[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Child Drawing Development Optimization Algorithm Based on Child’s Cognitive Development

  • Research Article-Computer Engineering and Computer Science
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel metaheuristic Child Drawing Development Optimization (CDDO) algorithm inspired by the child's learning behavior and cognitive development using the golden ratio to optimize the beauty behind their art. The golden ratio was first introduced by the famous mathematician Fibonacci. The ratio of two consecutive numbers in the Fibonacci sequence is similar, and it is called the golden ratio, which is prevalent in nature, art, architecture, and design. CDDO uses golden ratio and mimics cognitive learning and child's drawing development stages starting from the scribbling stage to the advanced pattern-based stage. Hand pressure width, length and golden ratio of the child's drawing are tuned to attain better results. This helps children with evolving, improving their intelligence and collectively achieving shared goals. CDDO shows superior performance in finding the global optimum solution for the optimization problems tested by 19 benchmark functions. Its results are evaluated against more than one state-of-art algorithms such as PSO, DE, WOA, GSA, and FEP. The performance of the CDDO is assessed, and the test result shows that CDDO is relatively competitive through scoring 2.8 ranks. This displays that the CDDO is outstandingly robust in exploring a new solution. Also, it reveals the competency of the algorithm to evade local minima as it covers promising regions extensively within the design space and exploits the best solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boussaïd, I.; Lepagnot, J.; Siarry, P.: A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Inf. Sci. 237, 82–117 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum, C.; Roli, A.: Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: overview and conceptual comparison. ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR 35(3), 268–308 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Madić, M.; Marković, D.; Radovanović, M.: Comparison of meta-heuristic algorithms for solving machining optimization problems. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng. 11(1), 29–44 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hutton, D.M.: The quest for artificial intelligence: a history of ideas and achievements. Kybernetes (2011)

  5. Agarwal, P.; Mehta, S.: Nature-inspired algorithms: state-of-art, problems and prospects. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 100(14), 14–21 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abualigah, L.; Yousri, D.; Abd Elaziz, M.; Ewees, A.A.; Al-qaness, M.A.; Gandomi, A.H.: Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Indus Eng Httpsdoi Org101016j Cie (2021)

  7. Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Ji, G.: A comprehensive survey on particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015 (2015)

  8. Mirjalili, S.; Mirjalili, S.M.; Lewis, A.: Grey wolf optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 69, 46–61 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abraham, A.; Das, S.; Roy, S.: Swarm intelligence algorithms for data clustering. In: Soft Computing for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 279–313. Springer, (2008)

  10. Adam, S.P.; Alexandropoulos, S.A.N.; Pardalos, P.M.; Vrahatis, M.N.: No free lunch theorem: a review. Approx. Optim. 57–82 (2019)

  11. Amodeo, L.; Talbi, E.G.; Yalaoui, F.: Recent developments in metaheuristics. Springer (2018)

  12. Yang, X.-S.: Nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Academic Press (2020)

  13. Abualigah, L.; Diabat, A.: Advances in sine cosine algorithm: a comprehensive survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 1–42 (2021)

  14. Kumar, M.; Kulkarni, A.J.: Socio-inspired optimization metaheuristics: a review. Socio-Cult. Inspired Metaheuristics 241–265 (2019)

  15. Bhuvaneswari, M.; Hariraman, S.; Anantharaj, B.; Balaji, N.: Nature inspired algorithms: a review. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Sci. Electron. 12(1), 21–28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dixit, M.; Upadhyay, N.; Silakari, S.: An exhaustive survey on nature inspired optimization algorithms. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Its Appl. 9(4), 91–104 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dorigo, M.; Di Caro, G.: Ant colony optimization: a new meta-heuristic. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406), vol. 2, pp. 1470–1477 (1999)

  18. Geem, Z.W.; Kim, J.H.; Loganathan, G.V.: A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2), 60–68 (2001)

  19. Karaboga, D.: An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Citeseer (2005)

  20. Fister, I.; Fister, I., Jr.; Yang, X.-S.; Brest, J.: A comprehensive review of firefly algorithms. Swarm Evol. Comput. 13, 34–46 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, X.-S.: Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms. Luniver press (2010)

  22. Yang, X.-S.: Nature-inspired mateheuristic algorithms: success and new challenges. http://arxiv.org/abs/12116658 (2012)

  23. Shamsaldin, A.S.; Rashid, T.A.; Al-Rashid Agha, R.A.; Al-Salihi, N.K.; Mohammadi, M.: Donkey and smuggler optimization algorithm: a collaborative working approach to path finding. J. Comput. Des. Eng. 6(4), 562–583 (2019)

  24. Abdullah, J.M.; Ahmed, T.: Fitness dependent optimizer: inspired by the bee swarming reproductive process. IEEE Access 7, 43473–43486 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abualigah, L.; Diabat, A.; Mirjalili, S.; Abd Elaziz, M.; Gandomi, A.H.: The arithmetic optimization algorithm. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 376, 113609 (2021)

  26. Goswami, U.; Bryant, P.: Children’s cognitive development and learning (2007)

  27. Einarsdottir, J.; Dockett, S.; Perry, B.: Making meaning: children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Dev. Care 179(2), 217–232 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Akhtaruzzaman, M.; Shafie, A.A.: Geometrical substantiation of Phi, the golden ratio and the baroque of nature, architecture, design and engineering. Int. J. Arts 1(1), 1–22 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huntley, H.E.: The divine proportion. Courier Corporation (2012)

  30. Fiorenza, A.; Vincenzi, G.: From Fibonacci sequence to the golden ratio. J. Math. 2013 (2013)

  31. Hufford, J.: An overview of the developmental stages in children’s drawings. Marilyn Zurmuehlen Work. Pap. Art Educ. 2(1), 2–7 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Akseer, T.; Lao, M.G.; Bosacki, S.: Children’s Gendered Drawings of Play Behaviours. Alta. J. Educ. Res. 58(2), 300–305 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Trawick-Smith, J.: Early childhood development: a multicultural perspective. Pearson Higher Ed (2013)

  34. Vasant, P.: Handbook of research on novel soft computing intelligent algorithms: theory and practical applications. IGI Global (2013)

  35. Mirjalili, S.; Lewis, A.: The whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 95, 51–67 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Abualigah, L.M.Q.: Feature selection and enhanced krill herd algorithm for text document clustering. Springer (2019)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the University of Kurdistan Hewler for providing facilities for this research work.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarik A. Rashid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulhameed, S., Rashid, T.A. Child Drawing Development Optimization Algorithm Based on Child’s Cognitive Development. Arab J Sci Eng 47, 1337–1351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05928-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05928-6

Keywords