[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Opportunities and Challenges of Social Media in Higher Education: A Literature Review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a review of the use of social media for learning and teaching in higher education, as well as the opportunities and challenges revealed from its use. A total of 77 related case studies published from 2010 to 2019 were collected from Scopus and Google Scholar for analysis. The results showed that social media was usually used as a learning management system and for enhancing learner engagement. The use of social media has brought opportunities for educational practices in terms of its high popularity among students, and its capacity to support two-way communication, easy knowledge sharing, community building, and collaborative learning, which enhance student learning experience. The challenges reported in the case studies cover the blurring of the boundary between the public and private life of students and between the relationships of students and instructors, as well as its doubtful effectiveness for knowledge construction, the inadequacy of instructors’ pedagogical and technological skills, and the lack of integration with instructional design. The results suggest the need for further work on examining suitable ways of using social media which would be viewed positively and accepted by users. There should also be future work on surveying the need for support for instructors for their involvement in teaching with social media, and developing effective pedagogies which cope with the features of social media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A. Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: a natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Int High Educ. 2012;15:3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pew Research Centre. Social Media Fact Sheet. 2019. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/. Accessed 9 Dec 2020

  3. Dabbagh N, Reo R. Impact of Web 2.0 on higher education. In: Surry DW, Stefurak T, Gray R, editors. Technology integration in higher education: social and organizational aspects. Hershey: IGI Global; 2011. p. 174–87.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kassens-Noor E. Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: the case of sustainable tweets. Act Learn High Educ. 2012;13:9–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Manca S, Ranierit M. Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. J Comput Assist Learn. 2013;29:487–504.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chugh R, Grose R, Macht SA. Social media usage by higher education academics: a scoping review of the literature. Educ Inf Technol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10288-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tess PA. The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)—a literature review. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29:A60–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith T, Lambert R. A systematic review investigating the use of Twitter and Facebook in university-based healthcare education. Health Educ. 2014;114:347–66.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chugh R, Ruhi U. Social media in higher education: a literature review of Facebook. Educ Inf Technol. 2018;23:605–16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Balakrishnan V, Gan C. Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telemat Inform. 2016;33:808–21.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manca S, Ranieri M. “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: social media in academic practices. Int High Educ. 2016;29:63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hung HT, Yuen SCY. Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teach High Educ. 2010;15:703–14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gikas J, Grant M. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones and social media. Int High Educ. 2013;19:18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brooks DC, Pomerantz J. ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology. Colorado: ECAR; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ajjan H, Hartshorne R. Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Int High Educ. 2008;11:71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moran M, Seaman J, Tinti-Kane H. Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts and Facebook: how today’s higher education faculty use social media. Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scott N, Goode D. The use of social media (some) as a learning tool in healthcare education: an integrative review of the literature. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;87:104357.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88:893–901.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Den Beemt A, Thurlings M, Willems M. Towards an understanding of social media use in the classroom: a literature review. Technol Pedagog Educ. 2020;29:35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zachos G, Paraskevopoulou-Kollia EA, Anagnostopoulos I. Social media use in higher education: a review. Educ Sci. 2018;8:194.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li KC, Wong BTM. The use of student response systems with learning analytics: a review of case studies (2008–2017). Int J Mob Learn Organ. 2020;14:63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wong BTM, Li KC. A review of learning analytics intervention in higher education (2011–2018). J Comput Educ. 2020;7:7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  23. DiVall M, Kirwin JL. Using Facebook to facilitate course-related discussion between students and faculty members. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76:32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Irwin C, Ball L, Desbrow B. Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australas J Educ Technol. 2012;28:1221–32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lieberman S. Using Facebook as an interactive learning environment in European political studies. Eur Polit Sci. 2014;13:23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Albayrak D, Yildirim Z. Using social networking sites for teaching and learning: students’ involvement in and acceptance of Facebook as a course management system. J Educ Comput Res. 2015;52:155–79.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dutta A, Roy R, Seetharaman P. Course management system adoption and usage: a process theoretic perspective. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29:2535–45.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Deng L, Tavares NJ. From Moodle to Facebook: exploring students’ motivation and experiences in online communities. Comput Educ. 2013;68:167–76.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy J. Blended learning environments: using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australas J Educ Technol. 2010;26:729–40.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deed C, Edwards A. Unrestructed student blogging: implications for active learning in a virtual text-based environment. Act Learn High Educ. 2011;12:11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Junco R, Heiberger G, Loken E. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J Comput Assist Learn. 2011;27:119–32.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Menkhoff T, Chay YW, Benggtsson ML, Woodard CJ, Gan B. Incorporating microblogging (“tweeting”) in higher education: lessons learnt in a knowledge management course. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51:1295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kuh G. What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. J Coll Stud Dev. 2009;50:683–706.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Andrade A, Castro C, Ferreira SA. Cognitive communication 2.0 in higher education: to tweet or not to tweet? Electron J E-Learn. 2012;10:293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  35. LeppIsaarI I, Kleimola R, Herrington J, Maunula M, Hohenthal T. Developing more authentic E-Courses by integrating working life mentoring and social media. J Interact Learn Res. 2014;25:209–34.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Megele C. eABLE: embedding social media in academic curriculum as a learning and assessment strategy to enhance students learning and e-professionalism. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2015;52:414–25.

