[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Hybrid-SFLA-Based Hyper-Parameter Tuning Algorithm in SVR for Exchange Rate Prediction

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a hybrid machine learning-based approach to forecast the exchange rate between the Indian Rupee and the US dollar. The prediction of the exchange rate is carried out by support vector regression (SVR) and a hybrid-shuffled frog leaping algorithm (HSFLA). SVR predicts the exchange rate, whereas the hybrid-SFLA is used to tune the hyper-parameters. Hybrid-SFLA is an improvement over SFLA where random movement of particles is carried out using levy flight distribution. The proposed work has been compared with state-of-the-art hybrid prediction models that have applied different meta-heuristic algorithms. To measure predictive efficiency, root mean square error, mean absolute percentage error, Theil’s U, and average relative variance have been used, and the proposed HSFLA outperformed the other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Messe RA, Rogoff KK. Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies do they fit out of samples. J Int Econ. 1983;14:3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaudhuri DT, Ghosh I. Artificial neural network and time series modeling based approach to forecasting the exchange rate in a multivariate framework. J Insur Financ Manag. 2016;1(5):92–123.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fleming JM. Domestic and financial policies under fixed and floating exchange rates. Staff Pap (IMF). 1962;9:369–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balassa B. The purchasing power parity doctrine: a reappraisal. J Political Econ. 1964;72(6):584-596. Caves, R. E. and Jones, R.W. (19810, World Trade and Payments: An Introduction, (3rd Ed.), Boston and Toronto, Little Brown and Company.

  5. Samuelson P. Theoretical notes on trade problems. Rev Econ Stat. 1964;46(2):145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meade JE. The theory of international economic policy, (volume 1: the balance of payments). London: Oxford University Press; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caves RE, Jones RW. World trade and payments: an introduction. 3rd ed. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dornbusch R. Open economy macroeconomics. New York: Basic Books; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang G, Berardi V. Time series forecasting with neural network ensembles: an application for exchange rate prediction. J Oper Res Soc. 2001;52:652–64. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yusuf P, Perwej A. Forecasting of Indian rupee (INR)/US Dollar (USD) currency exchange rate using artificial neural network. Int J Comput Sci Eng Appl (IJCSEA). 2012;2(2)

  11. Lam L, Fung L, Yu IW. Comparing forecast performance of exchange rate models. Hong Kong Monetary Authority Working Paper, 2008;(08).

  12. Ravi V, Lal R, Kiran NR. Foreign exchange rate prediction using computational intelligence methods. Int J Comput Inf Syst Ind Manag Appl. 2012;4:659–70.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dua P, Ranjan R. Modelling and forecasting the Indian Re/Us Dollar Exchange Rate, RBI Working 2011;Paper, No. 197

  14. Pacelli V. Forecasting exchange rates: a comparative analysis. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2012;3:145–56.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andreou AS, Zombanakis GA. Computational intelligence in exchange rate forecasting. Bank of Greece Working 2006; Paper, No. 49.

  16. Garg A. Forecasting exchange rates using machine learning models with time varying volatility, Master Thesis, 2012. http://liu.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:538398/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2023.

