Abstract
This paper examines the discrete-time Rosenzweig-MacArthur predator–prey model featuring a general predator functional response. We determine the closed and positively invariant set D, where the system’s dynamics are analyzed. The set contains extinction, boundary, and interior equilibrium points, which we explore in detail. Our research shows that extinction and boundary equilibrium points can be globally asymptotically stable. We observe transcritical and period-doubling at the boundary equilibrium point with stable two-cycle bifurcation. During period-doubling bifurcation at the boundary equilibrium, one Lyapunov exponent is zero, while the other is negative. The interior equilibrium point exhibits Neimark-Sacker and period-doubling bifurcation with unstable two-cycle. For the Neimark-Sacker bifurcation, we provide an exact form of the first Lyapunov exponent. Our research also shows that the system is permanent in set D. Finally, we apply our theoretical findings to various well-known predator functional responses.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable
Code availability
Not applicable
References
Balreira EC, Elaydi SS., Luis R (2014) Local stability implies global stability for the planar Ricker competition model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B 19(2):323–351.https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.32
Benettin G, Galgani L, Giorgilli A, Streicyn JM (1980) Lyapunov characteristic exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for Hamiltonian systems: A method for computing all of them. Meccanica 15:9–21
Berryman AA (1992) The Origins and Evolution of Predator-Prey Theory. Ecology 73(5):1530–1535
Dunn Robert P, Hovel Kevin A (2020) Predator type influences the frequency of functional responses to prey in marine habitats. Biol Lett 16:20190758. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0758
Ecofriendly pest management for food security, edited by OMKAR, Centre of Excellence in Biocontrol of Insect Pests Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India, Elsevier, (2016)
Fath B (2018) Encyclopedia of Ecology. 2e Elsevier, Amsterdam
Fussmann Gregor F, Bernd B (2005) Community response to enrichment is highly sensitive to model structure. Biol Lett 1:9–12. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0246
Garay BM, Hofbauer J (2003) Robust permanence for ecological differential equations, minimax, and discretizations. SIAM J Math Anal 34:1007–1039
Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Gause GF, Smaragdova NP, Witt AA (1936) Further studies of the interaction between predator and prey. J Animal Ecol 5:1–18
Geist K, Parlitz U, Lauter BW (1990) Comparison of Different Methods for Computing Lyapunov Exponents. Progress Theoret Phys 83:875–893
Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (1983) Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer, New York
Hadeler KP, Gerstmann I (1990) The Discrete Rosenzweig model. Mathe Biosci 98:49–72
Hale JK, Kocak JK (1991) Dynamics and bifurcations, Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York
Hofbauer J, Hutson V, Jansen W (1987) Coexistence for systems governed by difference equations of Lotka-Volterra type. J Math Biol 25:553–570
Holling CS (1965) The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem Ent Soc Can 45:3–60
Hutson V (1984) A theorem on average Liapunov functions. Monatshefte für Mathematik 98:267–275
Kang Yun (2013) Permanence of a general discrete-time two-species-interaction model with nonlinear per-capita growth rates. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B 18(8):2123–2142. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2123
Kang Y, Chesson P (2010) Relative nonlinearity and permanence. Theor Popul Biol 78:26–35
Kon R, Takeuchi Y (2001) Permanence of host-parasitoid system, Nonlinear. Analysis 47:1383–1393
Kot M (2001) Elements Math Ecol. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Krivan Vlastimil (2011) On the Gause predator-prey model with a refuge: a fresh look at the history. J Theor Biol 274(1):67–73
Lohse A (2014) Attraction properties and non-asymptotic stability of simple heteroclinic cycles and networks in \(\mathbb{R}^{4}\), PhD Thesis, Universität Hamburg
Lohse A (2023) Classification and Stability of Low-Dimensional Heteroclinic Structures, Habilitationsschrift, genehmigt vom Fachbereich Mathematik, Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften Universität Hamburg, Hamburg
Lotka AJ (1920) Analytical note on certain rhythmic relations in organic systems. Proc Nal Acad Sci 6(7):410–415
Lotka AJ (1925) Elements of Physical Biology. Williams & Witkins, Baltimore
Melbourne I (1991) An example of a nonasymptotically stable attractor. Nonlinearity 4:835–844
Murakami K (2002) The invariant curve caused by Neimark-Sacker bifurcation. Dynam Contin Discrete Impuls Systems 9(1):121–132
Myerscough MR, Darwen MJ, Hogarth WL (1980) Stability, persistence and structural stability in a classical predator-prey model. Ecol Modeling 89:31–42
Newhouse SE (1979) The abundance of wild hyperbolic sets and non-smooth stable sets for diffeomorphisms. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 50(1):101–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02684771
Oseledec VI (1968) A multiplicative ergodic theorem: Lyapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems. Trans Moscow Math Soc 19:197–231
Osipenko G (2009) Center Manifolds. In: Meyers R (ed) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_62
Podvigina O (2012) Stability and bifurcations of heteroclinic cycles of type Z. Nonlinearity 25:1887–1917
Podvigina O, Ashwin P (2011) On local attraction properties and a stability index for heteroclinic connections. Nonlinearity 24:887–929
Pounder JR, Rogers TD (1980) The geometry of chaos: dynamics of a nonlinear second-order difference equation. Bull Math Biol 42:551–597
Robinson C (1995) Dynamical Systems: Stability, Symbolic Dynamics, and Chaos. CRC Press, USA
Rodrigues Alexandre A (2021) Abundance of Strange Attractors Near an Attracting Periodically Perturbed Network. SIAM J Appl Dynam Syst. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1335510
Rodrigues AA (2022) Rank-one strange attractors versus heteroclinic tangles. Commun Pure Appl Anal 21(9):3213–3245. https://doi.org/10.3934/cpaa.2022097
Rodrigues Alexandre (2022) "Large’’ strange attractors in the unfolding of a heteroclinic attractor. Discrete Contin Dynam Systems 42(5):2355–2379. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2021193
Rosenzweig ML (1971) Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science 171:385–387
Rosenzweig ML, MacArthur RH (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. Am Nat 97:209–223
Sandri M (1996) Numerical calculation of Lyapunov exponents. Math J 6:78–84
Schreiber SJ (2000) Criteria for Cr Robust Permanence. J Differential Equations 162:400–426
Schreiber SJ (2001) Chaos and population disappearances in simple ecological models. J Math Biol 42:239–260
Seo G, Wolkowicz Gail SK (2018) Sensitivity of the dynamics of the general Rosenzweig-MacArthur model to the mathematical form of the functional response: a bifurcation theory approach. J Math Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-017-1201-y
Smith HL. The Rosenzweig-MacArthur predator-prey model. https://math.la.asu.edu/halsmith/Rosenzweig.pdf.
Solomon ME (1949) The natural control of animal populations. J Anim Ecol 18:1–35
Streipert Sabrina H, Wolkowicz Gail SK, Bohner Martin (2022) Derivation and Analysis of a Discrete Predator-Prey Model. Bull Math Biol 84:67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-022-01016-4
Turchin P (2003) Complex Population Dynamics. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton
Ufuktepe Ü, Kapçak S (2014) Applications of Discrete Dynamical Systems with Mathematica, Conference: RIMS vol. 1909
Volterra V (1926) Fluctuations in the abundance of a species considered mathematically. Nature 118:558–560
Volterra V (1931) Lessons on the Mathematical Theory of Struggle for Life (Original: Leçons sur la théorie mathématique de la Lutte pour la vie). Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Wang Q, Young LS (2002) From Invariant Curves to Strange Attractors. Commun Math Phys 225:275
Wang Q, Young LS (2003) Strange Attractors in Periodically-Kicked Limit Cycles and Hopf Bifurcations. Comm Math Phys 240:509–529
Wang Q, Young LS (2013) Dynamical profile of a class of rank-one attractors, Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. (33), pp. 1221-1264 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014338571200020X
Whitney H (1955) On singularities of mappings of euclidean spaces, mappings of the plane into the plane. Ann Math 62(3):374–410
Wiggins S (2003) Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos, 2nd edn. Texts in Applied Mathematics, 2. Springer-Verlag, New York
Willard S (2004) General Topol. Dover Publication, New York
Wood SN, Thomas MB (1999) Super-sensitivity to structure in biological models. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:565–570. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0673
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to the reviewer for the corrections and suggestions that helped improve this manuscript’s readability.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly to writing this article. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors reported no potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bešo, E., Kalabušić, S. & Pilav, E. Dynamics of the discrete-time Rosenzweig-MacArthur predator–prey system in the closed positively invariant set. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 341 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02481-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02481-w