    Google Scholar 

  37. McCarthy J. Enhancing feedback in higher education: students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Act Learn High Educ. 2017;18:127–41.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rambe P, Nel L. Technological utopia, dystopia and ambivalence: teaching with social media at a South African university. Br J Edu Technol. 2015;46:629–48.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Díaz-Lázaro J, Fernández IMS, Sánchez-Vera MM. Social learning analytics in higher education. An experience at the primary education stage. J New Approach Educ Res. 2017;6:119–26.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rodrigo I. Assisting language learning with new technologies: a case of Spanish degrees facing a European educational change process. CALL-EJ. 2017;18:40–61.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lim JSY, Agostinho J, Harper B, Chicharo JF. The engagement of social media technologies by undergraduate informatics students for academic purpose in Malaysia. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc. 2014;12:177–94.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liburd JJ, Christensen IMF. Using web 2.0 in higher tourism education. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ. 2013;12:99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sobaih A, Moustafa M. Speaking the same language: the value of social networking sites for hospitality and tourism higher education in Egypt. J Hosp Tour Educ. 2016;28:21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Baran E. Connect, participate and learn: transforming pedagogies in higher education. Bull IEEE Tech Committee Learn Technol. 2013;15:9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Feliz T, Ricoy C, Feliz S. Analysis of the use of Twitter as a learning strategy in master’s studies. Open Learn J Open Distance e-Learn. 2013;28:201–15.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reed P. Hashtags and retweets: using Twitter to aid community, communication and casual (informal) learning. Res Learn Technol. 2013;21:19692.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Carroll JA, Diaz A, Meiklejohn J, Newcomb M, Adkins B. Collaboration and competition on a wiki: the praxis of online social learning to improve academic writing and research in under-graduate students. Australas J Educ Technol. 2013;29:513–25.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Al-Rahmi WM, Othman MS, Musa MA. The improvement of students’ academic performance by using social media through collaborative learning in Malaysian higher education. Asian Soc Sci. 2014;10:210–21.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jang Y. Convenience matters: a qualitative study on the impact of use of social media and collaboration technologies on learning experience and performance in higher education. Educ Inf. 2015;31:73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cuesta M, Eklund M, Rydin I, Witt AK. Using Facebook as a co-learning community in higher education. Learn Media Technol. 2016;41:55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Laborda J, Litzler M. English for business: student responses to language learning through social networking tools. ESP Today. 2017;5:91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ricoy MC, Feliz T. Twitter as a learning community in higher education. Educ Technol Soc. 2016;19:237–48.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tur G, Marín V, Carpenter J. Using twitter in higher education in Spain and the USA. Comunicar. 2017;25:19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  54. O’Bannon BW, Beard JL, Britt VG. Using a Facebook group as an educational tool: effects on student achievement. Interdiscip J Pract Theory Appl Res. 2013;30:229–47.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Firpo D, Ractham P. Using social networking technology to enhance learning in higher education: a case study using Facebook. In: HICSS 44th Hawaii International Conference System Science. Kauai, USA; 2011.

  56. Goktalay SB. Challenges facing higher education: faculty’s concerns about technologies of social media. Int J Contin Eng Educ Life Long Learn. 2013;23:67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rochefort B, Richmond N. Connecting instruction to connected technologies—why bother? An instructional designer’s perspective. RUSC Univ Knowl Soc J. 2011;8:217–32.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bennett S, Bishop A, Dalgarno B, Waycott J, Kennedy G. Implementing Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: a collective case study. Comput Educ. 2012;59:524–34.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Demirbilek M. Social media and peer feedback: what do students really think about using Wiki and Facebook as platforms for peer feedback? Act Learn High Educ. 2015;16:211–24.

    Google Scholar 

  60. McLoughlin CE, Alam SL. A case study of instructor scaffolding using Web 2.0 tools to teach social informatics. J Inf Syst Educ. 2014;25:125–36.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Pinto MB. The use of Yammer in higher education: an exploratory study. J Educ Online. 2014;11:n1.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Li KC, Lee LYK, Wong SL, Yau ISY, Wong BTM. Evaluation of mobile learning for the clinical practicum in nursing education: application of the FRAME model. J Comput High Educ. 2019;31:290–310.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Li KC, Wong BTM. Blended learning in Hong Kong higher education. In: Singh, Makhanya, editors. Essays in online education—a global perspective. Berlin: UNISA Press; 2019. p. 107–20.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Li KC, Wong BTM. Features and trends of personalised learning: a review of journal publications from 2001 to 2018. Interact Learn Environ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1811735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wong BTM, Li KC, Choi SPM. Trends in learning analytics practices: a review of higher education institutions. Interact Technol Smart Educ. 2018;15:132–54.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ang KLM, Ge FL, Seng KP. Big educational data and analytics: survey, architecture and challenges. IEEE Access. 2020;8:116392–414.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Al-rahmi WM, Othman MS, Yusof LM, Musa MA. Using social media as a tool for improving academic performance through collaborative learning in Malaysian higher education. Rev Eur Stud. 2015;7:265–75.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Page KL, Reynolds N. Learning from a wiki way of learning. Stud High Educ. 2015;40:988–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Soluk L, Buddle CM. Tweets from the forest: Using Twitter to increase student engagement in an undergraduate field biology course. F1000Research. 2015;4:82.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wong BYY, Wong BTM, Pang S, et al. A framework for effectiveness of institutional policies on technology-enhanced learning. In: Li KC, et al., editors. Technology in education. Transforming educational practices with technology. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 175–86.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Crook C. Web 2.0 technologies for learning: the current landscape—opportunities, challenges and tensions. Becta: Coventry; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Manca S, Ranieri M. Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Comput Educ. 2016;95:216–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to support and conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong, China

    Kam Cheong Li & Billy Tak-ming Wong

Authors
  1. Kam Cheong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Billy Tak-ming Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Billy Tak-ming Wong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K.C., Wong, B.Tm. The Opportunities and Challenges of Social Media in Higher Education: A Literature Review. SN COMPUT. SCI. 2, 455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00857-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00857-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation