M., Degli Esposti, and S., Rambaldi, “Entropicmeasures of individual mobility patterns,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2013, no. 10, p. P10022, 2013.Google Scholar
[41] J. P., Bagrow and Y.-R., Lin, “Mesoscopic structure and social aspects of human mobility,” PLos One, vol. 7, no. 5, p. e37676, 2012.Google Scholar
[42] Y., Zheng, Q., Li, Y., Chen, X., Xie, and W.-Y., Ma, “Understanding mobility based on gps data,” in Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, ACM, 2008, pp. 312–321.Google Scholar
[43] A., Bazzani, B., Giorgini, S., Rambaldi, R., Gallotti, and L., Giovannini, “Statistical laws in urban mobility from microscopic GPS data in the area of florence,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2010, no. 05, p. P05001, 2010.Google Scholar
[44] L., Pietronero, E., Tosatti, V., Tosatti, and A., Vespignani, “Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: the laws of Benford and zipf,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. 297–304, 2001.Google Scholar
[45] R., Gallotti, “Statistical physics and modeling of human mobility,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bologna, 2013.Google Scholar
[46] R., Kölbl and D., Helbing, “Energy laws in human travel behaviour,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 48, 2003.Google Scholar
[47] F., Asgari, V., Gauthier, and M., Becker, “A survey on human mobility and its applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.0814, 2013.
[48] C., Roth, S. M., Kang, M., Batty, and M., Barthelemy, “Structure of urban movements: polycentric activity and entangled hierarchical flows,” PLos One, vol. 6, no. 1, p. e15923, 2011.Google Scholar
[49] B., Hawelka, I., Sitko, E., Beinat, et al., “Geo-located twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns,” Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 260–271, 2014.Google Scholar
[50] J.-P., Onnela, J., Saramäki, J., Hyvönen, et al., “Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 18, pp. 7332–7336, 2007.Google Scholar
[51] R., Lambiotte, V. D., Blondel, C., de Kerchove, et al., “Geographical dispersal of mobile communication networks,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 387, no. 21, pp. 5317–5325, 2008.Google Scholar
[52] M. C., Gonzalez, C. A., Hidalgo, and A.-L., Barabasi, “Understanding individual human mobility patterns,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7196, pp. 779–782, 2008.Google Scholar
[53] K. S., Kung, K., Greco, S., Sobolevsky, and C., Ratti, “Exploring universal patterns in human home-work commuting from mobile phone data,” PLos One, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e96180, 2014.Google Scholar
[54] V., Soto and E., Frias-Martinez, “Robust land use characterization of urban landscapes using cell phone data,” in Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Pervasive Urban Applications, in conjunction with 9th Int. Conf. Pervasive Computing, 2011.
[55] T., Pei, S., Sobolevsky, C., Ratti, et al., “A new insight into land use classification based on aggregated mobile phone data,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1988–2007, 2014.Google Scholar
[56] S., Sobolevsky, M., Szell, R., Campari, et al., “Delineating geographical regions with networks of human interactions in an extensive set of countries,” PLos One, vol. 8, no. 12, p. e81707, 2013.Google Scholar
[57] A., Anas, R., Arnott, and K. A., Small, “Urban spatial structure,” Journal of Economic Literature, pp. 1426–1464, 1998.Google Scholar
[58] A., Bertaud and S., Malpezzi, “The spatial distribution of population in 48 world cities: Implications for economies in transition,” Center for Urban Land Economics Research, University of Wisconsin, 2003.
[59] Y.-H., Tsai, “Quantifying urban form: compactness versus’ sprawl’,” Urban Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 141–161, 2005.Google Scholar
[60] M., Guérois and D., Pumain, “Built-up encroachment and the urban field: a comparison of forty european cities,” Environment and planning. A, vol. 40, no. 9, p. 2186, 2008.Google Scholar
[61] N., Schwarz, “Urban form revisited – selecting indicators for characterising european cities,” Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 2010.Google Scholar
[62] S., Berroir, H., Mathian, T., Saint-Julien, and L., Sanders, “The role of mobility in the building of metropolitan polycentrism,” in Modelling Urban Dynamics, ISTE-Wiley, 2011, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
[63] F. Le, Néchet, “Urban spatial structure, daily mobility and energy consumption: a study of 34 european cities,” Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 2012.Google Scholar
[64] R. H. M., Pereira, V., Nadalin, L., Monasterio, and P. H., Albuquerque, “Urban centrality: a simple index,” Geographical Analysis, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 77–89, 2013.Google Scholar
[65] C., Ratti, S., Williams, D., Frenchman, and R., Pulselli, “Mobile landscapes: using location data from cell phones for urban analysis,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 727–748, 2006.Google Scholar
[66] T., Louail, M., Lenormand, O. G. C., Ros, et al., “From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, 2014.Google Scholar
[67] R., Louf and M., Barthelemy, “Modeling the polycentric transition of cities,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 111, no. 19, p. 198702, 2013.Google Scholar
[68] V., Frias-Martinez, V., Soto, H., Hohwald, and E., Frias-Martinez, “Characterizing urban landscapes using geolocated tweets,” in Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing (SocialCom), IEEE, 2012, pp. 239–248.Google Scholar
[69] M., Lenormand, M., Picornell, O. G., Cantú-Ros, et al., “Cross-checking different sources of mobility information,” PLos One, vol. 9, no. 8, p. e105184, 2014.Google Scholar
[70] P. W., Newman and J. R., Kenworthy, “Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of us cities with a global survey,” Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 24–37, 1989.Google Scholar
[71] D., Pumain, F., Paulus, C., Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, and J., Lobo, “An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws,” Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography, 2006.Google Scholar
[72] L. M., Bettencourt, J., Lobo, D., Helbing, C., Kühnert, and G. B., West, “Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 17, pp. 7301–7306, 2007.Google Scholar
[73] H., Samaniego and M. E., Moses, “Cities as organisms: allometric scaling of urban road networks,” Journal of Transport and Land Use, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–39, 2008.Google Scholar
[74] H. D., Rozenfeld, D., Rybski, J. S., Andrade, et al., “Laws of population growth,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, no. 48, pp. 18 702–18 707, 2008.Google Scholar
[75] W., Pan, G., Ghoshal, C., Krumme, M., Cebrian, and A., Pentland, “Urban characteristics attributable to density-driven tie formation,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, 2013.Google Scholar
[76] R., Louf and M., Barthelemy, “How congestion shapes cities: from mobility patterns to scaling,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, 2014.Google Scholar
[77] M., Fujita and H., Ogawa, “Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 161–196, 1982.Google Scholar
[78] R., Louf and M., Barthelemy, “Scaling: lost in the smog,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.4964, 2014.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×