  17. Jena PR, Majhi R, Majhi B. Development and performance evaluation of a novel knowledge guided artificial neural network (KGANN) model for exchange rate prediction. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2015;27:450–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Premanode B, Vonprasert J, Toumazou C. Prediction of exchange rates using averaging intrinsic mode function and multiclass support vector regression. Artif Intell Res. 2013;2(2):2013. https://doi.org/10.5430/air.v2n2p47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Majhi B, Rout M, Majhi R, Panda G, Fleming PJ. New robust forecasting models for exchange rates prediction. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39:12658–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wong H, Ip WC, Xe Z, Lui X. Modelling and forecasting by wavelets, and the application to exchange rates. J Appl Stat. 2003;30:537–53.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Septiarini T, Agus A, Muhammad T. Application of wavelet fuzzy model to forecast the exchange rate IDR of USD. Int J Model Optim. 2016;6:66–70. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMO.2016.V6.505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tao H. A wavelet neural network model for forecasting exchange rate integrated with genetic algorithm. IJCSNS Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur. 2006;6(8A):60–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lebaron B. Technical trading rule profitability and foreign exchange intervention. J Int Econ. 1999;49:125–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baetaens DJE, Berg WM, Vaudrey H. Market inefficiencies, technical trading, and neural networks. In: Dunis C, editor. Forecasting financial markets, financial economics and quantitative analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 1996. p. 245–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaashoek JF, Van Dijk HK. Neural network pruning applied to real exchange rate analysis. J Forecast. 2002;21:559–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Das SR, Mishra D, Rout M. A hybridized ELM-Jaya forecasting model for currency exchange prediction. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2020;32(3):345–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.09.006. (ISSN:1319-578).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shafqat W, Malik S, Lee K-T, Kim D-H. PSO based optimized ensemble learning and feature selection approach for efficient energy forecast. Electronics. 2021;10:2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10182188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Hamori S. The predictability of the exchange rate when combining machine learning and fundamental models. J Risk Financ Manag. 2020;13:48. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pfahler JF. Exchange rate forecasting with advanced machine learning methods. J Risk Financ Manag. 2022;15:2. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15010002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dash R. An improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm based evolutionary framework for currency exchange rate prediction. Phys A Stat Mech Appl. 2017;486:782–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2017.05.044. (ISSN:0378-4371).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shen M-L, Lee C-F, Liu H-H, Chang P-Y, Yang C-H. An effective hybrid approach for forecasting currency exchange rates. Sustainability. 2021;13:2761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahmoudi N, Orouji H, Fallah-Mehdipour E. Integration of shuffled frog leaping algorithm and support vector regression for prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resour Manag. 2016;30:2195–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1280-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li Y, Yan Z. Improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm on system reliability analysis. Brain Inf. 2019;6:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40708-019-0095-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Houssein EH, Saad MR, Hashim FA, Shaban H, Hassaballah M. Levy flight distribution: a new metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2020;94: 103731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103731. (ISSN:0952-1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nguyen DH, Dung M. Comparing convergence of PSO and SFLA optimization algorithms in tuning parameters of fuzzy logic controller. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27247-4-39.

  36. Vapnik V. The nature of learning theory. New York: Springer Science and Business Media; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Singh KP, Basant N, Gupta S. Support vector machines in water quality management. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;703:152–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Keerthi SS. Efficient tuning of SVM hyperparameters using radius/margin bound and iterative algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 2002;13:1225–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ustun B, Melssen WJ, Oudenhuijzen M, Buydens LMC. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;544:292–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.12.024.

  40. Yusuf MM, Lansey KE. Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. J Water Resour Plan Manag. 2003;129(3):210–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dawkins R. The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN 95-international conference on neural networks. IEEE; 1995. p 1942–1948.

  43. Mahmoudi N, Orouji H, Fallah-Mehdipour E. Integration of shuffled frog leaping algorithm and support vector regression for prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resour Manag. 2016;30:2195–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1280-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Application, Dr. B. C. Roy Engineering College, Jemua Road, Durgapur, West Bengal, 713212, India

    Tanmoy Halder & Souvik Ganguly

  2. Computer Science, Sikkim University, Samdur, Gangtok, Sikkim, 700047, India

    Somnath Mukhopadhyay

  3. Bengal Economic Association, Raja S. C. Mallick Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700047, India

    Tamal Dutta Chaudhuri

Authors
  1. Tanmoy Halder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Souvik Ganguly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Somnath Mukhopadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tamal Dutta Chaudhuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanmoy Halder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. Finally, the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “SWOT to AI-embraced Communication Systems (SWOT-AI)” guest edited by Somnath Mukhopadhyay, Debashis De, Sunita Sarkar and Celia Shahnaz.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halder, T., Ganguly, S., Mukhopadhyay, S. et al. A Hybrid-SFLA-Based Hyper-Parameter Tuning Algorithm in SVR for Exchange Rate Prediction. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 285 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02598-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02598-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation